Millionaires and Marxist

There is something real absurd about wealthy Entertainers and Corporations who are founding the Racist Marxist BLM.
Why are they doing this?
MLB
Coke
Delta.......

We are preventing people from being hurt. We are preventing people from being offended. These speech codes and this discrimination against certain people is a good thing. That’s how it always happens. Always under the guise of goodness, do people lose liberty and freedom.
 
When Americans become afraid to speak their minds and stand up for what's right in their opinion its past time for the justice dept. and the courts to get to work in the protection of freedom...and so far they are letting the people down....
So it seems the wealthier you are the more afraid you are of the woke mob....that must stop!!!! and the media and big tech can do a lot to fix this....so they had better get started before its too late and we end up looking just like China with a till death leadership.....
 
There is something real absurd about wealthy Entertainers and Corporations who are founding the Racist Marxist BLM.
Why are they doing this?
MLB
Coke
Delta.......
They have decided that they don't want to be with the white racist?
But you voted for a White Racist named Joe Biden
 
There is something real absurd about wealthy Entertainers and Corporations who are founding the Racist Marxist BLM.
Why are they doing this?
MLB
Coke
Delta.......
They have decided that they don't want to be with the white racist?
But you voted for a White Racist named Joe Biden
No, I didn't, why would I vote for a member of the army in the drug war, as far as I am concerned he is the enemy.
 
There is something real absurd about wealthy Entertainers and Corporations who are founding the Racist Marxist BLM.
Why are they doing this?
MLB
Coke
Delta.......
That is easy. Over a certain amount of money, the beautiful people literally have more that they know what to do with to provide for their own consumption.

But greed doesn't stop with money. The next step is power, raw political power, that is, the ability to force or compel or coerce other people to do things they do not want to do and to prevent and restrain them from doing things they do want to do.

Those sitting at the table of the board of directors have no interest in the aggregate votes or choices of smaller shareholders of any given for-profit corporation.

Non-profits are similar. But they have an agenda of total control.
 
Corporate hypocrites would make commercials portraying their own grandmothers as racist for making sandwiches with white bread if it would sell their product. The Coca Cola people don't give a shit about Georgia voting laws. When their hypocrite corporate lawyers tell them that sales for their crappy product might be in jeopardy they behave like trained rats.
 
There is something real absurd about wealthy Entertainers and Corporations who are founding the Racist Marxist BLM.
Why are they doing this?
MLB
Coke
Delta.......

The secret to what initially looks like a clash of two philosophies, and they will, indeed, trick the socialists into believing that global socialism is here, while tricking you folks into believing just the reverse, is the marriage of the two.

It has nothing to do with race.

These folks don't care what color your skin is. . . they will of course try to create a universal dystopia, using race and the chaos to bring it about. . .

But it is about creating the Technocracy. A partnership between foundations and government, were wealthy un-elected oligarchs and celebrities, who once did direct your life, are now more openly in control, well, not them, but they will be the ones overseeing the computers and machines that run your life. Think. . . Neo-feudalism.

The Brave New World of Surveillance Capitalism

"Certain radical critiques of capitalism posit that it must necessarily monetize everything in time. The basic argument is that capitalism inherently requires infinite economic growth to function properly, but we are in a world of finite resources. As traditional resources used to feed the furnace are exhausted, more aspects of life that were previously outside of the money economy must be drawn into it – including abstract things like behavior, relationships and even thoughts.

The merits of such theories are debatable. What is beyond debate is that human thoughts and relationships are already in the advanced stages of monetization. Prof. Shoshana Zuboff, a leading expert in the field of business administration in information technology settings since the 1980s, coined the idea of “surveillance capitalism” (in the April 2015 edition of the Journal of Information Technology) to describe this phenomenon – the observation and recording of as much personal data as possible to create highly effective targeted advertisements.

Surveillance capitalism and privacy

Google is one of the best and oldest examples of surveillance capitalism in action. Their ostensibly “free” services, like Search and Gmail, have always been monetized by the data they collect from users. Same story with Facebook. These systems are opaque at best for the end user. You can never be entirely sure exactly what or how much data they’re collecting, how detailed a personal profile they’re building on you, what it is being used for or whose hands it is passing through. Thus the “surveillance” aspect – it’s as if you have hidden cameras recording you all the time as you move about virtual space.. . . . . "



Capitalism seen doing 'more harm than good' in global survey

". . . The survey confirmed a by-now familiar set of concerns ranging from worries about the pace of technological progress and job insecurity, to distrust of the media and a sense that national governments were not up to the challenges of the day.

Within the data there were divergences, with Asians more optimistic about their economic prospects than others across the world. There was also a growing split in attitudes according to status, with the affluent and college-educated much more likely to have faith in how things were being run.

Of possible interest to corporate leaders gathering in Davos this week was the finding that trust in business outweighed that in governments and that 92% of employees said CEOs should speak out on the social and ethical issues of the day.

“Business has leapt into the void left by populist and partisan government,” said Edelman CEO Richard Edelman. “It can no longer be business as usual, with an exclusive focus on shareholder returns.”
 
Secretive Bilderberg meeting to address Russia, cyber threats and Brexit as 130 of world's elite including Henry Kissinger, Mark Carney and the Dutch King prepare for Swiss summit
  • More than a hundred dignitaries from 23 countries will attend at Montreux
  • Bankers, Prime Ministers and CEOs will discuss topics under strict secrecy
  • Talking points include Russia, Brexit and the weaponisation of social media
  • The meeting of the rich and powerful attracts protest and conspiracy theories
 
There is something real absurd about wealthy Entertainers and Corporations who are founding the Racist Marxist BLM.
Why are they doing this?
MLB
Coke
Delta.......
Did not know they were paying any money to BLM. I just heard they knew it was UN-American to write and pass laws meant to keep the majority of people in Georgia from voting if at all possible, and said so. I did hear that several corporations were going to quit donating to Republican, but the republican should not care, they got trump. I am sure he will fund them. They don't need to worry, maybe they can get mobs to overthrow the elections in the state. Just because it didn't work in Washington DC, doesn't mean they can't take over a state or two by hook or crook or mob action.
 
There is something real absurd about wealthy Entertainers and Corporations who are founding the Racist Marxist BLM.
Why are they doing this?
MLB
Coke
Delta.......

The secret to what initially looks like a clash of two philosophies, and they will, indeed, trick the socialists into believing that global socialism is here, while tricking you folks into believing just the reverse, is the marriage of the two.

It has nothing to do with race.

These folks don't care what color your skin is. . . they will of course try to create a universal dystopia, using race and the chaos to bring it about. . .

But it is about creating the Technocracy. A partnership between foundations and government, were wealthy un-elected oligarchs and celebrities, who once did direct your life, are now more openly in control, well, not them, but they will be the ones overseeing the computers and machines that run your life. Think. . . Neo-feudalism.

The Brave New World of Surveillance Capitalism

"Certain radical critiques of capitalism posit that it must necessarily monetize everything in time. The basic argument is that capitalism inherently requires infinite economic growth to function properly, but we are in a world of finite resources. As traditional resources used to feed the furnace are exhausted, more aspects of life that were previously outside of the money economy must be drawn into it – including abstract things like behavior, relationships and even thoughts.

The merits of such theories are debatable. What is beyond debate is that human thoughts and relationships are already in the advanced stages of monetization. Prof. Shoshana Zuboff, a leading expert in the field of business administration in information technology settings since the 1980s, coined the idea of “surveillance capitalism” (in the April 2015 edition of the Journal of Information Technology) to describe this phenomenon – the observation and recording of as much personal data as possible to create highly effective targeted advertisements.

Surveillance capitalism and privacy

Google is one of the best and oldest examples of surveillance capitalism in action. Their ostensibly “free” services, like Search and Gmail, have always been monetized by the data they collect from users. Same story with Facebook. These systems are opaque at best for the end user. You can never be entirely sure exactly what or how much data they’re collecting, how detailed a personal profile they’re building on you, what it is being used for or whose hands it is passing through. Thus the “surveillance” aspect – it’s as if you have hidden cameras recording you all the time as you move about virtual space.. . . . . "



Capitalism seen doing 'more harm than good' in global survey

". . . The survey confirmed a by-now familiar set of concerns ranging from worries about the pace of technological progress and job insecurity, to distrust of the media and a sense that national governments were not up to the challenges of the day.

Within the data there were divergences, with Asians more optimistic about their economic prospects than others across the world. There was also a growing split in attitudes according to status, with the affluent and college-educated much more likely to have faith in how things were being run.

Of possible interest to corporate leaders gathering in Davos this week was the finding that trust in business outweighed that in governments and that 92% of employees said CEOs should speak out on the social and ethical issues of the day.

“Business has leapt into the void left by populist and partisan government,” said Edelman CEO Richard Edelman. “It can no longer be business as usual, with an exclusive focus on shareholder returns.”
Globalism is not an ideology exclusively developed by socialist it is a concept which has been in development since the Bronze Age capitalist have just as much to gain from it as socialist.
 
Corporate hypocrites would make commercials portraying their own grandmothers as racist for making sandwiches with white bread if it would sell their product. The Coca Cola people don't give a shit about Georgia voting laws. When their hypocrite corporate lawyers tell them that sales for their crappy product might be in jeopardy they behave like trained rats.

I don't know, this looks to me to have endangered sales for Wokacola. I am actively avoiding Coke products. If Coke suffers even a 2% decline in sales, some people should be getting seriously fired.

Of course the NFL has lost 70% of their revenue and still stick to virtue signaling and fascist racism.
 
Did not know they were paying any money to BLM. I just heard they knew it was UN-American to write and pass laws meant to keep the majority of people in Georgia from voting if at all possible, and said so. I did hear that several corporations were going to quit donating to Republican, but the republican should not care, they got trump. I am sure he will fund them. They don't need to worry, maybe they can get mobs to overthrow the elections in the state. Just because it didn't work in Washington DC, doesn't mean they can't take over a state or two by hook or crook or mob action.

You keep telling this lie..

What in the Georgia law - SPECIFICALLY "keep the majority of people in Georgia from voting if at all possible"

Be specific - cite examples and actual text?

Nah, you're just another lying Nazi demagogue...
 

Forum List

Back
Top