Massive Ballot scandal in Fairfax County, Va. Envelopes have holes that show if voter voted for Republicans.

Spanberger is CHOSEN to CHEAT with Dominion Voting Machines.

Against Vega in 2022, Spanberger was slightly behind in the final polls, and was down all night, and then WOOOSHE (we've seen that before in Virginia since 2000) Spanberger won...






"This was my calmest election ever"


because she knew Dominion Voting Machines would CHOOSE the CHOSEN.

Or maybe it's because mail-in ballots can't be counted until after polls close.

or

Choose to live in Conspiracy Theory land.

WW
 
Voter privacy is maintained.

Here in Virginia the ballot package contains:
  • Detailed instructions
  • The Ballot
  • Inner Security Envelope
  • Outer mailing Envelope
Once the ballot is completed, it goes into the security envelope, that they goes into the outer mailing envelope. At which point it's placed in the mail, since the security envelope is INSIDE the mailing envelope there is no compromise there as no one can see through the hole from the time it is sealed in the mailing envelope to the time it's opened by election officials.
.
.
.
.
So now explain in details how it was compromised under the two scenerios below:

#1 The ballot is cast, the ballot sealed in the security envelope, that then placed in the mailing envelope and mailed. The mailing envelope is received by election officials. Election officials working in pairs and under the observation of watchers from BOTH the DEM and GOP parties who function as election observers. The security envelope is removed from the mailing envelope, security checks are made, the security envelope is then opened and the ballot removed. At that point the security envelope is in the hand of election officials AND the ballot with all vote visible are now in the hands of those election officials.

#2 The ballot is cast, the ballot sealed in the security envelope, that then placed in the mailing envelope and mailed. The mailing envelope is received by election officials. Election officials working in pairs and under the observation of watchers from BOTH the DEM and GOP parties who function as election observers. The security envelope is removed from the mailing envelope, security checks are made, thje security envelope has single vote visible in some cases, the security envelope is then opened and the ballot removed. At that point the security envelope is in the hand of election officials AND the ballot with all vote visible are now in the hands of those election officials.
.
.
.
What exactly is the difference as the election officials - working in teams under observation by Election Watchers from both parties - between seeing a single cirlce through the hole and those same election workers removing the ballot from the envelope and at that point "seeing" both the voter identification on the security envelope and ALL the votes cast on the ballot once removed from the envelope?

WW
What does the tiny black dot, perfectly positioned behind the hole , represent? If you look at the total square surface area there is about a 2% chance thst it’s coincidental
 
On national basis in the last election of all the votes that straggled in during the wee hours or took days and weeks; 90% were for Democrat candidates . They invented the term “curing” which actually means manipulation
 
Or maybe it's because mail-in ballots can't be counted until after polls close.

or

Choose to live in Conspiracy Theory land.

WW
We choose reality and you choose the fantasy of denying reality and actual outcome
 
What does the tiny black dot, perfectly positioned behind the hole , represent? If you look at the total square surface area there is about a 2% chance thst it’s coincidental

Or if you consider that the whole is centrally placed on the envelope and that - since the back of the ballot is blank - there is a 50% chance of the voter putting it in the envelope backwards.

I'm not defending the poor placement of the hole. I think it was poor placement to begin with and I also think the QA testing of the design failed to account for the fact the ballot could be inserted two ways.

Do I buy the whole MAGA outrage and jump onto a DEM conspiracy theory? No.

WW
 
Or if you consider that the whole is centrally placed on the envelope and that - since the back of the ballot is blank - there is a 50% chance of the voter putting it in the envelope backwards.

I'm not defending the poor placement of the hole. I think it was poor placement to begin with and I also think the QA testing of the design failed to account for the fact the ballot could be inserted two ways.

Do I buy the whole MAGA outrage and jump onto a DEM conspiracy theory? No.

WW
So you gave a you don’t know answer but still maintain nothing is amiss
 
So you gave a you don’t know answer but still maintain nothing is amiss

I've repeated in every post that the design was poor placement and that QA should have found the problem.

Do I think their is a conspiracy for voter fraud? No.

The hole is in the security envelope. The security envelope goes INSIDE a mailing envelope.

The only people that would see it are (A) the voter who - ya know - gets to see it and (B) Election Officials when the process the mail in ballot. You know the people who work in teams, under the watch of election watchers from both parties, and whose job it is the remove security envelope from the mailing envelope, verify the voter, then REMOVE THE BALLOT from the security envelope. Who at the time of removal can "see" the voter information and ALL the votes cast. Ya know, it's their job.

I'm not defending the poor placement of the hole. I think it was poor placement to begin with and I also think the QA testing of the design failed to account for the fact the ballot could be inserted two ways. But I'm not buying into the MAGA outrage and the call - by some in this tread - to disenfranchise the voters.

WW
 
Or if you consider that the whole is centrally placed on the envelope and that - since the back of the ballot is blank - there is a 50% chance of the voter putting it in the envelope backwards.

I'm not defending the poor placement of the hole. I think it was poor placement to begin with and I also think the QA testing of the design failed to account for the fact the ballot could be inserted two ways.

Do I buy the whole MAGA outrage and jump onto a DEM conspiracy theory? No.

WW
There's precedent for this from 2000 when the democrats complained about poorly designed ballots in Florida (that one of their own created). They said it was done purposely to confuse seniors and make them vote for Bush.
 
If you can tell how someone voted from a seal envelope, that a ******* scandal.
How can you tell from a small hole where you can’t see the rest of the ballot?

That is massive to you?
 
How can you tell from a small hole where you can’t see the rest of the ballot?

That is massive to you?
As you well know, it’s what that black dot perfectly placed behind the hole is indicative of. You guys are trying to sell “coincidence”
 
How can you tell from a small hole where you can’t see the rest of the ballot?

That is massive to you?
Massive as in who designed the placement of that hole so you could see how the person voted.

I just voted last week and you can be damn sure that when I put my ballot in that envelope that you couldn't see shit on the ballot through the hole in my envelope.
 
As you well know, it’s what that black dot perfectly placed behind the hole is indicative of. You guys are trying to sell “coincidence”
What ballot choice is picked by that black dot?

The ballot with the hole is sealed and placed within another sealed envelope.
The only one who can see that hole is someone authorized to open the envelope.

What makes that a massive ballot scandal ?
 
What ballot choice is picked by that black dot?

The ballot with the hole is sealed and placed within another sealed envelope.
The only one who can see that hole is someone authorized to open the envelope.

What makes that a massive ballot scandal ?
No it’s viewable as it is transmitted from point to point. Thats not its final stage when it becomes visible for the first time. It’s visible well before reaching the final destination
 
Last edited:
15th post

This is an old trick from the left. Makes it easy to LOSE those ballots.

You can see right through the envelope to how the person voted.

Why not have fair elections?
From your own link:

Gorka’s letter alleged that design flaws in ballot envelopes could expose voters’ choices, compromising confidentiality and potentially violating state election laws,

The word "could" does not mean it did happen. It is a precautionary move and it does not in any way suggest that this was done on purpose by the Democrats.

BS OP that is pure bias on your part
 
What would be the point in a Democratic stronghold? More MAGA distraction to cover up the shutdown and Epstein debacles, IMO.
Becauuuuuuse it's no longer a blue stronghold.

DURRRRRR
 
Or maybe it's because mail-in ballots can't be counted until after polls close.

or

Choose to live in Conspiracy Theory land.

WW


Well, try it again.

You can be sure Kash won't bust you this time....
 
IMG_0484.webp
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom