OODA_Loop
Account Terminated
What constitutional right is violated?It is wise, but only because the constitution doesn’t really matter anymore.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What constitutional right is violated?It is wise, but only because the constitution doesn’t really matter anymore.
Fourth amendment. Arrest without probable cause.What constitutional right is violated?
Not arrest. Detainment.
He was arrested.Not arrest. Detainment.
From your provided link:
lProbable cause requires more than reasonable suspicion, which permits only brief, limited investigative stops and pat-downs when an officer can point to specific, articulable facts suggesting that criminal activity may be occurring.
Maybe the change they are forcing isn’t wanted? But **** the concerns of those who are affected, right?Violence is what happens when change doesn't occur by other means.
Um, okay, except you can't really avoid reporting murders, can you?
Murder rate has declined since 2020, when it reached a high under Trump.
Then you make the case they abused the system and are subject to be deported.Geez, there is proof when they entered ...when they encountered border patrol and turned themselves in to them. Do you not know that?
I'm going by the detainee and MSMs own accounts.....Facts of the matter clearly indicate an arrest.
See the link which does a good job explaining the difference.

While reasonable suspicion is required for detention of an individual by law enforcement, probable cause is a prerequisite for an arrest.Fourth amendment. Arrest without probable cause.
If they didn't come into the country through a port of entry, they are in criminal violation of immigration law.Geez, there is proof when they entered ...when they encountered border patrol and turned themselves in to them. Do you not know that?
Their own account clearly indicates it’s an arrest.I'm going by the detainee and MSMs own accounts.....
While reasonable suspicion is required for detention of an individual by law enforcement, probable cause is a prerequisite for an arrest.
Detained with reasonable suspicion, without establishing probable cause for an arrest.Their own account clearly indicates it’s an arrest.
You didn’t read the link.
He was never formally arrested. It’s still an arrest.
Which one?You didn’t read the link.
Not by the legal definitions of detainment and arrest.Detained with reasonable suspicion, without establishing probable cause for an arrest.
Not true.If they didn't come into the country through a port of entry, they are in criminal violation of immigration law.
No exceptions.
WhyNot true.
Wide area of interpretation dude.Not by the legal definitions of detainment and arrest.
No. They didn't abuse the system. The system allowed it.Then you make the case they abused the system and are subject to be deported.
That doesn't circumvent existing law.No. They didn't abuse the system. The system allowed it.
It’s so far from the definition of detain, it’s really not debatable.Wide area of interpretation dude.
Not really. Lots of legal latitude within the definitions.It’s so far from the definition of detain, it’s really not debatable.
Not enough latitude to drag them out of their car, throw them to the ground, drive them miles away to a jail, lock them up for 8 hours.Not really. Lots of legal latitude within the definitions.