Meet the American ISIS

Let's see: people who want to force citizens to buy certain products? Yup
People who want to prevent with criminal penalties citizens from buying other products? Yup.
People who want to impose definitions of who can marry? Yup.
Yup, Progressives are the ISIS of the United States.

That last one is actually from the right. They are the ones who want to impose definitions.
No. The right wants to vote on them. The Left wants them imposed by black robed mullahs.
 
Are you saying the Nazis were real socialists?
They were national socialists, not Marxists.
The Nazis were "national socialists" as opposed to the communists who were "international socialists." But that's the only difference. Nazism, fascism, and communism are all basically the same system. And the Progressives admired all of them at one time.
 
<NationalReport>In a surprise weekend vote, the city council of Dearborn, Michigan voted 4-3 to became the first US city to officially implement all aspects of Sharia Law. The tough new law, slated to go into effect January 1st, addresses secular law including crime, politics and economics as well as personal matters such as sexual intercourse, fasting, prayer, diet and hygiene.

The new law could see citizens stoned for adultery or having a limb amputated for theft. Lesser offenses, such as drinking alcohol or abortion, could result in flogging and/or caning. In addition, the law imposes harsh laws with regards to women and allows for child marriage.

City in Michigan First to Fully Implement Sharia Law National Report

You're kidding, right? You know this is an outright lie, don't you? Please tell me you put this up as a joke.

Prove it's a lie, you're starting to get annoying, annoying tries my patience

Yes, people who just believe anything that fits what they want to believe are often annoyed at those who point out it is false.

This is the site for the Dearborn Herald - the local newspaper. Now, if there had been such a vote one would think the local newspaper might have mentioned it. They did not. The News-Herald - Latest News Sports Opinion Entertainment Business Life
 
<NationalReport>In a surprise weekend vote, the city council of Dearborn, Michigan voted 4-3 to became the first US city to officially implement all aspects of Sharia Law. The tough new law, slated to go into effect January 1st, addresses secular law including crime, politics and economics as well as personal matters such as sexual intercourse, fasting, prayer, diet and hygiene.

The new law could see citizens stoned for adultery or having a limb amputated for theft. Lesser offenses, such as drinking alcohol or abortion, could result in flogging and/or caning. In addition, the law imposes harsh laws with regards to women and allows for child marriage.

City in Michigan First to Fully Implement Sharia Law National Report

You're kidding, right? You know this is an outright lie, don't you? Please tell me you put this up as a joke.

Prove it's a lie, you're starting to get annoying, annoying tries my patience

Yes, people who just believe anything that fits what they want to believe are often annoyed at those who point out it is false.

This is the site for the Dearborn Herald - the local newspaper. Now, if there had been such a vote one would think the local newspaper might have mentioned it. They did not. The News-Herald - Latest News Sports Opinion Entertainment Business Life

No where in your link does it say a vote wasn't taken, it was. You've proven nothing
 
<NationalReport>In a surprise weekend vote, the city council of Dearborn, Michigan voted 4-3 to became the first US city to officially implement all aspects of Sharia Law. The tough new law, slated to go into effect January 1st, addresses secular law including crime, politics and economics as well as personal matters such as sexual intercourse, fasting, prayer, diet and hygiene.

The new law could see citizens stoned for adultery or having a limb amputated for theft. Lesser offenses, such as drinking alcohol or abortion, could result in flogging and/or caning. In addition, the law imposes harsh laws with regards to women and allows for child marriage.

City in Michigan First to Fully Implement Sharia Law National Report

You're kidding, right? You know this is an outright lie, don't you? Please tell me you put this up as a joke.

Prove it's a lie, you're starting to get annoying, annoying tries my patience

sassy---your citation does not confirm your assertion
 
this is the standard garbage you get off any leftwing hate site.

NEVER click on a link for them and give them your support. Let them suck their money to pay for their sites from the suckers who visits them regularly
 
OP post is a great example of the reason we call them Moon Bats.

Nowadays Moon Bats hate Christians because they have a large Evangelical block that votes Conservative.

Back in the 1960s the Moon Bats loved the activist Left leaning Christians.

.Haters gonna hate.
 
<NationalReport>In a surprise weekend vote, the city council of Dearborn, Michigan voted 4-3 to became the first US city to officially implement all aspects of Sharia Law. The tough new law, slated to go into effect January 1st, addresses secular law including crime, politics and economics as well as personal matters such as sexual intercourse, fasting, prayer, diet and hygiene.

The new law could see citizens stoned for adultery or having a limb amputated for theft. Lesser offenses, such as drinking alcohol or abortion, could result in flogging and/or caning. In addition, the law imposes harsh laws with regards to women and allows for child marriage.

City in Michigan First to Fully Implement Sharia Law National Report

You're kidding, right? You know this is an outright lie, don't you? Please tell me you put this up as a joke.

Prove it's a lie, you're starting to get annoying, annoying tries my patience

sassy---your citation does not confirm your assertion

The prove it wrong. The article clearly states the vote was taken and passed
 
this is the standard garbage you get off any leftwing hate site.

NEVER click on a link for them and give them your support. Let them suck their money to pay for their sites from the suckers who visits them regularly

This is exactly why I don't click on any of the links you provide as well. You do the same exact thing but use right wing hate sites instead. You're a different side of the same coin.

That being said, this is a silly and overly dramatic thread premise.
 
since you broached the topic-----perhaps it would be nice to discuss the issue
of NATIONAL RELIGIONS. I have a theory---sorta. I believe that the
JIHAD onslaught on the civilized world might bring about "national
religions"---simply to combat the "JIHAD" thing. ----a kind of reaction to
the countries which limit the right of non muslims.

I really don't buy into a nation having a national religion. But I also don't buy into coddling the Muslims while they outright denounce Christianity. If they go to a nation they should be prepared to follow that nation's laws, live in harmony and peace and if they can't then go home.


So you believe that christians should not be "coddled" if they "outright denounce" Islam?

By coddling I'm talking about things like demanding Sharia Law in the court systems.

As opposed to demanding the 10 commandments in the court system? Sharia Law is not in the court system and no one who is being taken at all seriously is demanding that it be.

Who demanded the Commandments be in the court system? There are plenty of cases where Muslims want Sharia Law.
The Head of the Alabama Supreme Court for one. And he got his pee pee whacked for it too. :lol:
 
this is the standard garbage you get off any leftwing hate site.

NEVER click on a link for them and give them your support. Let them suck their money to pay for their sites from the suckers who visits them regularly

This is exactly why I don't click on any of the links you provide as well. You do the same exact thing but use right wing hate sites instead. You're a different side of the same coin.

That being said, this is a silly and overly dramatic thread premise.
I don't think the thread premise is meant to be taken literally. It's rhetorical. The idea is that an Islamic state is no different than a Christian state. Both are theocracies, both controlled by religious doctrine and ideology. The group ISIS is a terrorist group and promotes extremist, fundamentalist principles that the overwhelmingly vast majority of Muslims don't agree with: they don't agree with the tactics or behavior of ISIS and they don't want the type of Islamic state ISIS would set up. But the idea that a theocracy is a danger to a free society is there. The OP is making a comparison that is shocking in order to get people to think about the dangers of making Christianity or any religion a state religion, a national religion. We don't want that; it would be a slippery slope toward a loss of most of our civil rights and freedoms.
 
<NationalReport>In a surprise weekend vote, the city council of Dearborn, Michigan voted 4-3 to became the first US city to officially implement all aspects of Sharia Law. The tough new law, slated to go into effect January 1st, addresses secular law including crime, politics and economics as well as personal matters such as sexual intercourse, fasting, prayer, diet and hygiene.

The new law could see citizens stoned for adultery or having a limb amputated for theft. Lesser offenses, such as drinking alcohol or abortion, could result in flogging and/or caning. In addition, the law imposes harsh laws with regards to women and allows for child marriage.

City in Michigan First to Fully Implement Sharia Law National Report

You're kidding, right? You know this is an outright lie, don't you? Please tell me you put this up as a joke.

Prove it's a lie, you're starting to get annoying, annoying tries my patience
snopes.com City in Michigan First to Fully Implement Sharia Law

With all the links as to what really happened, fooling useful idiots such as yourself.
 
I suspect the left favors Islam as the "national religion"

since you broached the topic-----perhaps it would be nice to discuss the issue
of NATIONAL RELIGIONS. I have a theory---sorta. I believe that the
JIHAD onslaught on the civilized world might bring about "national
religions"---simply to combat the "JIHAD" thing. ----a kind of reaction to
the countries which limit the right of non muslims.

I really don't buy into a nation having a national religion. But I also don't buy into coddling the Muslims while they outright denounce Christianity. If they go to a nation they should be prepared to follow that nation's laws, live in harmony and peace and if they can't then go home.


So you believe that christians should not be "coddled" if they "outright denounce" Islam?
I suspect the left favors Islam as the "national religion"

since you broached the topic-----perhaps it would be nice to discuss the issue
of NATIONAL RELIGIONS. I have a theory---sorta. I believe that the
JIHAD onslaught on the civilized world might bring about "national
religions"---simply to combat the "JIHAD" thing. ----a kind of reaction to
the countries which limit the right of non muslims.

I really don't buy into a nation having a national religion. But I also don't buy into coddling the Muslims while they outright denounce Christianity. If they go to a nation they should be prepared to follow that nation's laws, live in harmony and peace and if they can't then go home.


So you believe that christians should not be "coddled" if they "outright denounce" Islam?

By coddling I'm talking about things like demanding Sharia Law in the court systems.


Which the radical RWs are doing.
 
<NationalReport>In a surprise weekend vote, the city council of Dearborn, Michigan voted 4-3 to became the first US city to officially implement all aspects of Sharia Law. The tough new law, slated to go into effect January 1st, addresses secular law including crime, politics and economics as well as personal matters such as sexual intercourse, fasting, prayer, diet and hygiene.

The new law could see citizens stoned for adultery or having a limb amputated for theft. Lesser offenses, such as drinking alcohol or abortion, could result in flogging and/or caning. In addition, the law imposes harsh laws with regards to women and allows for child marriage.

City in Michigan First to Fully Implement Sharia Law National Report

You're kidding, right? You know this is an outright lie, don't you? Please tell me you put this up as a joke.
Poor Sassy....doesn't know Satire sites like National Report and The Onion.
 
I suspect the left favors Islam as the "national religion"

since you broached the topic-----perhaps it would be nice to discuss the issue
of NATIONAL RELIGIONS. I have a theory---sorta. I believe that the
JIHAD onslaught on the civilized world might bring about "national
religions"---simply to combat the "JIHAD" thing. ----a kind of reaction to
the countries which limit the right of non muslims.

I really don't buy into a nation having a national religion. But I also don't buy into coddling the Muslims while they outright denounce Christianity. If they go to a nation they should be prepared to follow that nation's laws, live in harmony and peace and if they can't then go home.


So you believe that christians should not be "coddled" if they "outright denounce" Islam?
I suspect the left favors Islam as the "national religion"

since you broached the topic-----perhaps it would be nice to discuss the issue
of NATIONAL RELIGIONS. I have a theory---sorta. I believe that the
JIHAD onslaught on the civilized world might bring about "national
religions"---simply to combat the "JIHAD" thing. ----a kind of reaction to
the countries which limit the right of non muslims.

I really don't buy into a nation having a national religion. But I also don't buy into coddling the Muslims while they outright denounce Christianity. If they go to a nation they should be prepared to follow that nation's laws, live in harmony and peace and if they can't then go home.


So you believe that christians should not be "coddled" if they "outright denounce" Islam?

By coddling I'm talking about things like demanding Sharia Law in the court systems.


Which the radical RWs are doing.

Sorry but I've quit taking any of you using those idiot clown avatars serious.
 
this is the standard garbage you get off any leftwing hate site.

NEVER click on a link for them and give them your support. Let them suck their money to pay for their sites from the suckers who visits them regularly

This is exactly why I don't click on any of the links you provide as well. You do the same exact thing but use right wing hate sites instead. You're a different side of the same coin.

That being said, this is a silly and overly dramatic thread premise.
I don't think the thread premise is meant to be taken literally. It's rhetorical. The idea is that an Islamic state is no different than a Christian state. Both are theocracies, both controlled by religious doctrine and ideology. The group ISIS is a terrorist group and promotes extremist, fundamentalist principles that the overwhelmingly vast majority of Muslims don't agree with: they don't agree with the tactics or behavior of ISIS and they don't want the type of Islamic state ISIS would set up. But the idea that a theocracy is a danger to a free society is there. The OP is making a comparison that is shocking in order to get people to think about the dangers of making Christianity or any religion a state religion, a national religion. We don't want that; it would be a slippery slope toward a loss of most of our civil rights and freedoms.

how do you know with what MOST muslims do or do not agree? Who is "we"?
How do you know what "we" want? (PS---working in a professional
capacity in a muslim country does not get you in touch with the minds of
"MOST"------not even a sampling of "MOST" How much time did you
spend in the parlors of the ILLITERATES. ----or in the gutters with the
illiterates......) Just about all the muslims I knew before 1989 were from
Teheran----and highly educated-----left to them the AYATOILETS would
be dead. --------and the shah would have LIVED.
 
this is the standard garbage you get off any leftwing hate site.

NEVER click on a link for them and give them your support. Let them suck their money to pay for their sites from the suckers who visits them regularly

This is exactly why I don't click on any of the links you provide as well. You do the same exact thing but use right wing hate sites instead. You're a different side of the same coin.

That being said, this is a silly and overly dramatic thread premise.
I don't think the thread premise is meant to be taken literally. It's rhetorical. The idea is that an Islamic state is no different than a Christian state. Both are theocracies, both controlled by religious doctrine and ideology. The group ISIS is a terrorist group and promotes extremist, fundamentalist principles that the overwhelmingly vast majority of Muslims don't agree with: they don't agree with the tactics or behavior of ISIS and they don't want the type of Islamic state ISIS would set up. But the idea that a theocracy is a danger to a free society is there. The OP is making a comparison that is shocking in order to get people to think about the dangers of making Christianity or any religion a state religion, a national religion. We don't want that; it would be a slippery slope toward a loss of most of our civil rights and freedoms.

Oh, I totally agree with the spirit of your post, the idea of a theocracy is a danger to a free society. The OP likening 57% of Republicans whom were polled to ISIS is overly dramatic and distracts from the larger point, a point that you and I agree on.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top