Does he have an instruction manual for that?
He's male.. They don't need instructions - they just wing it and hope to god it works when they're done.
Izzatafact? Don't confuse males with their heads up their asses with those that can think.
Hell, you should see how they'd react to some Texas tags.
Not even with a sign that said something like, "I choose my own health care, keep your grubby paws out of my choices?"
Immie
He's male.. They don't need instructions - they just wing it and hope to god it works when they're done.
Izzatafact? Don't confuse males with their heads up their asses with those that can think.
One seems to far outweigh the other around here, as of late. My bad..
Hell, you should see how they'd react to some Texas tags.
Not even with a sign that said something like, "I choose my own health care, keep your grubby paws out of my choices?"
Immie
Choice? Ve haf no choice in the Reich. You lif to serve the Motherland. Publik werks, anyone?
Oh well. The Arabs that carried 9/11 to fruition were suspicious as well, but their civil rights couldn't be violated.
Oh well. The Arabs that carried 9/11 to fruition were suspicious as well, but their civil rights couldn't be violated.
The link is no longer any good.
I wanted to go back and look was he actually arrested or just detained?
I didn't think he was actually arrested. I thought they detained him for questioning and if that is the case, were any of his civil rights violated? Do we have the right not to be questioned by the police?
As for probable cause, if the President is in the area and you see an unknown man intently watching the Airport, wouldn't that raise some suspicion and bring about probable cause?
Immie
I didn't say you.
Look ... just because you don't like that meth-head Dante doesn't mean you need to out him. Next thing you know, we'll be having a Congressional, leftwingnut witch hunt and they'll find you guilty of being a redhead.
Look ... just because you don't like that meth-head Dante doesn't mean you need to out him. Next thing you know, we'll be having a Congressional, leftwingnut witch hunt and they'll find you guilty of being a redhead.
Well, shit.
The Springfield XD 40 is a nice handgun.
So who do we know that's from Ohio???
Linus Rawlings.
The Springfield XD 40 is a nice handgun.
So who do we know that's from Ohio???
Linus Rawlings.
Wanna come and see the varmint, Gunny?
Really? Why? Because he exists and has a gun and radio equipment? I know of bout 3500 Marines in the same boat.
You DO know your history, right? Hitler vilified and killed anyone that wasn't politically prudent for him to have around?
Dissidents, I tell you. Oh wait ... isn't THAT what the left claims to stand for?
Really? Why? Because he exists and has a gun and radio equipment? I know of bout 3500 Marines in the same boat.
You DO know your history, right? Hitler vilified and killed anyone that wasn't politically prudent for him to have around?
Dissidents, I tell you. Oh wait ... isn't THAT what the left claims to stand for?
Well, normally I would agree with you. The thing is though, I went to the last two years of HS at TC Roberson High, just a few miles from the Asheville airport.
We used to go out to the end of the runway and party when i was a kid. You can see the planes and all that, but its an empty area. That area is reallythe only part around the airport that isn't built up. So, that is likely where he was. Even when I was a kid, there were signs prohibiting firearms in that area. At that time the concern was probobly more like a stray bullet from some kid like me shooting rabbits would hit a plane.
I visited family last year, and that area now has signs that say you and your vehicle is subject to searches if you park there. The signs don't say you can't, justthat it is an area that is under observation, as it is right at the end of the runway.
The other thing is, people in NC just don't seem to carry firearms the way they do here in AZ, so I imagine someone armed, in an area at the end of the runway would be enough to cause people to call the police. the article in the Citizen times said that's what happened.
Just like with other laws, if he wasn't legal with his firearm, which he tacitly agreed to do when he came into the state, he should be charged.
Additionally, if he is in an area where "no firearms" is posted, I don't think it matters if the gun is legal or not. Even here in AZ, where most of us do carry guns, one would be arrested if one had a firearm in an area where it posted "no firearms".
Really? Why? Because he exists and has a gun and radio equipment? I know of bout 3500 Marines in the same boat.
You DO know your history, right? Hitler vilified and killed anyone that wasn't politically prudent for him to have around?
Dissidents, I tell you. Oh wait ... isn't THAT what the left claims to stand for?
Well, normally I would agree with you. The thing is though, I went to the last two years of HS at TC Roberson High, just a few miles from the Asheville airport.
We used to go out to the end of the runway and party when i was a kid. You can see the planes and all that, but its an empty area. That area is reallythe only part around the airport that isn't built up. So, that is likely where he was. Even when I was a kid, there were signs prohibiting firearms in that area. At that time the concern was probobly more like a stray bullet from some kid like me shooting rabbits would hit a plane.
I visited family last year, and that area now has signs that say you and your vehicle is subject to searches if you park there. The signs don't say you can't, justthat it is an area that is under observation, as it is right at the end of the runway.
The other thing is, people in NC just don't seem to carry firearms the way they do here in AZ, so I imagine someone armed, in an area at the end of the runway would be enough to cause people to call the police. the article in the Citizen times said that's what happened.
Just like with other laws, if he wasn't legal with his firearm, which he tacitly agreed to do when he came into the state, he should be charged.
Additionally, if he is in an area where "no firearms" is posted, I don't think it matters if the gun is legal or not. Even here in AZ, where most of us do carry guns, one would be arrested if one had a firearm in an area where it posted "no firearms".
What right do states have to usurp the US Constitution? This argument always seems to go in favor of who is making it. The left claims to want max freedoms, but support a fascist. The Constitution says the right to keep and bear arms "shall NOT be infringed".
Yet at every turn some state or another wants to defy the US Constitution.
So when are state's right's right, and when are they wrong? All I see are people swapping from one to the other as it is convenient to their argument.
The 10th Amendment: Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The 2nd Amendment: Second Amendment to the United States Constitution - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This isn't hard. As a basic amendment to the Constitution, the 2nd Amendment no only precedes the 10th, it also nullifies unconstitutional state laws that abound. The Constitution is clear. The states cannot usurp the Constitution and the Constitution cannot usurp the states. The being all too prevalent nowadays. That doesn't change the fact of this argument.
Clearly the Right granted in the Constitution supercedes any stupid local laws.
