Marriage Penalty Finally Calculated

citygator

Posting From Hunters Laptop
Gold Supporting Member
Jun 23, 2019
16,122
13,849
2,290
Charlotte
Answer: Over $100,000. My wife’s already expensive so tacking on a marriage penalty violates my 8th amendment right to be free from cruel and unusual punishment.

I know most of you don’t know what a girl is but it’s still interesting data. Strong families make for strong communities, we should be working to make sure that government policies encourage families rather than discourage them.

How Big Is the Marriage Tax? Now We Know | John C. Goodman

There are many reasons to care about this. Academic studies find that marriage stabilizes relationships, improves children’s outcomes and facilitates the development of labor market skills for the adults. In general, marriage is correlated with economic well-being. One study reports that married couples’ average per capita wealth is more than twice that of the never-married.

Until recently researchers have not had the tools to fully measure the full extent of government-created marriage penalties. A new study by Boston University economist Laurence Kotlikoff and his colleagues gives us the most accurate estimate to date.

The study includes more than 30 different federal and state entitlement programs—all of which condition benefits on the beneficiaries’ incomes. In addition to federal income and payroll taxes, it includes the tax rates in the 50 states and the District of Columbia. And it includes the effects of marriage on such elderly entitlement benefits as Social Security and Medicare. No previous study comes close to this level of careful measurement.

One finding: young adults with low- or middle-income jobs pay a heavy price if they marry. When higher tax rates are combined with a reduction in welfare/entitlement benefits, the economic loss from marriage is equal to between one-and-a-half and two years of income, on average.
 
W
Social engineering via the tax code - which is ostensibly in place to pay for legitimate functions of The State....How very fascist of you.
I swear if I posted the winning lotto numbers you fuckers would call me a fascist socialist. This is just bad tax code structure.
 
Answer: Over $100,000. My wife’s already expensive so tacking on a marriage penalty violates my 8th amendment right to be free from cruel and unusual punishment.

I know most of you don’t know what a girl is but it’s still interesting data. Strong families make for strong communities, we should be working to make sure that government policies encourage families rather than discourage them.

How Big Is the Marriage Tax? Now We Know | John C. Goodman

There are many reasons to care about this. Academic studies find that marriage stabilizes relationships, improves children’s outcomes and facilitates the development of labor market skills for the adults. In general, marriage is correlated with economic well-being. One study reports that married couples’ average per capita wealth is more than twice that of the never-married.

Until recently researchers have not had the tools to fully measure the full extent of government-created marriage penalties. A new study by Boston University economist Laurence Kotlikoff and his colleagues gives us the most accurate estimate to date.

The study includes more than 30 different federal and state entitlement programs—all of which condition benefits on the beneficiaries’ incomes. In addition to federal income and payroll taxes, it includes the tax rates in the 50 states and the District of Columbia. And it includes the effects of marriage on such elderly entitlement benefits as Social Security and Medicare. No previous study comes close to this level of careful measurement.

One finding: young adults with low- or middle-income jobs pay a heavy price if they marry. When higher tax rates are combined with a reduction in welfare/entitlement benefits, the economic loss from marriage is equal to between one-and-a-half and two years of income, on average.
Did you calculate filing individually?
 
Answer: Over $100,000. My wife’s already expensive so tacking on a marriage penalty violates my 8th amendment right to be free from cruel and unusual punishment.

I know most of you don’t know what a girl is but it’s still interesting data. Strong families make for strong communities, we should be working to make sure that government policies encourage families rather than discourage them.

How Big Is the Marriage Tax? Now We Know | John C. Goodman

There are many reasons to care about this. Academic studies find that marriage stabilizes relationships, improves children’s outcomes and facilitates the development of labor market skills for the adults. In general, marriage is correlated with economic well-being. One study reports that married couples’ average per capita wealth is more than twice that of the never-married.

Until recently researchers have not had the tools to fully measure the full extent of government-created marriage penalties. A new study by Boston University economist Laurence Kotlikoff and his colleagues gives us the most accurate estimate to date.

The study includes more than 30 different federal and state entitlement programs—all of which condition benefits on the beneficiaries’ incomes. In addition to federal income and payroll taxes, it includes the tax rates in the 50 states and the District of Columbia. And it includes the effects of marriage on such elderly entitlement benefits as Social Security and Medicare. No previous study comes close to this level of careful measurement.

One finding: young adults with low- or middle-income jobs pay a heavy price if they marry. When higher tax rates are combined with a reduction in welfare/entitlement benefits, the economic loss from marriage is equal to between one-and-a-half and two years of income, on average.
Your wife is expensive?? Do you have a chattel mortgage attached to her?

The lil stuff I pick up.

Is she for sale?
 
Answer: Over $100,000. My wife’s already expensive so tacking on a marriage penalty violates my 8th amendment right to be free from cruel and unusual punishment.

I know most of you don’t know what a girl is but it’s still interesting data. Strong families make for strong communities, we should be working to make sure that government policies encourage families rather than discourage them.

How Big Is the Marriage Tax? Now We Know | John C. Goodman

There are many reasons to care about this. Academic studies find that marriage stabilizes relationships, improves children’s outcomes and facilitates the development of labor market skills for the adults. In general, marriage is correlated with economic well-being. One study reports that married couples’ average per capita wealth is more than twice that of the never-married.

Until recently researchers have not had the tools to fully measure the full extent of government-created marriage penalties. A new study by Boston University economist Laurence Kotlikoff and his colleagues gives us the most accurate estimate to date.

The study includes more than 30 different federal and state entitlement programs—all of which condition benefits on the beneficiaries’ incomes. In addition to federal income and payroll taxes, it includes the tax rates in the 50 states and the District of Columbia. And it includes the effects of marriage on such elderly entitlement benefits as Social Security and Medicare. No previous study comes close to this level of careful measurement.

One finding: young adults with low- or middle-income jobs pay a heavy price if they marry. When higher tax rates are combined with a reduction in welfare/entitlement benefits, the economic loss from marriage is equal to between one-and-a-half and two years of income, on average.
It is not complicated.
 
Answer: Over $100,000. My wife’s already expensive so tacking on a marriage penalty violates my 8th amendment right to be free from cruel and unusual punishment.

I know most of you don’t know what a girl is but it’s still interesting data. Strong families make for strong communities, we should be working to make sure that government policies encourage families rather than discourage them.

How Big Is the Marriage Tax? Now We Know | John C. Goodman

There are many reasons to care about this. Academic studies find that marriage stabilizes relationships, improves children’s outcomes and facilitates the development of labor market skills for the adults. In general, marriage is correlated with economic well-being. One study reports that married couples’ average per capita wealth is more than twice that of the never-married.

Until recently researchers have not had the tools to fully measure the full extent of government-created marriage penalties. A new study by Boston University economist Laurence Kotlikoff and his colleagues gives us the most accurate estimate to date.

The study includes more than 30 different federal and state entitlement programs—all of which condition benefits on the beneficiaries’ incomes. In addition to federal income and payroll taxes, it includes the tax rates in the 50 states and the District of Columbia. And it includes the effects of marriage on such elderly entitlement benefits as Social Security and Medicare. No previous study comes close to this level of careful measurement.

One finding: young adults with low- or middle-income jobs pay a heavy price if they marry. When higher tax rates are combined with a reduction in welfare/entitlement benefits, the economic loss from marriage is equal to between one-and-a-half and two years of income, on average.
So you object to higher taxes but only when they affect you personally?
How very proggy of you.

Aren't ya'll the ones that believe it's our Patriotic duty to have the fruits of our labor confiscated by the govt for the greater good?
 
So you object to higher taxes but only when they affect you personally?
How very proggy of you.

Aren't ya'll the ones that believe it's our Patriotic duty to have the fruits of our labor confiscated by the govt for the greater good?
I don’t think there should be a “marriage” penalty but I do believe in progressive tax bills. I’d suggest treating investment money like income as a balancing lever to rid of us the marriage penalty.

I likely pay a good deal more in taxes than you do and I’m ok with that. In fact historically I’m paying very little for my income level as a percentage. I appreciate you Republican lap dogs looking out for us 1%ers. Warms my heart.
 
So you object to higher taxes but only when they affect you personally?
How very proggy of you.

Aren't ya'll the ones that believe it's our Patriotic duty to have the fruits of our labor confiscated by the govt for the greater good?
I don’t think there should be a “marriage” penalty but I do believe in progressive tax bills. I’d suggest treating investment money like income as a balancing lever to rid us of the marriage penalty.

I likely pay a good deal more in taxes than you do and I’m ok with that. In fact historically I’m paying very little for my income level as a percentage. I appreciate you Republican lap dogs looking out for us 1%ers. Warms my heart.
 
Never fails to amuse me how these statist bootlickers weep, wail, and wring their hands over the unfairness to them of a system, whose underlying premise is the very essence of unfairness.

Good times! :auiqs.jpg:
System treats me like a king. I appreciate you voting to keep me wealthier at your expense. The marriage penalty affects those at the middle mostly. Not me so much.
 
Answer: Over $100,000. My wife’s already expensive so tacking on a marriage penalty violates my 8th amendment right to be free from cruel and unusual punishment.

I know most of you don’t know what a girl is but it’s still interesting data. Strong families make for strong communities, we should be working to make sure that government policies encourage families rather than discourage them.

How Big Is the Marriage Tax? Now We Know | John C. Goodman

There are many reasons to care about this. Academic studies find that marriage stabilizes relationships, improves children’s outcomes and facilitates the development of labor market skills for the adults. In general, marriage is correlated with economic well-being. One study reports that married couples’ average per capita wealth is more than twice that of the never-married.

Until recently researchers have not had the tools to fully measure the full extent of government-created marriage penalties. A new study by Boston University economist Laurence Kotlikoff and his colleagues gives us the most accurate estimate to date.

The study includes more than 30 different federal and state entitlement programs—all of which condition benefits on the beneficiaries’ incomes. In addition to federal income and payroll taxes, it includes the tax rates in the 50 states and the District of Columbia. And it includes the effects of marriage on such elderly entitlement benefits as Social Security and Medicare. No previous study comes close to this level of careful measurement.

One finding: young adults with low- or middle-income jobs pay a heavy price if they marry. When higher tax rates are combined with a reduction in welfare/entitlement benefits, the economic loss from marriage is equal to between one-and-a-half and two years of income, on average.
I can't even get a beer or sandwich even after I mow the focking yard for two yours with heat indices hitting tripple digets. I'm reminded of Meatloaf's Praying for the End of Time. Nevertheless, in preparing for a retirement I'll probably not live to see .... I noticed that my federal income tax bite should be even less filing jointly and getting the "little Ms's" soc sec, than I'd have with just my own money .... which of course she'd take if I ever tried to "get free."
 
The average marriage in america lasts about 8 years. Most marriages end in divorce. However you want to look at it marriage rates are going to continue to fall.
 

Forum List

Back
Top