What a knee jerk reaction...You don't know me pal....What I find interesting is that anyone challanging your authortarian policy of mask wearing deserves personal attack by you....Just like a good fascist.
Really? So, now you think that people should ignore the policies at their place of work? Why? So they can lose their jobs? And if they don't they are hypocrites? You are one evil person you know that?
Really? So, now you think that people should ignore the policies at their place of work? Why? So they can lose their jobs? And if they don't they are hypocrites? You are one evil person you know that?
The article is what I was referencing. If they claim mask do not work then why do they use them? I don't care if you lose your job over a mask that is yer fault for submitting yourself to the domination of a corporation.
This is an "opinion" piece from a conservative leaning group of doctors. Suspect at best. The reason it may be inaccurate is because it is derived from a political point of view, not a science one.
All you have to do is take a look at their blog to find out what their "opinions" are.
This right here. Doesn't jive with the article below it. "Sweden has the lowest number of deaths per million in this comparison despite only 7.7% of the surveyed population reported wearing a mask".
Sweden on Wednesday took steps to increase measures against the novel coronavirus, recommending commuters wear masks on public transport during rush hour as the country announced a record death toll from COVID-19.
www.reuters.com
The entire article is a politically written, statistical and study based, cherry picked blog. It's someone's opinion. I could probably read something similar to this
on just about any alt-right Internet site. Sweden's death rate is lower than its lockdown European neighbors because it is not only lower in population, but
its population is spread out. Any fifth grader could work that out.
I'm glad to see that you only dispute this item, this is still a great endorsement of the article. On your one dispute, I noticed that the article you posted (from a different date, lol) has a disclaimer about skewed information. Can you post what the accurate information was on the date of what you are disputing?
This is just one sentence in the article I brought up. Again, this article was written from a political stance. The numbers, charts, and graphs were all cherry picked to support this political point of view.
What a knee jerk reaction...You don't know me pal....What I find interesting is that anyone challanging your authortarian policy of mask wearing deserves personal attack by you....Just like a good fascist.
This is an "opinion" piece from a conservative leaning group of doctors. Suspect at best. The reason it may be inaccurate is because it is derived from a political point of view, not a science one.
All you have to do is take a look at their blog to find out what their "opinions" are.
This right here. Doesn't jive with the article below it. "Sweden has the lowest number of deaths per million in this comparison despite only 7.7% of the surveyed population reported wearing a mask".
Sweden on Wednesday took steps to increase measures against the novel coronavirus, recommending commuters wear masks on public transport during rush hour as the country announced a record death toll from COVID-19.
www.reuters.com
The entire article is a politically written, statistical and study based, cherry picked blog. It's someone's opinion. I could probably read something similar to this
on just about any alt-right Internet site. Sweden's death rate is lower than its lockdown European neighbors because it is not only lower in population, but
its population is spread out. Any fifth grader could work that out.
I'm glad to see that you only dispute this item, this is still a great endorsement of the article. On your one dispute, I noticed that the article you posted (from a different date, lol) has a disclaimer about skewed information. Can you post what the accurate information was on the date of what you are disputing?
This is just one sentence in the article I brought up. Again, this article was written from a political stance. The numbers, charts, and graphs were all cherry picked to support this political point of view.
I got the point. It's cherry picked information sprinkled into an opinion piece. Like all propaganda, there are some truths spread about.
However, since the article was written from a political point of view with the information in it designed to support it, it remains suspect.
Sorry, I'm not playing the "Be specific" game that you righties like to play when you know you've been called out on your horseshit.
Really? So, now you think that people should ignore the policies at their place of work? Why? So they can lose their jobs? And if they don't they are hypocrites? You are one evil person you know that?
The article is what I was referencing. If they claim mask do not work then why do they use them? I don't care if you lose your job over a mask that is yer fault for submitting yourself to the domination of a corporation.
This is an "opinion" piece from a conservative leaning group of doctors. Suspect at best. The reason it may be inaccurate is because it is derived from a political point of view, not a science one.
All you have to do is take a look at their blog to find out what their "opinions" are.
This right here. Doesn't jive with the article below it. "Sweden has the lowest number of deaths per million in this comparison despite only 7.7% of the surveyed population reported wearing a mask".
Sweden on Wednesday took steps to increase measures against the novel coronavirus, recommending commuters wear masks on public transport during rush hour as the country announced a record death toll from COVID-19.
www.reuters.com
The entire article is a politically written, statistical and study based, cherry picked blog. It's someone's opinion. I could probably read something similar to this
on just about any alt-right Internet site. Sweden's death rate is lower than its lockdown European neighbors because it is not only lower in population, but
its population is spread out. Any fifth grader could work that out.
I'm glad to see that you only dispute this item, this is still a great endorsement of the article. On your one dispute, I noticed that the article you posted (from a different date, lol) has a disclaimer about skewed information. Can you post what the accurate information was on the date of what you are disputing?
This is just one sentence in the article I brought up. Again, this article was written from a political stance. The numbers, charts, and graphs were all cherry picked to support this political point of view.
I got the point. It's cherry picked information sprinkled into an opinion piece. Like all propaganda, there are some truths spread about.
However, since the article was written from a political point of view with the information in it designed to support it, it remains suspect.
Sorry, I'm not playing the "Be specific" game that you righties like to play when you know you've been called out on your horseshit.
This right here. Doesn't jive with the article below it. "Sweden has the lowest number of deaths per million in this comparison despite only 7.7% of the surveyed population reported
This is an "opinion" piece from a conservative leaning group of doctors. Suspect at best. The reason it may be inaccurate is because it is derived from a political point of view, not a science one.
All you have to do is take a look at their blog to find out what their "opinions" are.
This right here. Doesn't jive with the article below it. "Sweden has the lowest number of deaths per million in this comparison despite only 7.7% of the surveyed population reported wearing a mask".
Sweden on Wednesday took steps to increase measures against the novel coronavirus, recommending commuters wear masks on public transport during rush hour as the country announced a record death toll from COVID-19.
www.reuters.com
The entire article is a politically written, statistical and study based, cherry picked blog. It's someone's opinion. I could probably read something similar to this
on just about any alt-right Internet site. Sweden's death rate is lower than its lockdown European neighbors because it is not only lower in population, but
its population is spread out. Any fifth grader could work that out.
I'm glad to see that you only dispute this item, this is still a great endorsement of the article. On your one dispute, I noticed that the article you posted (from a different date, lol) has a disclaimer about skewed information. Can you post what the accurate information was on the date of what you are disputing?
This is just one sentence in the article I brought up. Again, this article was written from a political stance. The numbers, charts, and graphs were all cherry picked to support this political point of view.
Therefore, it is viewed in that light. If you don't want to wear a mask, don't. But if you get called out for it, I'm not going to defend you.
This right here. Doesn't jive with the article below it. "Sweden has the lowest number of deaths per million in this comparison despite only 7.7% of the surveyed population reported
This is an "opinion" piece from a conservative leaning group of doctors. Suspect at best. The reason it may be inaccurate is because it is derived from a political point of view, not a science one.
All you have to do is take a look at their blog to find out what their "opinions" are.
This right here. Doesn't jive with the article below it. "Sweden has the lowest number of deaths per million in this comparison despite only 7.7% of the surveyed population reported wearing a mask".
Sweden on Wednesday took steps to increase measures against the novel coronavirus, recommending commuters wear masks on public transport during rush hour as the country announced a record death toll from COVID-19.
www.reuters.com
The entire article is a politically written, statistical and study based, cherry picked blog. It's someone's opinion. I could probably read something similar to this
on just about any alt-right Internet site. Sweden's death rate is lower than its lockdown European neighbors because it is not only lower in population, but
its population is spread out. Any fifth grader could work that out.
I'm glad to see that you only dispute this item, this is still a great endorsement of the article. On your one dispute, I noticed that the article you posted (from a different date, lol) has a disclaimer about skewed information. Can you post what the accurate information was on the date of what you are disputing?
This is just one sentence in the article I brought up. Again, this article was written from a political stance. The numbers, charts, and graphs were all cherry picked to support this political point of view.
Therefore, it is viewed in that light. If you don't want to wear a mask, don't. But if you get called out for it, I'm not going to defend you.
This right here. Doesn't jive with the article below it. "Sweden has the lowest number of deaths per million in this comparison despite only 7.7% of the surveyed population reported
This is an "opinion" piece from a conservative leaning group of doctors. Suspect at best. The reason it may be inaccurate is because it is derived from a political point of view, not a science one.
All you have to do is take a look at their blog to find out what their "opinions" are.
This right here. Doesn't jive with the article below it. "Sweden has the lowest number of deaths per million in this comparison despite only 7.7% of the surveyed population reported wearing a mask".
Sweden on Wednesday took steps to increase measures against the novel coronavirus, recommending commuters wear masks on public transport during rush hour as the country announced a record death toll from COVID-19.
www.reuters.com
The entire article is a politically written, statistical and study based, cherry picked blog. It's someone's opinion. I could probably read something similar to this
on just about any alt-right Internet site. Sweden's death rate is lower than its lockdown European neighbors because it is not only lower in population, but
its population is spread out. Any fifth grader could work that out.
I'm glad to see that you only dispute this item, this is still a great endorsement of the article. On your one dispute, I noticed that the article you posted (from a different date, lol) has a disclaimer about skewed information. Can you post what the accurate information was on the date of what you are disputing?
This is just one sentence in the article I brought up. Again, this article was written from a political stance. The numbers, charts, and graphs were all cherry picked to support this political point of view.
Therefore, it is viewed in that light. If you don't want to wear a mask, don't. But if you get called out for it, I'm not going to defend you.