Massie has a great idea for getting the names of miscreants out there from the Epstein files

That was my whole gripe about the process.....guilt by association not guilt by involvement. These stooges don't care. That makes Massie and Ro Khanna as inept as they claim Bondi is.



Pretty much trading state secrets.

AL Capone was arrested for tax evasion.
 
And, right on cue.

They don't even want it investigated. Even with all the photos and videos and emails already recovered.

Why do they want to protect pedos and sexual trafficking?

I know why.

You phucks are willfully and intentionally brain dead.

Who doesn't want investigations?

We have had investigations - that is how we have -

Wait for it.

Wait for it -



files.
 
You don't even know.

I'm not surprised.

Look it up, Einstein.


I'm not the one talking about it. You are, you Obiden folk. I've seen nothing, heard of nothing incriminating.

This is the only site with enough TDS groupies to harp on it day and night. Post it? If you have anything. You could link it I guess? But, I'm not following you to Salon or other trash like David Corn from 1995.
 
You phucks are willfully and intentionally brain dead.

Who doesn't want investigations?

We have had investigations - that is how we have -

Wait for it.

Wait for it -



files.

Is it weird that being the genius that mac believes himself to be that he can only ever muster a thumps up when his puny posts are annililated?

I think so.

(yes I quoted myself.)
 
I have read that Rep. Thomas Massie says he has a major move in mind regarding the Epstein files.

He stated that if the Department of Justice, under Pam Bondi, does not release unredacted names linked to Epstein, he could take the issue to the House floor and read the names publicly under congressional immunity.

Under that protection, such statements would be part of the official Congressional Record.

Rep. Thomas Massie says he has a major move in mind regarding the Epstein files.
He stated that if the Department of Justice, under Pam Bondi, does not release unredacted names linked to Epstein, he could take the issue to the House floor and read the names publicly under congressional immunity.
Under that protection, such statements would be part of the official Congressional Record.

This is genius.

In the Yahoo News report, Massie states that he is willing to use the constitutional protections afforded to members of Congress to “publicly read a list of Epstein’s clients” that is being compiled by victims. This is a direct acknowledgment that he may release names on the House floor, where he cannot be prosecuted or sued for doing so.

Members of Congress are protected by the Speech and Debate Clause of the U.S. Constitution.This means:
  • They cannot be prosecuted for statements made during official legislative activity.
  • They cannot be sued for defamation for what they say on the floor.
  • They can introduce documents into the Congressional Record with legal immunity.
So if Massie chose to read names aloud, he would be shielded from legal consequences.
Except the clause does make exceptions, including committing a felony. Reading classified information in public would be considered a felony.

IMG_9866.webp



Massie is sure welcomed to do it. But I’m going to bet he isn’t going to do jack shit.
 
Trump released the files. Still no one accused of anything. amazing out of 3 million files. yet this is huge, HUGE!!! HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHA

oh, and Massie remains silent.
Release all the files.
 
15th post
Release all the files.
they will be releasing more, until then, what is it you've learned about anyone? Come on friend grow the fk up and speak what you've found? You need to tell Massie, cause he has jack shit.
 
Back
Top Bottom