Millions Evacuated After Catastrophic Flooding Hits China, Pakistan

[daws101]

Water Vapor Confirmed as Major Player in Climate Change
11.17.08

The distribution of atmospheric water vapor, a significant greenhouse gas, varies across the globe. During the summer and fall of 2005, this visualization shows that most vapor collects at tropical latitudes, particularly over south Asia, where monsoon thunderstorms swept the gas some 2 miles above the land.
Credit: NASA
> Watch video
Water vapor is known to be Earth’s most abundant greenhouse gas, but the extent of its contribution to global warming has been debated. Using recent NASA satellite data, researchers have estimated more precisely than ever the heat-trapping effect of water in the air, validating the role of the gas as a critical component of climate change.

Andrew Dessler and colleagues from Texas A&M University in College Station confirmed that the heat-amplifying effect of water vapor is potent enough to double the climate warming caused by increased levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.

With new observations, the scientists confirmed experimentally what existing climate models had anticipated theoretically. The research team used novel data from the Atmospheric Infrared Sounder (AIRS) on NASA’s Aqua satellite to measure precisely the humidity throughout the lowest 10 miles of the atmosphere. That information was combined with global observations of shifts in temperature, allowing researchers to build a comprehensive picture of the interplay between water vapor, carbon dioxide, and other atmosphere-warming gases. The NASA-funded research was published recently in the American Geophysical Union's Geophysical Research Letters.

NASA - Water Vapor Confirmed as Major Player in Climate Change

Water Vapor = H2O

Carbon Dioxide = CO2

So close!

true, only one atom separates them.
your point?

You're saying that H2O is the Biggest climate control knob

one of the two biggest,

 

[daws101]

I would have used the actual reports but I had to dumb it down ,
if I hadn't you'd look even more ignorant.

Here on page 8 of the thread I'm still waiting to hear how much it rained. OP claims its caused by manmade global warming but has zero data of the environmental data.

Very unscientific.

it rained enough to cause massive damage you wouldn't understand why that's important .

Wow, annual monsoons caused flooding.

Why do you hate science?

false it was not an average or even above average monsoon.
but you just had to say something.

China’s Ministry of Civil Affairs (MCA) says that since 30 June, floods, hail, landslides, mudslides and other disasters have affected the 11 provinces of Jiangsu, Anhui, Jiangxi, Henan, Hubei, Hunan, Guangxi, Chongqing, Sichuan, Guizhou and Yunnan.

MCA say that over 1 million people have been relocated, and over half a million others have required emergency assistance. Around 40,000 houses have been destroyed or have collapsed and 248,000 have been damaged. More than 1.5 million hectares of cropland has also been damaged.

MCA estimate that the severe weather has caused direct economic losses of over 38 billion yuan (around 5.7 billion US dollars).

Since 30 June, several daily rainfall records have been broken, including in Macheng (285 mm), Jingmen (273 mm), Jiangxia (263 mm), Zhongxiang (230 mm), Huangpi (227 mm), all in Hubei Province, and Chaohu (293 mm) in Anhui Province, according to a statement by MCA.

Page 9 coming up and still no data.

Why do you hate science?

really? if the rain fall totals aren't data what are they?

 

[Weatherman2020]

Bingo. Page 9 and the Doomsdayers have not provided any data to back up their rant.

 

[daws101]

Bingo. Page 9 and the Doomsdayers have not provided any data to back up their rant.

so you have no actual answer .

 

[jc456]

Water Vapor Confirmed as Major Player in Climate Change
11.17.08

The distribution of atmospheric water vapor, a significant greenhouse gas, varies across the globe. During the summer and fall of 2005, this visualization shows that most vapor collects at tropical latitudes, particularly over south Asia, where monsoon thunderstorms swept the gas some 2 miles above the land.
Credit: NASA
> Watch video
Water vapor is known to be Earth’s most abundant greenhouse gas, but the extent of its contribution to global warming has been debated. Using recent NASA satellite data, researchers have estimated more precisely than ever the heat-trapping effect of water in the air, validating the role of the gas as a critical component of climate change.

Andrew Dessler and colleagues from Texas A&M University in College Station confirmed that the heat-amplifying effect of water vapor is potent enough to double the climate warming caused by increased levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.

With new observations, the scientists confirmed experimentally what existing climate models had anticipated theoretically. The research team used novel data from the Atmospheric Infrared Sounder (AIRS) on NASA’s Aqua satellite to measure precisely the humidity throughout the lowest 10 miles of the atmosphere. That information was combined with global observations of shifts in temperature, allowing researchers to build a comprehensive picture of the interplay between water vapor, carbon dioxide, and other atmosphere-warming gases. The NASA-funded research was published recently in the American Geophysical Union's Geophysical Research Letters.

NASA - Water Vapor Confirmed as Major Player in Climate Change

curious, what causes humidity?

if you don't know that, then maybe you are in the wrong thread .
btw

Human impact on the environment
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search
"Anthropogenic" redirects here. It is not to be confused with Anthropogeny or Anthropization.

Environment

• Human impact
• Issues
• Environmentalism
• Environmental studies

Environment in

• Education
• Humanities
• Law
• Policy
• Science
• Social science

The ecosystem of public parks often includes humans feeding the wildlife.
Human impact on the environment or anthropogenic impact on the environment includes impacts on biophysical environments, biodiversity, and other resources.[1][2] The term anthropogenic designates an effect or object resulting from human activity. The term was first used in the technical sense by Russian geologist Alexey Pavlov, and was first used in English by British ecologist Arthur Tansley in reference to human influences on climax plant communities.[3] The atmospheric scientist Paul Crutzen introduced the term "anthropocene" in the mid-1970s.[4] The term is sometimes used in the context of pollution emissions that are produced as a result of human activities but applies broadly to all major human impacts on the environment.[5]
Human impact on the environment - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

so humidity in Chicago is from the oceans? Is that what you're preaching today? LOL. Really, interesting.
anthropogenic
Made up word for someone to make money on, simple as that.

 

[daws101]

Water Vapor Confirmed as Major Player in Climate Change
11.17.08

The distribution of atmospheric water vapor, a significant greenhouse gas, varies across the globe. During the summer and fall of 2005, this visualization shows that most vapor collects at tropical latitudes, particularly over south Asia, where monsoon thunderstorms swept the gas some 2 miles above the land.
Credit: NASA
> Watch video
Water vapor is known to be Earth’s most abundant greenhouse gas, but the extent of its contribution to global warming has been debated. Using recent NASA satellite data, researchers have estimated more precisely than ever the heat-trapping effect of water in the air, validating the role of the gas as a critical component of climate change.

Andrew Dessler and colleagues from Texas A&M University in College Station confirmed that the heat-amplifying effect of water vapor is potent enough to double the climate warming caused by increased levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.

With new observations, the scientists confirmed experimentally what existing climate models had anticipated theoretically. The research team used novel data from the Atmospheric Infrared Sounder (AIRS) on NASA’s Aqua satellite to measure precisely the humidity throughout the lowest 10 miles of the atmosphere. That information was combined with global observations of shifts in temperature, allowing researchers to build a comprehensive picture of the interplay between water vapor, carbon dioxide, and other atmosphere-warming gases. The NASA-funded research was published recently in the American Geophysical Union's Geophysical Research Letters.

NASA - Water Vapor Confirmed as Major Player in Climate Change

curious, what causes humidity?

if you don't know that, then maybe you are in the wrong thread .
btw

Human impact on the environment
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search
"Anthropogenic" redirects here. It is not to be confused with Anthropogeny or Anthropization.

Environment

• Human impact
• Issues
• Environmentalism
• Environmental studies

Environment in

• Education
• Humanities
• Law
• Policy
• Science
• Social science

The ecosystem of public parks often includes humans feeding the wildlife.
Human impact on the environment or anthropogenic impact on the environment includes impacts on biophysical environments, biodiversity, and other resources.[1][2] The term anthropogenic designates an effect or object resulting from human activity. The term was first used in the technical sense by Russian geologist Alexey Pavlov, and was first used in English by British ecologist Arthur Tansley in reference to human influences on climax plant communities.[3] The atmospheric scientist Paul Crutzen introduced the term "anthropocene" in the mid-1970s.[4] The term is sometimes used in the context of pollution emissions that are produced as a result of human activities but applies broadly to all major human impacts on the environment.[5]
Human impact on the environment - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

so humidity in Chicago is from the oceans? Is that what you're preaching today? LOL. Really, interesting.
anthropogenic
Made up word for someone to make money on, simple as that.

I can always count on you to showcase arrogant ignorance
btw dumb **** all words are made up..

an·thro·po·gen·ic
[ˌanTHrəpōˈjenik]
ADJECTIVE

1. (chiefly of environmental pollution and pollutants) originating in human activity:
   "anthropogenic emissions of sulfur dioxide"

 

[Weatherman2020]

Yep, that's leftist science. Wiki tells them everything they want to know.

I would have used the actual reports but I had to dumb it down ,
if I hadn't you'd look even more ignorant.

Here on page 8 of the thread I'm still waiting to hear how much it rained. OP claims its caused by manmade global warming but has zero data of the environmental data.

Very unscientific.

it rained enough to cause massive damage you wouldn't understand why that's important .

Wow, annual monsoons caused flooding.

Why do you hate science?

false it was not an average or even above average monsoon.
but you just had to say something.

China’s Ministry of Civil Affairs (MCA) says that since 30 June, floods, hail, landslides, mudslides and other disasters have affected the 11 provinces of Jiangsu, Anhui, Jiangxi, Henan, Hubei, Hunan, Guangxi, Chongqing, Sichuan, Guizhou and Yunnan.

MCA say that over 1 million people have been relocated, and over half a million others have required emergency assistance. Around 40,000 houses have been destroyed or have collapsed and 248,000 have been damaged. More than 1.5 million hectares of cropland has also been damaged.

MCA estimate that the severe weather has caused direct economic losses of over 38 billion yuan (around 5.7 billion US dollars).

Since 30 June, several daily rainfall records have been broken, including in Macheng (285 mm), Jingmen (273 mm), Jiangxia (263 mm), Zhongxiang (230 mm), Huangpi (227 mm), all in Hubei Province, and Chaohu (293 mm) in Anhui Province, according to a statement by MCA.

China

Bingo. Page 9 and the Doomsdayers have not provided any data to back up their rant.

so you have no actual answer .

Not my job to prove it.

Science involves data and sources of data.

The question remains, why do you hate science?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Water Vapor Confirmed as Major Player in Climate Change
11.17.08

The distribution of atmospheric water vapor, a significant greenhouse gas, varies across the globe. During the summer and fall of 2005, this visualization shows that most vapor collects at tropical latitudes, particularly over south Asia, where monsoon thunderstorms swept the gas some 2 miles above the land.
Credit: NASA
> Watch video
Water vapor is known to be Earth’s most abundant greenhouse gas, but the extent of its contribution to global warming has been debated. Using recent NASA satellite data, researchers have estimated more precisely than ever the heat-trapping effect of water in the air, validating the role of the gas as a critical component of climate change.

Andrew Dessler and colleagues from Texas A&M University in College Station confirmed that the heat-amplifying effect of water vapor is potent enough to double the climate warming caused by increased levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.

With new observations, the scientists confirmed experimentally what existing climate models had anticipated theoretically. The research team used novel data from the Atmospheric Infrared Sounder (AIRS) on NASA’s Aqua satellite to measure precisely the humidity throughout the lowest 10 miles of the atmosphere. That information was combined with global observations of shifts in temperature, allowing researchers to build a comprehensive picture of the interplay between water vapor, carbon dioxide, and other atmosphere-warming gases. The NASA-funded research was published recently in the American Geophysical Union's Geophysical Research Letters.

NASA - Water Vapor Confirmed as Major Player in Climate Change

Water Vapor = H2O

Carbon Dioxide = CO2

So close!

true, only one atom separates them.
your point?

You're saying that H2O is the Biggest climate control knob

one of the two biggest,

I see, and do we have readings on atmospheric H2O on a nano-second by nano-second basic like we do for CO2?

How is this accounted for in the AGW models?

 

[jc456]

Water Vapor Confirmed as Major Player in Climate Change
11.17.08

The distribution of atmospheric water vapor, a significant greenhouse gas, varies across the globe. During the summer and fall of 2005, this visualization shows that most vapor collects at tropical latitudes, particularly over south Asia, where monsoon thunderstorms swept the gas some 2 miles above the land.
Credit: NASA
> Watch video
Water vapor is known to be Earth’s most abundant greenhouse gas, but the extent of its contribution to global warming has been debated. Using recent NASA satellite data, researchers have estimated more precisely than ever the heat-trapping effect of water in the air, validating the role of the gas as a critical component of climate change.

Andrew Dessler and colleagues from Texas A&M University in College Station confirmed that the heat-amplifying effect of water vapor is potent enough to double the climate warming caused by increased levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.

With new observations, the scientists confirmed experimentally what existing climate models had anticipated theoretically. The research team used novel data from the Atmospheric Infrared Sounder (AIRS) on NASA’s Aqua satellite to measure precisely the humidity throughout the lowest 10 miles of the atmosphere. That information was combined with global observations of shifts in temperature, allowing researchers to build a comprehensive picture of the interplay between water vapor, carbon dioxide, and other atmosphere-warming gases. The NASA-funded research was published recently in the American Geophysical Union's Geophysical Research Letters.

NASA - Water Vapor Confirmed as Major Player in Climate Change

curious, what causes humidity?

if you don't know that, then maybe you are in the wrong thread .
btw

Human impact on the environment
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search
"Anthropogenic" redirects here. It is not to be confused with Anthropogeny or Anthropization.

Environment

• Human impact
• Issues
• Environmentalism
• Environmental studies

Environment in

• Education
• Humanities
• Law
• Policy
• Science
• Social science

The ecosystem of public parks often includes humans feeding the wildlife.
Human impact on the environment or anthropogenic impact on the environment includes impacts on biophysical environments, biodiversity, and other resources.[1][2] The term anthropogenic designates an effect or object resulting from human activity. The term was first used in the technical sense by Russian geologist Alexey Pavlov, and was first used in English by British ecologist Arthur Tansley in reference to human influences on climax plant communities.[3] The atmospheric scientist Paul Crutzen introduced the term "anthropocene" in the mid-1970s.[4] The term is sometimes used in the context of pollution emissions that are produced as a result of human activities but applies broadly to all major human impacts on the environment.[5]
Human impact on the environment - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

so humidity in Chicago is from the oceans? Is that what you're preaching today? LOL. Really, interesting.
anthropogenic
Made up word for someone to make money on, simple as that.

I can always count on you to showcase arrogant ignorance
btw dumb **** all words are made up..

an·thro·po·gen·ic
[ˌanTHrəpōˈjenik]
ADJECTIVE

1. (chiefly of environmental pollution and pollutants) originating in human activity:
   "anthropogenic emissions of sulfur dioxide"

so you have no comment on humidity in Chicago and that it comes from the ocean, after making a comment you did just a few posts back?

Again, when it rains in Chicago, the evaporation from the ocean causes it? hmmmmmmmmm

Once in awhile that may indeed be true, but last night's rain came from Minnesota and that ain't near any ocean.

 

[daws101]

I would have used the actual reports but I had to dumb it down ,
if I hadn't you'd look even more ignorant.

Here on page 8 of the thread I'm still waiting to hear how much it rained. OP claims its caused by manmade global warming but has zero data of the environmental data.

Very unscientific.

it rained enough to cause massive damage you wouldn't understand why that's important .

Wow, annual monsoons caused flooding.

Why do you hate science?

false it was not an average or even above average monsoon.
but you just had to say something.

China’s Ministry of Civil Affairs (MCA) says that since 30 June, floods, hail, landslides, mudslides and other disasters have affected the 11 provinces of Jiangsu, Anhui, Jiangxi, Henan, Hubei, Hunan, Guangxi, Chongqing, Sichuan, Guizhou and Yunnan.

MCA say that over 1 million people have been relocated, and over half a million others have required emergency assistance. Around 40,000 houses have been destroyed or have collapsed and 248,000 have been damaged. More than 1.5 million hectares of cropland has also been damaged.

MCA estimate that the severe weather has caused direct economic losses of over 38 billion yuan (around 5.7 billion US dollars).

Since 30 June, several daily rainfall records have been broken, including in Macheng (285 mm), Jingmen (273 mm), Jiangxia (263 mm), Zhongxiang (230 mm), Huangpi (227 mm), all in Hubei Province, and Chaohu (293 mm) in Anhui Province, according to a statement by MCA.

China

Bingo. Page 9 and the Doomsdayers have not provided any data to back up their rant.

so you have no actual answer .

Not my job to prove it.

Science involves data and sources of data.

The question remains, why do you hate science?

it sure as **** is .
you make claims and don't back them up .
it's obvious who hates science and it's not me.

 

[daws101]

Water Vapor Confirmed as Major Player in Climate Change
11.17.08

The distribution of atmospheric water vapor, a significant greenhouse gas, varies across the globe. During the summer and fall of 2005, this visualization shows that most vapor collects at tropical latitudes, particularly over south Asia, where monsoon thunderstorms swept the gas some 2 miles above the land.
Credit: NASA
> Watch video
Water vapor is known to be Earth’s most abundant greenhouse gas, but the extent of its contribution to global warming has been debated. Using recent NASA satellite data, researchers have estimated more precisely than ever the heat-trapping effect of water in the air, validating the role of the gas as a critical component of climate change.

Andrew Dessler and colleagues from Texas A&M University in College Station confirmed that the heat-amplifying effect of water vapor is potent enough to double the climate warming caused by increased levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.

With new observations, the scientists confirmed experimentally what existing climate models had anticipated theoretically. The research team used novel data from the Atmospheric Infrared Sounder (AIRS) on NASA’s Aqua satellite to measure precisely the humidity throughout the lowest 10 miles of the atmosphere. That information was combined with global observations of shifts in temperature, allowing researchers to build a comprehensive picture of the interplay between water vapor, carbon dioxide, and other atmosphere-warming gases. The NASA-funded research was published recently in the American Geophysical Union's Geophysical Research Letters.

NASA - Water Vapor Confirmed as Major Player in Climate Change

Water Vapor = H2O

Carbon Dioxide = CO2

So close!

true, only one atom separates them.
your point?

You're saying that H2O is the Biggest climate control knob

one of the two biggest,

I see, and do we have readings on atmospheric H2O on a nano-second by nano-second basic like we do for CO2?

How is this accounted for in the AGW models?

yes.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Here on page 8 of the thread I'm still waiting to hear how much it rained. OP claims its caused by manmade global warming but has zero data of the environmental data.

Very unscientific.

it rained enough to cause massive damage you wouldn't understand why that's important .

Wow, annual monsoons caused flooding.

Why do you hate science?

false it was not an average or even above average monsoon.
but you just had to say something.

China’s Ministry of Civil Affairs (MCA) says that since 30 June, floods, hail, landslides, mudslides and other disasters have affected the 11 provinces of Jiangsu, Anhui, Jiangxi, Henan, Hubei, Hunan, Guangxi, Chongqing, Sichuan, Guizhou and Yunnan.

MCA say that over 1 million people have been relocated, and over half a million others have required emergency assistance. Around 40,000 houses have been destroyed or have collapsed and 248,000 have been damaged. More than 1.5 million hectares of cropland has also been damaged.

MCA estimate that the severe weather has caused direct economic losses of over 38 billion yuan (around 5.7 billion US dollars).

Since 30 June, several daily rainfall records have been broken, including in Macheng (285 mm), Jingmen (273 mm), Jiangxia (263 mm), Zhongxiang (230 mm), Huangpi (227 mm), all in Hubei Province, and Chaohu (293 mm) in Anhui Province, according to a statement by MCA.

China

Bingo. Page 9 and the Doomsdayers have not provided any data to back up their rant.

so you have no actual answer .

Not my job to prove it.

Science involves data and sources of data.

The question remains, why do you hate science?

it sure as **** is .
you make claims and don't back them up .
it's obvious who hates science and it's not me.

What are my claims?
OH yeah, no data and no sources = No science.

 

[daws101]

Water Vapor Confirmed as Major Player in Climate Change
11.17.08

The distribution of atmospheric water vapor, a significant greenhouse gas, varies across the globe. During the summer and fall of 2005, this visualization shows that most vapor collects at tropical latitudes, particularly over south Asia, where monsoon thunderstorms swept the gas some 2 miles above the land.
Credit: NASA
> Watch video
Water vapor is known to be Earth’s most abundant greenhouse gas, but the extent of its contribution to global warming has been debated. Using recent NASA satellite data, researchers have estimated more precisely than ever the heat-trapping effect of water in the air, validating the role of the gas as a critical component of climate change.

Andrew Dessler and colleagues from Texas A&M University in College Station confirmed that the heat-amplifying effect of water vapor is potent enough to double the climate warming caused by increased levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.

With new observations, the scientists confirmed experimentally what existing climate models had anticipated theoretically. The research team used novel data from the Atmospheric Infrared Sounder (AIRS) on NASA’s Aqua satellite to measure precisely the humidity throughout the lowest 10 miles of the atmosphere. That information was combined with global observations of shifts in temperature, allowing researchers to build a comprehensive picture of the interplay between water vapor, carbon dioxide, and other atmosphere-warming gases. The NASA-funded research was published recently in the American Geophysical Union's Geophysical Research Letters.

NASA - Water Vapor Confirmed as Major Player in Climate Change

curious, what causes humidity?

if you don't know that, then maybe you are in the wrong thread .
btw

Human impact on the environment
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search
"Anthropogenic" redirects here. It is not to be confused with Anthropogeny or Anthropization.

Environment

• Human impact
• Issues
• Environmentalism
• Environmental studies

Environment in

• Education
• Humanities
• Law
• Policy
• Science
• Social science

The ecosystem of public parks often includes humans feeding the wildlife.
Human impact on the environment or anthropogenic impact on the environment includes impacts on biophysical environments, biodiversity, and other resources.[1][2] The term anthropogenic designates an effect or object resulting from human activity. The term was first used in the technical sense by Russian geologist Alexey Pavlov, and was first used in English by British ecologist Arthur Tansley in reference to human influences on climax plant communities.[3] The atmospheric scientist Paul Crutzen introduced the term "anthropocene" in the mid-1970s.[4] The term is sometimes used in the context of pollution emissions that are produced as a result of human activities but applies broadly to all major human impacts on the environment.[5]
Human impact on the environment - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

so humidity in Chicago is from the oceans? Is that what you're preaching today? LOL. Really, interesting.
anthropogenic
Made up word for someone to make money on, simple as that.

I can always count on you to showcase arrogant ignorance
btw dumb **** all words are made up..

an·thro·po·gen·ic
[ˌanTHrəpōˈjenik]
ADJECTIVE

1. (chiefly of environmental pollution and pollutants) originating in human activity:
   "anthropogenic emissions of sulfur dioxide"

so you have no comment on humidity in Chicago and that it comes from the ocean, after making a comment you did just a few posts back?

Again, when it rains in Chicago, the evaporation from the ocean causes it? hmmmmmmmmm

Once in awhile that may indeed be true, but last night's rain came from Minnesota and that ain't near any ocean.

false your definition of what near and what's far on a global scale is meaningless .
Minnesota also has a micro climate due to all the lakes .
you must have been sleeping in science class in grade school
Water cycle
The water cycle, also known as the hydrological cycle or the H2O cycle, describes the continuous movement of water on, above and below the surface of the Earth. The mass of water on Earth remains fairly constant over time but the partitioning of the water into the major reservoirs of ice, fresh water, saline water and atmospheric water is variable depending on a wide range of climatic variables.

 

[daws101]

it rained enough to cause massive damage you wouldn't understand why that's important .

Wow, annual monsoons caused flooding.

Why do you hate science?

false it was not an average or even above average monsoon.
but you just had to say something.

China’s Ministry of Civil Affairs (MCA) says that since 30 June, floods, hail, landslides, mudslides and other disasters have affected the 11 provinces of Jiangsu, Anhui, Jiangxi, Henan, Hubei, Hunan, Guangxi, Chongqing, Sichuan, Guizhou and Yunnan.

MCA say that over 1 million people have been relocated, and over half a million others have required emergency assistance. Around 40,000 houses have been destroyed or have collapsed and 248,000 have been damaged. More than 1.5 million hectares of cropland has also been damaged.

MCA estimate that the severe weather has caused direct economic losses of over 38 billion yuan (around 5.7 billion US dollars).

Since 30 June, several daily rainfall records have been broken, including in Macheng (285 mm), Jingmen (273 mm), Jiangxia (263 mm), Zhongxiang (230 mm), Huangpi (227 mm), all in Hubei Province, and Chaohu (293 mm) in Anhui Province, according to a statement by MCA.

China

Bingo. Page 9 and the Doomsdayers have not provided any data to back up their rant.

so you have no actual answer .

Not my job to prove it.

Science involves data and sources of data.

The question remains, why do you hate science?

it sure as **** is .
you make claims and don't back them up .
it's obvious who hates science and it's not me.

What are my claims?
OH yeah, no data and no sources = No science.

that's one ,
others include climate change is fake ,
white supremacy and having a 12" dick ,
all of them false.

 

[jc456]

it rained enough to cause massive damage you wouldn't understand why that's important .

Wow, annual monsoons caused flooding.

Why do you hate science?

false it was not an average or even above average monsoon.
but you just had to say something.

China’s Ministry of Civil Affairs (MCA) says that since 30 June, floods, hail, landslides, mudslides and other disasters have affected the 11 provinces of Jiangsu, Anhui, Jiangxi, Henan, Hubei, Hunan, Guangxi, Chongqing, Sichuan, Guizhou and Yunnan.

MCA say that over 1 million people have been relocated, and over half a million others have required emergency assistance. Around 40,000 houses have been destroyed or have collapsed and 248,000 have been damaged. More than 1.5 million hectares of cropland has also been damaged.

MCA estimate that the severe weather has caused direct economic losses of over 38 billion yuan (around 5.7 billion US dollars).

Since 30 June, several daily rainfall records have been broken, including in Macheng (285 mm), Jingmen (273 mm), Jiangxia (263 mm), Zhongxiang (230 mm), Huangpi (227 mm), all in Hubei Province, and Chaohu (293 mm) in Anhui Province, according to a statement by MCA.

China

Bingo. Page 9 and the Doomsdayers have not provided any data to back up their rant.

so you have no actual answer .

Not my job to prove it.

Science involves data and sources of data.

The question remains, why do you hate science?

it sure as **** is .
you make claims and don't back them up .
it's obvious who hates science and it's not me.

What are my claims?
OH yeah, no data and no sources = No science.

and pretty much spot on, bubba.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Wow, annual monsoons caused flooding.

Why do you hate science?

false it was not an average or even above average monsoon.
but you just had to say something.

China’s Ministry of Civil Affairs (MCA) says that since 30 June, floods, hail, landslides, mudslides and other disasters have affected the 11 provinces of Jiangsu, Anhui, Jiangxi, Henan, Hubei, Hunan, Guangxi, Chongqing, Sichuan, Guizhou and Yunnan.

MCA say that over 1 million people have been relocated, and over half a million others have required emergency assistance. Around 40,000 houses have been destroyed or have collapsed and 248,000 have been damaged. More than 1.5 million hectares of cropland has also been damaged.

MCA estimate that the severe weather has caused direct economic losses of over 38 billion yuan (around 5.7 billion US dollars).

Since 30 June, several daily rainfall records have been broken, including in Macheng (285 mm), Jingmen (273 mm), Jiangxia (263 mm), Zhongxiang (230 mm), Huangpi (227 mm), all in Hubei Province, and Chaohu (293 mm) in Anhui Province, according to a statement by MCA.

China

Bingo. Page 9 and the Doomsdayers have not provided any data to back up their rant.

so you have no actual answer .

Not my job to prove it.

Science involves data and sources of data.

The question remains, why do you hate science?

it sure as **** is .
you make claims and don't back them up .
it's obvious who hates science and it's not me.

What are my claims?
OH yeah, no data and no sources = No science.

that's one ,
others include climate change is fake ,
white supremacy and having a 12" dick ,
all of them false.

 

[jc456]

curious, what causes humidity?

if you don't know that, then maybe you are in the wrong thread .
btw

Human impact on the environment
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search
"Anthropogenic" redirects here. It is not to be confused with Anthropogeny or Anthropization.

Environment

• Human impact
• Issues
• Environmentalism
• Environmental studies

Environment in

• Education
• Humanities
• Law
• Policy
• Science
• Social science

The ecosystem of public parks often includes humans feeding the wildlife.
Human impact on the environment or anthropogenic impact on the environment includes impacts on biophysical environments, biodiversity, and other resources.[1][2] The term anthropogenic designates an effect or object resulting from human activity. The term was first used in the technical sense by Russian geologist Alexey Pavlov, and was first used in English by British ecologist Arthur Tansley in reference to human influences on climax plant communities.[3] The atmospheric scientist Paul Crutzen introduced the term "anthropocene" in the mid-1970s.[4] The term is sometimes used in the context of pollution emissions that are produced as a result of human activities but applies broadly to all major human impacts on the environment.[5]
Human impact on the environment - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

so humidity in Chicago is from the oceans? Is that what you're preaching today? LOL. Really, interesting.
anthropogenic
Made up word for someone to make money on, simple as that.

I can always count on you to showcase arrogant ignorance
btw dumb **** all words are made up..

an·thro·po·gen·ic
[ˌanTHrəpōˈjenik]
ADJECTIVE

1. (chiefly of environmental pollution and pollutants) originating in human activity:
   "anthropogenic emissions of sulfur dioxide"

so you have no comment on humidity in Chicago and that it comes from the ocean, after making a comment you did just a few posts back?

Again, when it rains in Chicago, the evaporation from the ocean causes it? hmmmmmmmmm

Once in awhile that may indeed be true, but last night's rain came from Minnesota and that ain't near any ocean.

false your definition of what near and what's far on a global scale is meaningless .
Minnesota also has a micro climate due to all the lakes .
you must have been sleeping in science class in grade school
Water cycle
The water cycle, also known as the hydrological cycle or the H2O cycle, describes the continuous movement of water on, above and below the surface of the Earth. The mass of water on Earth remains fairly constant over time but the partitioning of the water into the major reservoirs of ice, fresh water, saline water and atmospheric water is variable depending on a wide range of climatic variables.

and yet you all claim the sea levels are rising, so now you have sea level rise and over evaporation. see the issue at all?

 

[Dot Com]

Thanks OP

Yes, I heard this ont the BBC last night.

Sent from my VS415PP using Tapatalk

 

[Weatherman2020]

Thanks OP

Yes, I heard this ont the BBC last night.

Sent from my VS415PP using Tapatalk

Hilarious. Simply hilarious.
BBC.
You guys are great comedians.

 

[daws101]

if you don't know that, then maybe you are in the wrong thread .
btw

Human impact on the environment
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search
"Anthropogenic" redirects here. It is not to be confused with Anthropogeny or Anthropization.

Environment

• Human impact
• Issues
• Environmentalism
• Environmental studies

Environment in

• Education
• Humanities
• Law
• Policy
• Science
• Social science

The ecosystem of public parks often includes humans feeding the wildlife.
Human impact on the environment or anthropogenic impact on the environment includes impacts on biophysical environments, biodiversity, and other resources.[1][2] The term anthropogenic designates an effect or object resulting from human activity. The term was first used in the technical sense by Russian geologist Alexey Pavlov, and was first used in English by British ecologist Arthur Tansley in reference to human influences on climax plant communities.[3] The atmospheric scientist Paul Crutzen introduced the term "anthropocene" in the mid-1970s.[4] The term is sometimes used in the context of pollution emissions that are produced as a result of human activities but applies broadly to all major human impacts on the environment.[5]
Human impact on the environment - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

so humidity in Chicago is from the oceans? Is that what you're preaching today? LOL. Really, interesting.
anthropogenic
Made up word for someone to make money on, simple as that.

I can always count on you to showcase arrogant ignorance
btw dumb **** all words are made up..

an·thro·po·gen·ic
[ˌanTHrəpōˈjenik]
ADJECTIVE

1. (chiefly of environmental pollution and pollutants) originating in human activity:
   "anthropogenic emissions of sulfur dioxide"

so you have no comment on humidity in Chicago and that it comes from the ocean, after making a comment you did just a few posts back?

Again, when it rains in Chicago, the evaporation from the ocean causes it? hmmmmmmmmm

Once in awhile that may indeed be true, but last night's rain came from Minnesota and that ain't near any ocean.

false your definition of what near and what's far on a global scale is meaningless .
Minnesota also has a micro climate due to all the lakes .
you must have been sleeping in science class in grade school
Water cycle
The water cycle, also known as the hydrological cycle or the H2O cycle, describes the continuous movement of water on, above and below the surface of the Earth. The mass of water on Earth remains fairly constant over time but the partitioning of the water into the major reservoirs of ice, fresh water, saline water and atmospheric water is variable depending on a wide range of climatic variables.

and yet you all claim the sea levels are rising, so now you have sea level rise and over evaporation. see the issue at all?

not a claim fact ,
there is no issue both are happening.
you believing it or not is also meaningless .