itfitzme
Silver Member
Uhmm... hello McFly ... hello anyone in there? *What happens to the price of a commodity in which supply and demand are controlled by storage facilities storing the product when demand is low and selling the stored product when demand is high?
What happens to the price of a commodity when the value of the dollar falls due to unequal quantitative easing of the dollar as compared to the monetary system of the primary producers of said commodity? *
Are you trying to say the people selling the commodity can't up their price based on devaluation of the dollar? *Are you saying oil should be less valuable than the dollars generated by quantitative easing? *Yeah all they do is say here you go more money no drilling required, just add zeroes to the balance sheet. *Here's our dollars give me more oil?
Further the law of supply and demand goes out the door when the seller is an oligarchy that is allowed to set price.
That sets the market price above the free market equilibrium. *The standard models are the Carnout and Nash models. *The market price then fluctuates on demand. *The major driver is demand, with China increasing that demand. * They aren't mutually exclusive. *Which is why I find amusing to see the oiln execs before Congress saying then price is set by supply and demand. *They are the supply.
You do get the concept of "and"? Supply "and" demand? *Or in this convo, demand and supply. *I said demand, you said supply.
You should see my other post where I detailed the ologopoly and talked about market power. Got called a liberal for that.
Yep, I think we nailed it. *Good work. *I think we nailed it. *It's about F'in time two people nailed the fact that its SUPPLY AND DEMAND.
No, really, you should see my other posts. Though it's been a while since I've mentioned speculation, the commodity market.
Still, I can't find data on the tankers, just some comment that some one once made about actually seeing them off the coast.
I'll see if I can find my post on the major suppliers. *It leaves an open question about how much they can raise market price above then ideal market equulibrium. *The clue is profit per gallon. *In a perfect market with perfect competition tbere is no profit. *
Oil refineries have economies of scale and barriers to market entry, ergo not an ideal free market. *The major companies number less than ten. *
Thanks, I've had the demand side one day, the supply side the next. *Just could't get them together.
Ah... now I get your point. *FYI... when I said "demand is flat with production" I meant I was agreeing with your point to equilibrium cost being a matter of supply and demand, production being the supply side in my phrasing.
If there is no profit there is no reason for investment... if there's too much competition the narrow profit margin will chase the investment money to better returns. * Supply and demand also applies to investments, and monetary valuation.
Yeah, good. *There are too many personalities in this place.
Here is a good post,*#8 You can find it on page
Here -> http://www.usmessageboard.com/clean...line-diesel-more-afforedable.html#post7292888
If that includes a list of major oil companies, it's the one I'm thinking of. If not, i'll see if I can find it.
I think we were getting somewhere, in #8,*but stopped. *I think it's relevant and worth review. *Theory only gets so far before it degrades to speculation and can't move forward without some data. *
I literally just got my own "and" point.*I want to let this "AND" thing digest. **
I have to reread it and work on better understanding your responses. *
I think it's time to just list the concepts. *See if they will congeal.
There is simply the ideal market equilibrium point that moves on shifts in supply and demand.
There is the Nash and Carnout models that have the equilibrium point above the ideal, the supply curve shifted upward. *That upward shift is a different model that I had just as profit. *Now I know what the profit model is.
I've got the equilibrium point, the real dollar price, tracked by EIA or some websites data. *It was flat through 1998 then began rising to the recession. *It crashed. *Then it returned to pre-recesion levels.
We have oil tankers off shore. *How speculators got into that market, I can't figure. *You'de think that refineries could lock in long term contracts.
I was suprised that the price of crude is such a large percentage of the total pump price.
Taxes are not as significant as some may believe. *If they went away, prices wouldn't drop by the full amount. *Profits would go up to take up alot of that slack.
There is some other convo, up the thread, about the fact that it takes at least 8-10 years from the seismic crew beginning to survey leased land to the first barrel. You commented on investment. *It's a huge investment.
If Mexico, Canada, etc. have easier to get to supply, they can provide raw crude more cheaply than new reserves can be opened up. <-- hypothesis