Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Wow...Use your head. If I told you to find the temperature of all the CO2 in the Earth's atmosphere, what easily found value could you actually look for that would give you the answer?
Never said it wasn't.
You as usual don't allow the evidence presented show that Salt Domes and Diapir are NOT the same thing since it is a geological description that has different kinds of material in it.
You can't even understand this easy-to-understand definition at all:
"diapir, (from Greek diapeirein, “to pierce”), geological structure consisting of mobile material that was forced into more brittle surrounding rocks, usually by the upward flow of material from a parent stratum. The flow may be produced by gravitational forces (heavy rocks causing underlying lighter rocks to rise), tectonic forces (mobile rocks being squeezed through less mobile rocks by lateral stress), or a combination of both."
Try turning your small brain on...... for once.
You are replying to yourself again. Half of the time you don't use the reply button and when you do you use it wrong.Wow...
The temperature I gave is the average temperature of the Earth. Given that CO2 is a well-mixed gas in our atmosphere, that would be the temperature of all the CO2 as well as the nitrogen and oxygen and every other component. I thought that was pretty obvious but I guess not to everyone.
I was forced to reply to myself because you seemed to be unable to figure out I had given you the average temperature of the planet. As much time as you've spent looking at global warming you'd think you might have seen that number somewhere.You are replying to yourself again. Half of the time you don't use the reply button and when you do you use it wrong.
No. I had seen that. I asked you if that was really what you thought he was asking.I was forced to reply to myself because you seemed to be unable to figure out I had given you the average temperature of the planet. As much time as you've spent looking at global warming you'd think you might have seen that number somewhere.
Dude, you hardly ever use the reply feature. It's widely known. And when you do, you screw that up half of the time.I just looked back and saw your comment. Keep in mind that I have had you on ignore for some time and I only read your posts when I decide I owe you a response, which certainly isn't always. After you said "I can't put anything past you. If I knew where you had gotten that from I wouldn't have asked you where you got that from. Did you get it from a secret place?" I couldn't bring myself to engage with you. "A secret place"? Jiminy Christmas dude.
Yes I did.I would assume the average air temperature. But was that the question he was asking?
I didn't. I think he was asking you for the associated temperature due to CO2 in the atmosphere.Yes I did.
Wrong.Charlton Heston filmed a mockumentary about climate change back in 1973 called Soylent Green ... you're 50 years behind the rest of us ...
I just watch CBS claim that the Desert Southwest was becoming a desert due to global warming ... ha ha ... it's already a desert ... it's major disaster for Phoenix if their climate stays the same ... and I agree ... burn them tires ... help Phoenix ...
I would but there's no corresponding rise in sea level so it's bullshit.
It's been rising for the last 6,000 years at the same rate. That's what happens during an interglacial cycle.Wrong.
The sea level is rising.
My disagreement shouldn't make you this angry.The funniest part of these idiot denier threads is right there in the title....
Appealing to the authority of a scientist to argue that nearly the entire scientific community are liars or incompetent.
The denier idiots don't even realize they are doing it.
For about 11,000 years since the end of the last ice age the Earth has been warming except for a few relatively short exceptions such as the Little Ice Age. To become alarmed that this is continuing seems to be behavior worthy of Chicken Little. The Earth warmed quite a bit during the twentieth century, but more of the warming occurred prior to 1940 when our carbon footprint much smaller than occurred during the next sixty years.
People have been observing mars through telescopes for over four hundred years. During all that time Mars had an ice cap covering its northern polar region. This ice cap has been growing smaller but was still a one piece ice cap up until 2021. Then astronomers noted that the ice cap was no longer a one piece cap. It had melted away to separate pieces with gaps between them. Obviously Mars has warmed considerably. Since Mars (as well as the outer planets and moons) have been getting warmer at the same time the Earth is growing warmer doesn't common sense dictate that we believe we didn't cause that to happen.
It's been rising for the last 6,000 years at the same rate. That's what happens during an interglacial cycle.
My disagreement shouldn't make you this angry.
Yes it should.
That is because it is now warmer than it almost had ever been before, to the point we are risking the death of ocean life, from acidification.
Hotter climates means more CO2 absorption by the oceans, and CO2 is acidic.
It is killing the coral.
This is far more significant than you realize.
The oceans provide far more food than we can afford to lose.
It's been rising for the last 6,000 years at the same rate. That's what happens during an interglacial cycle.
It's an interglacial. That's what happens in interglacial cycles. There's been like 33 of them in the past 3 million years. In fact, we are 2C cooler than past cycles with 120 ppm more CO2.Yes it should.
That is because it is now warmer than it almost had ever been before, to the point we are risking the death of ocean life, from acidification.
Hotter climates means more CO2 absorption by the oceans, and CO2 is acidic.
It is killing the coral.
This is far more significant than you realize.
The oceans provide far more food than we can afford to lose.
