Meet Repub Senate candidate Ken Paxton

[Mac-7]

Because you’re an extremist.

You’ve been radicalized by the internet like a lot of people.

I hope its not extreme

Maybe in Lib La La Land

But not Texas

 

[Marener]

Is it too much to ask for a link to where he has "indicate[d]" he wants to break down your door while you are blowing your boyfriend?

No, it’s not too much to ask, and I already have in the thread.

Here’s another link.

Texas AG says he would back law banning sodomy if Supreme Court reconsiders landmark case

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton (R) said last week he would back a law banning the act of sodomy if the U.S. Supreme Court were to overrule a case deeming it unconstitutional. Paxton said during …

thehill.com

 

[Marener]

I hope its not extreme

Maybe in Lib La La Land

But not Texas

It is indeed extreme. Only a tiny sliver of the population wants to make it illegal to be gay.

You’re in line with the authoritarian states like Russia.

 

[Mac-7]

It is indeed extreme. Only a tiny sliver of the population wants to make it illegal to be gay.

You’re in line with the authoritarian states like Russia.

You keep misstating my position

It is unfortunate to be a homosexual

But you cant be put in jail for private thoughts

Nor should they be

 

[Rawley]

No, it’s not too much to ask, and I already have in the thread.

Here’s another link.

Texas AG says he would back law banning sodomy if Supreme Court reconsiders landmark case

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton (R) said last week he would back a law banning the act of sodomy if the U.S. Supreme Court were to overrule a case deeming it unconstitutional. Paxton said during …

thehill.com

LOL So if the SC overturned it's precedent and if the state legislature passed a law, he would be bound to enforce it. Sounds like the kind of AG I want - one that doesn't selectively enforce the laws based on their persona opinion. “My job is to defend state law and I’ll continue to do that, that is my job,”

So where's the part where he "wants" to break down your door while you are blowing your boyfriend?

 

[Marener]

You keep misstating my position

It is unfortunate to be a homosexual

But you cant be put in jail for private thoughts

Nor should they be

You are too ashamed to speak clearly and instead keep deflecting and dodging the issue.

You think arresting gay people is somehow going to protect children.

And that’s very hateful and prejudiced of you.

You’re a radical.

 

[Mac-7]

You are too ashamed to speak clearly and instead keep deflecting and dodging the issue.

You think arresting gay people is somehow going to protect children.

And that’s very hateful and prejudiced of you.

You’re a radical.

I think bad things happen when pro gay candidates win public office

 

[Marener]

LOL So if the SC overturned it's precedent and if the state legislature passed a law, he would be bound to enforce it. Sounds like the kind of AG I want - one that doesn't selectively enforce the laws based on their persona opinion. “My job is to defend state law and I’ll continue to do that, that is my job,”

So where's the part where he "wants" to break down your door while you are blowing your boyfriend?

Not quite. Paxton said SCOTUS was wrong in Lawrence v Texas and that he would work to reverse that decision.

As for selectively enforcing laws, that seems to be a standard that is held very inconsistently and is not an actual value, but an excuse to persecute gay people.

 

[Marener]

I think bad things happen when pro gay candidates win public office

I think it’s bad when radical extremists with hatred and prejudice win public office.

I don’t see anything wrong with a candidate who defends gay people from government persecution. Those candidates are on the side of freedom and liberty.

 

[Rawley]

Not quite. Paxton said SCOTUS was wrong in Lawrence v Texas and that he would work to reverse that decision.

Well, you got another link for that, because he didn't say either of those things in the link you provided

As for selectively enforcing laws, that seems to be a standard that is held very inconsistently and is not an actual value, but an excuse to persecute gay people.

Sorry you feel persecuted, but that doesn't excuse you making thing up about Paxton.

 

[Marener]

Well, you got another link for that, because he didn't say either of those things in the link you provided

Of course he did. Obviously you didn’t read it, or didn’t want to understand it.

Sorry you feel persecuted, but that doesn't excuse you making thing up about Paxton.

You’re living in denial. Are you willing to take a stand and say that laws banning homosexuality are unconstitutional?

 

[Mac-7]

I think it’s bad when radical extremists with hatred and prejudice win public office.

I don’t see anything wrong with a candidate who defends gay people from government persecution. Those candidates are on the side of freedom and liberty.

Talarico is the ultimate radical extremist

 

[Rawley]

Of course he did. Obviously you didn’t read it, or didn’t want to understand it.

Quote him then. Where did he say Lawrence v Texas was wrongly decided and where did he say he would work to overturn Lawrence v Texas?

You’re living in denial. Are you willing to take a stand and say that laws banning homosexuality are unconstitutional?

This thread is about Paxton, not me. Focus.

 

[Marener]

Talarico is the ultimate radical extremist

Talarico is on the side of freedom and liberty. If that makes him an extremist, you need to look inside yourself at the person you’ve become.

You’ve been radicalized by the internet. You’re made to fear other people. You’re paranoid and delusional.

 

[Marener]

Quote him then. Where did he say Lawrence v Texas was wrongly decided and where did he say he would work to overturn Lawrence v Texas?

Paxton said during a Friday interview with NewsNation he would defend the law banning sodomy because the Supreme Court in the past has “stepped into issues that I don’t think there was any constitutional provision dealing with.”


“They were legislative issues,” Paxton said. “This was one of those issues, and there may be more. It would depend on the issue and it would depend on the state law.”

When asked if he would have a personal issue with defending a law banning sodomy, Paxton said he would not.

This thread is about Paxton, not me. Focus.

Paxton would be in a position to help confirm judges and his radical beliefs on the ability to discriminate against people is a danger to freedom.

 

[Mac-7]

Talarico is on the side of freedom and liberty. If that makes him an extremist, you need to look inside yourself at the person you’ve become.

You’ve been radicalized by the internet. You’re made to fear other people. You’re paranoid and delusional.

Freedom for homosexuals to recruit children into the gay culture

 

[Rawley]

Paxton said during a Friday interview with NewsNation he would defend the law banning sodomy because the Supreme Court in the past has “stepped into issues that I don’t think there was any constitutional provision dealing with.”

Nope. That was the Hill editorializing the question. Watch the interview.

“They were legislative issues,” Paxton said. “This was one of those issues, and there may be more. It would depend on the issue and it would depend on the state law.”

When asked if he would have a personal issue with defending a law banning sodomy, Paxton said he would not.


Paxton would be in a position to help confirm judges and his radical beliefs on the ability to discriminate against people is a danger to freedom.

Ok, so he didn't say he would work to overturn Lawrence. Why did you lie?

 

[Marener]

Nope. That was the Hill editorializing the question. Watch the interview.

Ok, so he didn't say he would work to overturn Lawrence. Why did you lie?

He can’t defend their law without working to overturn Lawrence. It’s the same thing.

 

[Marener]

Freedom for homosexuals to recruit children into the gay culture

There’s your radical paranoia again.

You sound just like the authoritarians in Russia.

 

[Mac-7]

There’s your radical paranoia again.

You sound just like the authoritarians in Russia.

Sigh