Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Having second thoughts about a candidate over another candidate in a decision of this magnitude does not mean one thinks his final selection is 'stupid'. Such 'logic' / a claim as was made is stupid.Seems Trump might believe it was dumb to nominate him...I still find it funny that nine months ago people like C_Clayton_Jones were saying Trump would "never" be the nominee.
Nobody took him seriously (I, frankly, still don't).
But, now they are all over him.
I was one of those who didn't believe the American people are dumb and self-loathing enough to nominate/vote.
Never ever underestimate the stupidity of the rabid right wing froot loop.
I am certainly no Trump fan.
But I don't believe it was dumb to nominate him. I fully understand how he represents a reaction by many.
Now, I am guessing you somehow think it was smart to nominate Hillary.
If you do, you are no less stupid than those you accuse on the right.
Donald Trump reportedly had second thoughts about adding Pence to ticket
It's called politics. That was an attempt to distance himself from Trump's comments amid a now defunct reelection campaign.You won't like him conservatives!
Rachel Maddow will tear bigot Pence a new asshole.
Lol a man with morals scares these leftist loons to death!
Funny. Atheists also have morals - just not delusional/deranged ones.
Atheists have murdered more people in the last 100 years than all of the religious wars over the last 2,000 years dearie. You are quite simply full of shit.
If you count yourself among freedom loving Americans, anything anti-gay SHOULD send you into a fit.I'm starting to think Lakhota is gay, anything anti gay sends him into fits
Probably won't completely end Pence's
career" but the good news is that this will severely curtail the damage he can do.
Lol a man with morals scares these leftist loons to death!
Funny. Atheists also have morals - just not delusional/deranged ones.
Atheists have murdered more people in the last 100 years than all of the religious wars over the last 2,000 years dearie. You are quite simply full of shit.
Maybe you should expand your education...
So who has been the worst throughout history: atheist regimes or religious regimes? Obviously the big numbers come from the 20th century superpowers (China, Russia, Germany) so the answer depends on how you classify those. And this is where the meat of these debates is usually found, splitting hairs on which regime is atheist, which is merely secular, which is non-Christian and thus fair game to be called atheist. Hitchens points out that Stalin's government had all the trappings of religion, including Orwell's totalitarian theocracy, and thus it's merely a play on words to say that it was not religious. Pol Pot was raised a Buddhist monk who grew up to execute Buddhist monks, along with anyone else he could lay his hands on. Whole books have been written on the occult underpinnings of Nazi Germany, the symbology of the Norse gods, to say nothing of the claims that Hitler was a Christian, Hitler was a Jew, and his own writings expressing the kinship he felt with the Muslims. A favorite counterpoint raised by Christian debaters is that these despots practiced Social Darwinism and were thus atheists by definition. In summary, the winner of these debates is the one who can convince the other that the big 20th century genocidal maniacs were motivated either by religion or by a desire to destroy religion. The entire debate is the logical fallacy of the excluded middle.
Who Kills More, Religion or Atheism?
Lol a man with morals scares these leftist loons to death!
Funny. Atheists also have morals - just not delusional/deranged ones.
Atheists have murdered more people in the last 100 years than all of the religious wars over the last 2,000 years dearie. You are quite simply full of shit.
Maybe you should expand your education...
So who has been the worst throughout history: atheist regimes or religious regimes? Obviously the big numbers come from the 20th century superpowers (China, Russia, Germany) so the answer depends on how you classify those. And this is where the meat of these debates is usually found, splitting hairs on which regime is atheist, which is merely secular, which is non-Christian and thus fair game to be called atheist. Hitchens points out that Stalin's government had all the trappings of religion, including Orwell's totalitarian theocracy, and thus it's merely a play on words to say that it was not religious. Pol Pot was raised a Buddhist monk who grew up to execute Buddhist monks, along with anyone else he could lay his hands on. Whole books have been written on the occult underpinnings of Nazi Germany, the symbology of the Norse gods, to say nothing of the claims that Hitler was a Christian, Hitler was a Jew, and his own writings expressing the kinship he felt with the Muslims. A favorite counterpoint raised by Christian debaters is that these despots practiced Social Darwinism and were thus atheists by definition. In summary, the winner of these debates is the one who can convince the other that the big 20th century genocidal maniacs were motivated either by religion or by a desire to destroy religion. The entire debate is the logical fallacy of the excluded middle.
Who Kills More, Religion or Atheism?
Maybe you should actually read some real history instead of foisting off an atheist apologist website. Soviet Union, atheist by governmental decree, at least 60 million dead in Stalin's purges. China, atheistic by government proclamation at least 150 million dead. Cambodia, Pol Pot declares an atheistic agrarian utopia, but has to murder 2 million to get his way.
The most generous estimate for the number of people murdered by religion over the last 2,000 years is 2 million. For industrialized murder you need to go to the atheist socialist governments.
That's an unarguable fact.
It was just given to you. Look it up moron. It's history 101.Lol a man with morals scares these leftist loons to death!
Funny. Atheists also have morals - just not delusional/deranged ones.
Atheists have murdered more people in the last 100 years than all of the religious wars over the last 2,000 years dearie. You are quite simply full of shit.
Maybe you should expand your education...
So who has been the worst throughout history: atheist regimes or religious regimes? Obviously the big numbers come from the 20th century superpowers (China, Russia, Germany) so the answer depends on how you classify those. And this is where the meat of these debates is usually found, splitting hairs on which regime is atheist, which is merely secular, which is non-Christian and thus fair game to be called atheist. Hitchens points out that Stalin's government had all the trappings of religion, including Orwell's totalitarian theocracy, and thus it's merely a play on words to say that it was not religious. Pol Pot was raised a Buddhist monk who grew up to execute Buddhist monks, along with anyone else he could lay his hands on. Whole books have been written on the occult underpinnings of Nazi Germany, the symbology of the Norse gods, to say nothing of the claims that Hitler was a Christian, Hitler was a Jew, and his own writings expressing the kinship he felt with the Muslims. A favorite counterpoint raised by Christian debaters is that these despots practiced Social Darwinism and were thus atheists by definition. In summary, the winner of these debates is the one who can convince the other that the big 20th century genocidal maniacs were motivated either by religion or by a desire to destroy religion. The entire debate is the logical fallacy of the excluded middle.
Who Kills More, Religion or Atheism?
Maybe you should actually read some real history instead of foisting off an atheist apologist website. Soviet Union, atheist by governmental decree, at least 60 million dead in Stalin's purges. China, atheistic by government proclamation at least 150 million dead. Cambodia, Pol Pot declares an atheistic agrarian utopia, but has to murder 2 million to get his way.
The most generous estimate for the number of people murdered by religion over the last 2,000 years is 2 million. For industrialized murder you need to go to the atheist socialist governments.
That's an unarguable fact.
Fine, then give us some "credible" proof of your claims.
It was just given to you. Look it up moron. It's history 101.Funny. Atheists also have morals - just not delusional/deranged ones.
Atheists have murdered more people in the last 100 years than all of the religious wars over the last 2,000 years dearie. You are quite simply full of shit.
Maybe you should expand your education...
So who has been the worst throughout history: atheist regimes or religious regimes? Obviously the big numbers come from the 20th century superpowers (China, Russia, Germany) so the answer depends on how you classify those. And this is where the meat of these debates is usually found, splitting hairs on which regime is atheist, which is merely secular, which is non-Christian and thus fair game to be called atheist. Hitchens points out that Stalin's government had all the trappings of religion, including Orwell's totalitarian theocracy, and thus it's merely a play on words to say that it was not religious. Pol Pot was raised a Buddhist monk who grew up to execute Buddhist monks, along with anyone else he could lay his hands on. Whole books have been written on the occult underpinnings of Nazi Germany, the symbology of the Norse gods, to say nothing of the claims that Hitler was a Christian, Hitler was a Jew, and his own writings expressing the kinship he felt with the Muslims. A favorite counterpoint raised by Christian debaters is that these despots practiced Social Darwinism and were thus atheists by definition. In summary, the winner of these debates is the one who can convince the other that the big 20th century genocidal maniacs were motivated either by religion or by a desire to destroy religion. The entire debate is the logical fallacy of the excluded middle.
Who Kills More, Religion or Atheism?
Maybe you should actually read some real history instead of foisting off an atheist apologist website. Soviet Union, atheist by governmental decree, at least 60 million dead in Stalin's purges. China, atheistic by government proclamation at least 150 million dead. Cambodia, Pol Pot declares an atheistic agrarian utopia, but has to murder 2 million to get his way.
The most generous estimate for the number of people murdered by religion over the last 2,000 years is 2 million. For industrialized murder you need to go to the atheist socialist governments.
That's an unarguable fact.
Fine, then give us some "credible" proof of your claims.
Lol a man with morals scares these leftist loons to death!
Funny. Atheists also have morals - just not delusional/deranged ones.
Atheists have murdered more people in the last 100 years than all of the religious wars over the last 2,000 years dearie. You are quite simply full of shit.
Maybe you should expand your education...
So who has been the worst throughout history: atheist regimes or religious regimes? Obviously the big numbers come from the 20th century superpowers (China, Russia, Germany) so the answer depends on how you classify those. And this is where the meat of these debates is usually found, splitting hairs on which regime is atheist, which is merely secular, which is non-Christian and thus fair game to be called atheist. Hitchens points out that Stalin's government had all the trappings of religion, including Orwell's totalitarian theocracy, and thus it's merely a play on words to say that it was not religious. Pol Pot was raised a Buddhist monk who grew up to execute Buddhist monks, along with anyone else he could lay his hands on. Whole books have been written on the occult underpinnings of Nazi Germany, the symbology of the Norse gods, to say nothing of the claims that Hitler was a Christian, Hitler was a Jew, and his own writings expressing the kinship he felt with the Muslims. A favorite counterpoint raised by Christian debaters is that these despots practiced Social Darwinism and were thus atheists by definition. In summary, the winner of these debates is the one who can convince the other that the big 20th century genocidal maniacs were motivated either by religion or by a desire to destroy religion. The entire debate is the logical fallacy of the excluded middle.
Who Kills More, Religion or Atheism?
Maybe you should actually read some real history instead of foisting off an atheist apologist website. Soviet Union, atheist by governmental decree, at least 60 million dead in Stalin's purges. China, atheistic by government proclamation at least 150 million dead. Cambodia, Pol Pot declares an atheistic agrarian utopia, but has to murder 2 million to get his way.
The most generous estimate for the number of people murdered by religion over the last 2,000 years is 2 million. For industrialized murder you need to go to the atheist socialist governments.
That's an unarguable fact.
Fine, then give us some "credible" proof of your claims.
Funny. Atheists also have morals - just not delusional/deranged ones.
Atheists have murdered more people in the last 100 years than all of the religious wars over the last 2,000 years dearie. You are quite simply full of shit.
Maybe you should expand your education...
So who has been the worst throughout history: atheist regimes or religious regimes? Obviously the big numbers come from the 20th century superpowers (China, Russia, Germany) so the answer depends on how you classify those. And this is where the meat of these debates is usually found, splitting hairs on which regime is atheist, which is merely secular, which is non-Christian and thus fair game to be called atheist. Hitchens points out that Stalin's government had all the trappings of religion, including Orwell's totalitarian theocracy, and thus it's merely a play on words to say that it was not religious. Pol Pot was raised a Buddhist monk who grew up to execute Buddhist monks, along with anyone else he could lay his hands on. Whole books have been written on the occult underpinnings of Nazi Germany, the symbology of the Norse gods, to say nothing of the claims that Hitler was a Christian, Hitler was a Jew, and his own writings expressing the kinship he felt with the Muslims. A favorite counterpoint raised by Christian debaters is that these despots practiced Social Darwinism and were thus atheists by definition. In summary, the winner of these debates is the one who can convince the other that the big 20th century genocidal maniacs were motivated either by religion or by a desire to destroy religion. The entire debate is the logical fallacy of the excluded middle.
Who Kills More, Religion or Atheism?
Maybe you should actually read some real history instead of foisting off an atheist apologist website. Soviet Union, atheist by governmental decree, at least 60 million dead in Stalin's purges. China, atheistic by government proclamation at least 150 million dead. Cambodia, Pol Pot declares an atheistic agrarian utopia, but has to murder 2 million to get his way.
The most generous estimate for the number of people murdered by religion over the last 2,000 years is 2 million. For industrialized murder you need to go to the atheist socialist governments.
That's an unarguable fact.
Fine, then give us some "credible" proof of your claims.
I just gave it to you dumb ass. It's called history. Look it up.
Funny. Atheists also have morals - just not delusional/deranged ones.
Atheists have murdered more people in the last 100 years than all of the religious wars over the last 2,000 years dearie. You are quite simply full of shit.
Maybe you should expand your education...
So who has been the worst throughout history: atheist regimes or religious regimes? Obviously the big numbers come from the 20th century superpowers (China, Russia, Germany) so the answer depends on how you classify those. And this is where the meat of these debates is usually found, splitting hairs on which regime is atheist, which is merely secular, which is non-Christian and thus fair game to be called atheist. Hitchens points out that Stalin's government had all the trappings of religion, including Orwell's totalitarian theocracy, and thus it's merely a play on words to say that it was not religious. Pol Pot was raised a Buddhist monk who grew up to execute Buddhist monks, along with anyone else he could lay his hands on. Whole books have been written on the occult underpinnings of Nazi Germany, the symbology of the Norse gods, to say nothing of the claims that Hitler was a Christian, Hitler was a Jew, and his own writings expressing the kinship he felt with the Muslims. A favorite counterpoint raised by Christian debaters is that these despots practiced Social Darwinism and were thus atheists by definition. In summary, the winner of these debates is the one who can convince the other that the big 20th century genocidal maniacs were motivated either by religion or by a desire to destroy religion. The entire debate is the logical fallacy of the excluded middle.
Who Kills More, Religion or Atheism?
Maybe you should actually read some real history instead of foisting off an atheist apologist website. Soviet Union, atheist by governmental decree, at least 60 million dead in Stalin's purges. China, atheistic by government proclamation at least 150 million dead. Cambodia, Pol Pot declares an atheistic agrarian utopia, but has to murder 2 million to get his way.
The most generous estimate for the number of people murdered by religion over the last 2,000 years is 2 million. For industrialized murder you need to go to the atheist socialist governments.
That's an unarguable fact.
Fine, then give us some "credible" proof of your claims.
I just gave it to you dumb ass. It's called history. Look it up.
NYcarbiner: : "I am open minded but hate religious conservatives so much I'll make shit up all day long!!"Mike Pence: "I can see Jesusland from my house!!"
It was just given to you. Look it up moron. It's history 101.Atheists have murdered more people in the last 100 years than all of the religious wars over the last 2,000 years dearie. You are quite simply full of shit.
Maybe you should expand your education...
So who has been the worst throughout history: atheist regimes or religious regimes? Obviously the big numbers come from the 20th century superpowers (China, Russia, Germany) so the answer depends on how you classify those. And this is where the meat of these debates is usually found, splitting hairs on which regime is atheist, which is merely secular, which is non-Christian and thus fair game to be called atheist. Hitchens points out that Stalin's government had all the trappings of religion, including Orwell's totalitarian theocracy, and thus it's merely a play on words to say that it was not religious. Pol Pot was raised a Buddhist monk who grew up to execute Buddhist monks, along with anyone else he could lay his hands on. Whole books have been written on the occult underpinnings of Nazi Germany, the symbology of the Norse gods, to say nothing of the claims that Hitler was a Christian, Hitler was a Jew, and his own writings expressing the kinship he felt with the Muslims. A favorite counterpoint raised by Christian debaters is that these despots practiced Social Darwinism and were thus atheists by definition. In summary, the winner of these debates is the one who can convince the other that the big 20th century genocidal maniacs were motivated either by religion or by a desire to destroy religion. The entire debate is the logical fallacy of the excluded middle.
Who Kills More, Religion or Atheism?
Maybe you should actually read some real history instead of foisting off an atheist apologist website. Soviet Union, atheist by governmental decree, at least 60 million dead in Stalin's purges. China, atheistic by government proclamation at least 150 million dead. Cambodia, Pol Pot declares an atheistic agrarian utopia, but has to murder 2 million to get his way.
The most generous estimate for the number of people murdered by religion over the last 2,000 years is 2 million. For industrialized murder you need to go to the atheist socialist governments.
That's an unarguable fact.
Fine, then give us some "credible" proof of your claims.
I did...
Has atheism killed more people than religion?
NYcarbiner: : "I am open minded but hate religious conservatives so much I'll make shit up all day long!!"Mike Pence: "I can see Jesusland from my house!!"
It was just given to you. Look it up moron. It's history 101.Maybe you should expand your education...
So who has been the worst throughout history: atheist regimes or religious regimes? Obviously the big numbers come from the 20th century superpowers (China, Russia, Germany) so the answer depends on how you classify those. And this is where the meat of these debates is usually found, splitting hairs on which regime is atheist, which is merely secular, which is non-Christian and thus fair game to be called atheist. Hitchens points out that Stalin's government had all the trappings of religion, including Orwell's totalitarian theocracy, and thus it's merely a play on words to say that it was not religious. Pol Pot was raised a Buddhist monk who grew up to execute Buddhist monks, along with anyone else he could lay his hands on. Whole books have been written on the occult underpinnings of Nazi Germany, the symbology of the Norse gods, to say nothing of the claims that Hitler was a Christian, Hitler was a Jew, and his own writings expressing the kinship he felt with the Muslims. A favorite counterpoint raised by Christian debaters is that these despots practiced Social Darwinism and were thus atheists by definition. In summary, the winner of these debates is the one who can convince the other that the big 20th century genocidal maniacs were motivated either by religion or by a desire to destroy religion. The entire debate is the logical fallacy of the excluded middle.
Who Kills More, Religion or Atheism?
Maybe you should actually read some real history instead of foisting off an atheist apologist website. Soviet Union, atheist by governmental decree, at least 60 million dead in Stalin's purges. China, atheistic by government proclamation at least 150 million dead. Cambodia, Pol Pot declares an atheistic agrarian utopia, but has to murder 2 million to get his way.
The most generous estimate for the number of people murdered by religion over the last 2,000 years is 2 million. For industrialized murder you need to go to the atheist socialist governments.
That's an unarguable fact.
Fine, then give us some "credible" proof of your claims.
I did...
Has atheism killed more people than religion?
Your source is trying to sell Stalin wasn't atheist...that's a lie, Mao and Stalin both installed state atheism. This is common knowledge and history
That's a compliment.NYcarbiner: : "I am open minded but hate religious conservatives so much I'll make shit up all day long!!"Mike Pence: "I can see Jesusland from my house!!"
I hate people like you. Feel better?
It was just given to you. Look it up moron. It's history 101.Maybe you should actually read some real history instead of foisting off an atheist apologist website. Soviet Union, atheist by governmental decree, at least 60 million dead in Stalin's purges. China, atheistic by government proclamation at least 150 million dead. Cambodia, Pol Pot declares an atheistic agrarian utopia, but has to murder 2 million to get his way.
The most generous estimate for the number of people murdered by religion over the last 2,000 years is 2 million. For industrialized murder you need to go to the atheist socialist governments.
That's an unarguable fact.
Fine, then give us some "credible" proof of your claims.
I did...
Has atheism killed more people than religion?
Your source is trying to sell Stalin wasn't atheist...that's a lie, Mao and Stalin both installed state atheism. This is common knowledge and history
Don't climb too far up on that high horse. The most violent religion in history has been the Catholics.
