Michigan has 500,000 more registered voters than eligible voters

[j-mac]

Money, personnel, manpower, lack of resources.
Too, if a registered voter hasn't voted in 6yrs and he/she is still on the rolls.....so?

Voter could be dead, had moved to another precinct, to another state, joined the military, had personal travails. So 500,000 registered voters don't vote......in Michigan. So?

It’s incumbent upon the voter to ensure their registration is correct, and valid.

I believe that voter roles should be examined every year to ensure that only those properly registered are included on them.

Is there a problem with that?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

It’s incumbent upon the voter to ensure their registration is correct, and valid.

I believe that voter roles should be examined every year to ensure that only those properly registered are included on them.

Is there a problem with that?

The only problem is that your reasons are bunk, caused by lies from a fat orange rapist. And that people are using you, so that they can try to steal an election for the fat rapist again.

Since there is no significant fraud to worry about, you will keep believing these lies, and nothing anyone does will ever be good enough.

 

[Nostra]

It's not an opinion. It's his own words. Anyone who knows them and disagrees with me is simply a conspiracy nutsack himself.

Cool.

Quote his own words Fort Fun Indiana .

Watch this.........................

 

[EMH]

Instead of just whining about anonymously under a fake name.....get off your butt and be a man about it.
Do something. Maybe explain and prove, for a start.

You don't want to be viewed as a snowflake, do you poster EMH?

What, are you working with Chris Wray and the FBI to set up another hate hoaxed "kidnapping attempt" on Gretched Witchmer?

 

[ThisIsMe]

It says that is NOT the case, they are simply inactive voters.... In Michigan's system???


THE FACTS: This is missing context. While the state does have more total voter registrations than eligible voters, that number includes voters who are inactive but cannot yet be removed from voter rolls under federal and state laws. The number of active voters is far less than those who are eligible to vote, and experts say there is no reason to believe that widespread fraud will result.

It’s a mix of inactive voters and ineligible voters, who need to be removed from the rolls but can’t YET due to federal and state laws.

A lot of these registrations are people who have moved across the state, or out of the state, yet they are still on the voter rolls incorrectly.

These people need to be removed from the voter rolls so things like what almost happened in Arizona is not repeated.

 

[ThisIsMe]

Nope, not a problem at all. As the article describes quite neatly.

oh? Where does is say that?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

oh? Where does is say that?

I think it was about halfway down, thanks for asking. Odd question, considering you posted the article. It shows how this is just a normal state of affairs. Most of the article was spent on doing so, in fact. So again, odd question.

 

[Chillicothe]

I believe that voter roles should be examined every year to ensure that only those properly registered are included on them. Is there a problem with that?

Those that are on those Michigan rolls and are now the subject of GOP angst...ARE ....properly registered as you require.

They just haven't voted for several years. For a whole variety of reasons.....legitimate reasons personal to them.
Our legally mandated election governance takes the position that a properly registered voter not voting for one or more cycles should not lose their legal right to vote.

-----------------------------------------------------

"What, are you working with Chris Wray and the FBI to set up another hate hoaxed "kidnapping....."

You are one of the reasons I come to this gossip-board for entertainment. Please do not get kicked out again or even go back to the Q-Anon chatboard. You are too much fun! Salude!

 

[EMH]

the Q-Anon

Q-Anon and Chris Wray have a lot in common, both love to HATE HOAX....

Q-Anon SHEmon Jacob Chansley is a LEFT WING GAY who was Dykey Nancy's GUEST OF HONOR on 1/6, and did a selfie with Nancy's daughter. Chansley came in via the garage, which is why he was escorted as GUEST OF HONOR to Senate and let loose there.

 

[Care4all]

It’s a mix of inactive voters and ineligible voters, who need to be removed from the rolls but can’t YET due to federal and state laws.

A lot of these registrations are people who have moved across the state, or out of the state, yet they are still on the voter rolls incorrectly.

These people need to be removed from the voter rolls so things like what almost happened in Arizona is not repeated.

If they vote in person, they will be taken from inactive to active.... If they are out of State temporarily, they would have to request an absentee ballot to vote, and where to mail it.

All of these transactions would have a paper trail.

 

[ThisIsMe]

I think it was about halfway down, thanks for asking. Odd question, considering you posted the article. It shows how this is just a normal state of affairs. Most of the article was spent on doing so, in fact. So again, odd question.

See, but it doesn’t say that, and like usual, you don’t actually post any quotes to make an argument, or back up what you say, you just say it and expect everyone to believe it.

The article quite clearly says there are more registered voters than there are voting age citizens, by 500,000…as stated in the OP

 

[ThisIsMe]

If they vote in person, they will be taken from inactive to active.... If they are out of State temporarily, they would have to request an absentee ballot to vote, and where to mail it.

All of these transactions would have a paper trail.

I’m not suggesting there is fraud, I’m saying their voter roles are over 500,000 people who are due for deletion, have haven’t voted in over six years, but can’t be removed because state laws say they have to go through 2 federal election cycles.

The problem is that, it’s a problem that never gets solved because there are probably inactive voters who are currently in the middle of the waiting period who are scheduled for deletion who are in the middle of their cycle and will have to wait for another 4 years from today.

Now, imagine how many other states have voter rolls that are out of balance like that. Imagine if those states automatically mail out ballots to all registered voters. How many duplicate voter registrations there are out there, where people are registered to vote in multiple states.

Our voter system is just sloppy. You’d think we would be smart enough to have fixed this by now. Automatic periodic purges would help with this. Everyone should be required to register to vote every few years and show proof of citizenship before they are given the voter registration paperwork.

 

[BluesLegend]

Michigan is a class A cheat state, complete with a witch as Gov.

They'll have to switch votes this time, too many unhappy former Dems there...

Did you know Democrats bus people from Ohio up into Michigan to rig elections? Dems involved were caught on video admitting it.

 

[EMH]

Did you know Democrats bus people from Ohio up into Michigan to rig elections? Dems involved were caught on video admitting it.

As long as Chris Wray and Garland are in charge of justice, they will get away with it...

 

[martybegan]

They are removed as active voters and put as INACTIVE voters...until they can be legally removed under federal and Michigan law.

They are updated, that's why there are 1.2 million in inactive voters...

Did you even READ the article link? Yes or no?

I just don't like the use of the term "purging", it implies doing something against the law.

 

[candycorn]

Nice, 500,000 votes for Harris. Republicans might as well stay home.

 

[Care4all]

I just don't like the use of the term "purging", it implies doing something against the law.

It can be against the law, if the rules and laws to do so, are not followed....other than that, purging dead people, felons, non citizens, people moved etc is NOT against the law...

I agree, purging could give the impression of illegal disenfranchisement of citizens...

 

[Luckyone]

What could possibly go wrong?

Nothing if you are on the blue team.

You tell me what could possibly go wrong! explain the consequences that you are imagining.

 

[Independent thinker]

You tell me what could possibly go wrong! explain the consequences that you are imagining.

Explain what you are imagining Mr. Banker.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

If they vote in person, they will be taken from inactive to active.... If they are out of State temporarily, they would have to request an absentee ballot to vote, and where to mail it.

All of these transactions would have a paper trail.

That's right. And as the article points.out, the odds of people voting in two states are virtually zero.