Meet the next Supreme court justice Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson

[bodecea]

You're just irrated, Colon

You sqauwk and people takes shots at your dumfuckery.

Once again Bidum fcked uo

English please.

 

[bodecea]

You just support it for....wait for it.....black woman


Dumbass, you're a feeble *****

Well, there we have it.....con-firmation that it's about race and gender with the Far Right.

 

[bodecea]

Thank you for your well researched hatred and ignorance . It's a quality rarely seen in republicans.

I sense sarcasm in that last part.

 

[bodecea]

Go away Irrated Colon.

Absolutely nobody cares.


I know I don't

This seems to be an MO...."go away"....as if this poster has the power to make people leave and wishes to silence others. And posts again and again and again about how they "don't care".

 

[BackAgain]

She's going to be excellent. I believe she has more judicial experience than all the Republican Justices COMBINED. She will be the only Justice who has ever defended someone in court. She's the first Justice who served as a Public Defender.

Synthia, you’re such a petty little poseur. Judge Jackson has judicial experience no doubt. But that’s not more than the Republican Justices combined. Seriously, your lack of credibility gets underscored often enough without you straining to prove it.

Also, Judicial “experience” is hardly a major qualification. It is simply one qualification. I’m not a fan of many of the opinions of the late Justice William O. Douglas but he was a lib favorite for a long time. And do you know how much judicial experience he had prior to getting nominated for the SCOTUS? Exactly none.

You are orgasming ober the Brandon nomination of Judge Jackson for the very same reason I don’t care for her nomination. She’s a liberal; and her judicial philosophy is more liberal political philosophy than it is judicial. Fidelity to the constraints of the Constitution and the actual law is not your concern. Results are. Only results.

 

[bodecea]

Bbbuut she's a black woman

When that becomes the criteria it's an issue

Again, making it very clear that this is what you object to...and the ONLY thing you object to....her race and gender.

 

[bodecea]

**** you and your unique perspective excuse

My goodness....this is a very INCEL-like post.

 

[bodecea]

Name anything specific you disagree with

She just gave you two reasons.

 

[bodecea]

Dude stop trolling me

Interesting....to ask you to give legit and specific reasons why you object to Jackson in a thread about Jackson......you call it trolling.

 

[bodecea]

How are these not racist/sexist statements?

You are ascribing a point of view or set of values based on her skin color and the fact that she has a vagina

And it's telling how many on the Right object to her for those very same reasons.

 

[bodecea]

You'll get over it Mr 237K posts.

If not? I don't care

Again...."I don't care"......in how many posts in this thread so far? We've got it.............you object strictly based on Jackson's race and gender.

 

[bodecea]

A black woman? I'm shocked. Undoubtedly, the most qualified person in America for this job.

When a black woman has to be twice as good to get half as much credit....you are probably very correct.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

She will bring a unique perspective to the Supreme Court

A welcome addition

Unique how? Be specific

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Again...."I don't care"......in how many posts in this thread so far? We've got it.............you object strictly based on Jackson's race and gender.

And you support strictly on race and gender. Your hypocrisy is amazing.

 

[bodecea]

Doubtful but AA ratios has to be met

"AA ratios"? A women who went to one of the hardest and most prestigious law schools, clerked for the Supreme Court, was easily appointed to the Federal Bench (with the vetting involved)......but because she is a black women, it's all AA ratios to you. Very very telling.

 

[bodecea]

Unique how? Be specific

She's been a Public Defender.................been a long time since that perspective has been on the Supreme Court.

 

[bodecea]

And you support strictly on race and gender. Your hypocrisy is amazing.

Not at all....I support on her law school history, her SCOTUS clerking, her already done vetting by the Senate when she was appointed to a Federal Bench. Her qualifications match Chief Justice Roberts, but with more Federal bench time.

 

[bodecea]

Bish blah blah blah....and even more....blah

Now THIS ^ is trolling.

 

[rightwinger]

Unique how? Be specific

Unique as in unprecedented and not previously experienced

Now, If we were talking about a white, male, Protestant…..it would not be unique

Hope that clarifies for you

 

[Dogmaphobe]

I cannot lie, watching the Trumpers head explode over this pick is far more entertaining than it should be

By "Trumper", you must mean anybody who does not march in lockstep with authoritarian leftist identity politics.

When do you plan on abandoning your charade that you are actually some sort of libertarian?