progressive hunter
Diamond Member
- Dec 11, 2018
- 64,552
- 39,389
- 2,615
she has a tendency to twist your comment to a point her answer makes no fucking sense,,Is that what I said? Read my post again.Never. Hillary Clinton advised Biden never to concede, so why should Trump?it would have been easier to just say "NO"no you didnt,,just answer the question,,,its a simple yes or no answer,,are you going to answer my question???thanks for you opinion,, and you non relevant quote,,,do you lie all the time or just when youre on this forum,,,One is a deep red state.
Which one is that?
Meanwhile, what utterly bypasses your radar is we have a president and Republican hacks who have been discounting the election as "rigged" from day one, should the president lose and a president who won't even commit to a peaceful transfer of power. Mail balloting is only the tip of the iceberg in this election mess.
He's commited to the accepting the results of a free and fair election.. That's fine by me.. Ought to be EVERYONES' expectations of EVERY election.. But we're infested with busybodies engineering work arounds to the Constitution.. Like binding state electors to the NAtional pop vote and IGNORING THE WILL OF THEIR OWN VOTERS...
Consider that attempt.. Think about it.. Now how is NY, Cali, Illinois and other dozen states that signed that stupid deal gonna look if Trump wins the Popular vote and those states turn RED on the election map????
Can you think of anymore juvenile, crackpot plans with no DESIGN, no fault analysis that twist this country's election process more whompus than that???
He has not committed to "accepting the results of a free and fair election" because he has already STATED THAT THE ONLY WAY BIDEN COULD WIN WAS BY A RIGGED ELECTION. For God's sake.
hes said he will if its free and fair, its just that dems are trying to change the rules and procedures at the last minute and are claiming they are going it to draw it out,,,
Liar.
"Well, we're going to have to see what happens. You know that. I've been complaining very strongly about the ballots. And the ballots are a disaster. ... We want to have -- get rid of the ballots and you'll have a very trans- -- we'll have a very peaceful -- there won't be a transfer, frankly; there'll be a continuation. The ballots are out of control. You know it."
You realize that what he is saying is the only way he will accept it is if he wins.
youre selective view of the many comments he has made on the subject,,, it is noted and mocked for the TDS that led up to it,,,
tell me would you concede if there were signs of fraud or improper procedures???
Tell me, is the only valid election one in which you win?nope,,,thanks for you opinion,, and you non relevant quote,,,do you lie all the time or just when youre on this forum,,,One is a deep red state.
Which one is that?
Meanwhile, what utterly bypasses your radar is we have a president and Republican hacks who have been discounting the election as "rigged" from day one, should the president lose and a president who won't even commit to a peaceful transfer of power. Mail balloting is only the tip of the iceberg in this election mess.
He's commited to the accepting the results of a free and fair election.. That's fine by me.. Ought to be EVERYONES' expectations of EVERY election.. But we're infested with busybodies engineering work arounds to the Constitution.. Like binding state electors to the NAtional pop vote and IGNORING THE WILL OF THEIR OWN VOTERS...
Consider that attempt.. Think about it.. Now how is NY, Cali, Illinois and other dozen states that signed that stupid deal gonna look if Trump wins the Popular vote and those states turn RED on the election map????
Can you think of anymore juvenile, crackpot plans with no DESIGN, no fault analysis that twist this country's election process more whompus than that???
He has not committed to "accepting the results of a free and fair election" because he has already STATED THAT THE ONLY WAY BIDEN COULD WIN WAS BY A RIGGED ELECTION. For God's sake.
hes said he will if its free and fair, its just that dems are trying to change the rules and procedures at the last minute and are claiming they are going it to draw it out,,,
Liar.
"Well, we're going to have to see what happens. You know that. I've been complaining very strongly about the ballots. And the ballots are a disaster. ... We want to have -- get rid of the ballots and you'll have a very trans- -- we'll have a very peaceful -- there won't be a transfer, frankly; there'll be a continuation. The ballots are out of control. You know it."
You realize that what he is saying is the only way he will accept it is if he wins.
youre selective view of the many comments he has made on the subject,,, it is noted and mocked for the TDS that led up to it,,,
tell me would you concede if there were signs of fraud or improper procedures???
Tell me, is the only valid election one in which you win?
now you answer my question,,,
Cool.
Perhaps you can let Mr. Trump know this because he also talked about rigged elections in 2012...
If he he feels there improprieties he can utilize the courts, demand recounts, etc the same as any other candidate. The question that remains however is will he accept the results of that process or dismiss it as "fake news"?
At that point...if he doesn't concede to a peaceful transfer of power (which has not said he would) - what then?
I did. Let me simplify.
1. If he contests the election, he has the same avenues open to other candidates who have done so.
2. If those avenues rule he did not win the election, he should concede as other candidates have done so.
Do you disagree?
should he concede if there is clear proof of fraud or improper procedure???
Who determines the proof? Public opinion?
I did so I shan't repeat myself.
its a simple yes or no answer,,
I answered your question,,,
It's not a simple yes or no, unlike my question.
If he feels there are signs of fraud, he should contest and not concede. And he should provide evidence to the courts of his claims.
If the courts (who I guess would be ultimate arbitrary) say they there was no fraud, and the results stand then he should concede if he loses.
instead of a long drawn out explanation of why you said no,,,
Well, let me ask you a question then.
Should Trump concede if the process affirms the results of the election and he has lost?
What does Hillary have to do with it? She isn't in office. She isn't running.
So you say no peaceful transfer of power unless Trump wins?
in the real world thats called lying,,,