Mitt Romney has written an editorial. It should prompt a national discussion. It won't.

A self-employed person making 300k per year would pay about 16k more in taxes per year or $1300/mth.
It would be a little less than $800 a month. Perhaps small biz owners could get some relief in a newly written tax code.

The point being most people are going to have to sacrifice something in order to get our fiscal house in order.
 
BTW, thank you to B. Hussein O, for sparing this country from having this sanctimonious piece of crap in the WH by schlonging Mitt royally in 2012.

One thing Obama did that I agree entirely with.
You have we the people to thank for that.
 
This is such an obvious solution (eliminating the wage cap) that one wonders why it has not been done yet. It is like the reclassification of cannabis. Are rich political donors that petty and vindictive?
AI Overview

Republicans in Congress generally object to raising the income cap for FICA (Social Security) taxes, viewing it as a tax increase on high earners and businesses, which contradicts their focus on cutting taxes to promote economic growth.
 
What do you think about his idea to end the income cap on FICA taxes? It's time to put down your childish rhetoric and get serious.
Just looks like more chair adjustment on the deck of the U.S.S. Socialist Shit Barge to me.
Let me guess though, the percentage of FICA tax,6.2% will not be reduced in kind, to ease the burden a smidge on the poor. Something like Medicare which has no cap on salary is set @1.5%. Any calls for anything like that?

**** NO!...cause that would actually be fuckin fair, right? We all know the benefits of a flat tax! That's why Medicare is set at 1.5%! Cause the ballers gotta pay that too!

That is why this will NEVER...EVER....EVER happen.

So STFU Mitt.
 

Mitt Romney: Tax the Rich, Like Me​

In 2012, political ads suggested that some of my policy proposals, if enacted, would amount to pushing grandma off a cliff. Actually, my proposals were intended to prevent that very thing from happening.

Today, all of us, including our grandmas, truly are headed for a cliff: If, as projected, the Social Security Trust Fund runs out in the 2034 fiscal year, benefits will be cut by about 23 percent. The government will need trillions of dollars to make up the shortfall. When lenders refuse to loan the money unless they are paid much higher interest rates, economic calamity will almost certainly ensue. Alternatively, the government could print more money, inducing hyperinflation that devalues the national debt — along with your savings.

Typically, Democrats insist on higher taxes, and Republicans insist on lower spending. But given the magnitude of our national debt as well as the proximity of the cliff, both are necessary. DOGE took a slash-and-burn approach to budget cutting and failed spectacularly. Europe demonstrates that exorbitant taxes without spending restraint crushes economic vitality and thus speeds how fast the cliff arrives.


The title applies to his belief the $176K income cap for social security taxes should be done away with.

I long opposed increasing the income level on which FICA employment taxes are applied (this year, the cap is $176,100). No longer; the consequences of the cliff have changed my mind.

The largest source of additional tax revenues is also probably the most compelling for fairness and social stability. Some call it closing tax code loopholes, but the term “loopholes” grossly understates their scale. “Caverns” or “caves” would be more fitting.


He goes on to say the "step up in basis" capital gains tax treatment for wealthy estates should be amended. Meaning, if you inherit an asset for which the owner would have faced a capital gains tax upon its disposal if the owner did so while still alive, you shouldn't be able to inherit the asset tax free.

The thread is not intended to start a debate on the details of Romney's recommendations. Rather, it is to highlight the impending shortfall in the SS trust requires the nation to have a serious debate over what to do about it. And soon.

So too we need to have a discussion about the debt, during which both higher taxes and lower spending are on the table. There are still more.

Many have said our elected representatives have failed us with the rise of partisanship leading to paralyzing gridlock. The result being critical issues are not being effectively addressed. I say we have failed ourselves by not electing serious and informed officials to represent us. A reflection of "we the people," who spend too much time entertaining ourselves and not enough learning about fact based solutions to problems that will bring this republic down if they are not resolved in an intelligent, thoughtful, forward looking way.

There are a multitude of millionaires and billionaires completely unlike Trump, who actually favor fair taxation for the wealthy. The same can be said of automotive companies that don't want fuel mileage standards rolled back. It's not contradictory to those who want to do right.

MAGA calls this "fake news", they can't make this connection, mentally.
 
Sorry, but you lefties had your chance to elect old Mittens the Moderate. Instead you chose Bath House Barry the Hussein, a bastard homosexual Muslim socialist that hated America. The Hussein was very successful in “transforming America”, which helped Dems steal the election in 2020 and he even further helped destroy America by running the Biden Regime by proxy.
Folks like yourself are exactly the kind of people the rest of us need to marginalize so we can move towards serious solutions to serious problems.
 
I've noted this before......now this is based upon Trump still being coherent in three years. It's a decent odd he won't be.

If he is, he will get behind one of his son's. Everything is about him.

Lol, the Biden voter talking about Trump’s coherence.

Thanks for the laugh.
 
LOL. I thought that was your hero Musk's goal? How'd that work out for you?
I've been hearing the same shit from conservatives for four decades now. Corruption, fraud, the size of government..yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah......(except when WE are governing)

You do know what the top five annual items that contribute to our deficit and contribute to the debt are?
(Hint..one of them is not SNAP. :))
defense is a REQUIRED expenditure retard.
 
There are a multitude of millionaires and billionaires completely unlike Trump, who actually favor fair taxation for the wealthy.
The POT continues to block proposals for a more progressive tax code.
 
Yes, it would be very detrimental to the economy. Don’t be so naive.

If you guys were really concerned about saving SS, you wouldn’t be so opposed rooting out the rampant fraud and abuse and you wouldn’t be handing out SS numbers to non-citizens.
All taxes are detrimental to the economy, but we can’t just keep adding trillions of debt.

There’s very little fraud in social security. Remember when DOGE was telling you guys about all these millions of 120 year olds taking benefits? You guys thought that hook line and sinker. But it wasn’t true. It was never true. It was calmly explained to you why it wasn’t true. You just forgot about it and moved on without ever admitting you believed their garbage.

Adults can’t engage in magical thinking like you.
 
He took a sledge to USAID. That sledge has cost the lives of millions of people around the world.

The absolute height of incompetence. Again, to a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
and yet you can't link to any ACTUAL dead people just opinions.
 
Folks like yourself are exactly the kind of people the rest of us need to marginalize so we can move towards serious solutions to serious problems.

What serious solutions? All the serious problems were created by Democrats and RINOs like Romney.
 
You make more, you pay more. I believe that was one of the basic prems for implementing SS.
Extremely wealthy people as a class have a decision to make. Do they think making the country more fiscally sound is enough of a benefit to them to pay more of their income in taxes? If the answer is no I would ask them to consider what happens to them if the country collapses under the weight of the debt.
 
defense is a REQUIRED expenditure retard.
Compared to other similar let's say G7 countries, our defense expenditure as % of GDP is higher.
And just dealing with defense contractors, I can say that the fraud and waste...is rampant. :)
 
What serious solutions? All the serious problems were created by Democrats and RINOs like Romney.
As I said, folks like yourself need to be reduced to barstool cranks and eliminated from serious consideration in the public square.
 
15th post
and yet you can't link to any ACTUAL dead people just opinions.
Why don't you remove your lips from Trump and Musk's butts.
The ending of USAID is MORE than quantifiable. Google is your friend.
This..was a travesty. The height of incompetence. Like a small child being handed a loaded gun.

 

Mitt Romney: Tax the Rich, Like Me​

In 2012, political ads suggested that some of my policy proposals, if enacted, would amount to pushing grandma off a cliff. Actually, my proposals were intended to prevent that very thing from happening.

Today, all of us, including our grandmas, truly are headed for a cliff: If, as projected, the Social Security Trust Fund runs out in the 2034 fiscal year, benefits will be cut by about 23 percent. The government will need trillions of dollars to make up the shortfall. When lenders refuse to loan the money unless they are paid much higher interest rates, economic calamity will almost certainly ensue. Alternatively, the government could print more money, inducing hyperinflation that devalues the national debt — along with your savings.

Typically, Democrats insist on higher taxes, and Republicans insist on lower spending. But given the magnitude of our national debt as well as the proximity of the cliff, both are necessary. DOGE took a slash-and-burn approach to budget cutting and failed spectacularly. Europe demonstrates that exorbitant taxes without spending restraint crushes economic vitality and thus speeds how fast the cliff arrives.


The title applies to his belief the $176K income cap for social security taxes should be done away with.

I long opposed increasing the income level on which FICA employment taxes are applied (this year, the cap is $176,100). No longer; the consequences of the cliff have changed my mind.

The largest source of additional tax revenues is also probably the most compelling for fairness and social stability. Some call it closing tax code loopholes, but the term “loopholes” grossly understates their scale. “Caverns” or “caves” would be more fitting.


He goes on to say the "step up in basis" capital gains tax treatment for wealthy estates should be amended. Meaning, if you inherit an asset for which the owner would have faced a capital gains tax upon its disposal if the owner did so while still alive, you shouldn't be able to inherit the asset tax free.

The thread is not intended to start a debate on the details of Romney's recommendations. Rather, it is to highlight the impending shortfall in the SS trust requires the nation to have a serious debate over what to do about it. And soon.

So too we need to have a discussion about the debt, during which both higher taxes and lower spending are on the table. There are still more.

Many have said our elected representatives have failed us with the rise of partisanship leading to paralyzing gridlock. The result being critical issues are not being effectively addressed. I say we have failed ourselves by not electing serious and informed officials to represent us. A reflection of "we the people," who spend too much time entertaining ourselves and not enough learning about fact based solutions to problems that will bring this republic down if they are not resolved in an intelligent, thoughtful, forward looking way.
SS isn't going anywhere, YOU are......lol
 
Back
Top Bottom