Uncensored2008
Libertarian Radical
It's not property of the military unless the military owned it. Why is the military selling It's property?
And let's reiterate the fact that the AR-15 was neither designed for, nor ever used by the US Military.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's not property of the military unless the military owned it. Why is the military selling It's property?
I said carry on with your scree. What else do you want?
But it was the 3 hour protest of a stolen election that is called "insurrection."
Nah, just nudging you with a stick, in passing, noting the degree of importance you put on how the degree of importance of your findings really should impact everyone else.You would obviously like to disagree.
Put a little effort behind your indoctrination.
Please do. Then remind people that AR doesn't mean Assault Rifle. It's the manufacturer, Armalite.And let's reiterate the fact that the AR-15 was neither designed for, nor ever used by the US Military.
Te Crime Prevention Research Center s a gun advocacy group run by Jojn Lott, a gun advocacy leader. Their credibility is no better than the NRA
I seem to recall some Obama speech about how we are the only country with these mass shooting, the same day as some European nation did.....
“The one thing we do know is that we have a pattern now of mass shootings in this country that has no parallel anywhere else in the world, and there’s some steps we could take, not to eliminate every one of these mass shootings, but to improve the odds that they don’t happen as frequently.”
— President Obama, interview that aired on CBS Evening News, Dec. 2, 2015
Critics pushed back on that comment immediately, noting that Paris — where Obama was speaking — had just experienced a mass shooting. Mass shootings do happen in other countries, and that statement clearly is false, worthy of Four Pinocchios.
Does the United States have more mass shootings than other countries? It depends on the data.
Exactly how mass shootings in the U.S. compare to those in other countries is a highly disputed subject. In a widely publicized study originally released in 2015, the pro-gun nonprofit Crime Prevention Research Center (CPRC) compared the annual number of mass shooting deaths per million people in the U.S. to that of Canada and several European countries from 2009 to 2015. The result? Norway led the world with 1.88 deaths per million, followed by Serbia, France, and Macedonia. Where did the U.S. rank? 11th place.
Average (Mean) Annual Death Rate per Million People from Mass Public Shootings (U.S., Canada, and Europe, 2009-2015):
In addition, a 2018 CRPC study ranked the U.S. at number sixty-four in the world in terms of mass shooting rates per capita.
- Norway — 1.888
- Serbia — 0.381
- France — 0.347
- Macedonia — 0.337
- Albania — 0.206
- Slovakia — 0.185
- Switzerland — 0.142
- Finland — 0.132
- Belgium — 0.128
- Czech Republic — 0.123
- United States — 0.089
- Austria — 0.068
- Netherlands — 0.051
- Canada — 0.032
- England — 0.027
- Germany — 0.023
- Russia — 0.012
- Italy — 0.009
![]()
Mass Shootings by Country 2026
Information, data, and analysis regarding the number of mass shootings in the United States as compared to the number of mass shootings in every country in the world.worldpopulationreview.com
The 'culture' of killing due to America's continuous wars, as Michael Moore suggested, shouldn't just be laid aside and ignored.Well.....be fair to that dunce.....you can't be a Democrat in good standing and actually think.
Wait....you mean this 'violence'???
Nah, just nudging you with a stick, in passing, noting the degree of importance you put on how the degree of importance of your findings really should impact everyone else.
There are known photos of Bonnie and Clyde when they weren't robbing banks or killing people. Does that prove they were innocent?
America's continuous culture of wars since the end of WW2 has created the monsters that take out their military fantasies on little children that they consider safe targets.If you can't identify the problem, you can't fix it.
The military's weapon would be the ideal for the killer, but it's not easily available and so the closest copy is chosen.And let's reiterate the fact that the AR-15 was neither designed for, nor ever used by the US Military.
The 'culture' of killing due to America's continuous wars, as Michael Moore suggested, shouldn't just be laid aside and ignored.
That's not an attempt to place blame on either political persuasion but on Americans where it belongs.
But accepting responsibility comes with accepting guilt and the pain of the murdered children isn't being felt deeply enough yet.
At least your denial of a 'culture' of killing raises the question because of the need for denial.
How much impact has America's current war with Russia, as Americans begin to accept the fact and at least subconsciously understand the great risk?
The fact, they are not full auto capable, does not seem to lessen their effectiveness as a weapon of choice, easily attained by the unstable masses, does it? I kind of doubt what people choose to call it, affects how it is often used.Please do. Then remind people that AR doesn't mean Assault Rifle. It's the manufacturer, Armalite.
The semi-automatic civilian AR-15 was introduced by Colt in 1963. The primary distinction between civilian semi-automatic rifles and military assault rifles is select fire. Military models were produced with firing modes, semi-automatic fire and either fully automatic fire mode or burst fire mode, in which the rifle fires several rounds in succession when the trigger is depressed. Most components are interchangeable between semi-auto and select fire rifles including magazines, sights, upper receiver, barrels and accessories.[60][61] The military M4 carbine typically uses a 14.5-inch (37 cm) barrel. Civilian rifles commonly have 16-inch (41 cm) or longer barrels to comply with the National Firearms Act.The AR-15 was never sold to the United States Military and has never been used by it.
Cute, but you are starting to bore me again.Not everyone.....just those with the ability to judge reality, and truth.
I understand why you are not included.
Cute, but you are starting to bore me again.
We do not need gun control. We need crazy control. Salvador Ramos should have been off the streets when he slathered on the eyeliner and slashed up his face. Take him out even if he didn't have so much as a slingshot.The fact, they are not full auto capable, does not seem to lessen their effectiveness as a weapon of choice, easily attained by the unstable masses, does it? I kind of doubt what people choose to call it, affects how it is often used.
OK. What laws would you use to do that?We do not need gun control. We need crazy control. Salvador Ramos should have been off the streets when he slathered on the eyeliner and slashed up his face. Take him out even if he didn't have so much as a slingshot.
America's continuous culture of wars since the end of WW2 has created the monsters that take out their military fantasies on little children that they consider safe targets.
The shooters nearly always come dressed in the military costume and carrying the gun that most closely imitates the military ideal.
Don't continue to run away from the identity of the problem.