MAGA Pundit CORNERED into admitting TRUMP RACISM!

[DakotaKai_fan20]

What you don't believe is irrelevant to me young boy. You know less than I do, and you should be glad I'm taking the time to provide you with what I have learned in life. You re 40 years behind me boy, that's a fact. I've seen 23. I've been 23. You have not been 63 and if and when you get to 63, you won't think the same way you do now.

When I'm your age, I will believe that Trump was as good or better than Reagan.

 

[NetJedi]

Yep, can't discuss the topic.

You're correct, I cannot since You apparently believe that Scott Jennings the token conservative on that paragon of integrity CNN is racist and to Me whether he is or is not a racist is completely irrelevant. After all, he works for CNN where nobody is what they appear to be.

CNN; it's not news, it's kabuki theater.

 

[IM2]

When I'm your age, I will believe that Trump was as good or better than Reagan.

I doubt that you will. But if you do, you will be laughed at because Reagan was a terrible President and Trump will not be viewed favorably in history. I was your age when Reagan was president. I saw his entire presidency. You wre 21 years away from being born when Reagan was elected and 13 years from being born when he was finished. So I will not be arguing with some kids opinion based on what he was taught in South Carolina.

 

[kyzr]

To reiterate, the OP and the title are lies.
There is no Trump racism, period.

 

[DakotaKai_fan20]

I doubt that you will. But if you do, you will be laughed at because Reagan was a terrible President and Trump will not be viewed favorably in history. I was your age when Reagan was president. I saw his entire presidency. You wre 21 years away from being born when Reagan was elected and 13 years from being born when he was finished. So I will not be arguing with some kids opinion based on what he was taught in South Carolina.

You obviously don't know me. You don't know my future beliefs. I know them, not you.

 

[Seymour Flops]

You start out in 1954 by saying, “n****r, n****r, n****r.” By 1968 you can’t say “n****r”—that hurts you, backfires. So you say stuff like, uh, forced busing, states’ rights, and all that stuff, and you’re getting so abstract. Now, you’re talking about cutting taxes, and all these things you’re talking about are totally economic things and a byproduct of them is, blacks get hurt worse than whites.… “We want to cut this,” is much more abstract than even the busing thing, uh, and a hell of a lot more abstract than “n****r, n****r.”
Lee Atwater

Notice how Scott Jennings communicates. This is the classic tactic used by racists today. Lee Atwater made it plain and this is the tactic people have used for years. Today the abstract terms used are things like woke, immigration, DEI, PC, ETC.

In this video Jennings tries to evade. Because he evades making answers that show his racism, right wingers will declare he is not a racist with the excuse that he did not mention race. But Scott Jennings is indeed a white racist. Thisis a tactic we see in this forum every day. It's part of the playbook

Why quote Lee Atwater, who died many years ago?

Quote Scott Jennings being a racist, if you can, and give the video timestamp. I'm not watching 19 minutes looking for a racist needle in a haystack of reasonable reaction to an election you lost.

 

[IM2]

You're correct, I cannot since You apparently believe that Scott Jennings the token conservative on that paragon of integrity CNN is racist and to Me whether he is or is not a racist is completely irrelevant. After all, he works for CNN where nobody is what they appear to be.

CNN; it's not news, it's kabuki theater.

What I believe is that Jennings is not a conservative. He is a right winger, there is a difference. And he is on TV expressing racism. Now I can use all of the talkers on Fox as examples of this same tactic if you want to diss CNN. Because CNN has not had to pay 700 milion plus for lying.

 

[DakotaKai_fan20]

Why quote Lee Atwater, who died many years ago?

Quote Scott Jennings being a racist, if you can, and give the video timestamp. I'm not watching 19 minutes looking for a racist needle in a haystack of reasonable reaction to an election you lost.

He is obviously in a meltdown due to Harris losing.

 

[IM2]

You obviously don't know me. You don't know my future beliefs. I know them, not you.

I know that you cannot predict what you will be in 40 years. That's what I do know.

 

[IM2]

He is obviously in a meltdown due to Harris losing.

It's funny how you idiots think. There ain't any meltdown here litte boy. YOU and those like you are not prepared for what's coming. What you think is coming is not going to happen.

 

[DakotaKai_fan20]

It's funny how you idiots think. There ain't any meltdown here litte boy. YOU and those like you are not prepared for what's coming. What you think is coming is not going to happen.

Oh, I am prepared for four more years of greatness.

 

[Meathead]

It's funny how you idiots think. There ain't any meltdown here litte boy. YOU and those like you are not prepared for what's coming. What you think is coming is not going to happen.

WTF do you think is happening? That is exactly why you're melting down.

 

[NetJedi]

What I believe is that Jennings is not a conservative. He is a right winger, there is a difference. And he is on TV expressing racism. Now I can use all of the talkers on Fox as examples of this same tactic if you want to diss CNN. Because CNN has not had to pay 700 milion plus for lying.

What's the difference between a conservative and a right winger?

Why do you care if Scott Jennings is on CNN "expressing racism"? I've been led to believe that in the U.S. the 1st Amendment to COTUS protects Mr. Jennings right to express whatever rubbish suits his pleasure and apparently his "expressing racism" doesn't bother CNN. Maybe instead of being upset with Scott Jennings you should take umbrage with CNN? Just a thought.

When you say; "I can use all of the talkers on Fox as examples of this same tactic", what "tactic" are you referring to?

 

[Mister Iggy]

Being anti woke isn’t racist.. DEI has no place in the military, or anywhere really, that’s common sense..

The victimhood of IM2 is sad..

The victim hood of some other posters here in that everything is anti semitism is sad too..

Get help..

 

[para bellum]

When you say; "I can use all of the talkers on Fox as examples of this same tactic", what "tactic" are you referring to?

Talking while being white.

 

[BlackSand]

And so here we see the classic white man denying racism that he has just seen.

.

No ... I think a better description would be that the poster was figuratively comparing your desire to see racism everywhere ...
To Don Quixote tilting on windmills.

.​

 

[JustAGuy1]

You start out in 1954 by saying, “n****r, n****r, n****r.” By 1968 you can’t say “n****r”—that hurts you, backfires. So you say stuff like, uh, forced busing, states’ rights, and all that stuff, and you’re getting so abstract. Now, you’re talking about cutting taxes, and all these things you’re talking about are totally economic things and a byproduct of them is, blacks get hurt worse than whites.… “We want to cut this,” is much more abstract than even the busing thing, uh, and a hell of a lot more abstract than “n****r, n****r.”
Lee Atwater

Notice how Scott Jennings communicates. This is the classic tactic used by racists today. Lee Atwater made it plain and this is the tactic people have used for years. Today the abstract terms used are things like woke, immigration, DEI, PC, ETC.

In this video Jennings tries to evade. Because he evades making answers that show his racism, right wingers will declare he is not a racist with the excuse that he did not mention race. But Scott Jennings is indeed a white racist. Thisis a tactic we see in this forum every day. It's part of the playbook

Go eff yourself piglet.

 

[NetJedi]

Talking while being white.

Wow! those people have got a lot of nerve.

 

[JustAGuy1]

And here we see a logical fallacy used by whites on the right.

"Usually the black racist has been produced by the white racist. In most cases where you see it, it is the reaction to white racism, and if you analyze it closely, it's not really black racism... If we react to white racism with a violent reaction, to me that's not black racism. If you come to put a rope around my neck and I hang you for it, to me that's not racism. Yours is racism, but my reaction has nothing to do with racism..."
-- Malcolm X

Do they lynch people like you in Kansas?

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

You start out in 1954 by saying, “n****r, n****r, n****r.” By 1968 you can’t say “n****r”—that hurts you, backfires. So you say stuff like, uh, forced busing, states’ rights, and all that stuff, and you’re getting so abstract. Now, you’re talking about cutting taxes, and all these things you’re talking about are totally economic things and a byproduct of them is, blacks get hurt worse than whites.… “We want to cut this,” is much more abstract than even the busing thing, uh, and a hell of a lot more abstract than “n****r, n****r.”
Lee Atwater

Notice how Scott Jennings communicates. This is the classic tactic used by racists today. Lee Atwater made it plain and this is the tactic people have used for years. Today the abstract terms used are things like woke, immigration, DEI, PC, ETC.

In this video Jennings tries to evade. Because he evades making answers that show his racism, right wingers will declare he is not a racist with the excuse that he did not mention race. But Scott Jennings is indeed a white racist. Thisis a tactic we see in this forum every day. It's part of the playbook

You are such a weak man