- Banned
- #1
Medicine used to help treat 'abnormalities' such as when a person gets a 'flu' or a 'cold' .. why is a flu or a cold abnormal? Because if it is not within 'season', then to receive something that is not in 'season' is 'abnormal'.. Just like when a potato grows when it is not supposed to or when an a certain flower blooms when it is not supposed to.. these would be considered 'abnormal'. And medicine which are used to treat certain 'abnormal' conditions upon and within human beings should be thought of as 'medicines' which try to help the body get back on their own 'normal' path; sometimes by having the 'abnormality' be removed from the body.
There is a saying...
There is the beginning. And then there is diversion. Diversion sometimes results in perversion. When perversion occurs the only way back onto the beginning path is aversion. And when aversion occurs, the person can get back onto the beginning path. So.. beginning.. diversion.. perversion.. upon perversion... aversion... back to the beginning... And so it is likewise with 'medicine'.. trying to help the patient get back onto their 'beginning path'.. that path where and when their body did not have any of these 'abnormalities'...
So to look at medicine from a spiritual perspective... means that in a natural condition, normality occurs more often than not but when an abnormality is resulted within that natural condition, a 'perversion' off the natural path occurred.. not the person's own deliberate perversion but a 'perversion' of any sort that could have happened; within the body, upon the skin, in the air of a certain building entered within.. etc... a 'perversion' occurred... and it was within this 'perversed' place/situation/condition/circumstance that the 'abnormality' was more likely to have been received from than from their original 'natural' place/situation/condition/circumstance, etc... unless the 'abnormality' entered into the natural environment... unless the abnormal place/situation/condition/circumstance entered into the 'original/natural', normal place where life was in a 'normal', non abnormally diseased, virused, illed, sick, needing medicine, place....
And if these conditions could be seen to be true.. then to arrange for the 'balance' of the surrounding/place/condition/situation/circumstance to be as 'normal' to and with the 'medicine' being used would show how the medicine, which is to help take away the abnormality or cure the body of the abnormality, if in its naturally accepting place/situation/condition/circumstance surrounding would result much better in doing what it was meant to do...
So what are some natural/normal/original/non diverted/non perverted paths of certain 'medicines'? Let us see.
Let us take a basic stapled food.. grains for example.. Grains of wheat.. a very basic staple.
If wheat grains is used in an environment where the surrounding/circumstance/environment/situation is within the wheat's natural 'path', the wheat would probably have better opportunity to remain non diverted/non perverted into an abnormal 'path' outside of its original natural normal place/surrounding/path, etc.. which would have the wheat 'perform' what it naturally would in its own original natural environment.. It's like saying fish have an easier time being fish in water than when out of water... when in their natural/normal/non diverted/nonperverted/situation/condition/circumstance environment..
And if this can be agreed upon then to arrange for the 'fish' or the 'wheat' to have a more 'natural' surrounding IF out of its original environment would probably prove much more efficient for that fish or wheat to perform what it is normally best at performing... and so the same applies with medicine..
And likewise if an abnormal 'thing' were to be added into the 'water', the natural water of the fish, the fish would have a difficult time being fish the same as if they were out of water.. because an abnormality was introduced into their natural/normal environment/situation, etc.... But if that 'abnormal' addition to the water were contained or grouped or made to 'not leak', etc... then that addition would need to find a place within a balanced environment and that original balanced environment would not need to adapt, too much, to the newly added 'abnormality'.. and so the 'fish', those that have life, would not need to 'adapt' as much either just as the surrounding environment would not need to adapt so much... an example being when an abnormality is added into the water that is NOT contained, not grouped, not made to not leak.. but is free to freely 'be' within its own unnatural environment to try to find its own 'balanced' be-ing.. and so each is needing to struggle and fight with one another until a 'balance' is found and rested within to which the 'fish', the lifes, can go on in their ordinary way; since the living creatures are dependent upon their environment. And although the 'lifes' might need to receive 'abnormalities' within/to itselfs because of their environmentally struggling, non normal/ abnormal /situaltion, the 'lifes' will still be able to survive but maybe not in their original/natural/beginning way/path/ etc... they needed to receive and they needed to adapt to their received 'abnormalities'... (the 'containment/the grouped/ the made to not leak package or condition' being to these abnormalities, their own natural environment to and within which they have less need to deal with other 'abnormalities', which could result in more ease and which could result in less necessity to struggle with their environment since there is less 'room and less substances needing to struggle with).
and to these, in medicine, it is known as 'conditions which have adapted into being a part of acceptance'. Polluted water which would get a person visiting ill, for example..
Although the conditions of a certain resident's internal 'acceptance' would make a visitor become ill, because the visitor's inwards is not adapted to receiving the polluted drinking water for its daily naturally balanced environment, to the resident, the drinking water which would make a visitor ill is accepted as adaptable and acceptable enough for life to continue.
Their 'immune' system not needing to be part of these 'necessities' of environmental strugglings to be balanced. Why?
If a person is born into an environment where the environment has been 'diverted' off its original and is on a 'perverted' path, that newborn does not have any inward need for the non diverted original path's provisions... that new born is needing to receive, from their first breath, their first drink, from their first swallow, their first smell.. from their first 'senses', and is needing to have their 'bodies' and inwards beginning to form its dependence on what they received, which to them would be their original, beginning path but to their predecessor's, not... and it is within these diverted/perverted off paths not the original that the persons who previously were on a different 'path' are more likely than those born within these 'adapted' environments to receive ills and sicknesses, diseases and abnormalities to their natural well being, to their natural path of well being in their original path...
The predecessors are more likely than not to be the ones needing 'medicines', is what I'm trying to say..since they are still in need to 'adapt' to their changed or changing adapting environment.. with a greater struggle to find a balance within than if they were in a contained/grouped/made not to leak 'environment', etc...
And it is mostly and mainly to these that medicines are made and studied and researched for.. just like when leukemia is found in a child.. which to the majority of children, would be 'abnormal' to have received...
But since this is on the topic of medicine and its natural surrounding/environment and its probable probability of working more efficiently IF in a more 'natural' environment to their own 'natural environment', the topic of the leukemia and it probably having been received in/from some non 'normal/non original/diverted/perverted off' path or place, is another topic..
But the treatment of the leukemia/the patient with 'medicine'; whether it be quarantine, i.v lined, ingested, breathed, etc.... , if made to be environmentally more 'balanced' would probably prove more efficient to the 'goal' of treatment; whether it be quarantine, i.v lined, ingested, breathed, etc...
If the goal of the quarantine treatment is to keep contained any 'breathed' particles within its own natural accepted environment then to keep the 'possible' intrusion' and 'escaping' of 'airs', to the most minimum, would probably prove 'environmentally' adept enough to keep the environment balanced to and with its newly added medicine; which would have been the 'quarantine'.... WHILE not allowing for the 'material' used for quarantine to offset its own natural environment and also so as to not have the quarantined area be offset to its natural environment by the material, either. Hence the addition of the 'medicine', the quarantine with its goal intended and the materials, kept in as much of a balanced environment to itself and of the patient's balanced environment; inwardly and outwardly, would probably prove more efficient at getting the reason why the medicine was added, the quarantine with the material used and goal intended, to become much more valid at obtaining.
This being a real example of a balancing being applied, in medicine..
Spreading an antibiotic verses smearing an antibiotic to an area, given there are differences in distance and space with different applicable flesh 'areas' to where the antibacterial can be applied and at what amount of 'antibacterial' lotion/cream, etc is applied, is another valid example of balancing the environment.. of both the antibacterial and the flesh with its surrounding environments; the air or lack of air, being an example.
There is a saying...
There is the beginning. And then there is diversion. Diversion sometimes results in perversion. When perversion occurs the only way back onto the beginning path is aversion. And when aversion occurs, the person can get back onto the beginning path. So.. beginning.. diversion.. perversion.. upon perversion... aversion... back to the beginning... And so it is likewise with 'medicine'.. trying to help the patient get back onto their 'beginning path'.. that path where and when their body did not have any of these 'abnormalities'...
So to look at medicine from a spiritual perspective... means that in a natural condition, normality occurs more often than not but when an abnormality is resulted within that natural condition, a 'perversion' off the natural path occurred.. not the person's own deliberate perversion but a 'perversion' of any sort that could have happened; within the body, upon the skin, in the air of a certain building entered within.. etc... a 'perversion' occurred... and it was within this 'perversed' place/situation/condition/circumstance that the 'abnormality' was more likely to have been received from than from their original 'natural' place/situation/condition/circumstance, etc... unless the 'abnormality' entered into the natural environment... unless the abnormal place/situation/condition/circumstance entered into the 'original/natural', normal place where life was in a 'normal', non abnormally diseased, virused, illed, sick, needing medicine, place....
And if these conditions could be seen to be true.. then to arrange for the 'balance' of the surrounding/place/condition/situation/circumstance to be as 'normal' to and with the 'medicine' being used would show how the medicine, which is to help take away the abnormality or cure the body of the abnormality, if in its naturally accepting place/situation/condition/circumstance surrounding would result much better in doing what it was meant to do...
So what are some natural/normal/original/non diverted/non perverted paths of certain 'medicines'? Let us see.
Let us take a basic stapled food.. grains for example.. Grains of wheat.. a very basic staple.
If wheat grains is used in an environment where the surrounding/circumstance/environment/situation is within the wheat's natural 'path', the wheat would probably have better opportunity to remain non diverted/non perverted into an abnormal 'path' outside of its original natural normal place/surrounding/path, etc.. which would have the wheat 'perform' what it naturally would in its own original natural environment.. It's like saying fish have an easier time being fish in water than when out of water... when in their natural/normal/non diverted/nonperverted/situation/condition/circumstance environment..
And if this can be agreed upon then to arrange for the 'fish' or the 'wheat' to have a more 'natural' surrounding IF out of its original environment would probably prove much more efficient for that fish or wheat to perform what it is normally best at performing... and so the same applies with medicine..
And likewise if an abnormal 'thing' were to be added into the 'water', the natural water of the fish, the fish would have a difficult time being fish the same as if they were out of water.. because an abnormality was introduced into their natural/normal environment/situation, etc.... But if that 'abnormal' addition to the water were contained or grouped or made to 'not leak', etc... then that addition would need to find a place within a balanced environment and that original balanced environment would not need to adapt, too much, to the newly added 'abnormality'.. and so the 'fish', those that have life, would not need to 'adapt' as much either just as the surrounding environment would not need to adapt so much... an example being when an abnormality is added into the water that is NOT contained, not grouped, not made to not leak.. but is free to freely 'be' within its own unnatural environment to try to find its own 'balanced' be-ing.. and so each is needing to struggle and fight with one another until a 'balance' is found and rested within to which the 'fish', the lifes, can go on in their ordinary way; since the living creatures are dependent upon their environment. And although the 'lifes' might need to receive 'abnormalities' within/to itselfs because of their environmentally struggling, non normal/ abnormal /situaltion, the 'lifes' will still be able to survive but maybe not in their original/natural/beginning way/path/ etc... they needed to receive and they needed to adapt to their received 'abnormalities'... (the 'containment/the grouped/ the made to not leak package or condition' being to these abnormalities, their own natural environment to and within which they have less need to deal with other 'abnormalities', which could result in more ease and which could result in less necessity to struggle with their environment since there is less 'room and less substances needing to struggle with).
and to these, in medicine, it is known as 'conditions which have adapted into being a part of acceptance'. Polluted water which would get a person visiting ill, for example..
Although the conditions of a certain resident's internal 'acceptance' would make a visitor become ill, because the visitor's inwards is not adapted to receiving the polluted drinking water for its daily naturally balanced environment, to the resident, the drinking water which would make a visitor ill is accepted as adaptable and acceptable enough for life to continue.
Their 'immune' system not needing to be part of these 'necessities' of environmental strugglings to be balanced. Why?
If a person is born into an environment where the environment has been 'diverted' off its original and is on a 'perverted' path, that newborn does not have any inward need for the non diverted original path's provisions... that new born is needing to receive, from their first breath, their first drink, from their first swallow, their first smell.. from their first 'senses', and is needing to have their 'bodies' and inwards beginning to form its dependence on what they received, which to them would be their original, beginning path but to their predecessor's, not... and it is within these diverted/perverted off paths not the original that the persons who previously were on a different 'path' are more likely than those born within these 'adapted' environments to receive ills and sicknesses, diseases and abnormalities to their natural well being, to their natural path of well being in their original path...
The predecessors are more likely than not to be the ones needing 'medicines', is what I'm trying to say..since they are still in need to 'adapt' to their changed or changing adapting environment.. with a greater struggle to find a balance within than if they were in a contained/grouped/made not to leak 'environment', etc...
And it is mostly and mainly to these that medicines are made and studied and researched for.. just like when leukemia is found in a child.. which to the majority of children, would be 'abnormal' to have received...
But since this is on the topic of medicine and its natural surrounding/environment and its probable probability of working more efficiently IF in a more 'natural' environment to their own 'natural environment', the topic of the leukemia and it probably having been received in/from some non 'normal/non original/diverted/perverted off' path or place, is another topic..
But the treatment of the leukemia/the patient with 'medicine'; whether it be quarantine, i.v lined, ingested, breathed, etc.... , if made to be environmentally more 'balanced' would probably prove more efficient to the 'goal' of treatment; whether it be quarantine, i.v lined, ingested, breathed, etc...
If the goal of the quarantine treatment is to keep contained any 'breathed' particles within its own natural accepted environment then to keep the 'possible' intrusion' and 'escaping' of 'airs', to the most minimum, would probably prove 'environmentally' adept enough to keep the environment balanced to and with its newly added medicine; which would have been the 'quarantine'.... WHILE not allowing for the 'material' used for quarantine to offset its own natural environment and also so as to not have the quarantined area be offset to its natural environment by the material, either. Hence the addition of the 'medicine', the quarantine with its goal intended and the materials, kept in as much of a balanced environment to itself and of the patient's balanced environment; inwardly and outwardly, would probably prove more efficient at getting the reason why the medicine was added, the quarantine with the material used and goal intended, to become much more valid at obtaining.
This being a real example of a balancing being applied, in medicine..
Spreading an antibiotic verses smearing an antibiotic to an area, given there are differences in distance and space with different applicable flesh 'areas' to where the antibacterial can be applied and at what amount of 'antibacterial' lotion/cream, etc is applied, is another valid example of balancing the environment.. of both the antibacterial and the flesh with its surrounding environments; the air or lack of air, being an example.
Last edited: