Media is at it again: Remembering "Saint George" 5 years later

[the watcher]

You don't make the rules. The only reason you get pissy about us calling a black person an Uncle Tom is that you want to keep using them to justify your racism.

I would like to see a version of "the rules" as you see them, if you have time. That should make it easier to comply.

 

[MarathonMike]

It's not bullshit because poor whites are racists. Poor white people vote in people like Trump and others. If poor whites were like you and saw who the real dividers are, we'd solve this problem.

Fortunately there were MILLIONS of poor Blacks who voted Donald Trump into office.

Breakin the chains of the Democrat Plantation FREE AT LAST!!!

 

[eohrnberger]

Fortunately there were MILLIONS of poor Blacks who voted Donald Trump into office.

Breakin the chains of the Democrat Plantation FREE AT LAST!!!

This fact being one of the many which have the Democrats in a panic.
The other is that they seem to chose the 20% side of 80% / 20% issues - which shows how out of touch they are with the electorate which they expect to elect them.

Pretty clearly Democrats need a course correction, but putting the likes of Hogg in their party leadership isn't conducive to the course correction needed, nor is having AOC as the 'face' of the 'new' Democrat party.

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) is seen as the “face” of the Democratic Party according to new polling.​

​

In a Co/efficient survey conducted from May 7 to May 9 among 1,462 likely voters, 26% identified Ocasio-Cortez as the face of the Democratic Party. Another 26% said there is no one currently leading the party, while 22% chose “other.”​

​

Ocasio-Cortez was far ahead of other listed Democrats. Coming in a distant second was close ally Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT). The pair recently went to various states with their Fighting Oligarchy tour. Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-TX) placed third in the survey with 8%.​

AOC Seen as ‘Face’ of Democratic Party — and It’s Not Even Close: New Poll

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) is seen as the "face" of the Democratic Party according to new polling.

www.mediaite.com

 

[MarathonMike]

This fact being one of the many which have the Democrats in a panic.
The other is that they seem to chose the 20% side of 80% / 20% issues - which shows how out of touch they are with the electorate which they expect to elect them.

Pretty clearly Democrats need a course correction, but putting the likes of Hogg in their party leadership isn't conducive to the course correction needed, nor is having AOC as the 'face' of the 'new' Democrat party.

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) is seen as the “face” of the Democratic Party according to new polling.​

​

In a Co/efficient survey conducted from May 7 to May 9 among 1,462 likely voters, 26% identified Ocasio-Cortez as the face of the Democratic Party. Another 26% said there is no one currently leading the party, while 22% chose “other.”​

​

Ocasio-Cortez was far ahead of other listed Democrats. Coming in a distant second was close ally Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT). The pair recently went to various states with their Fighting Oligarchy tour. Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-TX) placed third in the survey with 8%.​

AOC Seen as ‘Face’ of Democratic Party — and It’s Not Even Close: New Poll

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) is seen as the "face" of the Democratic Party according to new polling.

www.mediaite.com

Real Americans should be encouraged that the Democrats are doubling down on failure.

 

[eohrnberger]

Real Americans should be encouraged that the Democrats are doubling down on failure.

While I agree with that sentiment, I wonder how long the Democrats are going to continue doing that.
At some point in time, even Democrats are going to have to stop that insanity.

The other part of this is the DNC MSM propaganda arm. They are plying their political bias and political activism, to falling and continuing to fall trust and credibility polling results. When are they going to stop their insanity?

Or do we get to live through yet another pro-Democrat cover up like their covering up for Biden being unfit for office?

 

[ThisIsMe]

White is a race. Just lie back. Don't try semantics, and what you don't buy is irrelevant. Whites on the right try to avoid the fact that they use race at every opportunity.

No, that would be black people. Its proven here in many posts here where the topic isnt a part of it, but the black folks here will always bring up race, or make a racial comment.

But it was whites who created the concept of race

Says who?

, and it has been whites in this country that has used race for virtually everything.

Again, this is incorrect. I'm not sure where you're getting this.

Those of us fighting are blamed for using race by whites who have deluded themselves into seeing themselves as the default for American or for humans.

I know of nobody who thinks this.

So like I said, I base what I say on documented data from a group that tracked the protests:

Demonstrations and Political Violence in America: New Data for Summer 2020

Preliminary analysis of key trends from May to August.

acleddata.com

A study from the Radcliffe Institute at Harvard that tracked the protests.

and:

Reports from NYPD, ChicagoPD, Baltimore PD, Philly PD, Denver PD, Dallas PD, Houston PD, Miami PD, and the LAPD.

Evidence. But you certainly don't have any questions about the whites in South Africa, where there's NOTHING t support that claim.

I'm not reading that essay...I skimmed through it...briefly, and what I got from it was them talking about the "mostly peaceful protests", which TV didnt show us, and would have still been overshadowed by the largely destructive riots that were happening elsewhere.

Show us some video of these mostly peaceful protests.

 

[Oddball]

 

[IM2]

No, that would be black people. Its proven here in many posts here where the topic isnt a part of it, but the black folks here will always bring up race, or make a racial comment.

Whites use race all the time here and everywhere else. The entire argument on immigration is about race.

Says who?

Carolus Linnaeus, Francois Bernier, and Johann Blumenach.

Again, this is incorrect. I'm not sure where you're getting this.

The 3/5ths compromise, Dred Scott, The Civil Rights Cases, Jim Croow, Plessy v. Ferguson, redlining, restrictive covenants, the exclusion of blacks in New Deal policies, the Southern Strategy, modern-day supreme court decisions on AA, the whining about illegal immigration on only 1 border, I can go on and on.

Again, this is incorrect. I'm not sure where you're getting this.

No, I am completely correct. It is all part of American history, past and present.

I know of nobody who thinks this.

Your responses show that you do. White is a race.

I'm not reading that essay...I skimmed through it...briefly, and what I got from it was them talking about the "mostly peaceful protests", which TV didnt show us, and would have still been overshadowed by the largely destructive riots that were happening elsewhere.

Show us some video of these mostly peaceful protests.

No. If you watched Fox, all you saw was violence because thats the narrative they wanted to present. The data shows something different. Learn to read. I read reports from 9 different police departments long wth this and other similar data. Do your due diligence and study. When you do, you'll become a better person.

The last thing I will say is to stop denying things you have seen and done. The use of plausible deniability by certain whites gets old.

 

[Andrew_Jackson_FTW]

Since the medical examiner said that drugs had nothing to do with his death, your opinion doesn't matter. I doubt that you would have known he had fentanyl in his system if he had not been choked for 9 minutes and 20 seconds.

Troll ^

So happy that Trump now has the support of 40% of black men. Country is headed in the right direction recovering from the heinous left-wing racism and violence.

 

[Andrew_Jackson_FTW]

No one gave the pig Chauvin authorization to be judge, jury, and executioner.

Chauvin was following police procedure. Plus all the other points already listed irt Floyd that you and the White racist IM2 ignore.

I’m glad Trump won and that Democrats have a 35 year low approval rating. These things are in large part a result of the types of ideologies that you IM2 and lefty democrats have. I’m glad that 40% of black men rejected you folks.

Poll: Trump Winning Over Black Men, DEI Skeptics, and Border Hawks as Democrats Lose Ground - Cygnal

WASHINGTON, D.C. (Feb. 11, 2025) – Cygnal, one of the nation’s fastest growing and most accurate private polling firms, released its monthly National Voter Trend (NVT) poll (conducted February 4-5) of 1,500 likely general election voters. “Throughout the election we highlighted just how far out...

www.cygn.al

 

[airplanemechanic]

Since the medical examiner said that drugs had nothing to do with his death, your opinion doesn't matter. I doubt that you would have known he had fentanyl in his system if he had not been choked for 9 minutes and 20 seconds.

Medical examiners have been wrong NUMEROUS TIMES. They've exhumed bodies that were determined to be death by natural causes, and in tissue samples, found poisons indicating the person was MURDERED, not died of natural causes.

Medical examiners are people, too. People get shit wrong.

 

[Moonglow]

Chauvin was following police procedure. Plus all the other points already listed irt Floyd that you and the White racist IM2 ignore.

I’m glad Trump won and that Democrats have a 35 year low approval rating. These things are in large part a result of the types of ideologies that you IM2 and lefty democrats have. I’m glad that 40% of black men rejected you folks.

Poll: Trump Winning Over Black Men, DEI Skeptics, and Border Hawks as Democrats Lose Ground - Cygnal

WASHINGTON, D.C. (Feb. 11, 2025) – Cygnal, one of the nation’s fastest growing and most accurate private polling firms, released its monthly National Voter Trend (NVT) poll (conducted February 4-5) of 1,500 likely general election voters. “Throughout the election we highlighted just how far out...

www.cygn.al

Black men reject me, wow, no crib, just squares?

 

[Moonglow]

Medical examiners have been wrong NUMEROUS TIMES. They've exhumed bodies that were determined to be death by natural causes, and in tissue samples, found poisons indicating the person was MURDERED, not died of natural causes.

Medical examiners are people, too. People get shit wrong.

But not if they are Republicans, just the Democrats....

 

[airplanemechanic]

But not if they are Republicans, just the Democrats....

Nope, politics doesn't matter. The cases I can cite I don't even know or care the politics involved.

CAN MEDICAL EXAMINERS GET CAUSE OF DEATH WRONG?

Yes, medical examiners can, and sometimes do, get the cause of death wrong. Studies have shown that errors in cause of death on death certificates are not uncommon. Various factors can contribute to inaccuracies, including a lack of full information, biases, or the complexity of some deaths.

Here's a more detailed look at why this happens:

• Incomplete Information:
  Medical examiners rely on information available to them, which may not always be complete or accurate. This could include incomplete medical histories or the absence of a full autopsy.
  
  
• Medical Examiner Training and Expertise:
  While medical examiners are typically physicians, they may not be specifically trained in forensic pathology, which is the branch of medicine focused on investigating the cause and manner of death.
  
  
• Bias:
  Factors like political or family influence can potentially affect the accuracy of a medical examiner's determination.
  
  
• Complexity of Deaths:
  Some deaths involve a complex interplay of factors, making it difficult to pinpoint the precise cause.
  
  
• Manner of Death:
  The manner of death (e.g., accidental, natural, suicidal, homicidal) can also be misclassified.
  
  
• Death Certificates as a Legal Document:
  While important for various legal and administrative purposes, death certificates can also be incorrect.

 

[Moonglow]

Nope, politics doesn't matter. The cases I can cite I don't even know or care the politics involved.

CAN MEDICAL EXAMINERS GET CAUSE OF DEATH WRONG?

Yes, medical examiners can, and sometimes do, get the cause of death wrong. Studies have shown that errors in cause of death on death certificates are not uncommon. Various factors can contribute to inaccuracies, including a lack of full information, biases, or the complexity of some deaths.

Here's a more detailed look at why this happens:

• Incomplete Information:
  Medical examiners rely on information available to them, which may not always be complete or accurate. This could include incomplete medical histories or the absence of a full autopsy.
  
  
• Medical Examiner Training and Expertise:
  While medical examiners are typically physicians, they may not be specifically trained in forensic pathology, which is the branch of medicine focused on investigating the cause and manner of death.
  
  
• Bias:
  Factors like political or family influence can potentially affect the accuracy of a medical examiner's determination.
  
  
• Complexity of Deaths:
  Some deaths involve a complex interplay of factors, making it difficult to pinpoint the precise cause.
  
  
• Manner of Death:
  The manner of death (e.g., accidental, natural, suicidal, homicidal) can also be misclassified.
  
  
• Death Certificates as a Legal Document:
  While important for various legal and administrative purposes, death certificates can also be incorrect.

They can also get it right.

 

[IM2]

Medical examiners have been wrong NUMEROUS TIMES. They've exhumed bodies that were determined to be death by natural causes, and in tissue samples, found poisons indicating the person was MURDERED, not died of natural causes.

Medical examiners are people, too. People get shit wrong.

The medical examiner was not wrong this time. Go find a friend, lay face down and have that friend press his or her knee on your neck for 9 minutes and 20 seconds then come back and tell us what you experienced.

You won't come back.

 

[IM2]

They can also get it right.

They desperately want to believe the lie.

 

[MarathonMike]

The medical examiner was not wrong this time. Go find a friend, lay face down and have that friend press his or her knee on your neck for 9 minutes and 20 seconds then come back and tell us what you experienced.

You won't come back.

Your description is a bald faced LIE. Police are (were?) trained on with the knee-on-neck restraint by applying minimum pressure to immobilize the head. That video was played a bazillion times to generate riots and springboard BLM into a multi-billion dollar FRAUD.