The judicial Calvinball of Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson

[Superbadbrutha]

Only in your racist imagination. Your only two requirements is that she is black and a far left liberal who makes rulings on her feelings and political beliefs rather than the Constitution.

Are you telling me that the clowns we have on the SC now that their rulings are based on the Constitution? You have the nerve to talk about a racist imagination; well you definitely are not imagining yours.

 

[Superbadbrutha]

So you think going to public school, being a low-level judge who made a series of bad rulings and a public defender makes her more qualified than the rest of the court. Riiiight.

You think your weak, racist ass opinion really holds any water? Please point out all the great rulings that all of the white judges have made over the years that makes them so much more qualified than she is. Please list these rulings.

 

[Superbadbrutha]

So does your side.

You want in their box, but they don't want you in their box.

 

[Moonglow]

So does your side.

I don't have a side, that is the difference..I think you all suck equally.

 

[LeftofLeft]

You want in their box, but they don't want you in their box.

I don’t want in anybody’s box. Besides, “they” is at a 19 percent approval rating. “They” have no ideas or vision besides getTrump.

 

[LeftofLeft]

I don't have a side, that is the difference..I think you all suck equally.

Good for you because no side gives a flying **** what you think. It’s a harsh truth.

 

[Moonglow]

Good for you because no side gives a flying **** what you think. It’s a harsh truth.

It's like being married. I am not so egotistical as MAGATs to need to be heard.

 

[LeftofLeft]

It's like being married. I am not so egotistical as MAGATs to need to be heard.

Liberals are the ones that conflate free speech as a mandate to be heard.

 

[Moonglow]

Liberals are the ones that conflate free speech as a mandate to be heard.

It seems to be a civil right in the Constitution, but you hate it, I know.

 

[LeftofLeft]

It seems to be a civil right in the Constitution, but you hate it, I know.

Where is “a mandate to be heard” in the Constitution? That means, people must listen to people are saying. I’m all for free speech but there is no requirement or mandate in the Constitution that says people must listen to what I say or that I must listen to what they say. Free Speech is a Right. Listening is a choice. Know the difference. If you are in favor of mandates requiring people to listen to what others are saying, that l’s not a Constitutional issue. That’s Fascism.

 

[TheGreatSatan]

Put her credentials up against the rest. Not surprising that you would attack another black woman, smfh.

^^^ believes men can become women

 

[Superbadbrutha]

I don’t want in anybody’s box. Besides, “they” is at a 19 percent approval rating. “They” have no ideas or vision besides getTrump.

Sure you do. Let's see what they are at the mid terms. The only vision the right has is Project 2025.

 

[Superbadbrutha]

^^^ believes men can become women

Does she?

 

[LeftofLeft]

Sure you do. Let's see what they are at the mid terms. The only vision the right has is Project 2025.

19 percent approval

 

[Superbadbrutha]

19 percent approval

That can easily change in a year, but who knows.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

By her own words she doesn't understand the function 9f a Supreme Court Justice. Or knows and doesn't care.

 

[Superbadbrutha]

By her own words she doesn't understand the function 9f a Supreme Court Justice. Or knows and doesn't care.

Well should she be good, because the Trump Humper Judges don't know either.

 

[LeftofLeft]

That can easily change in a year, but who knows.

It could

 

[forkintheroad7]

What a disaster she is. As many of us knew she would be.

Intemperate, not very bright, and as usual with these types, all about themselves.

​

“I just feel that I have a wonderful opportunity.”​

​

Those words of Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson came in a recent interview, wherein the justice explained how she felt liberated after becoming a member of the Supreme Court “to tell people in my opinions how I feel about the issues. And that’s what I try to do.”​

​

Jackson’s sense of liberation has increasingly become the subject of consternation on the court itself, as she unloads on her colleagues in strikingly strident opinions.​

​

Most recently, Jackson went ballistic after her colleagues reversed another district court judge who issued a sweeping injunction barring the Trump Administration from canceling roughly $783 million in grants in the National Institutes of Health. ​

​

Again writing alone, Jackson unleashed a tongue-lashing on her colleagues, who she suggested were unethical, unthinking cutouts for Trump. She denounced her fellow justices, stating, “This is Calvinball jurisprudence with a twist. Calvinball has only one rule: There are no fixed rules. We seem to have two: that one, and this administration always wins.”​

​

For some of us who have followed Jackson’s interestingly controversial tenure on the court, it was crushingly ironic. Although Jackson accused her colleagues of following a new rule that they must always rule with Trump, she herself is widely viewed as the very embodiment of the actual rule of the made-up game based on the comic strip of Calvin and Hobbes. In Jacksonian jurisprudence, it often seems like there are no fixed rules, only fixed outcomes. She then attacks her colleagues for a lack of integrity or empathy.​

​

To quote Calvin, Jackson proves that “there’s no problem so awful that you can’t add some guilt to it and make it even worse.”​

​

Jackson has attacked her colleagues in opinions, shattering traditions of civility and restraint. Her colleagues have clearly had enough. She now regularly writes diatribes that neither of her fellow liberals — Justices Sonia Sotomayor or Elena Kagan — are willing to sign on to. Indeed, she has raged against opinions that her liberal colleagues have joined. (emphasis added)​

​

...​

https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/5466931-the-chilling-jurisprudence-of-justice-ketanji-brown-jackson/

what do we expect from someone who can't even tell us what a woman is?

Also, what do we expect from Mr Potatohead bribum?

 

[Calypso Jones]

Habakkuk 1:4 Pretty profound wouldn't you say? We call it The Holy Bible, but it is actually God's word. Unchanging. As Relevant today as it was in the day that God inspired his prophets to write it down.

New International Version
Therefore the law is paralyzed, and justice never prevails. The wicked hem in the righteous, so that justice is perverted.

New Living Translation
The law has become paralyzed, and there is no justice in the courts. The wicked far outnumber the righteous, so that justice has become perverted.

English Standard Version
So the law is paralyzed, and justice never goes forth. For the wicked surround the righteous; so justice goes forth perverted.

Berean Standard Bible
Therefore the law is paralyzed, and justice never goes forth. For the wicked hem in the righteous, so that justice is perverted.