Faun
Diamond Member
- Nov 14, 2011
- 126,711
- 98,397
- 3,635
You cultists are brain-dead. The money was Iranian money frozen in bank accounts overseas. What Obama did was get the money released. It wasn't OUR money.
Military will build border wall if Pelosi, Schumer don't agree to pay for it: Trump
- Thread starter The Purge
- Start date
beautress
Always Faithful
The right wing doesn't know what they are talking about. We have a refugee problem on our southern border not a common defense problem.
Now dan, be reasonable. Pickpockets of 100% of the American taxpayers are a problem. And all of them are refugees who pay thousands of dollars apiece to criminals to get snuck in illegally rather than wait a dozen years and get in for free with their acceptance papers. The criminals often steal whatever else the refugees have. This particular group was warned to turn back every day they walked through Mexico, and paid no attention to serious warnings all along the way.
Faun
Diamond Member
- Nov 14, 2011
- 126,711
- 98,397
- 3,635
You understand wrong.
The funds were Iranian assets seized years earlier and frozen in various banks overseas. It was not OUR money. It was never OUR money. I don't blame you for being ignorant though. You're a conservative who's dumbed down by rightwing media
Eric Arthur Blair
Diamond Member
- Jul 21, 2015
- 25,955
- 15,967
- 1,415
Iran has been in a declared war against the U.S. for decades (since 1979) and we have every right to hang onto that money until hostilities cease. Nuke Deal or Not, Iran Has Already Declared War on Us
And that will be never as long as the theocrats remain in power (Obama pulled the rug out from under a popular Iranian uprising in 2009 Bloomberg - Are you a robot?) and not only did he give the money away, and failed to support an Iranian reform movement, but he bent over forwards
(yes, forwards for the Mullahs) and did everything he could to assist Iran in gaining a nuclear program that would, in a short time period, guarantee them nuclear weapons of mass destruction.
That's Barry Hussein Obama...friend and benefactor to one of the worst regimes in the world. He's a real bag of shit to a degree most people don't even want to know or can imagine.
No, all Trump needs is a military budget passed and he signs...part of keeping the govt from shutting down!McChrystal owes at least 1 star to the obomanation as obama was purging almost 200 high ranking officers that did not agree with him....McChrystal was NOT one of these...posse Comitas act has NOTHING TO DO WITH SEA BEES BUILDING A WALL!!!....DAMN, JUST SPEW OUT SHIT WHY DON'T YOU!McChrystal came along long before Obama.Is McChrystal the COC or is it President Trump who can direct military finances where he seems it is needed?...Sounds like the Gen. Is a Obomanation supporter!
McChrystal was responsible for death of alqaidi leader in iraq.
Posse Comitatus Act prevents military from building a wall.
They still need congressional authorization for the money.
The Defense Department's budget has already passed. This is not a part of the budget bill they are negotiating.
- Thread starter
- #368
Of course he did you asshole..
How Obama Secretly Gave Iran Access To Billions Of Dollars ā And Also Enabled Terrorism
- Thread starter
- #369
Then what are they negotiating?No, all Trump needs is a military budget passed and he signs...part of keeping the govt from shutting down!McChrystal owes at least 1 star to the obomanation as obama was purging almost 200 high ranking officers that did not agree with him....McChrystal was NOT one of these...posse Comitas act has NOTHING TO DO WITH SEA BEES BUILDING A WALL!!!....DAMN, JUST SPEW OUT SHIT WHY DON'T YOU!McChrystal came along long before Obama.
McChrystal was responsible for death of alqaidi leader in iraq.
Posse Comitatus Act prevents military from building a wall.
They still need congressional authorization for the money.
The Defense Department's budget has already passed. This is not a part of the budget bill they are negotiating.
- Thread starter
- #370
Why DemonRATS really FEAR trumps Wall
Why should the U.S. build a better wall on the southern border? House Majority Whip Steve Scalise offered a clear and candid rationale during a Fox News appearance this week, telling host Mark Levin that 10 known terrorists are captured each day trying to breach the border. U.S. Customs and Border Protections also informed Congress that 3,029 people were apprehended in one day this month ā deeming the occurrence a crisis.
Meanwhile, 21 percent of all potential migrants ā an astonishing 158 million people ā would like to come live in America if they could, according to a Gallup analysis, which found that the U.S. has remained the No. 1 destination for the last decade.
There is a viable rationale for border improvement. The wall, however, has become a showcase for President Trumpās foes, who wrap their opposition in humanitarian concerns ā even though they have walls and barriers of every description around their own homes.
Talk radio kingpin Rush Limbaugh points out that Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi are part of this group ā and appear motivated by political concerns rather than moral calling.
āThey could never, ever sign on to and assist in the funding and construction of a wall. You know why? Because walls work. These people that weāre talking about put walls around their homes and their estates. They know that walls work, and thatās precisely why there isnāt going to be one on the southern border, because if there ever is a wall, guess what? We finally will have control over who gets into this country and who doesnāt,ā Mr. Limbaugh told his 14 million
Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
Why should the U.S. build a better wall on the southern border? House Majority Whip Steve Scalise offered a clear and candid rationale during a Fox News appearance this week, telling host Mark Levin that 10 known terrorists are captured each day trying to breach the border. U.S. Customs and Border Protections also informed Congress that 3,029 people were apprehended in one day this month ā deeming the occurrence a crisis.
Meanwhile, 21 percent of all potential migrants ā an astonishing 158 million people ā would like to come live in America if they could, according to a Gallup analysis, which found that the U.S. has remained the No. 1 destination for the last decade.
There is a viable rationale for border improvement. The wall, however, has become a showcase for President Trumpās foes, who wrap their opposition in humanitarian concerns ā even though they have walls and barriers of every description around their own homes.
Talk radio kingpin Rush Limbaugh points out that Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi are part of this group ā and appear motivated by political concerns rather than moral calling.
āThey could never, ever sign on to and assist in the funding and construction of a wall. You know why? Because walls work. These people that weāre talking about put walls around their homes and their estates. They know that walls work, and thatās precisely why there isnāt going to be one on the southern border, because if there ever is a wall, guess what? We finally will have control over who gets into this country and who doesnāt,ā Mr. Limbaugh told his 14 million
Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
- Thread starter
- #371
If Trumps wall was built, that little girl would still be alive!
The Washington Post, which every day acts more and more like an integral part of the democrat party, generated an article that is as offensive as it was misleading.
Got that? The Border Patrol killed her, right? The Border Patrol refused her water for days, right?
Except that's not what happened.
The Washington Postās article led with concerns that the childās death, which occurred a week prior to publication, would lead to scrutiny of conditions at detention centers for families crossing the border into the United States. It read:
The childās death is likely to intensify scrutiny of detention conditions at Border Patrol stations and CBP facilities that are increasingly overwhelmed by large numbers of families seeking asylum in the United States.
But thenBut beginning in the fourth paragraph, the Washington Postās own report refutes the notion that Border Patrol bears responsibility for the girlās death.
Noting that she began to suffer from seizures just over eight hours after being taken into custody and that her temperature quickly spiked to 105.7 degrees, WaPo reported that emergency responders were called right away and the girl was revived and taken to a hospital. She died within 24 hours of being transported, and Border Patrol records show that she had not been given food or water for several days prior.
The WaPoo put out a deliberately misleading article and lamebrained liberals jumped all over it.
The girl and her family entered the US illegally, of course, and her father said nothing of her being ill for seven hours after being placed in custody:
CBP officials stated that the father of the seven-year-old girl who died in Border Patrol custody on December 7 claimed she was in good health until seven hours after they were apprehended. The father made mention of the girl being sick as they began a two-hour bus ride from the forward operating base to the Lordsburg Border Patrol Station.Despite their trespass in a remote area, the group of 163 illegals was properly processed
ue to the remote location, only four Border Patrol agents were available at the time for processing this group of migrants, the official stated. During the initial screening, the agents asked the migrants a series of 20 questions concerning their health and other demographic information. Officials said the agents asked the father the questions in Spanish and translated his answers to English for documentation on the form. The father reportedly checked the box on the I-779 immigration form that said his daughter had no current illnesses.The CBP did not kill this little girl. Her father did. His desire to enter the US illegally put her in jeopardy and he bears the blame for her death.
Read more at Floppingaces.net...
The Washington Post, which every day acts more and more like an integral part of the democrat party, generated an article that is as offensive as it was misleading.
Got that? The Border Patrol killed her, right? The Border Patrol refused her water for days, right?
Except that's not what happened.
The Washington Postās article led with concerns that the childās death, which occurred a week prior to publication, would lead to scrutiny of conditions at detention centers for families crossing the border into the United States. It read:
The childās death is likely to intensify scrutiny of detention conditions at Border Patrol stations and CBP facilities that are increasingly overwhelmed by large numbers of families seeking asylum in the United States.
But thenBut beginning in the fourth paragraph, the Washington Postās own report refutes the notion that Border Patrol bears responsibility for the girlās death.
Noting that she began to suffer from seizures just over eight hours after being taken into custody and that her temperature quickly spiked to 105.7 degrees, WaPo reported that emergency responders were called right away and the girl was revived and taken to a hospital. She died within 24 hours of being transported, and Border Patrol records show that she had not been given food or water for several days prior.
The WaPoo put out a deliberately misleading article and lamebrained liberals jumped all over it.
The girl and her family entered the US illegally, of course, and her father said nothing of her being ill for seven hours after being placed in custody:
CBP officials stated that the father of the seven-year-old girl who died in Border Patrol custody on December 7 claimed she was in good health until seven hours after they were apprehended. The father made mention of the girl being sick as they began a two-hour bus ride from the forward operating base to the Lordsburg Border Patrol Station.Despite their trespass in a remote area, the group of 163 illegals was properly processed
ue to the remote location, only four Border Patrol agents were available at the time for processing this group of migrants, the official stated. During the initial screening, the agents asked the migrants a series of 20 questions concerning their health and other demographic information. Officials said the agents asked the father the questions in Spanish and translated his answers to English for documentation on the form. The father reportedly checked the box on the I-779 immigration form that said his daughter had no current illnesses.The CBP did not kill this little girl. Her father did. His desire to enter the US illegally put her in jeopardy and he bears the blame for her death.Read more at Floppingaces.net...
In 1979, the U.S. froze all the Iranian funds in American banks as retribution for seizure of the U.S. embassy in Tehran, as revolution swept that nation. As part of the Iranian Nuclear deal, the funds were released. The funds belong to Iran in 1979 just they did when they were released. Obama did not give the money. It was always their money. We just returned it to them.
beautress
Always Faithful
...Chain of command....No, all Trump needs is a military budget passed and he signs...part of keeping the govt from shutting down!McChrystal owes at least 1 star to the obomanation as obama was purging almost 200 high ranking officers that did not agree with him....McChrystal was NOT one of these...posse Comitas act has NOTHING TO DO WITH SEA BEES BUILDING A WALL!!!....DAMN, JUST SPEW OUT SHIT WHY DON'T YOU!McChrystal came along long before Obama.
McChrystal was responsible for death of alqaidi leader in iraq.
Posse Comitatus Act prevents military from building a wall.
They still need congressional authorization for the money.
The Defense Department's budget has already passed. This is not a part of the budget bill they are negotiating.
beautress
Always Faithful
Quote: "You cultists are brain-dead."
negged!!!
I am one hundred percent a United States Citizen and a voter. That really gets your goat that I vote Republican, doesn't it. Tough bananas, toots.
Last edited:
Baz Ares
Gold Member
- Feb 2, 2017
- 10,970
- 1,099
- 260
- Banned
- #375
Even if the Great Douche gets some funding in 2018. As the House will not fund the project.
The Great Douche Won't be there that long to complete the wall by using the Military.
So WEAK a Deal to call on the Miltary to do the work, the Douche won't make any money.
And the Military can't buy Private land without congress approval.
Another MAGA failed DrumpF Project. Like DOPers can't understand the word incomplete.
The only reason DrumpF wants this wall is the SCAM money off it.
Last edited:
Vandalshandle
Gold Member
Your posts are above, and speak for themselves.
Slade3200
Diamond Member
- Jan 13, 2016
- 71,685
- 18,334
- 2,190
What was last years budget and what did they spend and get done? Do you know?
beautress
Always Faithful
Quote: "the Great Douche, WEAK Deal, Military can't, DrumpF, SCAM money off"
lolol! Leftist Lunatic has the Dowager Maxine Watters' website as his home page.
Similar threads
New Topics
-
America And Israels Al Qaeda Man In Syria Still On A Murder Rampage- Started by Deadstick
- Replies: 0
-
-
-
-
