Manafort should have worn a "WH FOR SALE" T-Shirt....

[rightwinger]

I was not aware that any evidence during this investigation is to be paraded out for the public to see BEFORE the Special Counselor and his team are ready to proceed or not proceed to indictments, etc. Is this a new procedure? Something that no prosecutor/investigative body does.....ever?

You are intentionally 'not aware' of a lot of things, snowflake, like the fact that there is usually evidence of a suspected crime before there are multiple investigations rather than start up a witch hunt in order to FIND A CRIME.

It was proven, long before Comey illegally leaked information to get a Special Counsel appointed, there was no crime, no 'collusion', that the investigations originated from the fake report containing Russia-generated propaganda Obama and Comey tried to acquire from a foreign agent.

No evidence of a Crime.
No evidence of Collusion.
No evidence of Obstruction.

If there was any you would have posted it when you were ast asked for it months ago.
If there was any the liberal media would have been bombarding the news with it.
If there was any Democrats would have used it in the election.
If there was any Trump and/or his people would have been indicted already.

Instead snowflakes keep making excuses for why there is none and keep saying, 'Wait and see'.

Lets see if the Grand Jury thinks there was a crime

 

[LordBrownTrout]

Lol, the lib frothing continues.

 

[nat4900]

None of us have anything yet.....none of us are truly privy to what's going on inside the Investigation.

The only tangible proof that we certainly have against Manafort, is the fact that a FISA judge granted TWO search warrants....THAT would not have happened without adequate and damning probable cause and the "fear" that documentation would have been destroyed by Manafort.

 

[rightwinger]

The question remains will Manafort or Flynn cop a deal to avoid prosecution?

 

[bodecea]

You have provided that information to the Special Counsel, right?

Oh, Mueller's team of Hillary and Obama donors and lawyers already know, but - as you should be intelligent enough to know - the purpose of their investigation is defined as / pertains to the non-existent potential of TRUMP collusion and they are not concerned with Hillary's and bill's crimes and collusion.

No...I'm talking about the Special Counsel for Hillary, etc. that we were promised all the way back in late July.....Ruh Roooooh!

 

[bodecea]

I was not aware that any evidence during this investigation is to be paraded out for the public to see BEFORE the Special Counselor and his team are ready to proceed or not proceed to indictments, etc. Is this a new procedure? Something that no prosecutor/investigative body does.....ever?

You are intentionally 'not aware' of a lot of things, snowflake, like the fact that there is usually evidence of a suspected crime before there are multiple investigations rather than start up a witch hunt in order to FIND A CRIME.

It was proven, long before Comey illegally leaked information to get a Special Counsel appointed, there was no crime, no 'collusion', that the investigations originated from the fake report containing Russia-generated propaganda Obama and Comey tried to acquire from a foreign agent.

No evidence of a Crime.
No evidence of Collusion.
No evidence of Obstruction.

If there was any you would have posted it when you were ast asked for it months ago.
If there was any the liberal media would have been bombarding the news with it.
If there was any Democrats would have used it in the election.
If there was any Trump and/or his people would have been indicted already.

Instead snowflakes keep making excuses for why there is none and keep saying, 'Wait and see'.

You are privy to all the evidence that the Mueller investigative team has then.......yes or no?

 

[ClosedCaption]

Manafort should have worn a "WH FOR SALE" T-Shirt...

Why should he need to? Barackass Obama and Hillary the Pig Slut have already been trying to sell out the nation for ages! And sell it out they have: Left, Right, Forwards, Backwards, Up and Down. The Clintons even put the Lincoln Bedroom up for sale all for a nice Clinton Donation.

So please take your FAKE NEWS about Manafort and keep it in your pocket.

When someone catches you doing something how often has "But they did it too" cleared your name?

 

[eddiew37]

The Mueller team does NOT take one little step, without first consulting Queasy...LOL

...and you continue to post such 'intellectually stimulating' pieces of insight .. because you continue to prove you have NOTHING.

None of us have anything yet.....none of us are truly privy to what's going on inside the Investigation.

Yes Trumps hands are clean ,,,,,,After all that money washing,,laundering, they should be

 

[rightwinger]

None of us have anything yet.....none of us are truly privy to what's going on inside the Investigation.

The only tangible proof that we certainly have against Manafort, is the fact that a FISA judge granted TWO search warrants....THAT would not have happened without adequate and damning probable cause and the "fear" that documentation would have been destroyed by Manafort.

There was also wiretaps on Manaforts phones

Be interesting to see if there were any calls to Crooked Donnie

 

[nat4900]

There was also wiretaps on Manaforts phones

Be interesting to see if there were any calls to Crooked Donnie

Of THAT, I have NO doubt.......(and even if not orange Don himself, probably phone calls to baby-Don and Kushner.)

 

[Dragonlady]

None of us have anything yet.....none of us are truly privy to what's going on inside the Investigation.

The only tangible proof that we certainly have against Manafort, is the fact that a FISA judge granted TWO search warrants....THAT would not have happened without adequate and damning probable cause and the "fear" that documentation would have been destroyed by Manafort.

There was also wiretaps on Manaforts phones

Be interesting to see if there were any calls to Crooked Donnie

Apparently there were lots of calls to Donald the Liar, which were picked up after the FBI obtained the second FISA warrant after Manaforte no longer worked for the campaign.

 

[NightFox]

None of us have anything yet.....none of us are truly privy to what's going on inside the Investigation.

The only tangible proof that we certainly have against Manafort, is the fact that a FISA judge granted TWO search warrants....THAT would not have happened without adequate and damning probable cause and the "fear" that documentation would have been destroyed by Manafort.

LOL, you're joking right? the track record for FISA warrants is that %0.03 of requests get denied, which basically means the DOJ Lawyer has to show up high on both heroine and crack, grab the Presiding Judges private parts and threaten to screw him with a rubber chicken and an Oreo cookie and then maybe the request will be declined.

The FISA warrants are in NO way any indication that reasonable probable cause existed anymore than FISA issuing a warrant authorizing surveillance on 10's of millions of American Citizens (which the FISA court did) indicates that there is probable cause to suspect them of any wrongdoing .

If that's your only "tangible proof" that you certainly have against Manafort then you might as well drop the matter now since that amounts to ZERO.

 

[nat4900]

When someone catches you doing something how often has "But they did it too" cleared your name?

.....and allow me to add that the ENTIRE investigative and prosecutorial apparatus is currently in republicans' hands........

 

[nat4900]

Apparently there were lots of calls to Donald the Liar, which were picked up after the FBI obtained the second FISA warrant after Manaforte no longer worked for the campaign.

Which then adds yet ANOTHER layer of subterfuge......WHY would Manafort and Trump be chatting about after Manafort had been "fired"???
I'm pretty sure that the conversations were NOT about such topics as:
"What are you going to wear today?"

 

[nat4900]

None of us have anything yet.....none of us are truly privy to what's going on inside the Investigation.

The only tangible proof that we certainly have against Manafort, is the fact that a FISA judge granted TWO search warrants....THAT would not have happened without adequate and damning probable cause and the "fear" that documentation would have been destroyed by Manafort.

LOL, you're joking right? the track record for FISA warrants is that %0.03 of requests get denied, which basically means the DOJ Lawyer has to show up high on both heroine and crack, grab the Presiding Judges private parts and threaten to screw him with a rubber chicken and an Oreo cookie and then maybe the request will be declined.

The FISA warrants are in NO way any indication that reasonable probable cause existed anymore than FISA issuing a warrant authorizing surveillance on 10's of millions of American Citizens (which the FISA court did) indicates that there is probable cause to suspect them of any wrongdoing .

If that's your only "tangible proof" that you certainly have against Manafort then you might as well drop the matter now since that amounts to ZERO.

You are aware that both the FISA courts was initiated by republicans, AND that 10 of the 11 FISA judges were appointed by republicans.

Are you hereby condemning republicans??..........yes or No?

 

[bodecea]

None of us have anything yet.....none of us are truly privy to what's going on inside the Investigation.

...the investigation into Trump's involvement in a crime that has not even been proven to have been committed. Democrats are investigating Trump to see what they can find, using as justification to do so a crime they can only CLAIM - without evidence to back it up - occurred.

And snowflakes are so bat-shit crazy with hate they can't even see how f*ed up that is.

"Democrats are investigating trump"....ah, but it's Republicans who assigned a Special Counsel and the Special Counsel himself is a Republican.

And how is it even possible to charge someone with a crime "without evidence"?

Trumpanzees continuously CLAIM that H. Clinton and Former President Obama are guilty of this and that crime....and yet not even one indictment as of yet tho we've been promised indictments for a very long time.........a very long time.

 

[ClosedCaption]

None of us have anything yet.....none of us are truly privy to what's going on inside the Investigation.

The only tangible proof that we certainly have against Manafort, is the fact that a FISA judge granted TWO search warrants....THAT would not have happened without adequate and damning probable cause and the "fear" that documentation would have been destroyed by Manafort.

LOL, you're joking right? the track record for FISA warrants is that %0.03 of requests get denied, which basically means the DOJ Lawyer has to show up high on both heroine and crack, grab the Presiding Judges private parts and threaten to screw him with a rubber chicken and an Oreo cookie and then maybe the request will be declined.

The FISA warrants are in NO way any indication that reasonable probable cause existed anymore than FISA issuing a warrant authorizing surveillance on 10's of millions of American Citizens (which the FISA court did) indicates that there is probable cause to suspect them of any wrongdoing .

If that's your only "tangible proof" that you certainly have against Manafort then you might as well drop the matter now since that amounts to ZERO.

Yeah, FISA warrants don't mean nuffin ROFL!!

 

[rightwinger]

Apparently there were lots of calls to Donald the Liar, which were picked up after the FBI obtained the second FISA warrant after Manaforte no longer worked for the campaign.

Which then adds yet ANOTHER layer of subterfuge......WHY would Manafort and Trump be chatting about after Manafort had been "fired"???
I'm pretty sure that the conversations were NOT about such topics as:
"What are you going to wear today?"

They were probably discussing Russian adoptions

 

[LordBrownTrout]

This is funny stuff.

 

[easyt65]

None of us have anything yet.....none of us are truly privy to what's going on inside the Investigation.

...the investigation into Trump's involvement in a crime that has not even been proven to have been committed. Democrats are investigating Trump to see what they can find, using as justification to do so a crime they can only CLAIM - without evidence to back it up - occurred.

And snowflakes are so bat-shit crazy with hate they can't even see how f*ed up that is.

"Democrats are investigating trump"....ah, but it's Republicans who assigned a Special Counsel and the Special Counsel himself is a Republican.

And how is it even possible to charge someone with a crime "without evidence"?

Trumpanzees continuously CLAIM that H. Clinton and Former President Obama are guilty of this and that crime....and yet not even one indictment as of yet tho we've been promised indictments for a very long time.........a very long time.

How's it coming collecting evidence to support there ever was a crime and that Trump was involved in 'Collusion'? You going to be able to do that any time soon or just keep 'flapping your gums'?