Massie has a great idea for getting the names of miscreants out there from the Epstein files

Would you rather stand around a 55gal barrel behind Safeway burning old pallets & drinking wine with hobo out of the bottle OR take a "job" at Epstein ranch changing bedsheets 2 hours oer week for $1500 per month tax free and all the freelance cash you can make? SHUP dirty TDS swine.
 
Last edited:
Yeah. His "niche" is having the backbone to hold his President actual conservative principles.
Which are what? I would've thought if you were going to show his bonafides, it would be accompanied with receipts.
 
We voted for what we were promised. Right now, the Prog elite made up No Kings protests are going on by the Progressive Socialist Communists. It is incredible how far we have fallen in 60 years.

The democrats have nothing to do with how bad Trump and his RINO's are.
 
Massie failed to stop any of it................ :biggrin:

We have a constitutional republic. Which means not one politician is more powerful than another.

You simply don't understand how government works. How is one congressman supposed to stop over 500 others?
 
Which means not one politician is more powerful than another.
I remember him screwing up votes with the slim margin.

How is one congressman supposed to stop over 500 others?
I thought he wore a cape. He could probably borrow one...

s-l400 (1).webp
 
The democrats have nothing to do with how bad Trump and his RINO's are.


The only RINO are in Congress and those like you, you and your KKKlan, the soft mushy underbelly, dirty pantyliners. Slimy sneaky dishonest mealy-mouthed phony plants working to fuel Board Stain Lunatics, exactly as the 98% commee media does.

You spread vile TDS, pretending an elevated pro-American position? Not all is going perfect, we know. Especially with you turncoats, 90% Congress & Media fighting against (distracting, slowing, limiting progress).

Benedict Ahnold in drag has more good inside than all you slimy sneaky red-jacketed faggy turncoats put together. It is even worse when the Military is out in harms way to take out enemies.

Once a traitor always a phony by definition. You have to be. Enjoy what you're doing, games on.
 
We have a constitutional republic. Which means not one politician is more powerful than another.

You simply don't understand how government works. How is one congressman supposed to stop over 500 others?
You have to be kidding.

One not one politician is more powerful than another? I think you meant to say something else.

Mike Johnson is more powerful than Jazmine Crocket because he convinced the House to elect him speaker.

If Massie knew how to be a team player instead of a grandstander, he had just as much chance as Johnson to be elected speaker.

If he knew how to talk to people instead of yelling at them, he has just as much chance as any other congressman to persuade his fellow representatives.
 
Can't unthink it....

okey dokey!

change your handle.

lol ... ' tis yer problemo, not mine.

You asked

okey dokey pokey!

Regardless.....many who had nothing to do with Epstein directly will be put into the public eye and have to deal with the consequences unfairly.

well, the victims have been unfairly dealt with for years.

Massie and Ro Khanna should be screening people in that situation but they don't care.

you are not convincing at all.
 
Run with the 13yr old.

There's no there there.

Deal with it.
Nope.

Here is Ro Khanna almost desperately trying to get Epstein's accountant to say that this 13yr old accused Trump of rape when she applied for money from the Epstein victims compensation fund. It's the first question he asks (naturally):



She did not, not by statement, nor by implication.

In fact, the fund denied her application because she did not meet the criteria for eligibility. Apparently, unlike Ro Khanna, the managers of the compensation fund required some kind of evidence or credibility before automatically believing a woman asking for money.
 
I have read that Rep. Thomas Massie says he has a major move in mind regarding the Epstein files.

He stated that if the Department of Justice, under Pam Bondi, does not release unredacted names linked to Epstein, he could take the issue to the House floor and read the names publicly under congressional immunity.

Under that protection, such statements would be part of the official Congressional Record.

Rep. Thomas Massie says he has a major move in mind regarding the Epstein files.
He stated that if the Department of Justice, under Pam Bondi, does not release unredacted names linked to Epstein, he could take the issue to the House floor and read the names publicly under congressional immunity.
Under that protection, such statements would be part of the official Congressional Record.

This is genius.

In the Yahoo News report, Massie states that he is willing to use the constitutional protections afforded to members of Congress to “publicly read a list of Epstein’s clients” that is being compiled by victims. This is a direct acknowledgment that he may release names on the House floor, where he cannot be prosecuted or sued for doing so.

Members of Congress are protected by the Speech and Debate Clause of the U.S. Constitution.This means:
  • They cannot be prosecuted for statements made during official legislative activity.
  • They cannot be sued for defamation for what they say on the floor.
  • They can introduce documents into the Congressional Record with legal immunity.
So if Massie chose to read names aloud, he would be shielded from legal consequences.
He would however be blocked from a lot of intel in the future, if he did this. Im also 99.9% sure that releasing these names wouldnt achieve a single conviction. :dunno:
 
We're talking about the same thing.

This 13 yr old that the left is so convinced she was referring to Trump is the same one who filed a west coast lawsuit that was tossed then refiled in NYC I think. She pop's up again in three interviews in a 302 that was recently released, with the FBI which they wanted her to come back for a fourth audio interview, which would be a sworn statement. She danced all around about doing a recorded interview, told the FBI she'd think about it and never contacted them again.

After that the woman who there was several articles covered in the Daily Mail, ended up suddenly dropping her lawsuit for no reason. There unproven reports of threats and so on but her atty said something about her dropping the suit for an unknown reason. This all happened in the run up to Trump's first election.

The Stooges on the left, including Ron Goldman, made big noise about 'the 13 yr old' on the floor of Congress...... that's all fine and dandy until you read the 302 on the last page and a half where it details what I pointed out about the interviews.

I posted it in post #1205 in The Epstein Files thread.
 
Last edited:
This 13 yr old DEM plant HO BS only started up again a few days after Trump announced running again for 2024. They just recycled it again.

Like they did with blue haired rspe hag in NY?

Disgraceful. Yet Adult board posters fall for it. Wow! Just wow!.
 
This 13 yr old DEM plant HO BS only started up again a few days after Trump announced running again for 2024. They just recycled it again.

Like they did with blue haired rspe hag in NY?

Disgraceful. Yet Adult board posters fall for it. Wow! Just wow!.

Also when they realized there was no smoking gun on 5th Ave.

What liars and the asshats on the left here suck it up as gospel.
 
15th post
I have read that Rep. Thomas Massie says he has a major move in mind regarding the Epstein files.

He stated that if the Department of Justice, under Pam Bondi, does not release unredacted names linked to Epstein, he could take the issue to the House floor and read the names publicly under congressional immunity.

Under that protection, such statements would be part of the official Congressional Record.

Rep. Thomas Massie says he has a major move in mind regarding the Epstein files.
He stated that if the Department of Justice, under Pam Bondi, does not release unredacted names linked to Epstein, he could take the issue to the House floor and read the names publicly under congressional immunity.
Under that protection, such statements would be part of the official Congressional Record.

This is genius.

In the Yahoo News report, Massie states that he is willing to use the constitutional protections afforded to members of Congress to “publicly read a list of Epstein’s clients” that is being compiled by victims. This is a direct acknowledgment that he may release names on the House floor, where he cannot be prosecuted or sued for doing so.

Members of Congress are protected by the Speech and Debate Clause of the U.S. Constitution.This means:
  • They cannot be prosecuted for statements made during official legislative activity.
  • They cannot be sued for defamation for what they say on the floor.
  • They can introduce documents into the Congressional Record with legal immunity.
So if Massie chose to read names aloud, he would be shielded from legal consequences.
He'll just have to be careful that the Zionists don't "Kirk" him in broad daylight. They do NOT want their names known.
 
All of it outside any statute of limitations yet if they can feed TDS? Here come the phony zmiddleStain with heavy doses TDS every day. If MessyMassie can swing a little more money from muslim enemies of Trump..
 
Back
Top Bottom