Massie has a great idea for getting the names of miscreants out there from the Epstein files

There is no 13 year old in this story.

What the phuck happened to you?


Not a thing.

I have always been against corrupt politicians, regardless of party.,

I have always been against the corruption of large organizations, whether they are think tanks, foundations, governments or corporations.

What happened? You are purely a hyper partisan, where telling the truth about the politicians you ego identify with is terrible, regardless of whether those facts are true or not.

So naturally, when folks that control your cult get in power, and I continue to act the same as I always have, you think I have changed. Things I post about the corrupt establishment when folks you hate are in power? That's fine. But you expect me to change b/c your cult is in power? Step-off loser.

You just don't pay attention very well.
 
The deliberative process privilege (DPP) is a common-law, qualified privilege protecting government documents that are both predecisional (created before a decision) and deliberative (reflecting recommendations, opinions, or debates). It encourages candid, internal policy discussions by preventing premature disclosure. Under FOIA Exemption 5, it protects drafts and opinions, but generally not purely factual information.
**** OFF IF YOU CONTINUE TO CUT DOWN MY QUOTES

BUT THE LAW WAS WRITTEN SO THE DOJ WAS SUPPOSED TO RELEASE THEM TO CONGRESS

Bipartisan lawmakers, including Rep. Ro Khanna and Rep. Thomas Massie, argue this violates the Transparency Act, which was intended to reveal the full record and decision-making process.


Redactions outside the law to protect ‘privilege’​


But there are whole pages and reports that are redacted, suggesting the redactions went much further than they needed to


More troubling is Blanche’s claim in the letter, not citing any statue, that redactions were made to protect the long-standing privileges around the deliberative process, work products and attorney-client privilege.

Blanche said Congress has long acknowledged these privileges, but Massie pointed out that the law Congress passed specifically demands DOJ communications that would include the deliberative process.



 
Not a thing.

I have always been against corrupt politicians, regardless of party.,

I have always been against the corruption of large organizations, whether they are think tanks, foundations, governments or corporations.

What happened? You are purely a hyper partisan, where telling the truth about the politicians you ego identify with is terrible, regardless of whether those facts are true or not.

So naturally, when folks that control your cult get in power, and I continue to act the same as I always have, you think I have changed. Things I post about the corrupt establishment when folks you hate are in power? That's fine. But you expect me to change b/c your cult is in power? Step-off loser.

You just don't pay attention very well.
Maybe you were always insane.
 
Trump mentioned the subject just twice — both times only when asked — offering limited, qualified answers rather than campaign pledges.

In a June 2024 interview on “Fox & Friends,” Trump was asked about declassifying various files, including JFK, 9/11 and Epstein.

I guess I would. I think that, less so, because you don’t want to affect people’s lives if it’s phony stuff in there because it’s a lot of phony stuff with that whole world. But I think I would,” Trump said, according to the Associated Press.


“Would you declassify the Epstein files?” Campos-Duffy said.

“Yeah, yeah, I would,” Trump said.

The clip spread on social media, and Trump’s campaign account also shared it.
 
WASHINGTON — The claim that “Trump campaigned on releasing the Epstein files” has been frequently repeated by critics of the president.

Despite viral posts and opinion articles from left-leaning commentators and politicians portraying Trump as having pledged to “release the Epstein client list,” the president never mentioned the issue in any major campaign speech, rally or policy announcement before the 2024 election.
LOL

I would be like saying Kamala campaigned on doing not a single thing different than President Biden did.

 
Stunning, Beale, stunning.

Her assault claims against Epstein, Atkins and Donald Trump remain unproven, and the White House has vigorously denied the assertions about the president. No direct evidence has been uncovered supporting the assault claims.


Wait, Cheeto and the W/H deny stuff like a 13 y/o child was molested by Cheeto? I'm shocked, shocked I tell you.


New Evidence Corroborates Claims of Trump Sex Accuser, 13​


...A report from South Carolina newspaper The Post and Courier released on Sunday has now corroborated key personal details given by the woman about a third man she claims also sexually assaulted her—named Jimmy Atkins. Those details are not directly related to her accusations against Trump, but suggest that she was truthful about other matters she raised with the FBI.






Oct 22, 2016

Trump vowing to sue 'every one' of his female accusers​


"Every one of these liars will be sued once the election is over," Trump said, adding, "I look so forward to doing that."




MAYBE WHEN HE'S DONE GOLFING, HE'LL ADD HER TO THE LIST OF THOSE HE'S GOING TO GO BACK TEN YEARS AND SUE?
 
“Would you declassify the Epstein files?” Campos-Duffy said.

“Yeah, yeah, I would,” Trump said.

The clip spread on social media, and Trump’s campaign account also shared it.
Your claim was He campaigned on that yet there were only two instances where He mentioned during any campaign speeches.

During the 2024 election, President Trump promised to release the Epstein files as part of a campaign message arguing the government was run by powerful people hiding the truth from Americans.

**** OFF IF YOU CONTINUE TO CUT DOWN MY QUOTES

200.gif
 
Your claim was He campaigned on that yet there were only two instances where He mentioned during any campaign speeches.





200.gif




Got it, him saying it twice, his campaign putting it out at least once, means he didn't really mean it? And his signing the law into effect THEN blocking it means?
 
Got it, him saying it twice, his campaign putting it out at least once, means he didn't really mean it? And his signing the law into effect THEN blocking it means?
It means it wasn’t a top priority. It’s a shame you don’t know much about this
 
15th post
Your claim was He campaigned on that yet there were only two instances where He mentioned during any campaign speeches.





200.gif

You are trying to explain words to a group of people who change the meaning of words at any time that they need, for their benefit.
 
New Evidence Corroborates Claims of Trump Sex Accuser, 13
From your article:

Her assault claims against Epstein, Atkins and Donald Trump remain unproven, and the White House has vigorously denied the assertions about the president. No direct evidence has been uncovered supporting the assault claims.
____________
While The Post and Courier has not independently verified a connection between Atkins and Epstein, the New York financier had many Ohio connections, including his billionaire client Les Wexner, who owned The Limited and Victoria’s Secret retail empires, and his early adviser Goldsmith, the British mogul who held business interests in the Buckeye State.


Got it, him saying it twice, his campaign putting it out at least once, means he didn't really mean it?
Trump mentioned in passing in two campaign speeches, your failure to assert it was a major campaign pledge has bit you in the ass.
 
It means it wasn’t a top priority. It’s a shame you don’t know much about this

Pedophiles not a top priority of Cheeto? Well I knew that, him being such a good friend of Epstein and all. Was just hoping SOME of his CULT cared about KIDS
 
Pedophiles not a top priority of Cheeto? Well I knew that, him being such a good friend of Epstein and all. Was just hoping SOME of his CULT cared about KIDS

There are no peds, kids, or children involved in this story.

You know what else was missing - any concern from you pukes until someone saw a political opportunity and instructed you to throw away the last brain cell that you had and get with the false narrative.
 
Back
Top Bottom