Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Saturated fat and sugar together is the absolute worst combination of foods.I don't see any reason why candy should make me sick. I need glycogen and this is the fastest way to get it, although pure glucose and fructose would be ideal. Honey is suitable for this.
The glycemic index of sweet and starch differs by a couple of minutes, it's all bloated from scratch. If sugar is harmful, then starch is also harmful. That is, bread, oatmeal, potatoes, and more. That's bullshit.
It is important for me to know that my liver and muscles are filled to capacity with glycogen, I don’t care what my sugar level is after eating, no one considers it abnormal at all, even medicine liers
It can't be. Starch is still quickly converted to glucose, and only monosaccharides are absorbed. The only difference between sugar and starch is that the starch first breaks down to glucose in the digestive tractSaturated fat and sugar together is the absolute worst combination of foods.
High sugar high fat crap like candy bars spike insulin, insulin drives fat storage.
And pure sugar doesn't provide long term energy because it spikes insulin levels and is removed from the body quickly hence the sugar crash.
Yes our bodies run on glucose but food that supplies a steady release is better than a single serving of pure sugar,
You get a lot more than just glucose from what you eat.It can't be. Starch is still quickly converted to glucose, and only monosaccharides are absorbed. The only difference between sugar and starch is that the starch first breaks down to glucose in the digestive tract
Moreover, sugar also breaks down, it is a disaccharide. only monosaccharides are immediately absorbed.
You get a lot more than just glucose from what you eat.
Simple sugar like straight glucose will enter the bloodstream at a rate of 30 calories per minute
The starch from a sweet potato will be digested and the resulting glucose will enter the bloodstream at a rate of 2 calories per minute
So saying there is no difference between eating pure glucose and a starchy vegetable is incorrect.
It's how the sugar enters the blood stream that matters not the total sugar in the food.By the way, they have perverted the concept of diabetes. The word diabetes itself means "to pass through", and it just referred to the low kidney threshold, because of which sugar did not stay in the blood, but went into the urine.
In fact, this is the exact opposite of what they invented in the second half of the 20th century
I repeat again. Yes, at a time when there was no fraud in medicine, sweet urine was considered diabetes. That is, diabetic was the one who could not keep more than 6-7 millimoles of glucose in the blood due to the inclusion of renal excretion of sugar.It's how the sugar enters the blood stream that matters not the total sugar in the food.
And when you start pissing sugar you're not healthy. Even trace sugar in urine is not clinically normal.
I didn't say anything about diabetes I said even trace sugar in urine is not clinically normal.I repeat again. Yes, at a time when there was no fraud in medicine, sweet urine was considered diabetes. That is, diabetic was the one who could not keep more than 6-7 millimoles of glucose in the blood due to the inclusion of renal excretion of sugar.
Now it's the other way around
Don't worry, medicine scammers never check it.I didn't say anything about diabetes I said even trace sugar in urine is not clinically normal.
Sorry but if you ever get a urinalysis they always check for sugar.Don't worry, medicine scammers never check it.
If your kidney threshold is below 6 and your blood glucose is 6, your urine will be sweet, otherwise it cannot be physically.
When you get a urinalysis they always check for sugar.in the scientific literature on biochemistry.
they don't care about it, they diagnose it by blood glucose
Excuse me, but do you even read what I write? How it can be that you not have sweet urine if, for example, your kidney threshold is 6 and your blood glucose is currently 10? Didn't you say that your IQ is over 100?Sorry but
Excuse me, but do you even read what I write? How it can be that you not have sweet urine if, for example, your kidney threshold is 6 and your blood glucose is currently 10? Didn't you say that your IQ is over 100?
So you got nothing to support these claims of yours.I suggest a textbook on biochemistry
I don't know what is normal there or not, this is their problem, but if your kidney threshold is 6 and your blood glucose is 7, you will have sweet urine. Is your IQ Above 40?As far as I can tell you're just making this shit up.
I have not been able to find any source that says sugar in the urine is clinically normal.
if your kidneys can't remove excess glucose and it ends up in your urine you either have far too much glucose in your blood or you have kidney problems.I don't know what is normal there or not, this is their problem, but if your kidney threshold is 6 and your blood glucose is 7, you will have sweet urine. Is your IQ Above 40?
Did you think that it remove blood glucose into the blood? Is your IQ > 15?if your kidneys can't remove excess glucose and it ends up in your urine you either have far too much glucose in your blood or you have kidney problems.
