The Germans thought that they we superior to other Europeans, Bill Maher has the same sort of mindset, except that he thinks that it's the middle class American who white Liberal are superior to.
the purpose of subsidized agriculture is to ensure a food supplyRural America depends on suburbia for its survival. How do you think the farm bill is subsidized? If it weren't for that Socialist program middle America would not exist.In a civil war, the urban/suburban coalation woud lose to the semi rural/rural coalation. Perobably won't happen. But now you know.He's right.
When you look at where the money is.
Who has healthcare.
How most people in Red States don't have education and do unskilled jobs.
Republicans talk about people fleeing California and New York. The people fleeing are uneducated and unskilled. They compete better in Red States where the competition is so much less.
You could have a two year college degree and make a great life in most Red States because you will be competing with people who barely finished high school. And what if they were home schooled by Republicans who believe the earth is only a few thousand years old. These people will hate continuing education because schools will teach facts and not religion. And Republicans can't handle that. They believe the education is biased and "good" science will come down on the side of magical creation.
Why is the government required to ensure your food supply through farm bill welfare?the purpose of subsidized agriculture is to ensure a food supplyRural America depends on suburbia for its survival. How do you think the farm bill is subsidized? If it weren't for that Socialist program middle America would not exist.In a civil war, the urban/suburban coalation woud lose to the semi rural/rural coalation. Perobably won't happen. But now you know.He's right.
When you look at where the money is.
Who has healthcare.
How most people in Red States don't have education and do unskilled jobs.
Republicans talk about people fleeing California and New York. The people fleeing are uneducated and unskilled. They compete better in Red States where the competition is so much less.
You could have a two year college degree and make a great life in most Red States because you will be competing with people who barely finished high school. And what if they were home schooled by Republicans who believe the earth is only a few thousand years old. These people will hate continuing education because schools will teach facts and not religion. And Republicans can't handle that. They believe the education is biased and "good" science will come down on the side of magical creation.
He is comparable to the Germans that caused the Germans to become NAZIS out of desperation.
if enough farmers go out of business we would have food shortagesWhy is the government required to ensure your food supply through farm bill welfare?the purpose of subsidized agriculture is to ensure a food supplyRural America depends on suburbia for its survival. How do you think the farm bill is subsidized? If it weren't for that Socialist program middle America would not exist.In a civil war, the urban/suburban coalation woud lose to the semi rural/rural coalation. Perobably won't happen. But now you know.He's right.
When you look at where the money is.
Who has healthcare.
How most people in Red States don't have education and do unskilled jobs.
Republicans talk about people fleeing California and New York. The people fleeing are uneducated and unskilled. They compete better in Red States where the competition is so much less.
You could have a two year college degree and make a great life in most Red States because you will be competing with people who barely finished high school. And what if they were home schooled by Republicans who believe the earth is only a few thousand years old. These people will hate continuing education because schools will teach facts and not religion. And Republicans can't handle that. They believe the education is biased and "good" science will come down on the side of magical creation.
And so, it's okay for farmers to get free welfare to feed you, who may not be on welfare, but it's not okay to feed those who are on welfare, because they don't have a job? Which means, you are guaranteeing job employment welfare for farmers, over those who may or may not have lost their jobs. Do I read that right? In other words, you are okay with welfare to feed you, even though farming can be a big failure, as opposed to individual failure in the work place, and that feeding them is not okay?
I think part of it is to guarantee rotation of crops. However I do not agree with anyone living the life of riley over it either.Why is the government required to ensure your food supply through farm bill welfare?the purpose of subsidized agriculture is to ensure a food supplyRural America depends on suburbia for its survival. How do you think the farm bill is subsidized? If it weren't for that Socialist program middle America would not exist.In a civil war, the urban/suburban coalation woud lose to the semi rural/rural coalation. Perobably won't happen. But now you know.He's right.
When you look at where the money is.
Who has healthcare.
How most people in Red States don't have education and do unskilled jobs.
Republicans talk about people fleeing California and New York. The people fleeing are uneducated and unskilled. They compete better in Red States where the competition is so much less.
You could have a two year college degree and make a great life in most Red States because you will be competing with people who barely finished high school. And what if they were home schooled by Republicans who believe the earth is only a few thousand years old. These people will hate continuing education because schools will teach facts and not religion. And Republicans can't handle that. They believe the education is biased and "good" science will come down on the side of magical creation.
And so, it's okay for farmers to get free welfare to feed you, who may not be on welfare, but it's not okay to feed those who are on welfare, because they don't have a job? Which means, you are guaranteeing job employment welfare for farmers, over those who may or may not have lost their jobs. Do I read that right? In other words, you are okay with welfare to feed you, even though farming can be a big failure, as opposed to individual failure in the work place, and that feeding them is not okay?
The farm bill is insurance against natural famine, not just crop rotation.I think part of it is to guarantee rotation of crops. However I do not agree with anyone living the life of riley over it either.Why is the government required to ensure your food supply through farm bill welfare?the purpose of subsidized agriculture is to ensure a food supplyRural America depends on suburbia for its survival. How do you think the farm bill is subsidized? If it weren't for that Socialist program middle America would not exist.In a civil war, the urban/suburban coalation woud lose to the semi rural/rural coalation. Perobably won't happen. But now you know.He's right.
When you look at where the money is.
Who has healthcare.
How most people in Red States don't have education and do unskilled jobs.
Republicans talk about people fleeing California and New York. The people fleeing are uneducated and unskilled. They compete better in Red States where the competition is so much less.
You could have a two year college degree and make a great life in most Red States because you will be competing with people who barely finished high school. And what if they were home schooled by Republicans who believe the earth is only a few thousand years old. These people will hate continuing education because schools will teach facts and not religion. And Republicans can't handle that. They believe the education is biased and "good" science will come down on the side of magical creation.
And so, it's okay for farmers to get free welfare to feed you, who may not be on welfare, but it's not okay to feed those who are on welfare, because they don't have a job? Which means, you are guaranteeing job employment welfare for farmers, over those who may or may not have lost their jobs. Do I read that right? In other words, you are okay with welfare to feed you, even though farming can be a big failure, as opposed to individual failure in the work place, and that feeding them is not okay?
And? What about it? At the end of the day, it's still Socialism for all of us to ensure a food supply. That's reality. And the fact that you can't answer my questions about those less fortunate on another front, tells us just how full of shit you are. You are making differences for your privileged guaranteed socialist food supply if you are employed, compliments of farmers, versus the socialist welfare for those who do not have a job. You're a real piece of shit.if enough farmers go out of business we would have food shortagesWhy is the government required to ensure your food supply through farm bill welfare?the purpose of subsidized agriculture is to ensure a food supplyRural America depends on suburbia for its survival. How do you think the farm bill is subsidized? If it weren't for that Socialist program middle America would not exist.In a civil war, the urban/suburban coalation woud lose to the semi rural/rural coalation. Perobably won't happen. But now you know.He's right.
When you look at where the money is.
Who has healthcare.
How most people in Red States don't have education and do unskilled jobs.
Republicans talk about people fleeing California and New York. The people fleeing are uneducated and unskilled. They compete better in Red States where the competition is so much less.
You could have a two year college degree and make a great life in most Red States because you will be competing with people who barely finished high school. And what if they were home schooled by Republicans who believe the earth is only a few thousand years old. These people will hate continuing education because schools will teach facts and not religion. And Republicans can't handle that. They believe the education is biased and "good" science will come down on the side of magical creation.
And so, it's okay for farmers to get free welfare to feed you, who may not be on welfare, but it's not okay to feed those who are on welfare, because they don't have a job? Which means, you are guaranteeing job employment welfare for farmers, over those who may or may not have lost their jobs. Do I read that right? In other words, you are okay with welfare to feed you, even though farming can be a big failure, as opposed to individual failure in the work place, and that feeding them is not okay?
That's an off the reservation counter argument coming from a coward who cannot handle the truth about welfare. Ha, we get it. With your team, welfare is for the privileged. You know, like the welfare we pay for with football players and the stadiums they play in.; You don't believe in safety nets to feed people and babies, but when it comes to sports Socialism, or the farm bill to feed you, that's okay. Damn, what a piece of shit you are;
Here's the difference between Red and Blue as simply as I can put it. The red side knows when someone's pissing on their shoes and trying to convince them it's raining! The Blue side are the one's pissing on your shoes! Bill Maher is a Comedian an irrelevant Comedian but a Comedian yet and still. He's just pissing on your shoes . There's my proof!
