Massie has a great idea for getting the names of miscreants out there from the Epstein files

[jacksonlamb]

haaaaaaaaaaaaahahaha, you've been had by me. You can't even accept the fact your ass just got handed to you. You are a very limited person who relies on others to think. I gave you what you were trying to avoid and if fked you up.

I bounce you like a basketball then dunk. You are a joke.

 

[Billiejeens]

Because they are obssessed with Epstein because MAGA routinely sexualizes young girls in our culture, period.

Epstein files are never going away.

Another insane phuck shows up.

 

[Billiejeens]

Good question and someone needs to ask him. I noted he gets no credit simply for the threat.

His life is doing things that no one should give him credit for.

and yet -

 

[jacksonlamb]

The class clown, billijeans, is on board.

 

[jc456]

I bounce you like a basketball then dunk. You are a joke.

in your wet dream you do.

 

[jc456]

The class clown, billijeans, is on board.

all aboard!!!!

 

[jc456]

Good question and someone needs to ask him. I noted he gets no credit simply for the threat.

how many months has it been since he opened his fking yap?

 

[jc456]

No one is going to shut up about seeing the files until they are ALL seen.

what is it you think is there? We've seen over 3 million and there's nothing there, really, prove something before you step out in the abyss.

Even tarzan massie can't make a statement on what he has. haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahahahaa

 

[Delldude]

It's called retaliation.

Including legal consequences.

 

[Billiejeens]

The class clown, billijeans, is on board.

Which idiot did you used to be?

 

[Luckyone]

I have read that Rep. Thomas Massie says he has a major move in mind regarding the Epstein files.

He stated that if the Department of Justice, under Pam Bondi, does not release unredacted names linked to Epstein, he could take the issue to the House floor and read the names publicly under congressional immunity.

Under that protection, such statements would be part of the official Congressional Record.

Rep. Thomas Massie says he has a major move in mind regarding the Epstein files.
He stated that if the Department of Justice, under Pam Bondi, does not release unredacted names linked to Epstein, he could take the issue to the House floor and read the names publicly under congressional immunity.
Under that protection, such statements would be part of the official Congressional Record.

This is genius.

In the Yahoo News report, Massie states that he is willing to use the constitutional protections afforded to members of Congress to “publicly read a list of Epstein’s clients” that is being compiled by victims. This is a direct acknowledgment that he may release names on the House floor, where he cannot be prosecuted or sued for doing so.

Members of Congress are protected by the Speech and Debate Clause of the U.S. Constitution.This means:

• They cannot be prosecuted for statements made during official legislative activity.
• They cannot be sued for defamation for what they say on the floor.
• They can introduce documents into the Congressional Record with legal immunity.

So if Massie chose to read names aloud, he would be shielded from legal consequences.

 

[jc456]

Including legal consequences.

well the legal consequences would be the retaliation. What else would it be today?

 

[jc456]

Which idiot did you used to be?

he's a good twit.

 

[pknopp]

how many months has it been since he opened his fking yap?

Not as long as Trump.

 

[jc456]

Not as long as Trump.

Trump released the files. Still no one accused of anything. amazing out of 3 million files. yet this is huge, HUGE!!! HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHA

oh, and Massie remains silent.

 

[pknopp]

Trump released the files. Still no one accused of anything. amazing out of 3 million files. yet this is huge, HUGE!!! HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHA

oh, and Massie remains silent.

A portion of the files and only after being forced.

 

[jc456]

A portion of the files and only after being forced.

it's 50% of what they have. nothing, and, I expect nothing from the next 50%. All you need to do is show something of value that makes an argument and you have nothing.

 

[Billiejeens]

A portion of the files and only after being forced.

You all are simply making a joke of all of this and of yourselves.

 

[Delldude]

well the legal consequences would be the retaliation. What else would it be today?

Public attacks.....aka retaliation.

 

[YoursTruly]

Massie votes with republicans when his votes doesn't make a difference, and against republicans when it does...

Massie doesn't vote with Republicans when they're trying to spend too much or override the COTUS.
Or get us into wars & protect pedophiles.