Mitt Romney likely win in presidential election shown by three key polls

[Pasco08]

After hearing the news of the last several days if you feel you can still support Obama you are one dumb mother fucker.

Same can be said about Romeny and what News the news fox tries to dish out? Oh wait they aren't a news company they are a entertainment company

 

[Bfgrn]

It's quite obvious that the recording of Romney dumping on the entitlement crowd has seriously backfired on Democrats... They honestly believe that it was a negative, when in fact it reveals a person who isn't afraid to say what he believes in, and that's a positive. Anyone with the slightest bit of common sense knows that Mitt Romney was referring to the people who will back Obama simply because they believe that either their entitlements will remain in order, or that their racially motivated vote (based solely upon Obama's skin color) will offer them something in return. There are far more people working who are completely disgusted that they have been lined up under Obama to subsidize people who simply want to be cared for, and don't have the motivation to ante up for themselves. Obama eliminating Bill Clinton's work requirement on Welfare comes to mind. Electing Mitt Romney wont completely satisfy me Politically because there are several aspects of his politics I tend to disagree with... But given the two choices... My wallet, and my beliefs cannot afford four more years of Barry Soetoro... Mitt gets my Vote.

So, Mitt gets your Vote. After he expressed that he loathes people like you.

What Mitt needs to know, that the American people already do know.


Who are the 47%?

Federal budget and Census data show that, in 2010, 91 percent of the benefit dollars from entitlement and other mandatory programs went to the elderly (people 65 and over), the seriously disabled, and members of working households. People who are neither elderly nor disabled — and do not live in a working household — received only 9 percent of the benefits.

Moreover, the vast bulk of that 9 percent goes for medical care, unemployment insurance benefits (which individuals must have a significant work history to receive), Social Security survivor benefits for the children and spouses of deceased workers, and Social Security benefits for retirees between ages 62 and 64. Seven out of the 9 percentage points go for one of these four purposes.

80 percent of the workforce has seen their wages decline in real terms over the last quarter-century, and the average household has seen 40 percent of its wealth disappear during the Great Recession. Through it all, families never asked for a handout from anyone, especially Washington. They were left to go on their own, working harder, squeezing nickels, and taking care of themselves. But their economic boats have been taking on water for years, and now the crisis has swamped millions of middle class families.

 

[Political Junky]

Hope springs eternal. OP should make some heavy bets on Willard winning.

 

[Imnukingfutz]

I think Obama will win this election. Not because he is the better of the two but because Romney is running a poor campaign and the media is solidly on the side of Obama.

Actually, if the Republican party was smart, they would concentrate on gaining control of the Senate. Control Congress.

Leave Obama in office when this whole house of cards implodes upon itself. Let the man who made the bed lie in it.

The economy is going to collapse no matter who is in office. Americans have short memories and if Romney is in office he will catch all the blame for it.

Maybe it is better to leave Obama in office and castrate him with Republican control of Congress. Right now Harry Ried is shielding Obama from any and every bill passed by the House that might just fix this economy. Obama cant be on record by vetoing bills that might help things that were Republican ideas, he has to rely on a do nothing Congress to do things the way he wants.

Leave him in there and keep shoving bills onto his desk, make him use the veto power to stop things...the premise of a do nothing Congress will disappear and it will become a do nothing President...and the end of the Democrat party.

 

[OODA_Loop]

Audience of the largest syndicated shock radio program (which is very pro-Obama) think so

Bubba the Love Sponge® Show

 

[Bfgrn]

I think Obama will win this election. Not because he is the better of the two but because Romney is running a poor campaign and the media is solidly on the side of Obama.

Actually, if the Republican party was smart, they would concentrate on gaining control of the Senate. Control Congress.

Leave Obama in office when this whole house of cards implodes upon itself. Let the man who made the bed lie in it.

The economy is going to collapse no matter who is in office. Americans have short memories and if Romney is in office he will catch all the blame for it.

Maybe it is better to leave Obama in office and castrate him with Republican control of Congress. Right now Harry Ried is shielding Obama from any and every bill passed by the House that might just fix this economy. Obama cant be on record by vetoing bills that might help things that were Republican ideas, he has to rely on a do nothing Congress to do things the way he wants.

Leave him in there and keep shoving bills onto his desk, make him use the veto power to stop things...the premise of a do nothing Congress will disappear and it will become a do nothing President...and the end of the Democrat party.

Sounds like the thought of a domestic terrorist, with a VERY short memory. Oh, that's right, Faux news told you that Obama and Democrats crashed the economy.

Insurgency

Texas Republican Congressman Pete Sessions compares GOP strategy to Taliban insurgency

"Insurgency, we understand perhaps a little bit more because of the Taliban, and that is that they went about systematically understanding how to disrupt and change a person's entire processes. And these Taliban -- I'm not trying to say the Republican Party is the Taliban. No, that's not what we're saying. I'm saying an example of how you go about [sic] is to change a person from their messaging to their operations to their frontline message. And we need to understand that insurgency may be required when the other side, the House leadership, does not follow the same commands, which we entered the game with."

Congressman Pete Sessions Compares House Republicans To Taliban | Capitol Annex

 

[Imnukingfutz]

I think Obama will win this election. Not because he is the better of the two but because Romney is running a poor campaign and the media is solidly on the side of Obama.

Actually, if the Republican party was smart, they would concentrate on gaining control of the Senate. Control Congress.

Leave Obama in office when this whole house of cards implodes upon itself. Let the man who made the bed lie in it.

The economy is going to collapse no matter who is in office. Americans have short memories and if Romney is in office he will catch all the blame for it.

Maybe it is better to leave Obama in office and castrate him with Republican control of Congress. Right now Harry Ried is shielding Obama from any and every bill passed by the House that might just fix this economy. Obama cant be on record by vetoing bills that might help things that were Republican ideas, he has to rely on a do nothing Congress to do things the way he wants.

Leave him in there and keep shoving bills onto his desk, make him use the veto power to stop things...the premise of a do nothing Congress will disappear and it will become a do nothing President...and the end of the Democrat party.

Sounds like the thought of a domestic terrorist, with a VERY short memory. Oh, that's right, Faux news told you that Obama and Democrats crashed the economy.

Insurgency

Texas Republican Congressman Pete Sessions compares GOP strategy to Taliban insurgency

"Insurgency, we understand perhaps a little bit more because of the Taliban, and that is that they went about systematically understanding how to disrupt and change a person's entire processes. And these Taliban -- I'm not trying to say the Republican Party is the Taliban. No, that's not what we're saying. I'm saying an example of how you go about [sic] is to change a person from their messaging to their operations to their frontline message. And we need to understand that insurgency may be required when the other side, the House leadership, does not follow the same commands, which we entered the game with."

Congressman Pete Sessions Compares House Republicans To Taliban | Capitol Annex

It was a mixture of both parties out of control spending and pandering that caused the situation we are in, however this administration has doubled down on its spending and tightened the noose around the neck of the economy and is strangling it to death.

You can only blame the other guy for so long before you have to accept responsibility for your own actions. That time has come to pass.

 

[Bfgrn]

I think Obama will win this election. Not because he is the better of the two but because Romney is running a poor campaign and the media is solidly on the side of Obama.

Actually, if the Republican party was smart, they would concentrate on gaining control of the Senate. Control Congress.

Leave Obama in office when this whole house of cards implodes upon itself. Let the man who made the bed lie in it.

The economy is going to collapse no matter who is in office. Americans have short memories and if Romney is in office he will catch all the blame for it.

Maybe it is better to leave Obama in office and castrate him with Republican control of Congress. Right now Harry Ried is shielding Obama from any and every bill passed by the House that might just fix this economy. Obama cant be on record by vetoing bills that might help things that were Republican ideas, he has to rely on a do nothing Congress to do things the way he wants.

Leave him in there and keep shoving bills onto his desk, make him use the veto power to stop things...the premise of a do nothing Congress will disappear and it will become a do nothing President...and the end of the Democrat party.

Sounds like the thought of a domestic terrorist, with a VERY short memory. Oh, that's right, Faux news told you that Obama and Democrats crashed the economy.

Insurgency

Texas Republican Congressman Pete Sessions compares GOP strategy to Taliban insurgency

"Insurgency, we understand perhaps a little bit more because of the Taliban, and that is that they went about systematically understanding how to disrupt and change a person's entire processes. And these Taliban -- I'm not trying to say the Republican Party is the Taliban. No, that's not what we're saying. I'm saying an example of how you go about [sic] is to change a person from their messaging to their operations to their frontline message. And we need to understand that insurgency may be required when the other side, the House leadership, does not follow the same commands, which we entered the game with."

Congressman Pete Sessions Compares House Republicans To Taliban | Capitol Annex

It was a mixture of both parties out of control spending and pandering that caused the situation we are in, however this administration has doubled down on its spending and tightened the noose around the neck of the economy and is strangling it to death.

You can only blame the other guy for so long before you have to accept responsibility for your own actions. That time has come to pass.

Now what?

 

[skookerasbil]

The 47% thing is a blip on the 24/7 news cycle. Old news in a few days on anything except MSLSD.

People vote on the big shit at the end of the day. Bush Sr didnt lose on a gaffe.........he lost because he was overseeing an economic shit sandwich........which is why Obama goes down hard in about 7 weeks.

Election model with 100% success rate for past 30 years predicts Romney victory | The Raw Story

 

[jillian]

keep telling yourself that, chimp

it would be really funny if it weren't so scary/sad.

 

[Imnukingfutz]

Sounds like the thought of a domestic terrorist, with a VERY short memory. Oh, that's right, Faux news told you that Obama and Democrats crashed the economy.

Insurgency

Texas Republican Congressman Pete Sessions compares GOP strategy to Taliban insurgency

"Insurgency, we understand perhaps a little bit more because of the Taliban, and that is that they went about systematically understanding how to disrupt and change a person's entire processes. And these Taliban -- I'm not trying to say the Republican Party is the Taliban. No, that's not what we're saying. I'm saying an example of how you go about [sic] is to change a person from their messaging to their operations to their frontline message. And we need to understand that insurgency may be required when the other side, the House leadership, does not follow the same commands, which we entered the game with."

Congressman Pete Sessions Compares House Republicans To Taliban | Capitol Annex

It was a mixture of both parties out of control spending and pandering that caused the situation we are in, however this administration has doubled down on its spending and tightened the noose around the neck of the economy and is strangling it to death.

You can only blame the other guy for so long before you have to accept responsibility for your own actions. That time has come to pass.

Now what?

Now what?

Link? Dates graph was compiled? What exactly does the graph include?

I can draw a purdy little graph too and make it look however I want it to look and use fancy words to make it seem authentic. Without a link and data to break it down it is useless.

 

[TheGreatGatsby]

If Virginia or Michigan starts to fall towards Romney; you will see some serious panic from the Soetoro campaign. I'm looking forward to the fireworks.

 

[mascale]

Housing is finally becoming a usual engine of the economy. New Starts are up. Prices are up. New home sales are up.

People who spend, buy things.

The Gallup Mid-September Unemployment Rate is at 7.9% continuing the downward direction.

U.S. Unadjusted Unemployment Rate at 7.9% in Mid-September

Unemployment Indices trending downward is not what the Democrats were facing in 2009. Indices showing a positive economy from Obama-Biden measures now as the Republicans mainly focused on everything else.

And now, famously, everyone is newly focused on that!

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Soon maybe Sarah Palin may find sudden need to streak a University of Wisconsin half-time event(?)! Clever diversion seems to characterize the Romney-Ryan brand, six weeks out! Maybe someone will flash "10" sign!))

 

[candycorn]

Rasmussen Reports has released today, three key polls that show Mitt Romney's likely win in this year's presidential election over President Obama. The Rasmussen Reports Presidential Daily Tracking Poll released today shows Romney leading 47 percent to 46 percent over Obama. Rasmussen's Daily Swing State Tracking Poll of 11 key swing states won by President Obama in 2008 shows Romney leading them by the exact same percentages. The latest Rasmussen poll of New Hampshire released today shows Romney leading there 48 percent to 45 percent.

New Hampshire is a key swing state that could make a difference with its four electoral votes, and George W. Bush would have reached 270 electoral voters in 2000 without having won this state. New Hampshire had narrowly favored Obama in many polls over the last few months and while the analysis conduced here by this columnist has consistently predicted Mitt Romney will win the state (based in part on knowledge of local politics in the state having lived in New England for years), most projected have shaded New Hampshire blue and predicted it will go for Obama. This Rasmussen survey is key in that it likely shows movement in New Hampshire in the direction of Mitt Romney.

In the instance of an incumbent president who enjoys just about 100 percent name recognition and is seeking reelection, most of the undecided voters are likely to swing to the challenger by election day. This is especially true when the challenger remains still less known to the public than the incumbent, as is true with former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney. By election day, those other nine percent not favoring Romney or Obama in the Rasmussen Daily Tracking poll are likely include less than one percent voting for third party candidates and five or six percent of those nine will likely vote for Mitt Romney. That would indicate a popular vote win by Romney of about 53 percent to 46 percent, or the reverse of Obama's win in 2008. This would lead to an electoral college total of more than 300 electoral votes for Romney.

The 11 swing states tracked by Rasmussen in it's swing state tracking poll show Romney leading 47 percent to 46 percent, where some weeks ago the two candidates were tied at 45 percent in the Rasmussen tracking poll of these 11 key swing states. President Obama won these same states collectively by a 53 percent to 46 percent margin in 2008. Now he is seven percent behind that finish now in these states. Romney is likely to capture most of the undecided votes and could win these states collectively by at least a 52 percent to 47 percent margin. That would likely lead to Romney winning Colorado, Florida, Iowa, Nevada, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Ohio, Virginia and Wisconsin while having a competitive chance in Michigan and Pennsylvania.

If President Obama can only win Michigan and Pennsylvania among those 11 swing states, he can not be reelected to the presidency.

Mitt Romney likely win in presidential election shown by three key polls - Arlington Conservative | Examiner.com

Bookmarked...You'll be seeing this one again.

 

[candycorn]

If Virginia or Michigan starts to fall towards Romney; you will see some serious panic from the Soetoro campaign. I'm looking forward to the fireworks.

Just go burn a cross or something (not that you were not planning to of course).

Michigan is Obama's and Virginia is looking pretty good too. Get used to it beeotch.

 

[TheGreatGatsby]

Rasmussen Reports has released today, three key polls that show Mitt Romney's likely win in this year's presidential election over President Obama. The Rasmussen Reports Presidential Daily Tracking Poll released today shows Romney leading 47 percent to 46 percent over Obama. Rasmussen's Daily Swing State Tracking Poll of 11 key swing states won by President Obama in 2008 shows Romney leading them by the exact same percentages. The latest Rasmussen poll of New Hampshire released today shows Romney leading there 48 percent to 45 percent.

New Hampshire is a key swing state that could make a difference with its four electoral votes, and George W. Bush would have reached 270 electoral voters in 2000 without having won this state. New Hampshire had narrowly favored Obama in many polls over the last few months and while the analysis conduced here by this columnist has consistently predicted Mitt Romney will win the state (based in part on knowledge of local politics in the state having lived in New England for years), most projected have shaded New Hampshire blue and predicted it will go for Obama. This Rasmussen survey is key in that it likely shows movement in New Hampshire in the direction of Mitt Romney.

In the instance of an incumbent president who enjoys just about 100 percent name recognition and is seeking reelection, most of the undecided voters are likely to swing to the challenger by election day. This is especially true when the challenger remains still less known to the public than the incumbent, as is true with former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney. By election day, those other nine percent not favoring Romney or Obama in the Rasmussen Daily Tracking poll are likely include less than one percent voting for third party candidates and five or six percent of those nine will likely vote for Mitt Romney. That would indicate a popular vote win by Romney of about 53 percent to 46 percent, or the reverse of Obama's win in 2008. This would lead to an electoral college total of more than 300 electoral votes for Romney.

The 11 swing states tracked by Rasmussen in it's swing state tracking poll show Romney leading 47 percent to 46 percent, where some weeks ago the two candidates were tied at 45 percent in the Rasmussen tracking poll of these 11 key swing states. President Obama won these same states collectively by a 53 percent to 46 percent margin in 2008. Now he is seven percent behind that finish now in these states. Romney is likely to capture most of the undecided votes and could win these states collectively by at least a 52 percent to 47 percent margin. That would likely lead to Romney winning Colorado, Florida, Iowa, Nevada, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Ohio, Virginia and Wisconsin while having a competitive chance in Michigan and Pennsylvania.

If President Obama can only win Michigan and Pennsylvania among those 11 swing states, he can not be reelected to the presidency.

Mitt Romney likely win in presidential election shown by three key polls - Arlington Conservative | Examiner.com

Bookmarked...You'll be seeing this one again.

Not bookmarked...You won't be seeing this one again because you'll have a different screen name by then.

 

[TheGreatGatsby]

If Virginia or Michigan starts to fall towards Romney; you will see some serious panic from the Soetoro campaign. I'm looking forward to the fireworks.

Just go burn a cross or something (not that you were not planning to of course).

Michigan is Obama's and Virginia is looking pretty good too. Get used to it beeotch.

Another bad day at Taco Bell? Got mad when you saw some Mexicans who dared to hold plastic sporks?

 

[candycorn]

Rasmussen Reports has released today, three key polls that show Mitt Romney's likely win in this year's presidential election over President Obama. The Rasmussen Reports Presidential Daily Tracking Poll released today shows Romney leading 47 percent to 46 percent over Obama. Rasmussen's Daily Swing State Tracking Poll of 11 key swing states won by President Obama in 2008 shows Romney leading them by the exact same percentages. The latest Rasmussen poll of New Hampshire released today shows Romney leading there 48 percent to 45 percent.

New Hampshire is a key swing state that could make a difference with its four electoral votes, and George W. Bush would have reached 270 electoral voters in 2000 without having won this state. New Hampshire had narrowly favored Obama in many polls over the last few months and while the analysis conduced here by this columnist has consistently predicted Mitt Romney will win the state (based in part on knowledge of local politics in the state having lived in New England for years), most projected have shaded New Hampshire blue and predicted it will go for Obama. This Rasmussen survey is key in that it likely shows movement in New Hampshire in the direction of Mitt Romney.

In the instance of an incumbent president who enjoys just about 100 percent name recognition and is seeking reelection, most of the undecided voters are likely to swing to the challenger by election day. This is especially true when the challenger remains still less known to the public than the incumbent, as is true with former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney. By election day, those other nine percent not favoring Romney or Obama in the Rasmussen Daily Tracking poll are likely include less than one percent voting for third party candidates and five or six percent of those nine will likely vote for Mitt Romney. That would indicate a popular vote win by Romney of about 53 percent to 46 percent, or the reverse of Obama's win in 2008. This would lead to an electoral college total of more than 300 electoral votes for Romney.

The 11 swing states tracked by Rasmussen in it's swing state tracking poll show Romney leading 47 percent to 46 percent, where some weeks ago the two candidates were tied at 45 percent in the Rasmussen tracking poll of these 11 key swing states. President Obama won these same states collectively by a 53 percent to 46 percent margin in 2008. Now he is seven percent behind that finish now in these states. Romney is likely to capture most of the undecided votes and could win these states collectively by at least a 52 percent to 47 percent margin. That would likely lead to Romney winning Colorado, Florida, Iowa, Nevada, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Ohio, Virginia and Wisconsin while having a competitive chance in Michigan and Pennsylvania.

If President Obama can only win Michigan and Pennsylvania among those 11 swing states, he can not be reelected to the presidency.

Mitt Romney likely win in presidential election shown by three key polls - Arlington Conservative | Examiner.com

Bookmarked...You'll be seeing this one again.

Not bookmarked...You won't be seeing this one again because you'll have a different screen name by then.

Oh yeah; I have a list of most of the RW bullshit to bring up as it becomes apparent that your President Obama will win.

As for my "screen name", hell, lets do a sig line bet that will survive any change in screen names then? Or are you even afraid of that Klanny?

If Obama wins, change your sig line to "All Hail President Obama, My President, Your President, Our President".

If Romney wins, I change mine to "All Hail President Romney, My President, Your President, Our President."

Font size 3, blue font, bold typeface. And we each agree to leave it there until 1/1/13. Actually I would have to leave mine there until 12/31/13.

That would remain regardless of any other screen name I may come up with--not that it would ever happen of course; Tea Party Samurai has already bailed out of his/her screen name but this isn't that important to me.

Anyway slick...if you want to talk shit; put up or shut up.

I know you'll run like a little racist bitch that you are from it; you always do.

 

[TheGreatGatsby]

Bookmarked...You'll be seeing this one again.

Not bookmarked...You won't be seeing this one again because you'll have a different screen name by then.

Oh yeah; I have a list of most of the RW bullshit to bring up as it becomes apparent that your President Obama will win.

As for my "screen name", hell, lets do a sig line bet that will survive any change in screen names then? Or are you even afraid of that Klanny?

If Obama wins, change your sig line to "All Hail President Obama, My President, Your President, Our President".

If Romney wins, I change mine to "All Hail President Romney, My President, Your President, Our President."

Font size 3, blue font, bold typeface. And we each agree to leave it there until 1/1/13. Actually I would have to leave mine there until 12/31/13.

That would remain regardless of any other screen name I may come up with--not that it would ever happen of course; Tea Party Samurai has already bailed out of his/her screen name but this isn't that important to me.

Anyway slick...if you want to talk shit; put up or shut up.

I know you'll run like a little racist bitch that you are from it; you always do.

I'm sure you do have your crybaby list. None of that'll change the fact that you're a LYING SACK OF CRAP.

And you can stop offering me your stupid fucking bet. You've already made it with others for one thing; so I'm not going to take a bet already in the works IDIOT.

Also, it's like I said; you ain't going anywhere. You're just gonna get another screen name. We all fucking know that COCK SUCKER.

 

[candycorn]

Not bookmarked...You won't be seeing this one again because you'll have a different screen name by then.

Oh yeah; I have a list of most of the RW bullshit to bring up as it becomes apparent that your President Obama will win.

As for my "screen name", hell, lets do a sig line bet that will survive any change in screen names then? Or are you even afraid of that Klanny?

If Obama wins, change your sig line to "All Hail President Obama, My President, Your President, Our President".

If Romney wins, I change mine to "All Hail President Romney, My President, Your President, Our President."

Font size 3, blue font, bold typeface. And we each agree to leave it there until 1/1/13. Actually I would have to leave mine there until 12/31/13.

That would remain regardless of any other screen name I may come up with--not that it would ever happen of course; Tea Party Samurai has already bailed out of his/her screen name but this isn't that important to me.

Anyway slick...if you want to talk shit; put up or shut up.

I know you'll run like a little racist bitch that you are from it; you always do.

I'm sure you do have your crybaby list. None of that'll change the fact that you're a LYING SACK OF CRAP.

And you can stop offering me your stupid fucking bet..

Yeah, I knew you'd pussy out. See, you don't really like Romney--nobody does. You just hate Obama because he's black. I bet you're mostly upset that you can't say the "N" word any more. Yindar did...and he's gone.

Oh well...Obama is going to win. Win easily and you'll just have to sit here and take it. Don't worry...I'll be here to rub your nose in it every day afterword.

Can't wait.

Love,

CC