Slade3200
Diamond Member
- Jan 13, 2016
- 71,376
- 18,284
- 2,190
I see y'all using the buzzword collusion a lot... Is that a tit for tat for the Russia deal?! Because what y'all are calling collusion is simple communication that both sides were doing.The COLLUSION and Constitution breaking cooperation allowing the govt to USE a media platform to censor speech, was VERY widespread and STILL operating in the lead-up the recent 2022 midterms.
The social media platforms had systems set up for government officials and public figures and anybody else to flag tweets for review. If those tweets violated Twitters policy they would be flagged or removed. Trumps White House did it, states do it, businesses do it, the DNC and RNC do it, its not a legal issue.
The Hobbs example you gave shows just that. Somebody in her admin flagged two tweets to twitter, they said they would review, after review they deleted the tweets. So what? What were the Tweets? If they violated Twitters policy then do you have an issue with Twitter removing them? Don't you think you should know this before using it as an example of some kind of deep state collusion?
I've been looking everywhere for the actual tweets, can't find them. Don't you find that curious?
Here is the response from Hobbs office:
This email exchange is from January 2021, as shown in the screenshot. Not only was it taken entirely out of context, it has nothing to do with this year’s midterm election. This is yet another example of conspiracy theorists trying to create chaos and confusion by casting doubt on our election system. It’s unfair to Arizona voters and it’s harmful to our democracy.
It is standard practice for government entities, organizations, and corporations alike to report content on social media that violates a platform’s terms of service. It’s the Secretary of State’s job to make sure that voters are informed about how to vote and how our election system works. One of the ways we do that is by working to counter disinformation online that can confuse voters.