mass graves in Iraq

nbdysfu

Member
Nov 17, 2003
829
29
16
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tm...0031207/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iraq_what_lies_beneath

AP: Scientists to Excavate Iraqi Graves
Sat Dec 6, 7:32 PM ET

By NIKO PRICE, Associated Press Writer

MAHAWEEL, Iraq - The killers kept bankers' hours.


AFP/File Photo



They showed up for work at the barley field at 9 a.m., trailed by backhoes and three buses filled with blindfolded men, women and children as young as 1.


Every day, witnesses say, the routine was the same: The backhoes dug a trench. Fifty people were led to the edge of the hole and shot, one by one, in the head. The backhoes covered them with dirt, then dug another hole for the next group.


At 5 p.m., the killers — officials of Saddam Hussein (news - web sites)'s Baath Party — went home to rest up for another day of slaughter.


In this wind-swept field in the central town of Mahaweel, witnesses say, this went on without a break for 35 days in March and April of 1991, during a crackdown on a Shiite Muslim uprising that followed the first Gulf War (news - web sites).


"I watched this with my own eyes," said Sayed Abbas Muhsen, 35, whose family farm was appropriated by Saddam's government for use as a killing field. "But we couldn't tell anyone. We didn't dare."


The mass grave at Mahaweel, with more than 3,100 sets of remains, is the largest of some 270 such sites across Iraq (news - web sites). They hold upward of 300,000 bodies; some Iraqi political parties estimate there are more than 1 million.


"It's as easy to find mass graves in Iraq as it once was to find oil," said Adnan Jabbar al-Saadi, a lawyer with Iraq's new Human Rights Ministry.


In the days following Saddam's fall on April 9, family members rushed to grave sites, digging for ID cards and clothing that confirmed their worst fears: The bones in the ground belonged to a son, a wife, a grandfather.


The U.S.-led occupation authority desperately tried to halt the digging, telling people that if they waited, forensic teams would unearth the remains and use the evidence to punish those responsible.


Now, an Associated Press investigation has discovered, forensic teams will begin digging in January to preserve the first physical evidence at four grave sites, their desert locations kept secret to prevent relatives from disturbing them first.


___


In a tiny back room of the deposed Iraqi president's sprawling brick-and-marble Republican Palace in Baghdad, American and British experts are using the latest technology to reach out to the dead.


They work from a growing database of 270 suspected grave sites, matching witness accounts with geological evidence, preparing for field trips by four-wheel-drive vehicle and helicopter to confirm their high-tech data with the most low-tech of methods: a shovel.


"This is not a case of `X marks the spot,'" said archaeologist Barrie Simpson. "It's not like driving down Route 66 with signposts that say, `Stop here.'"


Gypsum is one key tool. The Iraqi desert has a hard crust a foot below the surface, which is broken when a hole is dug. Minerals then mix to form gypsum, a kind of salt whose glistening white crystals are visible decades later from a satellite or from the ground.


Imagery in six spectral bands comes from a commercial satellite in orbit since 1983, which can take images of any spot on Earth every 16 days. The classified computers — which the experts switch off before a reporter enters the room — hold two decades of imagery.





If witnesses report a mass grave was dug in a certain desert location, say, in March 1991, experts can analyze data from images taken in February 1991 and June 1991, and determine whether a pit was dug in that area during that time period.

"We don't care what it looks like," said geoscientist Bruce Gerrick. "When our pixels come back and say it's gypsum, that's it."

After seven months of work, the team has confirmed 41 mass graves across the length and breadth of Iraq — a country the size of France — some near major cities, and others miles from the nearest road.

They have a long way to go.

___

Excavating a grave site under international standards is painstaking work. To pull 100 sets of remains from the ground, it usually takes six to eight weeks.

Nobody expects scientists to dig up and identify 300,000 sets of remains. So as the scientists analyze the desert, experts are trying to identify which graves could help prosecutors build a case against those responsible for their creation.

"We're trying to make sure that there is at least one grave, and hopefully two or three, for each major period of atrocity," said Sandra Hodgkinson, director of the occupation authority's human rights office. That would mean eight to 24 mass graves selected for full exhumation.

Of the 41 mass grave sites confirmed by the coalition team, only four meet the criteria for full exhumation so far, several members of the scientific team told AP. All are in the remote desert, none closer than 10 miles from the nearest road.

Forensic teams were supposed to have been in place months ago, but several canceled or delayed their trips out of fear for their safety. Hodgkinson said several are ready to begin work in late January.

The locations of the first four graves selected remain classified. Experts fear that if people know where they are, family members — or even the killers — might try to dig them up.

Meanwhile, Iraqis will unearth graves with an eye toward identification. Entifadh Qanbar, spokesman for the Iraqi National Congress, a major political party, said that will help Iraqis move on from three decades of brutal dictatorship — at least as important as seeing justice served.

"Those people who lost family members need to know where their sons and fathers are, and to rebury them with dignity," he said. "That will bring a lot of peace and comfort to the victims' families and start a process of reconciliation."

___

Iraq's U.S.-appointed rulers have drafted a plan to set up a special tribunal for crimes against humanity.

According to four people who have seen the draft — expected to be approved as soon as Sunday — it calls for Iraqi judges to hear cases from Iraqi prosecutors. International experts will participate as advisers.

Some human rights groups are uncomfortable with the plan, fearful that Iraqis won't have the expertise, or that they will sacrifice justice in their thirst for revenge. Some also say the U.S.-led government forced the plan on Iraqis.

But many Iraqis like the idea. They see an Iraqi-led process — no matter how it comes about — as more satisfying.

"I think it's very important for people to see the criminals who killed their families in court," said al-Saadi at the Human Rights Ministry.

U.S. authorities are pushing for a small number of high-profile trials — maybe 100 or so, including Saddam and other key leaders. Many Iraqis want to try thousands with links to the former regime.

"I think those highly responsible should face the courts," said Dr. Rafed al-Husseini, who heads the Iraqi Society for the Preservation of Mass Graves.. "For the people who followed their orders, we need forgiveness in Iraq."

___

Villagers dug furiously in Mahaweel in April, carting away more than 2,200 sets of remains. For those they couldn't identify, they dug individual, unmarked graves, and piled the belongings found with them atop the mounds.

In Mahaweel today, 900 mounds sit topped with shreds of clothing. On one is a pair of child-sized high-tops. On another, a blood-spattered green jacket. A wallet. A string of black prayer beads.

"It's over," said Atlas Hamid Ode, whose brother-in-law was buried there. "People don't go there anymore. They have lost all hope of finding their sons. These graves, without names, will remain as shrines."

If families are losing hope, the start of formal exhumations next month is sure to churn up old feelings. It's a process complex beyond description — a fragile mix of politics, justice and revenge in a delicate country wary of all three.

And relatives hope that in the midst of it all, in an occupied land where the very notion of tomorrow is uncertain, someone, somehow, will help them find peace.

___

Niko Price is correspondent-at-large for The Associated Press.
 
"The USA was still wrong for going into Iraq"
"Can you prove Saddam's regime was responsible"?
"It's still not WMD"
"It's just an excuse to steal their oil"
"Bush is stupid"
"There's no mass graves! Infidels!"
:rolleyes:

The WMD may not have been found, but the mass destruction sure has. This is sickening to read. Any excuse given by the liberals that Saddam was "harmless" is just pure rubbish.

Many posts were made since Operation Iron Hammer started. All I can recall the liberals speaking about was how innocent civilians were killed in the bombings. Replies were made about how it's not right that the citizens houses get raided. How come my searches come up empty when looking for posts condemning the thousands upon thousands of bodies found in these graves? Let me get this straight - It's ok to condemn the USA for accidentally killing civilians in a struggle with insurgents, but condemning the killing of perhaps hundreds of thousands of citizens isn't worthy of posting?

Seems to me like "Let's bash the current administration at every opportunity, but sit silently when news of the treachery that existed in Iraq is discussed".

This alone was enough to invade and occupy Iraq.
 
This alone was enough to invade and occupy Iraq.

Jim, I know two things. If I was still an active duty marine I would have gladly gone in to remove hussein and free the iraqi people but millions of people in this country look at our armed forces as having one responsibility and thats the defense of THIS nation. They believe, and maybe rightly so, that we are not the worlds police force. We are there to protect american interests and provide our national security, not to liberate every oppressed country or peoples in the world. We can certainly HELP those that want to help themselves, but we can't do it because we say so. I also know that, as a marine, had I been ordered to go over there to remove the threat of weapons of mass destruction that could be used against my countrymen and still haven't found them, i'm going to be upset with someone.

All the rhetoric aside, I believe this war in iraq has many facets to it, most of them legitimate, but the one thing our government forgot is that the population CAN be reasonable and if the WMD's hadn't been stressed to us as the primary reason, if the president had said to the american people that there was a mistake made in supporting hussein and we are now going to remove that mistake, we'd have more than 75% in favor. Thats my opinion anyway, maybe I have too much faith in the people of this country when it comes to that.
 
The only thing I disagree with is the USA fighting for others and fighting for our country. My belief is that we should help other nations in trouble. I feel we have an obligation as world leaders to intervene when citizens of that magnitude are being systematically eliminated.

I think our homeland gets obvious priority, but we should never ignore others in danger. The entire Middle East is a better place without Saddam.
 
Indeed, the whole region,if not the entire world,free or not is better off with out the likes of saddam ruling Iraq. I may look at this differently then most but I have no problem taking freedom to people that cant get to our shores. freedom is a GOD given right to allpeople with out reguard to race/relegion or income. we can and will help the oppressed as we have from day one.
 
we can and will help the oppressed as we have from day one.

on behalf of my native american ancestors, we thank you for freeing us from the oppression of life on the open plains.

sarcasm off
 
sarcasm mode back on

No need to thank us, we didn't ask you then and we aren't asking now.

ok, back off
 
Aside from the very callous remarks you've made previously in this thread, jim, I ask only that you consider the Potter's fields that dot this country like wildflowers. There is no country that has not experienced catstrophe in one form or another. Some say that the "Yellow Fever" epidemic that effected my town so dramatically in the early 1900's could've been prevented but the truth is, it was not. TB also took it's toll and produced the addition and enlargement of Potter's Fields. Influenza, whooping cough and right on into syphilis and other STD's have proven devastating to our AMERICAN society. I suppose one might surmise that we also have "mass graves".

Being the suspicious one that I am, I doubt the accuracy or the political inclinations of discoveries of "mass graves" in a country that is much older than my own. Come on down South. I'll point out many "mass graves" for you if you are so inclined to desire the education. Gee whiz, we're only a few hundred years old. Time didn't start in 1492.

To be clear, I am certain that the former leader of Iraq was a butcher of his own peoples and others that he considered enemies. But I made my point. Shed no tears for me or my memories, shed your tears for the atrocities that we witness today.
 
originally posted by psychoblues
Being the suspicious one that I am, I doubt the accuracy or the political inclinations of discoveries of "mass graves" in a country that is much older than my own. Come on down South. I'll point out many "mass graves" for you if you are so inclined to desire the education. Gee whiz, we're only a few hundred years old. Time didn't start in 1492.
_________________________ _________________________

For Accuracy refer back to the article, specifically:

They work from a growing database of 270 suspected grave sites, matching witness accounts with geological evidence, preparing for field trips by four-wheel-drive vehicle and helicopter to confirm their high-tech data with the most low-tech of methods: a shovel.


"This is not a case of `X marks the spot,'" said archaeologist Barrie Simpson. "It's not like driving down Route 66 with signposts that say, `Stop here.'"


Gypsum is one key tool. The Iraqi desert has a hard crust a foot below the surface, which is broken when a hole is dug. Minerals then mix to form gypsum, a kind of salt whose glistening white crystals are visible decades later from a satellite or from the ground.


Imagery in six spectral bands comes from a commercial satellite in orbit since 1983, which can take images of any spot on Earth every 16 days. The classified computers — which the experts switch off before a reporter enters the room — hold two decades of imagery.





If witnesses report a mass grave was dug in a certain desert location, say, in March 1991, experts can analyze data from images taken in February 1991 and June 1991, and determine whether a pit was dug in that area during that time period.

"We don't care what it looks like," said geoscientist Bruce Gerrick. "When our pixels come back and say it's gypsum, that's it."

After seven months of work, the team has confirmed 41 mass graves across the length and breadth of Iraq — a country the size of France — some near major cities, and others miles from the nearest road.

They have a long way to go.

In other words they won't be able to mistake ancient grave sites or even ones from the year before on this one.

As to political inclinations, I'm sorry it looks like the tire gators are flying off your truck on this one.



originally posted by psychoblues
To be clear, I am certain that the former leader of Iraq was a butcher of his own peoples and others that he considered enemies. But I made my point. Shed no tears for me or my memories, shed your tears for the atrocities that we witness today.

_________________________ _________________________
:confused:
'I guess those 6million jews that died in WWII were actually just the remnants of 5th century bc mongol invaders. Even though Hitler was an evil guy.' That's your argument. You have yet to prove a point.
 
Typical dittohead obfuscation. Jeesh, I didn't say a word about the 6 million Jews that were "exterminated" during the fascist regime of Adolph Hitler. You're kind of out there on a limb, aren't you, nbdysfu?
 
Originally posted by Psychoblues
Aside from the very callous remarks you've made previously in this thread, jim, I ask only that you consider the Potter's fields that dot this country like wildflowers. There is no country that has not experienced catstrophe in one form or another. Some say that the "Yellow Fever" epidemic that effected my town so dramatically in the early 1900's could've been prevented but the truth is, it was not. TB also took it's toll and produced the addition and enlargement of Potter's Fields. Influenza, whooping cough and right on into syphilis and other STD's have proven devastating to our AMERICAN society. I suppose one might surmise that we also have "mass graves".

Being the suspicious one that I am, I doubt the accuracy or the political inclinations of discoveries of "mass graves" in a country that is much older than my own. Come on down South. I'll point out many "mass graves" for you if you are so inclined to desire the education. Gee whiz, we're only a few hundred years old. Time didn't start in 1492.

To be clear, I am certain that the former leader of Iraq was a butcher of his own peoples and others that he considered enemies. But I made my point. Shed no tears for me or my memories, shed your tears for the atrocities that we witness today.

What the hell are you talking about? Go tell your rosy stories to someone who gives a shit about you.

It's a fact that MANY mass graves have been found in Iraq and continue to be found.

Citizens were systematically eliminated in a calculated manner. These are real and these are fact. You trying to downplay their authenticity shows just how foolish you are.

This is the Iraq forum in case you forgot.
 
how do you compare epidemics with saddam? at the time of the epidemics you speak of there was no cure. however there is a 'cure; for saddam. death would be tooo good for him, the butcher of bagdad.
 

Forum List

Back
Top