Wait this couldn't have happened in Canada because they have All the Best Gun Laws and every time there's a shooting in America they bring all the Snooty Canucks here to lecture us.
So I know I'm not reading this right now.
Correct?
(Condolences to the families of the lost. As we know humans are humans wherever you are and some of them are rotten)
Nope, not correct. Because it's got nothing to do with "laws" and never did. Has everything to do with
Culture.
We live in an established culture of violence and death, based around the penis-shaped bullet. We're indoctrinated into it from childhood from TV commercials for toy guns to comic books "celebrating" gunslingers of the "old west". Canada doesn't have that legacy. MOST cultures don't have that shit. Then plug in a major Masculinity Crisis (guess what gender virtually all mass shooters comprise) and you have a recipe for mayhem. You can pass or not pass all the laws you want, it doesn't change that
culture. As long as that culture demands worship of Almighty Gun with its attendant blood and carnage, those immersed in it will commit that carnage, laws or no laws.
Lemme see if I can dredge up an old thread of mine on this, the topic upon which I joined this site, right between the Jacksonville and Sandy Hook shootings.
EDIT - here ya go, no thanks to the site search box -- had to Google to find it. This is from a few years ago, begin paste:
I give you two cities, split by a river, kinda like Minneapolis and St. Paul are but this is a different pair of cities.
Obviously being next to each other, these cities have much in common regionally, climatically, industrially and so on. They are less than a mile apart, connected by a bridge and a tunnel. But the two cities show a stark difference in one area.
The city to the west recorded 377 total homicides in 2011 and 327 in 2010, according to police statistics(1), carrying a homicide rate of around 50 per 100,000 people
Across the bridge in the same time period, there was a total of
one. For both years put together. A rate of 0.30. From September 27, 2009 to November 22, 2011 in that city, there were no murders at all.
Zero.
What's going on here?
One of them is in Canada. The cities are Detroit and Windsor.
I haven't determined how many of those homicides were committed by firearm, but for a guide, out of 386 Detroit homicides in 2012, 333 were by firearm. Over 86%. (1)
And the one murder that finally broke the 2011 streak in Windsor? It was a stabbing.
People in his city of about 215,000 have a saying, Blaine said Friday afternoon: "In Windsor, when a 7-Eleven is held up, it usually is a knife. In Detroit, it is an Uzi."
It's not that there's no crime in Windsor, an industrial city that has seen its own economic challenges. "We're no different than any other major metropolitan area," Corey said. (
here)
704 to 1 in homicide;
several hundred to zero in gun deaths.
Detroit: at or near the highest murder rate in its country; Windsor:
lowest in its country.
Less than a mile apart.
What's driving the difference? Gun control? Or gun
culture?
Resources/further reading:
The fault lies not in our guns but in ourselves. To our values we are underlings.
{end paste}