Massie has a great idea for getting the names of miscreants out there from the Epstein files

[YoursTruly]

I bounce you like a basketball then dunk. You are a joke.

The Trump tribe is as easy as whack a mole.

 

[jc456]

Public attacks.....aka retaliation.

no fking way. If their names came out today and anything physical happened, they'd be done. No fking way, lawsuit is what they'd do.

 

[jc456]

Massie doesn't vote with Republicans when they're trying to spend too much or override the COTUS.
Or get us into wars & protect pedophiles.

still nothing on that pdo thing exposed, still waiting, why don't you do a citizens arrest mthr fkr, I grow tired of your useless dribble.

 

[jc456]

The Trump tribe is as easy as whack a mole.

you all are easier. DoH!

 

[pknopp]

it's 50% of what they have. nothing, and, I expect nothing from the next 50%. All you need to do is show something of value that makes an argument and you have nothing.

It got Andy arrested.

 

[Delldude]

Massie doesn't vote with Republicans when they're trying to spend too much or override the COTUS.

Override the COTUS? This gotta be good.

Or get us into wars & protect pedophiles.

True, Trump was protecting the pedophiles when he helped in the prosecution of Epstein and Maxwell.

The Trump tribe is as easy as whack a mole.

Whack a mole is taking campaign cash from the same hands the Jew hating terrorist supporting Squad does......

no fking way. If their names came out today and anything physical happened, they'd be done. No fking way, lawsuit is what they'd do.

Media dude........ wake up

 

[leftwinger]

Congress set rules for release with redactions. Yet filthy MiddleStain & dirty Stain still chirp....."get Trump, get Trump, we know he's in there". Of course his name is in there. He's beenTargeted every day since 2015 but no proof. That's weird.

 

[jc456]

It got Andy arrested.

Andy who? If you mean Andrew, he wasn't arrested for sex trafficking or having sex with minors. Show me the arrest.

Trying to stretch a lie as far as you can and it's still a lie.

We're all still waiting for that first arrest fool.

 

[Carl in Michigan]

Nail the pigs who took part in this.

This may end up being one of the biggest and ugliest things our elites have ever been a part of. At least that we KNOW about.

Anyone who doesn't want the lid blown off this thing is knowingly protecting pedos and sexual trafficking.

ACCUSATIONS.

 

[leftwinger]

ACCUSATIONS.

Filthy DemonRats like Mac&Cheese, PeeKkk and YT don't care if no proof. Jack Smith, Russian, phony rape lady, mortgage fraud etc. All false too. DEMs pay false accusers.

But these rats just need media co-operation to print accusations. Retraction? If at all, months later on page 12B.

 

[YoursTruly]

pknopp , why hasn't Massie just stated the names then?

Representative Thomas Massie did go to the House floor to address these names recently.

On February 24, 2026, Massie delivered a speech where he criticized the Department of Justice's (DOJ) handling of the files and explicitly called for the prosecution of several individuals. While he has been strategic about how and when he reveals specific redacted information to avoid legal or procedural blowbacks, he and Representative Ro Khanna (D-CA) have already named several figures they believe were unnecessarily hidden.

Here is the current breakdown of why certain names were withheld and what has been released:

The "Six Men" Disclosure​

In early February 2026, Massie and Khanna reviewed unredacted files at the DOJ and discovered six "wealthy and powerful" men whose names had been redacted without a clear legal justification. Shortly after, the names were made public:

• Les Wexner: The billionaire founder of Victoria's Secret.
• Sultan Ahmed Bin Sulayem: A Dubai-based DP World chairman.
• Nicola Caputo: An Italian politician.
• Salvatore Nuara, Zurab Mikeladze, and Leonic Leonov: Additional figures identified in the files.
  
  
  Why he didn't name them immediately

Massie originally threatened to read the names on the House floor but paused to give the DOJ a chance to "correct their mistakes" first. His caution was rooted in a few factors:

• The "Epstein Files Transparency Act": Massie co-authored this law, which allows redactions only for victims or ongoing investigations. He wanted to ensure that by speaking, he wasn't accidentally compromising a legitimate investigation or a victim's privacy.
• Procedural Leverage: By holding the names, he pressured the DOJ to release the "302 forms" (FBI interview summaries), which he argues contain the real evidence of why these individuals were never prosecuted.
• Ongoing Conflict with Leadership: Massie has stated that he believes some within the current administration and the DOJ are protecting "friends and donors," leading to a protracted legal battle involving subpoenas for Attorney General Pam Bondi.
  
  
  
  

 

[OldFlame]

Representative Thomas Massie did go to the House floor to address these names recently.

On February 24, 2026, Massie delivered a speech where he criticized the Department of Justice's (DOJ) handling of the files and explicitly called for the prosecution of several individuals. While he has been strategic about how and when he reveals specific redacted information to avoid legal or procedural blowbacks, he and Representative Ro Khanna (D-CA) have already named several figures they believe were unnecessarily hidden.

Here is the current breakdown of why certain names were withheld and what has been released:

The "Six Men" Disclosure​

In early February 2026, Massie and Khanna reviewed unredacted files at the DOJ and discovered six "wealthy and powerful" men whose names had been redacted without a clear legal justification. Shortly after, the names were made public:

• Les Wexner: The billionaire founder of Victoria's Secret.
• Sultan Ahmed Bin Sulayem: A Dubai-based DP World chairman.
• Nicola Caputo: An Italian politician.
• Salvatore Nuara, Zurab Mikeladze, and Leonic Leonov: Additional figures identified in the files.
  
  
  Why he didn't name them immediately

Massie originally threatened to read the names on the House floor but paused to give the DOJ a chance to "correct their mistakes" first. His caution was rooted in a few factors:

• The "Epstein Files Transparency Act": Massie co-authored this law, which allows redactions only for victims or ongoing investigations. He wanted to ensure that by speaking, he wasn't accidentally compromising a legitimate investigation or a victim's privacy.
• Procedural Leverage: By holding the names, he pressured the DOJ to release the "302 forms" (FBI interview summaries), which he argues contain the real evidence of why these individuals were never prosecuted.
• Ongoing Conflict with Leadership: Massie has stated that he believes some within the current administration and the DOJ are protecting "friends and donors," leading to a protracted legal battle involving subpoenas for Attorney General Pam Bondi.
  
  

I hope the four from the last two bullet points sue the hell out of them since they had nothing to do with Epstein, you idiot.

 

[pknopp]

Andy who? If you mean Andrew, he wasn't arrested for sex trafficking or having sex with minors. Show me the arrest.

Trying to stretch a lie as far as you can and it's still a lie.

We're all still waiting for that first arrest fool.

It got him arrested.

 

[OldFlame]

It got him arrested.

Not for sexual deviancy with Epstein, only because he allegedly shared confidential information with him. It has nothing to do with any victims or Epstein's trafficking.

 

[Mac1958]

Anyone who doesn't want the lid blown off this thing is knowingly protecting pedos and sexual trafficking.

ACCUSATIONS.

Filthy DemonRats like Mac&Cheese, PeeKkk and YT don't care if no proof. Jack Smith, Russian, phony rape lady, mortgage fraud etc. All false too. DEMs pay false accusers.

And, right on cue.

They don't even want it investigated. Even with all the photos and videos and emails already recovered.

Why do they want to protect pedos and sexual trafficking?

I know why.

 

[leftwinger]

And, right on cue.

They don't even want it investigated. Even with all the photos and videos and emails already recovered.

Why do they want to protect pedos and sexual trafficking?

I know why.

Its already been investigated for years. They got what they could.

Now you have ten more resigations, punishments just for knowing Epstien or visiting the island. Vigilante press justice. The Mac&Cheesee D method. Are you happy now?

Yes, I went on vacations and exchanged a few emails. I must resign in disgrace now. Yet I did nothing with any young or old hookers? D-MAC wins!!!

 

[leftwinger]

And, right on cue.

They don't even want it investigated. Even with all the photos and videos and emails already recovered.

Why do they want to protect pedos and sexual trafficking?

I know why.

What photos? What videos?surely you can post something if you can chirp on it? Clinton in a hotel pool in Morocco? Is that a crime?

 

[Delldude]

I hope the four from the last two bullet points sue the hell out of them since they had nothing to do with Epstein, you idiot.

That was my whole gripe about the process.....guilt by association not guilt by involvement. These stooges don't care. That makes Massie and Ro Khanna as inept as they claim Bondi is.

It got him arrested.

Pretty much trading state secrets.

 

[jc456]

Nail the pigs who took part in this.

This may end up being one of the biggest and ugliest things our elites have ever been a part of. At least that we KNOW about.

Anyone who doesn't want the lid blown off this thing is knowingly protecting pedos and sexual trafficking.

Why don’t the women put out the names?

 

[Mac1958]

What photos? What videos?surelyyou can post something if you can chirp on it? Clinton in a hotel pool in Morocco? Is that a crime?

You don't even know.

I'm not surprised.

Look it up, Einstein.