Midwest Lesbians Beat Son With Hammer & Kicked His Groin Until He Suffered Two Strokes

[Syriusly]

The child in the aforementioned case threatened to self-mutilate, the parents merely gave in and allowed the child to dress and act as he felt most comfortable - which happened to be as a girl. When puberty became imminent, years later, the parents rejected the child's demand for a sex-change operation, agreeing only to hormone blocking which would enable the child to decide for, or against, a sex change operation when he was older. ALL of it is fully backed by medical and psychological evaluation of the child since he was 7, and solid diagnoses of gender identity disorder.

Their other option would be to /force/ the child to be a "boy" in spite of the medical diagnoses - something they were not willing to do to the child they love.

Silhouette objects to the boy's parents and doctors deciding on what should be the best course of action for their child and patient.

She believes that she should decide what is best for every child, in every situation.

 

[Dhara]

Are you in favor of incestuous marriage?

We'll talk about your non sequitur after you answer the following question:

And what pray tell is your opinion of the two lesbians drugging their minor son with female hormones to prepare him for later dick amputation in California? (see the OP for the link. You know damn well who I'm talking about)

Angels or monsters?

Hater.

 

[Silhouette]

Are you in favor of incestuous marriage?

We'll talk about your non sequitur after you answer the following question:

And what pray tell is your opinion of the two lesbians drugging their minor son with female hormones to prepare him for later dick amputation in California? (see the OP for the link. You know damn well who I'm talking about)

Angels or monsters?

Hater.

So you think those two drugging their son are haters. I agree. They hate males enough where they'd encourage and coerce the boy into amputating his male genitals..

 

[Skylar]

Are you in favor of incestuous marriage?

We'll talk about your non sequitur after you answer the following question:

And what pray tell is your opinion of the two lesbians drugging their minor son with female hormones to prepare him for later dick amputation in California? (see the OP for the link. You know damn well who I'm talking about)

Angels or monsters?

Hater.

So you think those two drugging their son are haters. I agree. They hate males enough where they'd encourage and coerce the boy into amputating his male genitals..

Wow. Even by your standards the shit you're spouting in this thread is particularly loathsome.

 

[Dhara]

You're an over the top LGBT hater, sillhouette.

It's sickening.

 

[Dhara]

People like you, I don't understand, sil. Honestly, I don't. All I know is you're very unhappy.

 

[Skylar]

You're an over the top LGBT hater, sillhouette.

It's sickening.

She wasn't always like this. Its been a rather stark deterioration since her dad died. Though why that translates into a deranged fixation on gay people, I have no idea.

The key word in this scenario appears to be 'co-morbidity'.

 

[Silhouette]

The child in the aforementioned case threatened to self-mutilate, the parents merely gave in and allowed the child to dress and act as he felt most comfortable - which happened to be as a girl. When puberty became imminent, years later, the parents rejected the child's demand for a sex-change operation, agreeing only to hormone blocking which would enable the child to decide for, or against, a sex change operation when he was older....

I've known children threatening to hurt themselves if they didn't get a toy they wanted.

Also, has it occurred to any child psychologist involved that the boy might be rejecting his gender because he sees both of the adult women in his life (the only "parents" he knows) utterly rejecting his gender by their daily example of refusing to be with men; even when a male was necessary to produce him?

Until we know exactly what's going on, without blocking regressive therapy to get to the bottom of it, you can't justify drugging a child because he threatens to hurt himself otherwise..

 

[Syriusly]

Are you in favor of incestuous marriage?

We'll talk about your non sequitur after you answer the following question:

And what pray tell is your opinion of the two lesbians drugging

Are you in favor of incestuous marriage?

 

[Syriusly]

The child in the aforementioned case threatened to self-mutilate, the parents merely gave in and allowed the child to dress and act as he felt most comfortable - which happened to be as a girl. When puberty became imminent, years later, the parents rejected the child's demand for a sex-change operation, agreeing only to hormone blocking which would enable the child to decide for, or against, a sex change operation when he was older....

I've known children threatening to hurt themselves if they didn't get a toy they wanted.
..

Silhouette believes that she- not a child's parents- working with the child's doctors- should decide on the best treatment for a child.

 

[MaryL]

Well you have to understand, the reason they're lesbians in the first place is rooted in such a deep disdain for the male gender that ...well...the obvious. Also, one of them still dresses and acts like a man usually, so the desire for normalcy persists while the simmering hatred bubbles up from below...

January 14, 2016
Lesbian couple 'beat one woman's 5-year-old son with a HAMMER, duct-taped his eyes and kicked him in the groin until he bled and suffered two strokes' Lesbian couple 'beat one woman's son, 5, until he suffered 2 strokes'

And don't forget about this one:

Boy Drugged By Lesbian "Parents" To Be A Girl


And this one:

A lesbian couple is facing 21 counts of child abuse after being accused of abusing their three children....Eraca Dwan Craig, 31, and Christian Jessica DeAnda, 44, of Salinas, California...The Monterey Herald reports that the girl was covered in bruises when a welfare worker went to the visit the couple's home on March 14, and then revealed that she was chained to the floor 'all day, every day.'..In addition to their 8-year-old daughter, the couple have two sons, ages 5 and 3-years-old Lesbians who chained daughter to wall so she couldn't eat stand trial

^^ All three kids were on the verge of starvation. Only the daughter was chained up every day though.

I think that when people give themselves a proud identity derived from a type of wrong sex (in this case, lesbian) they practice (sex is for procreation), then the barn door sort of gets kicked open for any other wrong sex being embraced.

And just in general, identifying yourself as a lesbian, say, is really a way of saying "I subconsciously or consciously loathe males so much that I would rather have sex with a female dressed up as a man than an actual man". Or "I can and should justify drugging my son to be a girl". Or "I can justify kicking my little boy in the balls and beating him with a hammer because men suck"...

Of the two identical twin girls I know that I've been discussing on another thread, one turned out gay and the other straight. So there's that. But there's a further story too. One of the lesbian moms of these twins, the lipstick one a friend of mine got to know to where she divulged her sordid past. Turns out she was molested by a man when she was little and grew up simultaneously fearing men but also lusting after them because of the imprinted sexualizing as a child. So her way of resolving this was to be with a butch lesbian... They still had epic fights so there was no resolution. The eventually split up and the women went back and forth between men and butch lesbians in her relationships to this day.

..I could go on and on with this woman's checkered and waffling sexual manifestations of earlier abuse, except it would divert from the point I'm trying to make, which is this:

ATLANTA [2005 Clinical Psychiatry News] -- Substance abuse is pervasive among gay men and is so intricately intertwined with epidemics of depression, partner abuse, and childhood sexual abuse that adequately addressing one issue requires attention to the others as well, said Ronald Stall, Ph.D., chief of prevention research for the division of HIV/AIDS prevention at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta...

Now the LGBT professional blogger crew will show up spamming this thread in no time, claiming that "most molestation and abuse occurs from heteros". Except that it doesn't, not really. The propensity (likelihood of the tendency to abuse sexually) occurs more frequently (and probably as you might suspect) in people who embrace wrong sex as an identity (homosexuals, as an example):

Here's what the Mayo Clinic says about the demographics who sexually abuse children:

Pedophiles are usually attracted to a particular age range and/or sex of child. Research categorizes male pedophiles by whether they are attracted to only male children (homosexual pedophilia), female children (heterosexual pedophilia),or children from both sexes (bisexual pedophilia). The percentage of homosexual pedophiles ranges from 9% to 40%, which is approximately 4 to 20 times higher than the rate of adult men attracted to other adult men http://www.drrichardhall.com/Articles/pedophiles.pdf

So, in short, homosexuals molest children up to 40% of all childhood molestation reports (those that are reported, boys tend to under report when they are molested because of stigma and shame being buggered by a man). So the LGBT payroll bloggers will say that "see! 40% is less than 60%!" But what you need to understand is that homosexuals only make up (for now, numbers growing) around 2-5% of the entire population. So we have 2-5% of the entire population accounting for approaching half of all child molestation. That's what you call "a propensity to molest".

I think red flags should appear when adults are creating identities from their sexual kinks, parading them down streets in "pride" and then wanting to involve children in their lives. Their obvious and screaming mental wounds are poised to infect the children who are sucked into their midst by natural birth or by adoption. At the very least, anyone identifying themselves and parading any type but especially unusual sexual behavior in public as a constant part of their persona should be watched closely if they are entrusted with the unsupervised care of children..

Gays are an artificial class not mentioned in the bill of rights or Constitution. And they don't NEED nor have a "right" to adopt. This is something we allow, its a PRIVILEDGE based on intellect, but not a basic human prerogative. Humans pro create heterosexually. Homosexuality isn't going to make to many babies, it's just an excuse.

 

[Silhouette]

Are you in favor of incestuous marriage?

You said you thought that the lesbians who kicked their son in the groin (gender hate crime) until he had two strokes were "monsters". Then I asked you to tell us whether or not you thought the two lesbians drugging their son to eventually cut his genitals clean off (gender hate crime via coercion) were also "monsters". You have conspicuously neglected to answer that question.

I would like your answer. We'll talk about your off-topic non sequitur in another thread. You're aware of the rules of staying on topic I assume?

 

[mdk]

Sil is so concerned about the sexual abuse of children she described Josh Duggar's acts as 'playing doctor' and was more concerned with blaming gays for his acts. His victims...not so much. She mentioned Oprah more than the poor children he abused. Her concern for children ends the second she can't use them to further her anti-gay narrative. Fact.

 

[Silhouette]

Sil is so concerned about the sexual abuse of children she described Josh Duggar's acts as 'playing doctor' and was more concerned with blaming gays for his acts. His victims...not so much. She mentioned Oprah more than the poor children he abused. Her concern for children ends the second she can't use them to further her anti-gay narrative. Fact.

Stop covering for Syriusly's non sequitur by introducing your own. Stay on topic or be reported. It's that simple.

 

[mdk]

Sil is so concerned about the sexual abuse of children she described Josh Duggar's acts as 'playing doctor' and was more concerned with blaming gays for his acts. His victims...not so much. She mentioned Oprah more than the poor children he abused. Her concern for children ends the second she can't use them to further her anti-gay narrative. Fact.

Stop covering for Syriusly's non sequitur by introducing your own. Stay on topic or be reported. It's that simple.

Child sex abuse is mentioned in your OP. I am sorry if your own words reveal that you're full of shit when comes to caring about sexually abused children.

Report away, crybaby.

 

[Skylar]

Well you have to understand, the reason they're lesbians in the first place is rooted in such a deep disdain for the male gender that ...well...the obvious. Also, one of them still dresses and acts like a man usually, so the desire for normalcy persists while the simmering hatred bubbles up from below...

January 14, 2016
Lesbian couple 'beat one woman's 5-year-old son with a HAMMER, duct-taped his eyes and kicked him in the groin until he bled and suffered two strokes' Lesbian couple 'beat one woman's son, 5, until he suffered 2 strokes'

And don't forget about this one:

Boy Drugged By Lesbian "Parents" To Be A Girl


And this one:

A lesbian couple is facing 21 counts of child abuse after being accused of abusing their three children....Eraca Dwan Craig, 31, and Christian Jessica DeAnda, 44, of Salinas, California...The Monterey Herald reports that the girl was covered in bruises when a welfare worker went to the visit the couple's home on March 14, and then revealed that she was chained to the floor 'all day, every day.'..In addition to their 8-year-old daughter, the couple have two sons, ages 5 and 3-years-old Lesbians who chained daughter to wall so she couldn't eat stand trial

^^ All three kids were on the verge of starvation. Only the daughter was chained up every day though.

I think that when people give themselves a proud identity derived from a type of wrong sex (in this case, lesbian) they practice (sex is for procreation), then the barn door sort of gets kicked open for any other wrong sex being embraced.

And just in general, identifying yourself as a lesbian, say, is really a way of saying "I subconsciously or consciously loathe males so much that I would rather have sex with a female dressed up as a man than an actual man". Or "I can and should justify drugging my son to be a girl". Or "I can justify kicking my little boy in the balls and beating him with a hammer because men suck"...

Of the two identical twin girls I know that I've been discussing on another thread, one turned out gay and the other straight. So there's that. But there's a further story too. One of the lesbian moms of these twins, the lipstick one a friend of mine got to know to where she divulged her sordid past. Turns out she was molested by a man when she was little and grew up simultaneously fearing men but also lusting after them because of the imprinted sexualizing as a child. So her way of resolving this was to be with a butch lesbian... They still had epic fights so there was no resolution. The eventually split up and the women went back and forth between men and butch lesbians in her relationships to this day.

..I could go on and on with this woman's checkered and waffling sexual manifestations of earlier abuse, except it would divert from the point I'm trying to make, which is this:

ATLANTA [2005 Clinical Psychiatry News] -- Substance abuse is pervasive among gay men and is so intricately intertwined with epidemics of depression, partner abuse, and childhood sexual abuse that adequately addressing one issue requires attention to the others as well, said Ronald Stall, Ph.D., chief of prevention research for the division of HIV/AIDS prevention at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta...

Now the LGBT professional blogger crew will show up spamming this thread in no time, claiming that "most molestation and abuse occurs from heteros". Except that it doesn't, not really. The propensity (likelihood of the tendency to abuse sexually) occurs more frequently (and probably as you might suspect) in people who embrace wrong sex as an identity (homosexuals, as an example):

Here's what the Mayo Clinic says about the demographics who sexually abuse children:

Pedophiles are usually attracted to a particular age range and/or sex of child. Research categorizes male pedophiles by whether they are attracted to only male children (homosexual pedophilia), female children (heterosexual pedophilia),or children from both sexes (bisexual pedophilia). The percentage of homosexual pedophiles ranges from 9% to 40%, which is approximately 4 to 20 times higher than the rate of adult men attracted to other adult men http://www.drrichardhall.com/Articles/pedophiles.pdf

So, in short, homosexuals molest children up to 40% of all childhood molestation reports (those that are reported, boys tend to under report when they are molested because of stigma and shame being buggered by a man). So the LGBT payroll bloggers will say that "see! 40% is less than 60%!" But what you need to understand is that homosexuals only make up (for now, numbers growing) around 2-5% of the entire population. So we have 2-5% of the entire population accounting for approaching half of all child molestation. That's what you call "a propensity to molest".

I think red flags should appear when adults are creating identities from their sexual kinks, parading them down streets in "pride" and then wanting to involve children in their lives. Their obvious and screaming mental wounds are poised to infect the children who are sucked into their midst by natural birth or by adoption. At the very least, anyone identifying themselves and parading any type but especially unusual sexual behavior in public as a constant part of their persona should be watched closely if they are entrusted with the unsupervised care of children..

Gays are an artificial class not mentioned in the bill of rights or Constitution. And they don't NEED nor have a "right" to adopt. This is something we allow, its a PRIVILEDGE based on intellect, but not a basic human prerogative. Humans pro create heterosexually. Homosexuality isn't going to make to many babies, it's just an excuse.

Neither will infertility. But adoption is open to them too. And you don't get to define which rights people 'need' and which they don't. They have their rights regardless of what you believe.

 

[Skylar]

Sil is so concerned about the sexual abuse of children she described Josh Duggar's acts as 'playing doctor' and was more concerned with blaming gays for his acts. His victims...not so much. She mentioned Oprah more than the poor children he abused. Her concern for children ends the second she can't use them to further her anti-gay narrative. Fact.

The only time Sil gives a shit about children...is if she can use them to hurt gay people. That's it. The moment a child is no longer useful for her compulsive obsession....that child is beneath contempt.

Look at the hundreds of thousands of children of same sex couples that Sil gladly wants to hurt......for no particular reason. As denying marriage to same sex parents helps no child. But hurts hundreds of thousands of children.

 

[Rustic]

No, not really. Let's be blunt why would two lesbians want to raise some boy? That alone has to be questioned, or is it too politically incorrect to do such a thing??

I find most progressives are disingenuous in their intentions…

Why would any couple want to raise some boy? What is it you have against boys? Shouldn't they be raised?

In this case lesbians seem to be the wrong match, Due to their behavior toward the boy… I think he will have identity crisis in future years.

Why would he have an identity crisis? What is it you have to tell us?

This lesbian couple for starters, who supposedly loved him, kicking him in the nuts over and over again, the people who let them have this kid, The appeasers going to bat for this couple's lifestyle choice...
Everything about the story is fucked up

Well let us break this down:

• This lesbian couple for starters, who supposedly loved him, kicking him in the nuts over and over again,-there is no a poster in this thread who has not agreed that this abuse is horrible. You- in contrast- were the one who laughed at it.
• the people who let them have this kid, One of the two women is the boy's biological mother. Who do you think 'gave' the son to the biological mother
• The appeasers going to bat for this couple's lifestyle choice...Here is where your fucked up bigotry comes into play. Child abuse is not a lifestyle choice- no one is excusing this couples child abuse- the bigots are attacking this couple because they are lesbians.
• And remember- you are the only one in this thread who has laughed at the abuse this boy sufffered.

The mothers are monsters.

You are merely an asshole.

Laughing at the appeasers who stand up for this couple, because of political correctness...
It's not normal family, kid obviously found that out the hard way…

 

[Rustic]

You focus more on his "nuts" than the two strokes he had. I'm sure more than his genitals were abused. He probably suffered cranial damage too. But that doesn't appeal to your nut jokes.

I would say getting kicked in the nuts over and over again had a lot to do with the strokes?? Hes probably mentally damaged for life… that being kicked in the nuts over and over again by his lesbian parents trying to explain that I guess…

How many times do you have to say "kicked in the nuts". That's not the most important detail of this story. This child was beaten within an inch of his life. That has nothing to do with his parents being female.

I'm beginning to think that he's getting some kind of titillation from saying it again and again.

But in all seriousness it's lesbianskicking a kid in the nuts over and over again, Who happens to be their adopted kid. You really think that should be ignored, that detail? …

In all seriousness- all child abuse is tragic- you only care about this case because the parents are lesbians.

In the two months since the news story of this tragic came out there have been hundreds of cases of children- adoptive and biological- being beaten or raped by their parents- probably 97% of the time by straight people.

You haven't expressed concern for any of them.

You really think that all of those kids should be ignored- just because their mom's aren't lesbians?

It's a fucked up family, the kid found that out the hard way...

 

[EverCurious]

The child in the aforementioned case threatened to self-mutilate, the parents merely gave in and allowed the child to dress and act as he felt most comfortable - which happened to be as a girl. When puberty became imminent, years later, the parents rejected the child's demand for a sex-change operation, agreeing only to hormone blocking which would enable the child to decide for, or against, a sex change operation when he was older....

I've known children threatening to hurt themselves if they didn't get a toy they wanted.

Also, has it occurred to any child psychologist involved that the boy might be rejecting his gender because he sees both of the adult women in his life (the only "parents" he knows) utterly rejecting his gender by their daily example of refusing to be with men; even when a male was necessary to produce him?

Until we know exactly what's going on, without blocking regressive therapy to get to the bottom of it, you can't justify drugging a child because he threatens to hurt himself otherwise..

Interesting every happily married woman on the planet "refuses to be with other men" as well, your interpretation of cause and effect are terribly flawed...

Though you're right, /I/ can't, but the /doctor's/ who go to school for such things can, and did.