Men who run into burning buildings, walk into warzones, and keep the worst of society locked away typically don't vote left. Does this matter?

[Correll]

You are out of your element here. Just take the loss on move on:

Dude. Save teh shit talk for someone who might be impressed. Like your pothead buddies.

For decades Republicans actively promoted the idea that affirmative action involved unfair "racial preferences" or "quotas". Just a few examples of your bullshit statement refuted by actions in the 90s. The 2000’s were even worse.

So, I point to generations of formal government policy and practice and you ignore that and point instead to some republicans, CORRECTLY, discussing the fact that Affrimative Action involves anti-white discrimination.

Yes, during the time period in question, the gop held to the consensus despite the growing realization that the status quo was nothing but a form of anti-white racism.

That does not refute my point that we have had a bi-partisan consensus on equality for blacks. Just that a growing portion of people, republicans especially were not prepared to be racist against whites in the pursuit of that goal.

Equal Opportunity Act of 1995 (sponsored by Bob Dole) would have banned federal affirmative action programs.

Proposition 209 (1996) was a California ballot initiative, championed by Republicans and their allies, successfully amended the state constitution to prohibit state government entities from considering race

So,... are you supporting the idea that the only way to advance black equality is be discriminiating against whites?

 

[Correll]

Nixon didn't fight racism, the overwhelmingly democratic congress fought racism.

Here's a hint... Carl Albert and Mike Mansfield

nixon desegregated southern schools. That is an historical fact.

Would you like to admit that, or live in denial some more.

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

The southern white conservatives?

Didn’t work. Everybody knows the southern democrats were the racists.

 

[frackapisa]

Dude. Save teh shit talk for someone who might be impressed. Like your pothead buddies.



So, I point to generations of formal government policy and practice and you ignore that and point instead to some republicans, CORRECTLY, discussing the fact that Affrimative Action involves anti-white discrimination.

Yes, during the time period in question, the gop held to the consensus despite the growing realization that the status quo was nothing but a form of anti-white racism.

That does not refute my point that we have had a bi-partisan consensus on equality for blacks. Just that a growing portion of people, republicans especially were not prepared to be racist against whites in the pursuit of that goal.




So,... are you supporting the idea that the only way to advance black equality is be discriminiating against whites?

It's the same way that chemotherapy fights cancer.

 

[frackapisa]

nixon desegregated southern schools. That is an historical fact.

Would you like to admit that, or live in denial some more.

Was this a new "Nixon" policy, or was he just faithfully executing the law?

 

[frackapisa]

Didn’t work. Everybody knows the southern democrats were the racists.

The operative word is "were".

As opposed to republicans "are" racist.

 

[citygator]

Dude. Save teh shit talk for someone who might be impressed. Like your pothead buddies.



So, I point to generations of formal government policy and practice and you ignore that and point instead to some republicans, CORRECTLY, discussing the fact that Affrimative Action involves anti-white discrimination.

Yes, during the time period in question, the gop held to the consensus despite the growing realization that the status quo was nothing but a form of anti-white racism.

That does not refute my point that we have had a bi-partisan consensus on equality for blacks. Just that a growing portion of people, republicans especially were not prepared to be racist against whites in the pursuit of that goal.




So,... are you supporting the idea that the only way to advance black equality is be discriminiating against whites?

I rest my case. You literally proved my point. I mean, your whole tirade has been the GOP since they adopted the southern strategy.

 

[Correll]

It's the same way that chemotherapy fights cancer.

Common leftards tactic.

i make a serious point, backed up with citing long term government policy, and your response is vague to the point of... retarded.


If I address it as you clearly meant it, you retreat adn pretend you meant something else and act offended that I would say something so mean about you.


If I ask for clarification, you dance and weave like a spastic kangeroo.


And all the while you avoid my point, like a vampire running from a whole field of crosses.


You ever stop to that that every time you play a retard game like that, that you are admitting to yourself that you know you are on the wrong side?

 

[Correll]

Was this a new "Nixon" policy, or was he just faithfully executing the law?

I believe the law was on the books already, but he was the first to aggressive enforce it.

I consider that a Nixon policy, as it was a change from the previous policy.


Regardless either way, he was enforcing it. He did it. That is him fighting racism and segregation, in support of the goal of equality for blacks.


I was asked for an example of the Republcians supporting "progress" on equality for blacks and there is a good example.


Would you like to admit that, or would you like to pretend to be too retarded to understand it?

 

[Correll]

I rest my case. You literally proved my point. I mean, your whole tirade has been the GOP since they adopted the southern strategy.

My point stands. This nation has had a bi-partisan consensus on equality for blacks since the mid 60s.


BOTH partiers have supported the recent status quo of enforced affirmative action, which was a massive program of discriminating in favor of blacks at teh expense of whites.


During that period, many voices were raised, criticizing the obvious racism of discriminating by race.

But that being against anti-white racism is not the same as supporting anti-black racism. It is just being morally and intellectual CONSISTENT, in opposing both forms of racism.

AND, it is worth nothign that until Trump SECOND TERM, that argument FAILED to win the republican primaries or internal debates.

So, my point about the consensus is true and your weird claim of proving something, is ******* retarded.

 

[BrokeLoser]

It's the same way that chemotherapy fights cancer.

I always like to ask a simple question that make woke white guilt wackos piss their pants…
Get ready…here goes….How did ending racism enhance and improve America for it’s core people?
Didn’t it get us a bunch of savages turned loose to terrorize the American public?
Didn’t it get us 40-50 million illegal thirdworlders and millions of anchor babies to **** the place up?
Didn’t we end up with Ragheads taking over beautiful American cities like Minneapolis?
Didn’t dark people destroy our public education, healthcare, social and emergency services?
Didn’t they destroy blue collar trades and the middle-class?
Didn’t we end up with a divided citizenry?

So try not to piss yourself, keep your cool and tell us…how was ending racism good for America?
By the way, is that you at center of this image?

 

[frackapisa]

Common leftards tactic.

i make a serious point, backed up with citing long term government policy, and your response is vague to the point of... retarded.


If I address it as you clearly meant it, you retreat adn pretend you meant something else and act offended that I would say something so mean about you.


If I ask for clarification, you dance and weave like a spastic kangeroo.


And all the while you avoid my point, like a vampire running from a whole field of crosses.


You ever stop to that that every time you play a retard game like that, that you are admitting to yourself that you know you are on the wrong side?

Over your head,.

The only way to fight discrimination is like the only way to fight cancer.
There is no way of killing "only" what you're targeting. And there is collateral damage that can't be avoided.

So in a zero-sum employment system, you are discriminating against everyone you aren't targeting for affirmative action.

If you're promoting employment of women, you're discriminating against black men and white men,

 

[frackapisa]

I always like to ask a simple question that make woke white guilt wackos piss their pants…
Get ready…here goes….How did ending racism enhance and improve America for it’s core people?
Didn’t it get us a bunch of savages turned loose to terrorize the American public?
Didn’t it get us 40-50 million illegal thirdworlders and millions of anchor babies to **** the place up?
Didn’t we end up with Ragheads taking over beautiful American cities like Minneapolis?
Didn’t dark people destroy our public education, healthcare, social and emergency services?
Didn’t they destroy blue collar trades and the middle-class?
Didn’t we end up with a divided citizenry?

So try not to piss yourself, keep your cool and tell us…how was ending racism good for America?
By the way, is that you at center of this image?
View attachment 1146550

Except none of that had anything to do with affirmative action.

Sorry

 

[BrokeLoser]

Except none of that had anything to do with affirmative action.

Sorry

Hahaha…hold on.
You’re unable to draw a straight line from the end of racism to the implementation of affirmative action?

 

[Correll]

Over your head,.

The only way to fight discrimination is like the only way to fight cancer.
There is no way of killing "only" what you're targeting. And there is collateral damage that can't be avoided.

So in a zero-sum employment system, you are discriminating against everyone you aren't targeting for affirmative action.

If you're promoting employment of women, you're discriminating against black men and white men,

So, you are actually AGREEING with me that the policy of the federal government, supported by BOTH partiers and BOTH party's voters,


was to discriminate against whites in favor of blacks to try to reach black equality.


Interesting. Yet you are attacking me for pointing out something you agree is the hisorical truth, instead of attacking the other leftard who is denying that this is the case.


Help me beat some sense into this fool. Then we can discuss what we as a society should do NEXT, now that white people are done with this game.

 

[Anomalism]

View attachment 1146550

Where is that picture from? Wow...

 

[Zincwarrior]

There are obviously exceptions to the rule, but I am speaking in general right now.

Right wing men disproportionately fill the roles, cultures, and mindsets that involve physical risk, sacrifice, duty-based identity, warrior ethos, and a willingness to die for what they believe in. Those aren’t just job categories; they’re dispositions, and culturally, the right is more aligned with that stoic, confrontational, protector archetype. That’s just reality. Most men willing to fight and die for what they believe in are on the political right. Most of the military, law enforcement, first responders, and tradesmen, jobs that demand discipline, sacrifice, and risk, are overwhelmingly right leaning. The right still embraces traditional masculine virtues such as courage, duty, honor, protection, and the stoic acceptance of pain or death if necessary.

Is there anything to be gleaned from this reality?

Many of them also belong to unions.

 

[Zincwarrior]

Are left wing men in general just more cowardly and effeminate?

Trump dodged the Draft.

 

[g5000]

There are obviously exceptions to the rule, but I am speaking in general right now.

Right wing men disproportionately fill the roles, cultures, and mindsets that involve physical risk, sacrifice, duty-based identity, warrior ethos, and a willingness to die for what they believe in. Those aren’t just job categories; they’re dispositions, and culturally, the right is more aligned with that stoic, confrontational, protector archetype. That’s just reality. Most men willing to fight and die for what they believe in are on the political right. Most of the military, law enforcement, first responders, and tradesmen, jobs that demand discipline, sacrifice, and risk, are overwhelmingly right leaning. The right still embraces traditional masculine virtues such as courage, duty, honor, protection, and the stoic acceptance of pain or death if necessary.

Is there anything to be gleaned from this reality?

Are you feeling inadequate or something?

 

[g5000]

Are you actually going to argue that most law enforcement, military, first responders and tradesmen don't lean conservative? Do you live in reality?

You are not living in reality.

Stop dodging. Where is your data? You are spewing assumptions.

Faulty ones, in fact.

Here is a survey of the veterans of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars done just before the 2024 election:

Presidential Candidate Choice:

• The vote is statistically tied between the two candidates. When ballot options include third party candidates the results are:
  
  • 43% VP Harris
  • 42% former President Trump
  • 15% Third Party, Other
  
  
  
  

  IAVA Surveyed Members in Run-up to the General Election. Here are the Results! | Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America

  iava.org