Mexico says it will not accept migrants deported by Texas under new state law

[SavannahMann]

Duh!!!!!!! how is it you're so fking stupid?

That judge in the article was appointed by Trump. Are you saying Trump appointed a liberal?

 

[jc456]

That judge in the article was appointed by Trump. Are you saying Trump appointed a liberal?

I give two shits. follow the money cuck!!!!

 

[jc456]

When I got my Concealed Weapons License, I attended a training course that covered the law, and the responsibility for carrying. That course, taught by an off duty cop, explained how I could find myself in jail for doing what some would say is the right thing.

That’s how I knew the McMichaels were in big trouble over Arbury. Same state. Same laws. They literally did everything I was told would get me arrested if I was dumb enough to do it.

Don’t blame me if the laws don’t say what you think they should. I prefer to live in the real world. I prefer to deal with truth instead of propaganda. And I intend to avoid the idiotic RW excuse about how unfair it is that the laws don’t say what I think they should.

not sure what that has to do with open borders?

 

[Resnic]

Well, since many of the illegals are not from Mexico, deport them to Sanctuary cities.

Hope you meant sanctuary countries.

Cities would mean cities in America. And despite a city or states political affiliation all these illegals being here hurt America as a whole. Yeah Chicago, California, new York, etc are all shit holes but they are still a part of America. And I love all of America, even the blue areas. Even something negative that effects a blue city negativity still effects the whole country negativity.

 

[jc456]

Hope you meant sanctuary countries.

Cities would mean cities in America. And despite a city or states political affiliation all these illegals being here hurt America as a whole. Yeah Chicago, California, new York, etc are all shit holes but they are still a part of America. And I love all of America, even the blue areas. Even something negative that effects a blue city negativity still effects the whole country negativity.

those cities pay for them to come here. They are here because of them!!!

 

[elektra]

Actually you don’t - every person is eligible to make the case for asylum under current law.
Although they are presumed ineligible, they have a chance to prove otherwise. About 1% succeed.

actually you don't? dont what? You need to quote so I know what you are speaking of.
Make the case for asylum? Technically, you are responding to something a bit different than making the case for asylum. Yes, everybody can make the case for asylum.

We are talking about people ineligible, making the case that they should be able to overcome their ineligible status due specific circumstances.

Which is it that you think you are addressing by coming to the rescue of Savannah, because make no mistake, which you did, that these are two separate issues.

We are now speaking of ineligible persons. Eligible persons do not break the law.

Fact Sheet: Circumvention of Lawful Pathways Final Rule | Homeland Security

As part of the Biden-Harris Administration’s work to prepare for the end of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Title 42 public health Order, which will expire after May 11, 2023, and to return to processing all noncitizens under Title 8 immigration authorities, the Department of...

www.dhs.gov

Noncitizens who cross the southwest land border or adjacent coastal borders of the United States without authorization after traveling through a third country will be presumed ineligible for asylum unless they, or a member of their family with whom they are traveling, meet one of three exceptions:

• They were provided authorization to travel to the United States pursuant to a DHS-approved parole process;
• They used the CBP One app to schedule a time and place to present at a port of entry, or they presented at a port of entry without using the CBP One app and established that it was not possible to access or use the CBP One app due to a language barrier, illiteracy, significant technical failure, or other ongoing and serious obstacle; or
• They applied for and were denied asylum in a third country en route to the United States.

Unaccompanied children are exempted from the rebuttable presumption.

Noncitizens can rebut the presumption of asylum ineligibility in exceptionally compelling circumstances, including if they demonstrate that, at the time of their unauthorized entry, they or a member of their family with whom they were traveling:

• Faced an acute medical emergency;
• Faced an extreme and imminent threat to their life or safety, such as an imminent threat of rape, kidnapping, torture, or murder; or
• Were a victim of a severe form of trafficking, as defined in 8 CFR § 214.11.

If an asylum officer determines that the noncitizen is not subject to, is excepted from, or has rebutted the presumption of asylum ineligibility, the asylum officer’s credible fear determination would follow existing procedures, including the screening for eligibility for asylum, withholding of removal, and Convention Against Torture (CAT) protection under a significant possibility standard.

If an asylum officer determines that the noncitizen is subject to and has not made a sufficient showing of being excepted from or rebutting the presumption, the asylum officer’s screening would be limited to determining whether the noncitizen has demonstrated a reasonable possibility of persecution or torture in the designated country of removal. If a reasonable possibility of persecution or torture is established, the noncitizen will be issued a notice to appear for removal proceedings before an immigration judge.

 

[the watcher]

Why don't drug families in Mexico send cash to the Newmericans here to help them? Why doesn't it work like that?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Properly says they submit the claim while physically within the United States.

Well, they broke the rules to come into the country, ship them out and try again the right way.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Wrong. They would be charged under Federal Law for depriving the people of their rights under color of law. Five cops were just sentenced to decades in prison for those charges not related to immigration in Mississippi.

Nah. Fuck 'em.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

It can be done. It just needs some legislative fixes. Fixes the Republicans opposed. They want this, and they want to keep the status quo.

Biden fucked up at the border, now he can run on his fuckup.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Presumed is not insured. They still get a hearing. Presumed means they have a higher standard of proof.

Show your proof now. No proof? Buh bye.

That'd take like a minute per fake claim.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Some folks call marener MORONer

He is MORONest

 

[jc456]

It can be done. It just needs some legislative fixes. Fixes the Republicans opposed. They want this, and they want to keep the status quo.

ukraine isn't part of our border last I looked. Hmmmm how does that work?

 

[Thinker101]

Hope you meant sanctuary countries.

Cities would mean cities in America. And despite a city or states political affiliation all these illegals being here hurt America as a whole. Yeah Chicago, California, new York, etc are all shit holes but they are still a part of America. And I love all of America, even the blue areas. Even something negative that effects a blue city negativity still effects the whole country negativity.

I understand and agree, although, sanctuary cities/states need to learn a hard and fast lesson.

 

[jc456]

I understand and agree, although, sanctuary cities/states need to learn a hard and fast lesson.

what else did they intend after making such a legal statement?

 

[Invisibleflash]

Well then....... There's that. Texas can arrest and try to deport them. But apparently Mexico isn't going to give them the chance.

Mexico says it will not accept migrants deported by Texas under new state law​

March 19 (UPI) -- Mexico will not accept migrants deported by Texas, its foreign ministry said after the U.S. Supreme Court let stand a controversial law that allows Texas police to arrest people suspected of crossing into the state illegally.

The foreign ministry issued the statement Tuesday, condemning Texas Senate Bill 4, which makes it a criminal offense to illegally cross in to Texas via the Texas-Mexico border. The law also requires Texas judges to order those convicted to be returned to Mexico.

Make a door in the fence and shove the illegals through the door.

Reality?

 

[Staidhup]

Well then....... There's that. Texas can arrest and try to deport them. But apparently Mexico isn't going to give them the chance.

Mexico says it will not accept migrants deported by Texas under new state law​

March 19 (UPI) -- Mexico will not accept migrants deported by Texas, its foreign ministry said after the U.S. Supreme Court let stand a controversial law that allows Texas police to arrest people suspected of crossing into the state illegally.

The foreign ministry issued the statement Tuesday, condemning Texas Senate Bill 4, which makes it a criminal offense to illegally cross in to Texas via the Texas-Mexico border. The law also requires Texas judges to order those convicted to be returned to Mexico.

That speaks volumes, they don’t want them so dump them on America.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Fine, just set-up a compound in TX and incarcerate them.

Right! Much more expensive and much more cruel! Just what we expect from the white nationalists.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Well, they broke the rules to come into the country, ship them out and try again the right way.

Sounds easy! I wonder why nobody thought of it?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

I understand and agree, although, sanctuary cities/states need to learn a hard and fast lesson.

And the white nationalist idea for that is being cruel to human beings. Naturally.

The cruelty is the point.