Mark Levin Calls on Republicans to Boycott State of the Union

[thanatos144]

Levin's ok. He despises Communists. I'm with him on that. But i'm not a loyal follower. His followers don't realize that he's been part of the Neocon/Progressive Globalist cabal for many years. He's an insider and a Lawyer. He's been part of the problem. So i wouldn't trust him so much. And he is wrong on this one. It will not help the cause. The Communists are already on their way out. The People don't want em anymore. So it would be wise to stay calm & cool. It's time to sit back and enjoy watching their fall. Stunts like this just aren't necessary.

You do know that because a person is a constitutional conservative and not a LIBERTARIAN that he isn't a progressive right? Tell me you are not that far gone

Levin has been part of the Neocon/Progressive Globalist cabal for years. He's been part of the problem. But like i said, he's ok. He rails against the Communists, and i'm with him on that. Just keep in mind though, Neocon/Progressive Globalists are only a hair off being Communist Globalists themselves. However I have noticed a change in Levin in recent years. He's coming around. He's finally beginning to shed his Neocon/Progressive Globalist skin. But this is still a bad idea. The Communists are gonna fall. So there's no need for dramatic stunts like this.

Yep your nothing more then a Paulbot lunatic....Go get your tin foil hat before the aliens and their CIA masters steal your thoughts.

 

[paulitician]

Levin's ok. He despises Communists. I'm with him on that. But i'm not a loyal follower. His followers don't realize that he's been part of the Neocon/Progressive Globalist cabal for many years. He's an insider and a Lawyer. He's been part of the problem. So i wouldn't trust him so much. And he is wrong on this one. It will not help the cause. The Communists are already on their way out. The People don't want em anymore. So it would be wise to stay calm & cool. It's time to sit back and enjoy watching their fall. Stunts like this just aren't necessary.

You have no idea what you're talking about..Listen to him and get back to me you. Just posted some talking points "He's a lawyer" Yeah a constitutional originalist you have a problem with that?

I've listened to him. He's ok. But he is a Lawyer who worked very hard for many years, promoting the Neocon/Progressive Globalist agenda. That's just the reality. If he is genuinely changing, good for him. But i'm still a bit skeptical. I'll give him a listen from time to time though. If he has truly changed, i'll be happy to acknowledge it.

 

[Jroc]

Levin's ok. He despises Communists. I'm with him on that. But i'm not a loyal follower. His followers don't realize that he's been part of the Neocon/Progressive Globalist cabal for many years. He's an insider and a Lawyer. He's been part of the problem. So i wouldn't trust him so much. And he is wrong on this one. It will not help the cause. The Communists are already on their way out. The People don't want em anymore. So it would be wise to stay calm & cool. It's time to sit back and enjoy watching their fall. Stunts like this just aren't necessary.

You do know that because a person is a constitutional conservative and not a LIBERTARIAN that he isn't a progressive right? Tell me you are not that far gone

Levin has been part of the Neocon/Progressive Globalist cabal for years. He's been part of the problem. But like i said, he's ok. He rails against the Communists, and i'm with him on that. Just keep in mind though, Neocon/Progressive Globalists are only a hair off being Communist Globalists themselves. However I have noticed a change in Levin in recent years. He's coming around. He's finally beginning to shed his Neocon/Progressive Globalist skin. But this is still a bad idea. The Communists are gonna fall. So there's no need for dramatic stunts like this.

Look..... You just throw around the same stupid term the liberals do. Maybe you should explain yourself instead of throwing around poll tested terms. "neocon" ..."neocon" you and Jake are like clones

 

[paulitician]

You do know that because a person is a constitutional conservative and not a LIBERTARIAN that he isn't a progressive right? Tell me you are not that far gone

Levin has been part of the Neocon/Progressive Globalist cabal for years. He's been part of the problem. But like i said, he's ok. He rails against the Communists, and i'm with him on that. Just keep in mind though, Neocon/Progressive Globalists are only a hair off being Communist Globalists themselves. However I have noticed a change in Levin in recent years. He's coming around. He's finally beginning to shed his Neocon/Progressive Globalist skin. But this is still a bad idea. The Communists are gonna fall. So there's no need for dramatic stunts like this.

Look..... You just throw around the same stupid term the liberals do. Maybe you should explain yourself instead of throwing around poll tested terms. "neocon" ..."neocon" you and Jake are like clones

Levin has been a loyal Neocon/Progressive Globalist soldier for many years. As a Lawyer, he worked very hard promoting that agenda. But like i said, he seems to be changing a bit. I'm still skeptical though. Either way, boycotting a State of the Union address does nothing to help get rid of the Communists. In fact, in some ways it would probably help them.

 

[Jroc]

Levin has been part of the Neocon/Progressive Globalist cabal for years. He's been part of the problem. But like i said, he's ok. He rails against the Communists, and i'm with him on that. Just keep in mind though, Neocon/Progressive Globalists are only a hair off being Communist Globalists themselves. However I have noticed a change in Levin in recent years. He's coming around. He's finally beginning to shed his Neocon/Progressive Globalist skin. But this is still a bad idea. The Communists are gonna fall. So there's no need for dramatic stunts like this.

Look..... You just throw around the same stupid term the liberals do. Maybe you should explain yourself instead of throwing around poll tested terms. "neocon" ..."neocon" you and Jake are like clones

Levin has been a loyal Neocon/Progressive Globalist soldier for many years. As a Lawyer, he worked very hard promoting that agenda. But like i said, he seems to be changing a bit. I'm still skeptical though. Either way, boycotting a State of the Union address does nothing to help get rid of the Communists. In fact, in some ways it would probably help them.

What is a "neocon"?... "Progressive"? That's actually laughable. This is the problem with you Ron Paul types, you just spew out talking points like the libs. The progressive world view is an isolationist world view. Ron Paul is a progressive on foreign policy get your terms straight

 

[Foxfyre]

Levin has been part of the Neocon/Progressive Globalist cabal for years. He's been part of the problem. But like i said, he's ok. He rails against the Communists, and i'm with him on that. Just keep in mind though, Neocon/Progressive Globalists are only a hair off being Communist Globalists themselves. However I have noticed a change in Levin in recent years. He's coming around. He's finally beginning to shed his Neocon/Progressive Globalist skin. But this is still a bad idea. The Communists are gonna fall. So there's no need for dramatic stunts like this.

Look..... You just throw around the same stupid term the liberals do. Maybe you should explain yourself instead of throwing around poll tested terms. "neocon" ..."neocon" you and Jake are like clones

Levin has been a loyal Neocon/Progressive Globalist soldier for many years. As a Lawyer, he worked very hard promoting that agenda. But like i said, he seems to be changing a bit. I'm still skeptical though. Either way, boycotting a State of the Union address does nothing to help get rid of the Communists. In fact, in some ways it would probably help them.

I can probably find a dozen Levin quotes to show how he is no neocon. I won't bother because I know that would be futile in changing your mind about him. But then, even though you and I find common ground on numerous issues, the "Paulistas" tend to brand as a 'neocon' anybody who supports any kind of involvement with a foreign country. So the labels flung around really do lose their punch as they become meaningless and just another smear code word.

 

[JimH52]

If the GOP, or a significant number of its members, boycotted the State of the Union speech, it would just be another millstone around the neck of a struggling political party. It would not be a good idea.

 

[HenryBHough]

If the GOP, or a significant number of its members, boycotted the State of the Union speech, it would just be another millstone around the neck of a struggling political party. It would not be a good idea.

Oh, I think the Democrat Party might feel a little slighted but probably would survive. But they do thank you for your concern.

 

[paulitician]

Look..... You just throw around the same stupid term the liberals do. Maybe you should explain yourself instead of throwing around poll tested terms. "neocon" ..."neocon" you and Jake are like clones

Levin has been a loyal Neocon/Progressive Globalist soldier for many years. As a Lawyer, he worked very hard promoting that agenda. But like i said, he seems to be changing a bit. I'm still skeptical though. Either way, boycotting a State of the Union address does nothing to help get rid of the Communists. In fact, in some ways it would probably help them.

What is a "neocon"?... "Progressive"? That's actually laughable. This is the problem with you Ron Paul types, you just spew out talking points like the libs. The progressive world view is an isolationist world view. Ron Paul is a progressive on foreign policy get your terms straight

The founders of Neo-Conservatism are all former Progressive Democrats. Today's Republican Leadership for the most part, are Progressive Globalists. I think this video may help you understand...

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TYLftg-tIlE]John Stossel - Progressives And War - YouTube[/ame]

 

[Jroc]

Levin has been a loyal Neocon/Progressive Globalist soldier for many years. As a Lawyer, he worked very hard promoting that agenda. But like i said, he seems to be changing a bit. I'm still skeptical though. Either way, boycotting a State of the Union address does nothing to help get rid of the Communists. In fact, in some ways it would probably help them.

What is a "neocon"?... "Progressive"? That's actually laughable. This is the problem with you Ron Paul types, you just spew out talking points like the libs. The progressive world view is an isolationist world view. Ron Paul is a progressive on foreign policy get your terms straight

The founders of Neo-Conservatism are all former Progressive Democrats. Today's Republican Leadership for the most part, are Progressive Globalists. I think this video may help you understand...

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TYLftg-tIlE]John Stossel - Progressives And War - YouTube[/ame]

Dude Levin was never a progressive Democrat and he slams the establish Republican types every day...Like i say you don't what you're talking about...The term "neocon" is now a generic term used to slander people as Foxfyre said

 

[paulitician]

Look..... You just throw around the same stupid term the liberals do. Maybe you should explain yourself instead of throwing around poll tested terms. "neocon" ..."neocon" you and Jake are like clones

Levin has been a loyal Neocon/Progressive Globalist soldier for many years. As a Lawyer, he worked very hard promoting that agenda. But like i said, he seems to be changing a bit. I'm still skeptical though. Either way, boycotting a State of the Union address does nothing to help get rid of the Communists. In fact, in some ways it would probably help them.

I can probably find a dozen Levin quotes to show how he is no neocon. I won't bother because I know that would be futile in changing your mind about him. But then, even though you and I find common ground on numerous issues, the "Paulistas" tend to brand as a 'neocon' anybody who supports any kind of involvement with a foreign country. So the labels flung around really do lose their punch as they become meaningless and just another smear code word.

Well if he is truly changing, good for him. But his past indicates he was a loyal Neocon/Progressive Globalist. He worked tirelessly promoting that agenda. I'm very skeptical of personalities like Levin, Limbaugh, and Hannity. To me, they seem a bit disingenuous. They were all for Big Government Globalism in the past. For me, it's just not enough to hate Democrats. I see Neocons as being Progressives. I don't see much difference. Their policies are very similar. I'll give Levin a chance though. I'll give him some time to prove he's no longer a Neocon/Progressive. I'm a fair-minded person.

 

[Papageorgio]

"Get off the phone, you big dope" is his standard response to callers who call him on his crap.

How mature.

So you listen to him? I think you are a bigger dope!

 

[Foxfyre]

Levin has been a loyal Neocon/Progressive Globalist soldier for many years. As a Lawyer, he worked very hard promoting that agenda. But like i said, he seems to be changing a bit. I'm still skeptical though. Either way, boycotting a State of the Union address does nothing to help get rid of the Communists. In fact, in some ways it would probably help them.

What is a "neocon"?... "Progressive"? That's actually laughable. This is the problem with you Ron Paul types, you just spew out talking points like the libs. The progressive world view is an isolationist world view. Ron Paul is a progressive on foreign policy get your terms straight

The founders of Neo-Conservatism are all former Progressive Democrats. Today's Republican Leadership for the most part, are Progressive Globalists. I think this video may help you understand...

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TYLftg-tIlE]John Stossel - Progressives And War - YouTube[/ame]

While I agree that the definition of 'neo-con' is synonymous with 'progressive globalist' I think you didn't get the full message in the content and message in the clip you linked. And it certainly does not implicate Mark Levin as a neocon. That is the label attached to him by the Paulistas who resented his criticism of Ron Paul. If you label a neocon everybody who does not accept Ron Paul' doctrine of isolationism without question, again it weakens your argument.

 

[paulitician]

What is a "neocon"?... "Progressive"? That's actually laughable. This is the problem with you Ron Paul types, you just spew out talking points like the libs. The progressive world view is an isolationist world view. Ron Paul is a progressive on foreign policy get your terms straight

The founders of Neo-Conservatism are all former Progressive Democrats. Today's Republican Leadership for the most part, are Progressive Globalists. I think this video may help you understand...

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TYLftg-tIlE]John Stossel - Progressives And War - YouTube[/ame]

Dude Levin was never a progressive Democrat and he slams the establish Republican types every day...Like i say you don't what you're talking about...The term "neocon" is now a generic term used to slander people as Foxfyre said

The founders of Neo-Conservatism were former Progressive Democrats for the most part. And Levin worked for them promoting that agenda. So i have to be a bit skeptical of the man. It's not enough to just screech about how much you hate Democrats. If i feel he's truly no longer a Neocon/Progressive Globalist, i'll gladly acknowledge it. I'll need more time to decide that though.

 

[IlarMeilyr]

The founders of Neo-Conservatism are all former Progressive Democrats. Today's Republican Leadership for the most part, are Progressive Globalists. I think this video may help you understand...

John Stossel - Progressives And War - YouTube

Dude Levin was never a progressive Democrat and he slams the establish Republican types every day...Like i say you don't what you're talking about...The term "neocon" is now a generic term used to slander people as Foxfyre said

The founders of Neo-Conservatism were former Progressive Democrats for the most part. And Levin worked for them promoting that agenda. So i have to be a bit skeptical of the man. It's not enough to just screech about how much you hate Democrats. If i feel he's truly no longer a Neocon/Progressive Globalist, i'll gladly acknowledge it. I'll need more time to decide that though.

Bull shit.

Levin "worked" for Progressive Democrats?

Or are you attempting to grunt out that Levin somehow worked for Neo-Conservatism?

Either way, your statement is ZERO in the truth value department.
He was NEVER a NeoCon or a "progressive" nor was he EVER a Globalist.

WTF ARE you bleating about?

 

[Howey]

Who wants to bet a very large majority of Republicans show up at the SOTU address Tuesday?

Of course, most of the old coots will be sleeping, but they'll be there! As much as a buhlack socialist Kenyan communist Obummer is, they'll all be crowding the aisle trying to get their picture with him.

Just watch!

 

[paulitician]

Dude Levin was never a progressive Democrat and he slams the establish Republican types every day...Like i say you don't what you're talking about...The term "neocon" is now a generic term used to slander people as Foxfyre said

The founders of Neo-Conservatism were former Progressive Democrats for the most part. And Levin worked for them promoting that agenda. So i have to be a bit skeptical of the man. It's not enough to just screech about how much you hate Democrats. If i feel he's truly no longer a Neocon/Progressive Globalist, i'll gladly acknowledge it. I'll need more time to decide that though.

Bull shit.

Levin "worked" for Progressive Democrats?

Or are you attempting to grunt out that Levin somehow worked for Neo-Conservatism?

Either way, your statement is ZERO in the truth value department.
He was NEVER a NeoCon or a "progressive" nor was he EVER a Globalist.

WTF ARE you bleating about?

Levin was a Lawyer who worked tirelessly for the Neocon Globalist cause. He was an influential insider. I have to be skeptical of him, Limbaugh, and Hannity. In the past, they've proven to be big proponents of Big Government Globalism. But if they're changing, i'll be glad to accept it. But i'm not ready to say they have yet. I know they hate Democrats. But that's all i really know about them.

 

[Foxfyre]

Levin has been a loyal Neocon/Progressive Globalist soldier for many years. As a Lawyer, he worked very hard promoting that agenda. But like i said, he seems to be changing a bit. I'm still skeptical though. Either way, boycotting a State of the Union address does nothing to help get rid of the Communists. In fact, in some ways it would probably help them.

I can probably find a dozen Levin quotes to show how he is no neocon. I won't bother because I know that would be futile in changing your mind about him. But then, even though you and I find common ground on numerous issues, the "Paulistas" tend to brand as a 'neocon' anybody who supports any kind of involvement with a foreign country. So the labels flung around really do lose their punch as they become meaningless and just another smear code word.

Well if he is truly changing, good for him. But his past indicates he was a loyal Neocon/Progressive Globalist. He worked tirelessly promoting that agenda. I'm very skeptical of personalities like Levin, Limbaugh, and Hannity. To me, they seem a bit disingenuous. They were all for Big Government Globalism in the past. For me, it's just not enough to hate Democrats. I see Neocons as being Progressives. I don't see much difference. Their policies are very similar. I'll give Levin a chance though. I'll give him some time to prove he's no longer a Neocon/Progressive. I'm a fair-minded person.

I know you are. I also know you are a committed Paulista and, while I respect that, I just can't share the isolationist doctrine to the extent that most of Ron Paul's supporters do. And neither do the people you listed here that you are skeptical about. But progressive globalists? Nope. Don't think you'll find one in the bunch. And that would include Mark Levin.

One of the most interesting, albeit wordy, insights into Mark Levin's perception of the way things were or are can be found in this comparison of Ronald Reagan with George W. Bush if you (or anybody else) is interested and/or has the time:
https://www.facebook.com/notes/mark-levin/ronald-reagan-george-w-bush/10150109191410946

 

[paulitician]

I can probably find a dozen Levin quotes to show how he is no neocon. I won't bother because I know that would be futile in changing your mind about him. But then, even though you and I find common ground on numerous issues, the "Paulistas" tend to brand as a 'neocon' anybody who supports any kind of involvement with a foreign country. So the labels flung around really do lose their punch as they become meaningless and just another smear code word.

Well if he is truly changing, good for him. But his past indicates he was a loyal Neocon/Progressive Globalist. He worked tirelessly promoting that agenda. I'm very skeptical of personalities like Levin, Limbaugh, and Hannity. To me, they seem a bit disingenuous. They were all for Big Government Globalism in the past. For me, it's just not enough to hate Democrats. I see Neocons as being Progressives. I don't see much difference. Their policies are very similar. I'll give Levin a chance though. I'll give him some time to prove he's no longer a Neocon/Progressive. I'm a fair-minded person.

I know you are. I also know you are a committed Paulista and, while I respect that, I just can't share the isolationist doctrine to the extent that most of Ron Paul's supporters do. And neither do the people you listed here that you are skeptical about. But progressive globalists? Nope. Don't think you'll find one in the bunch. And that would include Mark Levin.

One of the most interesting, albeit wordy, insights into Mark Levin's perception of the way things were or are can be found in this comparison of Ronald Reagan with George W. Bush if you (or anybody else) is interested and/or has the time:
https://www.facebook.com/notes/mark-levin/ronald-reagan-george-w-bush/10150109191410946

Just judging them on their pasts. And in the past, they were fully onboard with Big Government Globalism. It's too convenient and disingenuous to only rail against it when the other side has power. I'll be very skeptical of him, Limbaugh, and Hannity till they prove otherwise. Just how i feel about em anyway.

 

[The2ndAmendment]

Such a staggering display in the loss of confidence in the United States would immediately lead to --- the end of the Obama Regime.

I fully endorse this.