Magazine limits..another anti-gun bait and switch......

2aguy

Diamond Member
Jul 19, 2014
112,367
52,615
2,290
There has been a lot of stupid talk about limiting magazine capacity for guns......it is stupid because it has no bearing on crime or mass shootings....

But..it is another example of the anti-gun bait and switch tactic.

Most people think "high capacity" magazines are for rifles, and many think Drum Magazine with 100 round capability....and when you ask a non gun owner, that is what they will respond with....

The anti-gunners...they use "high capacity" as a lie to dupe normal people, that is the bait........this way they get every non gun owner on board to ban high capacity magazines.......and if they pass the law...then they do the switch....

All of a sudden, normal magazines for pistols will be found to have been designated as High Capacity....15 round pistol magazines that have been designed for the specific pistol.......

And with that switch, whole models of pistol will now be illegal because the retooling to provide magazines are not going to be worth it......thus a ban on these pistols will be accomplished....

Democrat Favors Limits ON “Ammunition clips” | Extrano's Alley, more than a gun blog

As a practical matter, many competent defensive weapons have no reduced capacity magazines available, and tooling costs preclude any possibility of making them profitably to sell at an affordable price.

If no reduced capacity “ammunition holding device” is available, owners of many fine defensive weapons would have no choice but to attempt to use their gun as a single shot, or to dispose of it. No doubt Kaine, like his Party, would prefer a disarmed populace so that is the probable reason for the call.
 
There has been a lot of stupid talk about limiting magazine capacity for guns......it is stupid because it has no bearing on crime or mass shootings....

But..it is another example of the anti-gun bait and switch tactic.

Most people think "high capacity" magazines are for rifles, and many think Drum Magazine with 100 round capability....and when you ask a non gun owner, that is what they will respond with....

The anti-gunners...they use "high capacity" as a lie to dupe normal people, that is the bait........this way they get every non gun owner on board to ban high capacity magazines.......and if they pass the law...then they do the switch....

All of a sudden, normal magazines for pistols will be found to have been designated as High Capacity....15 round pistol magazines that have been designed for the specific pistol.......

And with that switch, whole models of pistol will now be illegal because the retooling to provide magazines are not going to be worth it......thus a ban on these pistols will be accomplished....

Democrat Favors Limits ON “Ammunition clips” | Extrano's Alley, more than a gun blog

As a practical matter, many competent defensive weapons have no reduced capacity magazines available, and tooling costs preclude any possibility of making them profitably to sell at an affordable price.

If no reduced capacity “ammunition holding device” is available, owners of many fine defensive weapons would have no choice but to attempt to use their gun as a single shot, or to dispose of it. No doubt Kaine, like his Party, would prefer a disarmed populace so that is the probable reason for the call.
In My state I am limited to a 10 round mag for all guns

It's fucking ridiculous
 
There has been a lot of stupid talk about limiting magazine capacity for guns......it is stupid because it has no bearing on crime or mass shootings....

But..it is another example of the anti-gun bait and switch tactic.

Most people think "high capacity" magazines are for rifles, and many think Drum Magazine with 100 round capability....and when you ask a non gun owner, that is what they will respond with....

The anti-gunners...they use "high capacity" as a lie to dupe normal people, that is the bait........this way they get every non gun owner on board to ban high capacity magazines.......and if they pass the law...then they do the switch....

All of a sudden, normal magazines for pistols will be found to have been designated as High Capacity....15 round pistol magazines that have been designed for the specific pistol.......

And with that switch, whole models of pistol will now be illegal because the retooling to provide magazines are not going to be worth it......thus a ban on these pistols will be accomplished....

Democrat Favors Limits ON “Ammunition clips” | Extrano's Alley, more than a gun blog

As a practical matter, many competent defensive weapons have no reduced capacity magazines available, and tooling costs preclude any possibility of making them profitably to sell at an affordable price.

If no reduced capacity “ammunition holding device” is available, owners of many fine defensive weapons would have no choice but to attempt to use their gun as a single shot, or to dispose of it. No doubt Kaine, like his Party, would prefer a disarmed populace so that is the probable reason for the call.
In My state I am limited to a 10 round mag for all guns

It's fucking ridiculous

And I'm sure the cops follow the same limit, right?

Actually, are they required to follow the same limits for their off duty carry pieces? Serious question.
 
There has been a lot of stupid talk about limiting magazine capacity for guns......it is stupid because it has no bearing on crime or mass shootings....

But..it is another example of the anti-gun bait and switch tactic.

Most people think "high capacity" magazines are for rifles, and many think Drum Magazine with 100 round capability....and when you ask a non gun owner, that is what they will respond with....

The anti-gunners...they use "high capacity" as a lie to dupe normal people, that is the bait........this way they get every non gun owner on board to ban high capacity magazines.......and if they pass the law...then they do the switch....

All of a sudden, normal magazines for pistols will be found to have been designated as High Capacity....15 round pistol magazines that have been designed for the specific pistol.......

And with that switch, whole models of pistol will now be illegal because the retooling to provide magazines are not going to be worth it......thus a ban on these pistols will be accomplished....

Democrat Favors Limits ON “Ammunition clips” | Extrano's Alley, more than a gun blog

As a practical matter, many competent defensive weapons have no reduced capacity magazines available, and tooling costs preclude any possibility of making them profitably to sell at an affordable price.

If no reduced capacity “ammunition holding device” is available, owners of many fine defensive weapons would have no choice but to attempt to use their gun as a single shot, or to dispose of it. No doubt Kaine, like his Party, would prefer a disarmed populace so that is the probable reason for the call.
Still waiting to hear how much stock in ammo and weapons companies Democrats bought in 08.
 
There has been a lot of stupid talk about limiting magazine capacity for guns......it is stupid because it has no bearing on crime or mass shootings....

But..it is another example of the anti-gun bait and switch tactic.

Most people think "high capacity" magazines are for rifles, and many think Drum Magazine with 100 round capability....and when you ask a non gun owner, that is what they will respond with....

The anti-gunners...they use "high capacity" as a lie to dupe normal people, that is the bait........this way they get every non gun owner on board to ban high capacity magazines.......and if they pass the law...then they do the switch....

All of a sudden, normal magazines for pistols will be found to have been designated as High Capacity....15 round pistol magazines that have been designed for the specific pistol.......

And with that switch, whole models of pistol will now be illegal because the retooling to provide magazines are not going to be worth it......thus a ban on these pistols will be accomplished....

Democrat Favors Limits ON “Ammunition clips” | Extrano's Alley, more than a gun blog

As a practical matter, many competent defensive weapons have no reduced capacity magazines available, and tooling costs preclude any possibility of making them profitably to sell at an affordable price.

If no reduced capacity “ammunition holding device” is available, owners of many fine defensive weapons would have no choice but to attempt to use their gun as a single shot, or to dispose of it. No doubt Kaine, like his Party, would prefer a disarmed populace so that is the probable reason for the call.
LOL. Just make it mandatory to be able to get the same license that is required for a Thompson full auto .45 to get or possess off your own property, any gun, pistol or rifle, that is capable of semi-auto mode, and rapid magazine change. And if you are off your property with said weapon and no license, you go to jail on a felony charge, have all your weapons confiscated and destroyed, and can never have a gun in their possession again.

Now I would have no problem getting said license, and really don't want those who would have trouble getting that license to have the ability to buy war weapons like AR's and AK's.
 
There has been a lot of stupid talk about limiting magazine capacity for guns......it is stupid because it has no bearing on crime or mass shootings....

But..it is another example of the anti-gun bait and switch tactic.

Most people think "high capacity" magazines are for rifles, and many think Drum Magazine with 100 round capability....and when you ask a non gun owner, that is what they will respond with....

The anti-gunners...they use "high capacity" as a lie to dupe normal people, that is the bait........this way they get every non gun owner on board to ban high capacity magazines.......and if they pass the law...then they do the switch....

All of a sudden, normal magazines for pistols will be found to have been designated as High Capacity....15 round pistol magazines that have been designed for the specific pistol.......

And with that switch, whole models of pistol will now be illegal because the retooling to provide magazines are not going to be worth it......thus a ban on these pistols will be accomplished....

Democrat Favors Limits ON “Ammunition clips” | Extrano's Alley, more than a gun blog

As a practical matter, many competent defensive weapons have no reduced capacity magazines available, and tooling costs preclude any possibility of making them profitably to sell at an affordable price.

If no reduced capacity “ammunition holding device” is available, owners of many fine defensive weapons would have no choice but to attempt to use their gun as a single shot, or to dispose of it. No doubt Kaine, like his Party, would prefer a disarmed populace so that is the probable reason for the call.
LOL. Just make it mandatory to be able to get the same license that is required for a Thompson full auto .45 to get or possess off your own property, any gun, pistol or rifle, that is capable of semi-auto mode, and rapid magazine change. And if you are off your property with said weapon and no license, you go to jail on a felony charge, have all your weapons confiscated and destroyed, and can never have a gun in their possession again.

Now I would have no problem getting said license, and really don't want those who would have trouble getting that license to have the ability to buy war weapons like AR's and AK's.
I don't believe Thompson sub-machine gun is made any longer. Too bad...I would love one.
 
LOL. Just make it mandatory to be able to get the same license that is required for a Thompson full auto .45 to get or possess off your own property....
Why do you erroneously believe the right to keep and bear arms, and the constitutional protection for it, exists only while yo are on your property?
 
There has been a lot of stupid talk about limiting magazine capacity for guns......it is stupid because it has no bearing on crime or mass shootings....

But..it is another example of the anti-gun bait and switch tactic.

Most people think "high capacity" magazines are for rifles, and many think Drum Magazine with 100 round capability....and when you ask a non gun owner, that is what they will respond with....

The anti-gunners...they use "high capacity" as a lie to dupe normal people, that is the bait........this way they get every non gun owner on board to ban high capacity magazines.......and if they pass the law...then they do the switch....

All of a sudden, normal magazines for pistols will be found to have been designated as High Capacity....15 round pistol magazines that have been designed for the specific pistol.......

And with that switch, whole models of pistol will now be illegal because the retooling to provide magazines are not going to be worth it......thus a ban on these pistols will be accomplished....

Democrat Favors Limits ON “Ammunition clips” | Extrano's Alley, more than a gun blog

As a practical matter, many competent defensive weapons have no reduced capacity magazines available, and tooling costs preclude any possibility of making them profitably to sell at an affordable price.

If no reduced capacity “ammunition holding device” is available, owners of many fine defensive weapons would have no choice but to attempt to use their gun as a single shot, or to dispose of it. No doubt Kaine, like his Party, would prefer a disarmed populace so that is the probable reason for the call.
In My state I am limited to a 10 round mag for all guns

It's fucking ridiculous

And I'm sure the cops follow the same limit, right?

Actually, are they required to follow the same limits for their off duty carry pieces? Serious question.

Nope the exemptions apply both on and off duty
 
There has been a lot of stupid talk about limiting magazine capacity for guns......it is stupid because it has no bearing on crime or mass shootings....

But..it is another example of the anti-gun bait and switch tactic.

Most people think "high capacity" magazines are for rifles, and many think Drum Magazine with 100 round capability....and when you ask a non gun owner, that is what they will respond with....

The anti-gunners...they use "high capacity" as a lie to dupe normal people, that is the bait........this way they get every non gun owner on board to ban high capacity magazines.......and if they pass the law...then they do the switch....

All of a sudden, normal magazines for pistols will be found to have been designated as High Capacity....15 round pistol magazines that have been designed for the specific pistol.......

And with that switch, whole models of pistol will now be illegal because the retooling to provide magazines are not going to be worth it......thus a ban on these pistols will be accomplished....

Democrat Favors Limits ON “Ammunition clips” | Extrano's Alley, more than a gun blog

As a practical matter, many competent defensive weapons have no reduced capacity magazines available, and tooling costs preclude any possibility of making them profitably to sell at an affordable price.

If no reduced capacity “ammunition holding device” is available, owners of many fine defensive weapons would have no choice but to attempt to use their gun as a single shot, or to dispose of it. No doubt Kaine, like his Party, would prefer a disarmed populace so that is the probable reason for the call.
LOL. Just make it mandatory to be able to get the same license that is required for a Thompson full auto .45 to get or possess off your own property, any gun, pistol or rifle, that is capable of semi-auto mode, and rapid magazine change. And if you are off your property with said weapon and no license, you go to jail on a felony charge, have all your weapons confiscated and destroyed, and can never have a gun in their possession again.

Now I would have no problem getting said license, and really don't want those who would have trouble getting that license to have the ability to buy war weapons like AR's and AK's.
Capable of semiauto mode?

A rifle is either semiautomatic or it isn't there is no switch to toggle between semi auto and single shot

And no rifle available to any civilian is military grade they just look like military rifles

How many times do you people have to be told te same fact before it sinks into your thick skulls anyway?
 
A rifle is either semiautomatic or it isn't there is no switch to toggle between semi auto and single shot
Well....
I have an old Savage Model 6A .22LR that operates in semi-auto or single shot/straight pull.
If you push the op handle into the frame while the bolt is in battery, it will not cycle automatically - you have to pull the handle out and pull the bolt back manually.
 
There has been a lot of stupid talk about limiting magazine capacity for guns......it is stupid because it has no bearing on crime or mass shootings....

But..it is another example of the anti-gun bait and switch tactic.

Most people think "high capacity" magazines are for rifles, and many think Drum Magazine with 100 round capability....and when you ask a non gun owner, that is what they will respond with....

The anti-gunners...they use "high capacity" as a lie to dupe normal people, that is the bait........this way they get every non gun owner on board to ban high capacity magazines.......and if they pass the law...then they do the switch....

All of a sudden, normal magazines for pistols will be found to have been designated as High Capacity....15 round pistol magazines that have been designed for the specific pistol.......

And with that switch, whole models of pistol will now be illegal because the retooling to provide magazines are not going to be worth it......thus a ban on these pistols will be accomplished....

Democrat Favors Limits ON “Ammunition clips” | Extrano's Alley, more than a gun blog

As a practical matter, many competent defensive weapons have no reduced capacity magazines available, and tooling costs preclude any possibility of making them profitably to sell at an affordable price.

If no reduced capacity “ammunition holding device” is available, owners of many fine defensive weapons would have no choice but to attempt to use their gun as a single shot, or to dispose of it. No doubt Kaine, like his Party, would prefer a disarmed populace so that is the probable reason for the call.
In My state I am limited to a 10 round mag for all guns

It's fucking ridiculous

And I'm sure the cops follow the same limit, right?

Actually, are they required to follow the same limits for their off duty carry pieces? Serious question.

Nope the exemptions apply both on and off duty

Figures. Rules for thee and not for me.
 

Forum List

Back
Top