Matt Whittaker, New Acting US AG

[Skylar]

Let the special counsel investigations into Hillary and top Dem's begin How many Dem's will go to jail for leaking? We should start a pool.

At least the Republicans are no longer trying to pretend that their investigations aren't politically motivated.

So that's progress, I suppose.

Though it is adorable for them to insist that a Republican led investigation, seated by a Republican, under a Republican administration......is an attack by the Democrats.

We never pretended, we hate your guts and want to destroy you, clear enough?

With the House being taken by Democrats in their single greatest House shift since Watergate......um, how's that working out for you?

Lib please, the Dem House loss in 2010 was their biggest loss in nearly 100 years. AND its still funny

Laughing......says the poor soul that believes that tuesday was a 'great victory for Republicans' because you were told to.

With House leadership comes subpoena powers. But tell us again how your campaign to 'destroy us' is going again?

 

[BlindBoo]

without having a massive political bias

Hahahahaha.

Gee, all we have are all his statements to the contrary to refute your claim.

He is completely bias.

Even his acting apt should be illegal, because he hasn't been a DOJ employee for min 90 days.

Bias isn't really an issue. Holder was biased.... he worked on Obama's campaign. He was however a former judge, who'd served in the DOJ for around 20 years, including chief of civil rights enforcement.

Whittaker's a failed senate candidate (a politician) with little govt experience, and his SOLE qualification is fealty to his Don.

And that's going to be an issue. Unless AG is pretty much a terminal career move, a guy has to come out with some character intact. Holder is just fine back in his DC law practice representing banks, and he'd been chief of civil rights in the DOJ previously. Lynch has a nice pension after years at DOJ, but I think she's retired. Alberto Gonzalez had trouble finding a new gig, but he'd been a Tex AG and SC justice. Ed Meese was always more a Reagan advisor than lawyer, but he stepped in for a dead guy. Griffin Bell was a lion.

I can agree with that. Everyone has bias. I should have been more specific. Whittakers' obvious bias about the Mueller investigation means he should have to recuse himself.

 

[BluesLegend]

Let the special counsel investigations into Hillary and top Dem's begin How many Dem's will go to jail for leaking? We should start a pool.

At least the Republicans are no longer trying to pretend that their investigations aren't politically motivated.

So that's progress, I suppose.

Though it is adorable for them to insist that a Republican led investigation, seated by a Republican, under a Republican administration......is an attack by the Democrats.

We never pretended, we hate your guts and want to destroy you, clear enough?

With the House being taken by Democrats in their single greatest House shift since Watergate......um, how's that working out for you?

Lib please, the Dem House loss in 2010 was their biggest loss in nearly 100 years. AND its still funny

Laughing......says the poor soul that believes that tuesday was a 'great victory for Republicans' because you were told to.

With House leadership comes subpoena powers. But tell us again how your campaign to 'destroy us' is going again?

Go ahead run amok with subpoena's Trump will rip you idiots a new one. lol

 

[The Original Tree]

You have to laugh your ass off at delusional DemNazis who think a losing issue like Russia Russia Russia isn't going to hurt them if they are stupid enough to waste the taxpayer's money in submitting frivolous after frivolous subpoena instead of doing their jobs and legislating.

You dummies saw what happened to The DemNazi Senators who smeared Kavanaugh did you not?

America thinks you are desperate.

And they are right.

 

[BlindBoo]

Let the special counsel investigations into Hillary and top Dem's begin How many Dem's will go to jail for leaking? We should start a pool.

At least the Republicans are no longer trying to pretend that their investigations aren't politically motivated.

So that's progress, I suppose.

Though it is adorable for them to insist that a Republican led investigation, seated by a Republican, under a Republican administration......is an attack by the Democrats.

We never pretended, we hate your guts and want to destroy you, clear enough?

With the House being taken by Democrats in their single greatest House shift since Watergate......um, how's that working out for you?

Lib please, the Dem House loss in 2010 was their biggest loss in nearly 100 years. AND its still funny

That may be true but it was a reaction to the Co-opted Tea Party message of ObamaFear. Now the country is living with and understanding the benefits of ObamaCare. I think that fear card is worn out. A couple more years of Crooked' lil Donnie and even our Cousins in the rural areas of the country will come around.

 

[Skylar]

You have to laugh your ass off at delusional DemNazis who think a losing issue like Russia Russia Russia isn't going to hurt them if they are stupid enough to waste the taxpayer's money in submitting frivolous after frivolous subpoena instead of doing their jobs and legislating.

You dummies saw what happened to The DemNazi Senators who smeared Kavanaugh did you not?

America thinks you are desperate.

And they are right.

Says the unhinged conspiracy theorist that offered us this lovely piece of batshit buffoonery:

Desperate Dems Faking Mailbox Bombs. "You Cannot Be Civil"

Your claims of 'desperate dems' don't amount to much, tinfoil.

 

[busybee01]

I pray that Whittaker is biased for Trump. He should be after the two years of fact less lies on Trump.
Trump deserves a person who has his back as much as Holder and Lynch did with Obama.
Not once did the liberals question the direction and deflection that those two gave Obama.
MAGA

This is not about Obama. The AG is not the head of Trump's personal security force. The AG is the head of law enforcement for the people. H e is supposed to investigate crimes no matter where they lead. If it leads to Trump then so be it.

 

[bendog]

without having a massive political bias

Hahahahaha.

Gee, all we have are all his statements to the contrary to refute your claim.

He is completely bias.

Even his acting apt should be illegal, because he hasn't been a DOJ employee for min 90 days.

Bias isn't really an issue. Holder was biased.... he worked on Obama's campaign. He was however a former judge, who'd served in the DOJ for around 20 years, including chief of civil rights enforcement.

Whittaker's a failed senate candidate (a politician) with little govt experience, and his SOLE qualification is fealty to his Don.

And that's going to be an issue. Unless AG is pretty much a terminal career move, a guy has to come out with some character intact. Holder is just fine back in his DC law practice representing banks, and he'd been chief of civil rights in the DOJ previously. Lynch has a nice pension after years at DOJ, but I think she's retired. Alberto Gonzalez had trouble finding a new gig, but he'd been a Tex AG and SC justice. Ed Meese was always more a Reagan advisor than lawyer, but he stepped in for a dead guy. Griffin Bell was a lion.

I can agree with that. Everyone has bias. I should have been more specific. Whittakers' obvious bias about the Mueller investigation means he should have to recuse himself.

Well, there's an underlying misdirection by the WH. Sessions was AG. Comey was FBI. Trump fired Comey to "put an end" to the Russia thing, that the FBI was investigating.

Sessions it turned out had his own "misstatements about his involvement in "the Russia thing." the AG can tell the FBI to stop an inveistgation, but sessions was tarnished. Rosenstein appointed Mueller to investigate "the Russia thing" independently of the FBI or DOJ.

And you are right that Whittaker has already at least given the appearance that he thinks Mueller is dawdling, and he explicity said Mueller should not look at Trump's fiancés, .... including what Russia has loaned to him for ... questionable collateral.

So, we'd hope he couldn't be confirmed on that, because it Trump is owned by Putin ... that's sort of relevant. LOL At least he shouldn't be limiting Mueller's looking into possible corruption regarding Russia.

but Whittaker has not worked for the DOJ long enough to be "acting director," and he's simply not qualified to be AG even if the "Russia thing" is ignored

 

[Meister]

I pray that Whittaker is biased for Trump. He should be after the two years of fact less lies on Trump.
Trump deserves a person who has his back as much as Holder and Lynch did with Obama.
Not once did the liberals question the direction and deflection that those two gave Obama.
MAGA

This is not about Obama. The AG is not the head of Trump's personal security force. The AG is the head of law enforcement for the people. H e is supposed to investigate crimes no matter where they lead. If it leads to Trump then so be it.

Now, I would agree with you, but for the fact, that it was okay for Obama's DOJ's to cover for Obama and there was nothing but crickets
chirping coming from the liberals.
Now that Trump may get someone to have his back, liberals are coming out of the woodwork like cockroaches.

What's good for the goose is good for the gander.

 

[edward37]

without having a massive political bias

Hahahahaha.

Gee, all we have are all his statements to the contrary to refute your claim.

He is completely bias.

Even his acting apt should be illegal, because he hasn't been a DOJ employee for min 90 days.

Bias isn't really an issue. Holder was biased.... he worked on Obama's campaign. He was however a former judge, who'd served in the DOJ for around 20 years, including chief of civil rights enforcement.

Whittaker's a failed senate candidate (a politician) with little govt experience, and his SOLE qualification is fealty to his Don.

And that's going to be an issue. Unless AG is pretty much a terminal career move, a guy has to come out with some character intact. Holder is just fine back in his DC law practice representing banks, and he'd been chief of civil rights in the DOJ previously. Lynch has a nice pension after years at DOJ, but I think she's retired. Alberto Gonzalez had trouble finding a new gig, but he'd been a Tex AG and SC justice. Ed Meese was always more a Reagan advisor than lawyer, but he stepped in for a dead guy. Griffin Bell was a lion.

I can agree with that. Everyone has bias. I should have been more specific. Whittakers' obvious bias about the Mueller investigation means he should have to recuse himself.

Well, there's an underlying misdirection by the WH. Sessions was AG. Comey was FBI. Trump fired Comey to "put an end" to the Russia thing, that the FBI was investigating.

Sessions it turned out had his own "misstatements about his involvement in "the Russia thing." the AG can tell the FBI to stop an inveistgation, but sessions was tarnished. Rosenstein appointed Mueller to investigate "the Russia thing" independently of the FBI or DOJ.

And you are right that Whittaker has already at least given the appearance that he thinks Mueller is dawdling, and he explicity said Mueller should not look at Trump's fiancés, .... including what Russia has loaned to him for ... questionable collateral.

So, we'd hope he couldn't be confirmed on that, because it Trump is owned by Putin ... that's sort of relevant. LOL

but Whittaker has not worked for the DOJ long enough to be "acting director," and he's simply not qualified to be AG even if the "Russia thing" is ignored

Who is this guy ? lol
Also claims he doesn't know who this guy is.


About this website

NBCNEWS.COM

Trump claims he hasn’t spoken with Acting Attorney General Whitaker about Mueller probe
Trump also told reporters that he didn't know the man he named acting attorney general after Jeff Sessions resigned at the president’s request.

 

[busybee01]

They must also believe that it is Patriotic to accept a meeting with the Russians to discuss their plans to aid his campaign.

Hey genius, Trump Jr met with a Russian lawyer for 7 minutes and walked away without taking anything from her.... Hillary Clinton colluded with and PAID foreign spies - working for Obama's FBI and who was already communicating with Robert Mueller before he was appointed Special Counsel - AND Russians for their help in trying to win the Presidency, walking away with a Russian-authored piece of propaganda illegally used by Obama's DOJ, NIA, CIA, & FBI!

Mwuhahahahaha......STFU!

Doesn't matter. He went there with the intent of receiving dirt from a Russian national. Hillary Clinton did not collude with anyone. Michael Steele was a former spy who was doing investigative work. He consulted the contacts he still had and was concerned about what he was hearing. There was nothing illegal about it. The Russians wanted Trump to win and that is why they used social media to help him. Putin has even admitted it. Russian media is crying that Democrats took over the House.

 

[edward37]

They must also believe that it is Patriotic to accept a meeting with the Russians to discuss their plans to aid his campaign.

Hey genius, Trump Jr met with a Russian lawyer for 7 minutes and walked away without taking anything from her.... Hillary Clinton colluded with and PAID foreign spies - working for Obama's FBI and who was already communicating with Robert Mueller before he was appointed Special Counsel - AND Russians for their help in trying to win the Presidency, walking away with a Russian-authored piece of propaganda illegally used by Obama's DOJ, NIA, CIA, & FBI!

Mwuhahahahaha......STFU!

Stop stop easy you crack me up
Also claims he doesn't know who this guy is.


About this website

NBCNEWS.COM

Trump claims he hasn’t spoken with Acting Attorney General Whitaker about Mueller probe
Trump also told reporters that he didn't know the man he named acting attorney general after Jeff Sessions resigned at the president’s request.
Lies and the lying liar easy ?

 

[bendog]

I pray that Whittaker is biased for Trump. He should be after the two years of fact less lies on Trump.
Trump deserves a person who has his back as much as Holder and Lynch did with Obama.
Not once did the liberals question the direction and deflection that those two gave Obama.
MAGA

This is not about Obama. The AG is not the head of Trump's personal security force. The AG is the head of law enforcement for the people. H e is supposed to investigate crimes no matter where they lead. If it leads to Trump then so be it.

Now, I would agree with you, but for the fact, that it was okay for Obama's DOJ's to cover for Obama and there was nothing but crickets
chirping coming from the liberals.
Now that Trump may get someone to have his back, liberals are coming out of the woodwork like cockroaches.

What's good for the goose is good for the gander.

Obama didn't fire Comey to halt an investigation. That's the difference. Jared sort of vukced that one up. LOL

 

[Skylar]

At least the Republicans are no longer trying to pretend that their investigations aren't politically motivated.

So that's progress, I suppose.

Though it is adorable for them to insist that a Republican led investigation, seated by a Republican, under a Republican administration......is an attack by the Democrats.

We never pretended, we hate your guts and want to destroy you, clear enough?

With the House being taken by Democrats in their single greatest House shift since Watergate......um, how's that working out for you?

Lib please, the Dem House loss in 2010 was their biggest loss in nearly 100 years. AND its still funny

Laughing......says the poor soul that believes that tuesday was a 'great victory for Republicans' because you were told to.

With House leadership comes subpoena powers. But tell us again how your campaign to 'destroy us' is going again?

Go ahead run amok with subpoena's Trump will rip you idiots a new one. lol

Laughing....like he did with the House election and the Mueller investigation? Trump's threats are a demonstration of his desperation.

 

[The Original Tree]

They must also believe that it is Patriotic to accept a meeting with the Russians to discuss their plans to aid his campaign.

Hey genius, Trump Jr met with a Russian lawyer for 7 minutes and walked away without taking anything from her.... Hillary Clinton colluded with and PAID foreign spies - working for Obama's FBI and who was already communicating with Robert Mueller before he was appointed Special Counsel - AND Russians for their help in trying to win the Presidency, walking away with a Russian-authored piece of propaganda illegally used by Obama's DOJ, NIA, CIA, & FBI!

Mwuhahahahaha......STFU!

Doesn't matter. He went there with the intent of receiving dirt from a Russian national. Hillary Clinton did not collude with anyone. Michael Steele was a former spy who was doing investigative work. He consulted the contacts he still had and was concerned about what he was hearing. There was nothing illegal about it. The Russians wanted Trump to win and that is why they used social media to help him. Putin has even admitted it. Russian media is crying that Democrats took over the House.

If The Russians wanted Trump to win, then why were the Democrats, specifically The DNC, Obama, and Clinton able to PAY for, and obtain, Russian Propaganda now known as the Dirty Dossier, while no such Clinton Dossier was ever obtained by The Trump Campaign?

In regards to Social Media, there were postings for and against Donald Trump. So that is a wash.

In what Cracked world do you live in where the facts can be twisted to say The Russians wanted Trump to win, when he laid some heavy sanctions on them, while Obama and Clinton promised to make deals with them, and did.

We know Clinton and Obama got Russian Dirt on Trump, and even though it was false and salacious, they used it to file False Affidavits in a FISA Court and Spy on The Trump Campaign.

We know for a Fact that Clinton and Obama Moles and Political Operatives in THE DOJ and FBI were Corrupt and politicized both Agencies and turned them in to political weapons against Obama's opponents. We also know Obama did the exact same thing with THE IRS.

AGAIN, Who spied on The Clinton Campaign?

No ONE.

Who used th e Power of The US Government to try to alter the outcome of an election?

Obama and Clinton did.

Who tried to use the Power of The US Government to launch a COUP against The President using False and Salacious Russian Propaganda as an Insurance Policy and a excuse to try to Thwart The Will of the People, Obstruct The President's Agenda, and violate multiple Federal Statutes and Civil Rights when they went after The President, for no reason at all except that he defeated Hillary Rotten Clinton?

Obama and Clinton and all of their cronies like Lynch, Comey, McCabe, Strozk, Ohr, Page, Baker, and many many more did.

Russia didn't do shit, but The Damn DemNazis did. They are the biggest threat to our Democracy. Hell even right now down in Florida they have broken multiple election laws, and are down there trying to manufacture Fake Votes enough to over turn an election that was already won by a Republican, and are doing the exact same thing in Georgia and Arizonza.

Are you gonna tell me Putin makes The Democrat Party engage in voter fraud in every election?

 

[Rustic]

He is a scam artist and wrote those opeds just for Trump. I wonder what he says about Trump's unsecure cell phone,
Trump's acting attorney general was part of firm US accused of vast scam

We have nothing but a crime family in the Admin. Can't wait till the Dems clean it up.

The great thing about Whitaker is that he is going to take over an investigation without having a massive political bias that will restrict him to seeing only the unproven allegations against Trump but will also be allow him to see and acknowledge the wealth of evidence, testimony, and reports (like the US IG's reports) that have exposed crimes committed by Democrats / Obama Agency Directors / Obama Cabinet Members.

I mean, how far do you have to have your head up Obama's ass to conduct an investigation into illegal Russian collusion without asking / interviewing Barak Obama, who was proven to have known about Russia's interference / hacking / counter-Intelligence ops back in 2014 yet allowed it to continue for 2 years without doing anything about it?

How biased do you have to be to claim Trump Jr meeting with a Russian Lawyer for a 7-minute meeting where no information was exchanged is 'Illegal Collusion' but collaborating with and paying foreign spies (who are working for the FBI) and Russians for their help to win the Presidential election - buying a Russian-authored propaganda-filled report that was illegally used against the GOP candidate by Obama's FBI Director and CIA Director - is somehow NOT illegal?

He is bias for Trump. What does this have to do with Obama? I think Trump and his family conspired with Russia, and Trump and his family are major white collar criminals along with the Kushner's, and lets not forget obstruction of justice against Trump.

Lol
Live with it bed wetter... Conservatives had to put up with that shit stain Obama for eight years

 

[Skylar]

He is a scam artist and wrote those opeds just for Trump. I wonder what he says about Trump's unsecure cell phone,
Trump's acting attorney general was part of firm US accused of vast scam

We have nothing but a crime family in the Admin. Can't wait till the Dems clean it up.

The great thing about Whitaker is that he is going to take over an investigation without having a massive political bias that will restrict him to seeing only the unproven allegations against Trump but will also be allow him to see and acknowledge the wealth of evidence, testimony, and reports (like the US IG's reports) that have exposed crimes committed by Democrats / Obama Agency Directors / Obama Cabinet Members.

I mean, how far do you have to have your head up Obama's ass to conduct an investigation into illegal Russian collusion without asking / interviewing Barak Obama, who was proven to have known about Russia's interference / hacking / counter-Intelligence ops back in 2014 yet allowed it to continue for 2 years without doing anything about it?

How biased do you have to be to claim Trump Jr meeting with a Russian Lawyer for a 7-minute meeting where no information was exchanged is 'Illegal Collusion' but collaborating with and paying foreign spies (who are working for the FBI) and Russians for their help to win the Presidential election - buying a Russian-authored propaganda-filled report that was illegally used against the GOP candidate by Obama's FBI Director and CIA Director - is somehow NOT illegal?

He is bias for Trump. What does this have to do with Obama? I think Trump and his family conspired with Russia, and Trump and his family are major white collar criminals along with the Kushner's, and lets not forget obstruction of justice against Trump.

Lol
Live with it bed wetter... Conservatives had to put up with that shit stain Obama for eight years

The thing I love about Trump is the lack of pretense. He's open about the investigations he wants to lead being blatantly political. He's flagrant in his appointment of a loyalist who is wildly biased.

 

[Rustic]

He is a scam artist and wrote those opeds just for Trump. I wonder what he says about Trump's unsecure cell phone,
Trump's acting attorney general was part of firm US accused of vast scam

We have nothing but a crime family in the Admin. Can't wait till the Dems clean it up.

The great thing about Whitaker is that he is going to take over an investigation without having a massive political bias that will restrict him to seeing only the unproven allegations against Trump but will also be allow him to see and acknowledge the wealth of evidence, testimony, and reports (like the US IG's reports) that have exposed crimes committed by Democrats / Obama Agency Directors / Obama Cabinet Members.

I mean, how far do you have to have your head up Obama's ass to conduct an investigation into illegal Russian collusion without asking / interviewing Barak Obama, who was proven to have known about Russia's interference / hacking / counter-Intelligence ops back in 2014 yet allowed it to continue for 2 years without doing anything about it?

How biased do you have to be to claim Trump Jr meeting with a Russian Lawyer for a 7-minute meeting where no information was exchanged is 'Illegal Collusion' but collaborating with and paying foreign spies (who are working for the FBI) and Russians for their help to win the Presidential election - buying a Russian-authored propaganda-filled report that was illegally used against the GOP candidate by Obama's FBI Director and CIA Director - is somehow NOT illegal?

He is bias for Trump. What does this have to do with Obama? I think Trump and his family conspired with Russia, and Trump and his family are major white collar criminals along with the Kushner's, and lets not forget obstruction of justice against Trump.

Lol
Live with it bed wetter... Conservatives had to put up with that shit stain Obama for eight years

The thing I love about Trump is the lack of pretense. He's open about the investigations he wants to lead being blatantly political. He's flagrant in his appointment of a loyalist who is wildly biased.

He is damaging the GOP establishment that can only be a good thing...

 

[Skylar]

They must also believe that it is Patriotic to accept a meeting with the Russians to discuss their plans to aid his campaign.

Hey genius, Trump Jr met with a Russian lawyer for 7 minutes and walked away without taking anything from her.... Hillary Clinton colluded with and PAID foreign spies - working for Obama's FBI and who was already communicating with Robert Mueller before he was appointed Special Counsel - AND Russians for their help in trying to win the Presidency, walking away with a Russian-authored piece of propaganda illegally used by Obama's DOJ, NIA, CIA, & FBI!

Mwuhahahahaha......STFU!

Doesn't matter. He went there with the intent of receiving dirt from a Russian national. Hillary Clinton did not collude with anyone. Michael Steele was a former spy who was doing investigative work. He consulted the contacts he still had and was concerned about what he was hearing. There was nothing illegal about it. The Russians wanted Trump to win and that is why they used social media to help him. Putin has even admitted it. Russian media is crying that Democrats took over the House.

If The Russians wanted Trump to win, then why were the Democrats, specifically The DNC, Obama, and Clinton able to PAY for, and obtain, Russian Propaganda now known as the Dirty Dossier, while no such Clinton Dossier was ever obtained by The Trump Campaign?

In regards to Social Media, there were postings for and against Donald Trump. So that is a wash.

In what Cracked world do you live in where the facts can be twisted to say The Russians wanted Trump to win, when he laid some heavy sanctions on them, while Obama and Clinton promised to make deals with them, and did.

We know Clinton and Obama got Russian Dirt on Trump, and even though it was false and salacious, they used it to file False Affidavits in a FISA Court and Spy on The Trump Campaign.

We 'know' no such thing, tinfoil. The 'false affidavits' claim fell apart. Nunes tried it....and had to eventually admit that the FBI ackonwledged the poltiically biased nature of Dossier. Utterly destroying your entire narrative.

Worse, your narrative is lunatic. As the affidavits were to investigate Carter Page AFTER he'd left the Trump campaign. You're literally arguing that the FBI 'spied' on the Trump campaign by getting FISA warrants for a person who didn't work for the Trump campaign.

Which is just one of the stupidest conspiracies I've ever heard. And yet you believe. Though you are the same hapless soul who insisted that the mail bombs sent to Trump critics were a democrat false flag. So clearly, critical thinking isn't what we come to you for.

 

[WEATHER53]

He should give Mueller 4 months to wrap it up, present the info or game over
See libbies don’t compete, they give scoreless participations so they have no experience that 320 to 230 electoral means a Win and that when time has expired for ballot counting that you don’t get to declare your own overtime in order to count 100,000 more ballots 90% favorable to you.