Maybe THIS Is Why Liberals Are Freaked Out Over Latest USSC Decision

[BULLDOG]

First we need to be prepared to ward off rabid lefties. Your "protests" will not be allowed in our neighborhoods. We'll chase you protesting asses right out of town. And out of the next town, and the next . You will learn to leave our children alone. Or we will start dealing with your threats and intimidation in our own way.

Don't believe me? Try me. Try it and see what happens. Let's see you fuckers burn out one of the Justice's homes. Go ahead, I triple dare you. We'll have a hundred of you fuckers in tar and feathers on live national television.

That was kinda my point gun nut.

 

[BULLDOG]

1/6 was a protest. The last insurrection resulted in the birth of the United States.

Nope. The attempt to overthrow an election for president and instal a tinpot dictator instead is an insurrection.

 

[BULLDOG]

Are you familiar with the term "straw man"?

Nothing straw about the very real threats of armed violence posted here every day.

 

[scruffy]

That was kinda my point gun nut.

Fuck you. Try rioting again, see what happens. You fucking Stalinist assholes think you're going to run roughshod over the families in the United States? You got another thing coming.

 

[scruffy]

Nothing straw about the very real threats of armed violence posted here every day.

Nothing straw about EIGHT MONTHS OF LEFTIST RIOTS, fucktard.

Nothing straw about FOUR BILLION DOLLARS IN DAMAGE.

Nothing straw about TWO THOUSAND SMALL BUSINESSES BEING BURNED OUT. Nothing straw about TWO THOUSAND INJURED COPS.

FUCK YOU, dumbass leftie fucktard. Try that shit again and you're going to get HURT.

 

[Batcat]

The courts are 1/3 of our government. Gun nuts demand access to military style weapons because it is important for our government to be afraid of the people. Your logic demands the Supremes be afraid, doesn't it?

I wouldn’t say the Second Amendment is designed to cause the government to fear the people. In my opinion it was designed to make sure the government respects the people. There is a difference.

 

[there4eyeM]

"Infringement" of the first amendment seems ok, though.

 

[scruffy]

I wouldn’t say the Second Amendment is designed to cause the government to fear the people. In my opinion it was designed to make sure the government respects the people. There is a difference.

We have a worse problem now, than government disrespecting the people.

We have people disrespecting the people.

Consider the riots in their full context - we have the Democratic party PAYING the BLM organization for those riots, because it helps them get rid of Donald Trump.

This is scumbaggery on a galactic scale! "Dirty tricks" is not the right word for this. This is STALINISM, plain and simple. Josef Stalin did the exact same thing, he paid agitators to cause trouble for political gain.

Violence for political gain is TERRORISM. By definition. If you're on the offensive side of the violence, you're a terrorist. That applies to every single one of those little AntiFa scumbags and their BLM dupes. The glaring conclusion is the Democratic party FUNDED TERROR to get rid of a political opponent they didn't like.

The Democratic party is not the government. It's just people. People being led around by a bunch of psychopaths.

 

[pknopp]

No more "Stop and Frisk". Everyone should be happy about this.

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

The courts are 1/3 of our government. Gun nuts demand access to military style weapons because it is important for our government to be afraid of the people. Your logic demands the Supremes be afraid, doesn't it?

No.

 

[Batcat]

We have a worse problem now, than government disrespecting the people.

We have people disrespecting the people.

Consider the riots in their full context - we have the Democratic party PAYING the BLM organization for those riots, because it helps them get rid of Donald Trump.

This is scumbaggery on a galactic scale! "Dirty tricks" is not the right word for this. This is STALINISM, plain and simple. Josef Stalin did the exact same thing, he paid agitators to cause trouble for political gain.

Violence for political gain is TERRORISM. By definition. If you're on the offensive side of the violence, you're a terrorist. That applies to every single one of those little AntiFa scumbags and their BLM dupes. The glaring conclusion is the Democratic party FUNDED TERROR to get rid of a political opponent they didn't like.

The Democratic party is not the government. It's just people. People being led around by a bunch of psychopaths.

If the Republican Party turns into a group of fighters like Trump we may be able to turn things around.

If the Republican Party continues to play the nice, always polite guys in white hats we will lose big time. The establishment GOP is wimpy, wimpy, wimpy and acts proud of that fact.

 

[pknopp]

No.

Why not? What if they would someday rule the government can come and take your weapons? Should those who rule that not be concerned the people would not accept that ruling?

If one reason people were acknowledged to have the right to be armed is for protection against the government why would this threat not include all aspects of they government?

 

[pknopp]

If the Republican Party turns into a group of fighters like Trump we may be able to turn things around.

If the Republican Party continues to play the nice, always polite guys in white hats we will lose big time. The establishment GOP is wimpy, wimpy, wimpy and acts proud of that fact.

Like Trump? The guy who rallied people to the Capital but wouldn't go himself?

 

[eagle1462010]

Yep. You're nuts.

Sure am. I believe in the Freedom to CHOOSE for myself my way in this world. You...........NOT SO MUCH.

Every example is one where your side thinks you have the right to shove it down our throats for OUR OWN GOOD.

I keep weapons and tell you to mind your own fucking business FOR YOUR OWN GOOD.

See how that shit works?

 

[eagle1462010]

Thank you for agreeing. Crazy right wing gun nuts want to be prepared for insurrection.

See you are learning. We want to be prepared for you when you go postal for not getting your way.

We realize how you get unhinged when someone says NO.

 

[eagle1462010]

Nothing straw about the very real threats of armed violence posted here every day.

Again. You are learning. We are warning you to mind your fucking business. Don't push your ideals down our throats.

You see.......I don't care if you are a Moonbat from Cali. I don't live there. If you want to tax yourself to the point of insanity and go.........why is everyone living it tents........That's on you. But when you make NATIONAL policy and try to force it here..........Well you can kiss my ass.

Now is that simple enough for you?

 

[SeaMajor7]

No idea, but trump's supreme court just made it easier for all of them to be legally armed.

No, it's the Constitution that does that!

Too bad for you demented avenger subverted demoralized zombies.

 

[Flash]

This exactly what I said. Crazy right wing gun nuts like to feel prepared for insurrection at any time.

Bat Shit Crazy Marxist Revolutionaries demand that arms be taken away from the citizens so they can more easily turn the country into a Socialist Shithole.

Crooks love gun control laws. It makes their job easier.

 

[Flash]

Thank you for agreeing. Crazy right wing gun nuts want to be prepared for insurrection.

Crooks love for the citizens to be disarmed. They don't have to worry about getting resistance in rapes, murders and home invasions.

 

[iamwhatiseem]

The courts are 1/3 of our government. Gun nuts demand access to military style weapons because it is important for our government to be afraid of the people. Your logic demands the Supremes be afraid, doesn't it?

The law wasn't about military weapons... you can't conceal a rifle.
Thanks for playing