Michigan has 500,000 more registered voters than eligible voters

Doesn’t matter. If they’re ineligible, then they shouldn’t be voting period.

and there is no indication they did.

Didn’t pay attention in civics?

Well I sure do not recall them teaching about a law that requires me to report to the Govt that I am moving.

Do you have a link to said law?
 

Someone on the “inactive list” who votes in person has to prove residency and ID

Someone on the inactive list who votes absentee will have their ballot marked “challenged” . If an election is close the challenged votes are examined

Calm down and stop believing f bullshit

This is Federal law
 
and there is no indication they did.
So, leave it alone and hope it doesn’t happen? Or, just leave them on the roles so, what? Dems can use them in upcoming elections? No.
Well I sure do not recall them teaching about a law that requires me to report to the Govt that I am moving.

Do you have a link to said law?
I never said it was a law, I said you have a responsibility.
 
Clean the rolls in-between elections, not 1 month before one.



According to you.
This has been going on for many years. When is the best time this will be done? When this constitution is gone, you will not like the new one that you are birthing. And the world may not like the dictatorial declining power getting vicious to keep relevance.
 
Then it would have not been taught in civics class 44 years ago.
We were taught that voting was a privilege, not a right, therefore, it was incumbent on us to make sure of a couple of things....

1. make sure that our registration was current.

2. that if we move we must make sure we can vote in the place where we move to....

And lastly, Why is it that Democrats are so against making sure that ineligible names on the roles, are purged?
 
1. make sure that our registration was current.

2. that if we move we must make sure we can vote in the place where we move to....

I have always done those two things.

Why is it that Democrats are so against making sure that ineligible names on the roles, are purged?

I cannot speak to why the Dems to anything. For me the Govt should always err on the side of the voter and not remove people unless it is certain they are no longer eligible.
 
I have always done those two things.
Ok.
I cannot speak to why the Dems to anything. For me the Govt should always err on the side of the voter and not remove people unless it is certain they are no longer eligible.
That's easy to settle...Send a notice that the name will be removed from the voter roles, and give the remedies if it's in error...It's super easy to take care of...
 
That's easy to settle...Send a notice that the name will be removed from the voter roles, and give the remedies if it's in error...It's super easy to take care of...

Yep, it is. Just do not do it so close to the election people do not have time to respond
 
Yep, it is. Just do not do it so close to the election people do not have time to respond
I believe that the VA courts already ruled similar to what your wishes are...In MI, there seems to be a great deal of people that are erroneously still on the roles. It's a dem run state. Why wasn't this corrected before now?
 
I believe that the VA courts already ruled similar to what your wishes are..

Indeed they did, the judge actually followed the law as passed by Congress and signed by the POTUS.

Weird I know

In MI, there seems to be a great deal of people that are erroneously still on the roles. It's a dem run state. Why wasn't this corrected before now?

Again, I have no clue why Dems do or do not do anything. I am not sure why you keep asking me, you seem to know far more about them than I do
 
Indeed they did, the judge actually followed the law as passed by Congress and signed by the POTUS.

Weird I know
Did I say any differently? Seems like you're trying your best to start a fight here....What's the matter, can't discuss a subject without the trolling?
Again, I have no clue why Dems do or do not do anything. I am not sure why you keep asking me, you seem to know far more about them than I do
Then why participate in the thread if you admittedly don't have a clue what you're talking about?
 
15th post
I guess Harpy didn't want to discuss anymore....I wonder why?
 
Don't legitimate this terrible acting. This is all bullshit to set up a challenge to the election by a fat orange sore loser.
 
Did I say any differently? Seems like you're trying your best to start a fight here....What's the matter, can't discuss a subject without the trolling?

Once again, proving you were born without a sense of irony.

Then why participate in the thread if you admittedly don't have a clue what you're talking about?

I do not have a clue why the Dems do things, why Dems do things is not the topic of the thread. Talk about trying to start a fight.

I guess Harpy didn't want to discuss anymore....I wonder why?

I went to the gym, sorry for not giving you the attention you clearly crave from me
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom