MAGA—More Are Getting Arrested.

[Faun]

It's @Faun ....... literally the most dishonest and stupid partisan hack poster here.
It's really hard to look closely at that level of lying and stupidity.

I don't care who it is. You completely missed the context of the conversation.

Hey now, I care. I'm #1 in his book. What a badge of honor!

 

[colfax_m]

They are treated like they commit most of the crime..... because they do.

That's not racial bias, it's fucking reality.



And the fact is, conservatives who do the exact same things a leftist does, are being more vigorously prosecuted, plain and simple. Treat everyone the same..... there's nothing "preferential" about that.


Don't bitch to me about imaginary racial bias on one hand, while you excuse malicious prosecution based on ideology (and maybe race as well) on the other, you fucking hypocrite.

And you know they commit the most crime because they're convicted more. They're convicted more because they're prosecuted more. They're prosecuted more because they're policed more aggressively.

You want to pretend they're the EXACT SAME THING, but fail to acknowledge that the Capitol riot was not the EXACT SAME THING as any other riot. It was intended specifically to disrupt the function of Congress, which is what they're being charged with. No leftists that I know of is charged with that obstruction of official proceeding because that just didn't happen.

The racial bias is definitely not imaginary and you're just sticking your head in the ground to avoid it. It's not only a huge problem, it's orders of magnitude greater than a few dozen conservatives being charged because they committed crimes. They're not being prosecuted based on ideology. They're being prosecuted based on crimes. Go ahead and tell me that they're not committing crimes. I dare you.

 

[bripat9643]

You are comparing apples to oranges. YOu are purposefully comparing one cherry picked example to the 1/6 riot, ignoring that there have been HUNDREDS of radical lefty riots, where various people were threatened and the police did not shoot down the rioters.

Indeed, there were a lot of other cops there that day. Why did only one of them fire? If the need for lethal force was so clear, why was there not dozens of cops firing hundreds of rounds?

You cherry picked Babbitt, not me.

The vast majority of the protestors were peaceful and unarmed. THe woman that was killed was unarmed.

Why did only one of them fire? Because as I stated earlier, the other cops were treating the protestors with kid gloves and retreating. This cop couldn't retreat any further as the violent mob had reached their last line of defense before reaching members of Congress.

It's utterly bizarre how the cult refuses to accept Benedict Babbitt put herself into a lethal situation.

Based on the norms set by you fucktards over the last 4 years, it would be completely understandable, how she could have though that breaking and entering would have been acceptable behavior, perhaps with some minor judicial implications.

Who over the last four years threatened to attack members of Congress and got feet away from them?

Your moral compass is broken and unrepairable.

Are you pretending to not be aware of the massive wave of riots that have been raging unchecked for years in this country, or are you actually retarded?

You didn't answer ... who among them threatened to attack members of Congress and got within feet of them?

They firebombed a federal courthouse while people were inside of it, you fucking NAZI.

Show the cop standing there who did nothing...

Police near the courthouse doing nothing while it's being firebombed:

He asked for it. You gave it. Now he will show that his asking for it, was shit, because no information will change his position because he is a mindless ideological zealot.

Dumbfuck, he posted an image where no one's life was being threatened.

Now stop lying. He didn't prove what I asked for.

If I show a picture of people being attacked and cops not shooting the rioters, would you admit it?

Possibly. If it shows the rioters were a threat to someone's life and I can find the news describing the event of the photo which confirms it, then sure.

Possibly? LOL!!!

Yes, possibly. Or are you so retarded, you'd think I'd accept your claim as fact before you post your evidence.

Errr, are you pretending to be so retarded that you don't understand the concept of a IF/THEN question?

You like IF/THEN questions? If Trump had not told his mob to be at the capital on January 6th and expect a "wild time", would the riot have occured?

Here's another. If Trump hadn't lied about the election being stolen, would his mob have stormed the capital screaming for Mike Pence's death?

what a fun game!

It is your opinion that Trump lied. That is meaningless.

Nope, that's not opinion. Had Trump not lied, he would have been able to prove his claims and he would still be president.

Had he not lied about the election swindle? Biden was already president, you fucking nimrod.

 

[bripat9643]

They are treated like they commit most of the crime..... because they do.

That's not racial bias, it's fucking reality.



And the fact is, conservatives who do the exact same things a leftist does, are being more vigorously prosecuted, plain and simple. Treat everyone the same..... there's nothing "preferential" about that.


Don't bitch to me about imaginary racial bias on one hand, while you excuse malicious prosecution based on ideology (and maybe race as well) on the other, you fucking hypocrite.

And you know they commit the most crime because they're convicted more. They're convicted more because they're prosecuted more. They're prosecuted more because they're policed more aggressively.

You want to pretend they're the EXACT SAME THING, but fail to acknowledge that the Capitol riot was not the EXACT SAME THING as any other riot. It was intended specifically to disrupt the function of Congress, which is what they're being charged with. No leftists that I know of is charged with that obstruction of official proceeding because that just didn't happen.

The racial bias is definitely not imaginary and you're just sticking your head in the ground to avoid it. It's not only a huge problem, it's orders of magnitude greater than a few dozen conservatives being charged because they committed crimes. They're not being prosecuted based on ideology. They're being prosecuted based on crimes. Go ahead and tell me that they're not committing crimes. I dare you.

"And you know they commit the most crime because they're convicted more."

How fucking stupid can a person be?

 

[Faun]

You are comparing apples to oranges. YOu are purposefully comparing one cherry picked example to the 1/6 riot, ignoring that there have been HUNDREDS of radical lefty riots, where various people were threatened and the police did not shoot down the rioters.

Indeed, there were a lot of other cops there that day. Why did only one of them fire? If the need for lethal force was so clear, why was there not dozens of cops firing hundreds of rounds?

You cherry picked Babbitt, not me.

The vast majority of the protestors were peaceful and unarmed. THe woman that was killed was unarmed.

Why did only one of them fire? Because as I stated earlier, the other cops were treating the protestors with kid gloves and retreating. This cop couldn't retreat any further as the violent mob had reached their last line of defense before reaching members of Congress.

It's utterly bizarre how the cult refuses to accept Benedict Babbitt put herself into a lethal situation.

Based on the norms set by you fucktards over the last 4 years, it would be completely understandable, how she could have though that breaking and entering would have been acceptable behavior, perhaps with some minor judicial implications.

Who over the last four years threatened to attack members of Congress and got feet away from them?

Your moral compass is broken and unrepairable.

Are you pretending to not be aware of the massive wave of riots that have been raging unchecked for years in this country, or are you actually retarded?

You didn't answer ... who among them threatened to attack members of Congress and got within feet of them?

They firebombed a federal courthouse while people were inside of it, you fucking NAZI.

Show the cop standing there who did nothing...

Police near the courthouse doing nothing while it's being firebombed:

He asked for it. You gave it. Now he will show that his asking for it, was shit, because no information will change his position because he is a mindless ideological zealot.

Dumbfuck, he posted an image where no one's life was being threatened.

Now stop lying. He didn't prove what I asked for.

If I show a picture of people being attacked and cops not shooting the rioters, would you admit it?

Possibly. If it shows the rioters were a threat to someone's life and I can find the news describing the event of the photo which confirms it, then sure.

Possibly? LOL!!!

Yes, possibly. Or are you so retarded, you'd think I'd accept your claim as fact before you post your evidence.

Errr, are you pretending to be so retarded that you don't understand the concept of a IF/THEN question?

You like IF/THEN questions? If Trump had not told his mob to be at the capital on January 6th and expect a "wild time", would the riot have occured?

Here's another. If Trump hadn't lied about the election being stolen, would his mob have stormed the capital screaming for Mike Pence's death?

what a fun game!

It is your opinion that Trump lied. That is meaningless.

Nope, that's not opinion. Had Trump not lied, he would have been able to prove his claims and he would still be president.

Had he not lied about the election swindle? Biden was already president, you fucking nimrod.

Biden became president on November 4th, fucking moron??

Who knew? ?

 

[bripat9643]

You are comparing apples to oranges. YOu are purposefully comparing one cherry picked example to the 1/6 riot, ignoring that there have been HUNDREDS of radical lefty riots, where various people were threatened and the police did not shoot down the rioters.

Indeed, there were a lot of other cops there that day. Why did only one of them fire? If the need for lethal force was so clear, why was there not dozens of cops firing hundreds of rounds?

You cherry picked Babbitt, not me.

The vast majority of the protestors were peaceful and unarmed. THe woman that was killed was unarmed.

Why did only one of them fire? Because as I stated earlier, the other cops were treating the protestors with kid gloves and retreating. This cop couldn't retreat any further as the violent mob had reached their last line of defense before reaching members of Congress.

It's utterly bizarre how the cult refuses to accept Benedict Babbitt put herself into a lethal situation.

Based on the norms set by you fucktards over the last 4 years, it would be completely understandable, how she could have though that breaking and entering would have been acceptable behavior, perhaps with some minor judicial implications.

Who over the last four years threatened to attack members of Congress and got feet away from them?

Your moral compass is broken and unrepairable.

Are you pretending to not be aware of the massive wave of riots that have been raging unchecked for years in this country, or are you actually retarded?

You didn't answer ... who among them threatened to attack members of Congress and got within feet of them?

They firebombed a federal courthouse while people were inside of it, you fucking NAZI.

Show the cop standing there who did nothing...

Police near the courthouse doing nothing while it's being firebombed:

He asked for it. You gave it. Now he will show that his asking for it, was shit, because no information will change his position because he is a mindless ideological zealot.

Dumbfuck, he posted an image where no one's life was being threatened.

Now stop lying. He didn't prove what I asked for.

If I show a picture of people being attacked and cops not shooting the rioters, would you admit it?

Possibly. If it shows the rioters were a threat to someone's life and I can find the news describing the event of the photo which confirms it, then sure.

Possibly? LOL!!!

Yes, possibly. Or are you so retarded, you'd think I'd accept your claim as fact before you post your evidence.

Errr, are you pretending to be so retarded that you don't understand the concept of a IF/THEN question?

You like IF/THEN questions? If Trump had not told his mob to be at the capital on January 6th and expect a "wild time", would the riot have occured?

Here's another. If Trump hadn't lied about the election being stolen, would his mob have stormed the capital screaming for Mike Pence's death?

what a fun game!

It is your opinion that Trump lied. That is meaningless.

Nope, that's not opinion. Had Trump not lied, he would have been able to prove his claims and he would still be president.

Had he not lied about the election swindle? Biden was already president, you fucking nimrod.

Biden became president on November 4th, fucking moron??

Who knew? ?

That's about 3 months before Jan 6, moron.

 

[Faun]

You are comparing apples to oranges. YOu are purposefully comparing one cherry picked example to the 1/6 riot, ignoring that there have been HUNDREDS of radical lefty riots, where various people were threatened and the police did not shoot down the rioters.

Indeed, there were a lot of other cops there that day. Why did only one of them fire? If the need for lethal force was so clear, why was there not dozens of cops firing hundreds of rounds?

You cherry picked Babbitt, not me.

The vast majority of the protestors were peaceful and unarmed. THe woman that was killed was unarmed.

Why did only one of them fire? Because as I stated earlier, the other cops were treating the protestors with kid gloves and retreating. This cop couldn't retreat any further as the violent mob had reached their last line of defense before reaching members of Congress.

It's utterly bizarre how the cult refuses to accept Benedict Babbitt put herself into a lethal situation.

Based on the norms set by you fucktards over the last 4 years, it would be completely understandable, how she could have though that breaking and entering would have been acceptable behavior, perhaps with some minor judicial implications.

Who over the last four years threatened to attack members of Congress and got feet away from them?

Your moral compass is broken and unrepairable.

Are you pretending to not be aware of the massive wave of riots that have been raging unchecked for years in this country, or are you actually retarded?

You didn't answer ... who among them threatened to attack members of Congress and got within feet of them?

They firebombed a federal courthouse while people were inside of it, you fucking NAZI.

Show the cop standing there who did nothing...

Police near the courthouse doing nothing while it's being firebombed:

He asked for it. You gave it. Now he will show that his asking for it, was shit, because no information will change his position because he is a mindless ideological zealot.

Dumbfuck, he posted an image where no one's life was being threatened.

Now stop lying. He didn't prove what I asked for.

If I show a picture of people being attacked and cops not shooting the rioters, would you admit it?

Possibly. If it shows the rioters were a threat to someone's life and I can find the news describing the event of the photo which confirms it, then sure.

Possibly? LOL!!!

Yes, possibly. Or are you so retarded, you'd think I'd accept your claim as fact before you post your evidence.

Errr, are you pretending to be so retarded that you don't understand the concept of a IF/THEN question?

You like IF/THEN questions? If Trump had not told his mob to be at the capital on January 6th and expect a "wild time", would the riot have occured?

Here's another. If Trump hadn't lied about the election being stolen, would his mob have stormed the capital screaming for Mike Pence's death?

what a fun game!

It is your opinion that Trump lied. That is meaningless.

Nope, that's not opinion. Had Trump not lied, he would have been able to prove his claims and he would still be president.

Had he not lied about the election swindle? Biden was already president, you fucking nimrod.

Biden became president on November 4th, fucking moron??

Who knew? ?

That's about 3 months before Jan 6, moron.

Holy shit, fucking moron.

It's 2 months, not "about 3 months."

Regardless of your maladies, he started lying the election was stolen the day after the election.

Six months later and rightards are still looking for proof.

 

[bripat9643]

You are comparing apples to oranges. YOu are purposefully comparing one cherry picked example to the 1/6 riot, ignoring that there have been HUNDREDS of radical lefty riots, where various people were threatened and the police did not shoot down the rioters.

Indeed, there were a lot of other cops there that day. Why did only one of them fire? If the need for lethal force was so clear, why was there not dozens of cops firing hundreds of rounds?

You cherry picked Babbitt, not me.

The vast majority of the protestors were peaceful and unarmed. THe woman that was killed was unarmed.

Why did only one of them fire? Because as I stated earlier, the other cops were treating the protestors with kid gloves and retreating. This cop couldn't retreat any further as the violent mob had reached their last line of defense before reaching members of Congress.

It's utterly bizarre how the cult refuses to accept Benedict Babbitt put herself into a lethal situation.

Based on the norms set by you fucktards over the last 4 years, it would be completely understandable, how she could have though that breaking and entering would have been acceptable behavior, perhaps with some minor judicial implications.

Who over the last four years threatened to attack members of Congress and got feet away from them?

Your moral compass is broken and unrepairable.

Are you pretending to not be aware of the massive wave of riots that have been raging unchecked for years in this country, or are you actually retarded?

You didn't answer ... who among them threatened to attack members of Congress and got within feet of them?

They firebombed a federal courthouse while people were inside of it, you fucking NAZI.

Show the cop standing there who did nothing...

Police near the courthouse doing nothing while it's being firebombed:

He asked for it. You gave it. Now he will show that his asking for it, was shit, because no information will change his position because he is a mindless ideological zealot.

Dumbfuck, he posted an image where no one's life was being threatened.

Now stop lying. He didn't prove what I asked for.

If I show a picture of people being attacked and cops not shooting the rioters, would you admit it?

Possibly. If it shows the rioters were a threat to someone's life and I can find the news describing the event of the photo which confirms it, then sure.

Possibly? LOL!!!

Yes, possibly. Or are you so retarded, you'd think I'd accept your claim as fact before you post your evidence.

Errr, are you pretending to be so retarded that you don't understand the concept of a IF/THEN question?

You like IF/THEN questions? If Trump had not told his mob to be at the capital on January 6th and expect a "wild time", would the riot have occured?

Here's another. If Trump hadn't lied about the election being stolen, would his mob have stormed the capital screaming for Mike Pence's death?

what a fun game!

It is your opinion that Trump lied. That is meaningless.

Nope, that's not opinion. Had Trump not lied, he would have been able to prove his claims and he would still be president.

Had he not lied about the election swindle? Biden was already president, you fucking nimrod.

Biden became president on November 4th, fucking moron??

Who knew? ?

That's about 3 months before Jan 6, moron.

Holy shit, fucking moron.

It's 2 months, not "about 3 months."

Regardless of your maladies, he started lying the election was stolen the day after the election.

Six months later and rightards are still looking for proof.

Is there anything so trivial that you want quibble about it?

 

[Faun]

You are comparing apples to oranges. YOu are purposefully comparing one cherry picked example to the 1/6 riot, ignoring that there have been HUNDREDS of radical lefty riots, where various people were threatened and the police did not shoot down the rioters.

Indeed, there were a lot of other cops there that day. Why did only one of them fire? If the need for lethal force was so clear, why was there not dozens of cops firing hundreds of rounds?

You cherry picked Babbitt, not me.

The vast majority of the protestors were peaceful and unarmed. THe woman that was killed was unarmed.

Why did only one of them fire? Because as I stated earlier, the other cops were treating the protestors with kid gloves and retreating. This cop couldn't retreat any further as the violent mob had reached their last line of defense before reaching members of Congress.

It's utterly bizarre how the cult refuses to accept Benedict Babbitt put herself into a lethal situation.

Based on the norms set by you fucktards over the last 4 years, it would be completely understandable, how she could have though that breaking and entering would have been acceptable behavior, perhaps with some minor judicial implications.

Who over the last four years threatened to attack members of Congress and got feet away from them?

Your moral compass is broken and unrepairable.

Are you pretending to not be aware of the massive wave of riots that have been raging unchecked for years in this country, or are you actually retarded?

You didn't answer ... who among them threatened to attack members of Congress and got within feet of them?

They firebombed a federal courthouse while people were inside of it, you fucking NAZI.

Show the cop standing there who did nothing...

Police near the courthouse doing nothing while it's being firebombed:

He asked for it. You gave it. Now he will show that his asking for it, was shit, because no information will change his position because he is a mindless ideological zealot.

Dumbfuck, he posted an image where no one's life was being threatened.

Now stop lying. He didn't prove what I asked for.

If I show a picture of people being attacked and cops not shooting the rioters, would you admit it?

Possibly. If it shows the rioters were a threat to someone's life and I can find the news describing the event of the photo which confirms it, then sure.

Possibly? LOL!!!

Yes, possibly. Or are you so retarded, you'd think I'd accept your claim as fact before you post your evidence.

Errr, are you pretending to be so retarded that you don't understand the concept of a IF/THEN question?

You like IF/THEN questions? If Trump had not told his mob to be at the capital on January 6th and expect a "wild time", would the riot have occured?

Here's another. If Trump hadn't lied about the election being stolen, would his mob have stormed the capital screaming for Mike Pence's death?

what a fun game!

It is your opinion that Trump lied. That is meaningless.

Nope, that's not opinion. Had Trump not lied, he would have been able to prove his claims and he would still be president.

Had he not lied about the election swindle? Biden was already president, you fucking nimrod.

Biden became president on November 4th, fucking moron??

Who knew? ?

That's about 3 months before Jan 6, moron.

Holy shit, fucking moron.

It's 2 months, not "about 3 months."

Regardless of your maladies, he started lying the election was stolen the day after the election.

Six months later and rightards are still looking for proof.

Is there anything so trivial that you want quibble about it?

Pointing out Trump has been crying since November 4th is not trivial. Nothing else was quibbling -- just making fun of you.

 

[Mustang]

They are treated like they commit most of the crime..... because they do.

That's not racial bias, it's fucking reality.



And the fact is, conservatives who do the exact same things a leftist does, are being more vigorously prosecuted, plain and simple. Treat everyone the same..... there's nothing "preferential" about that.


Don't bitch to me about imaginary racial bias on one hand, while you excuse malicious prosecution based on ideology (and maybe race as well) on the other, you fucking hypocrite.

And you know they commit the most crime because they're convicted more. They're convicted more because they're prosecuted more. They're prosecuted more because they're policed more aggressively.

You want to pretend they're the EXACT SAME THING, but fail to acknowledge that the Capitol riot was not the EXACT SAME THING as any other riot. It was intended specifically to disrupt the function of Congress, which is what they're being charged with. No leftists that I know of is charged with that obstruction of official proceeding because that just didn't happen.

The racial bias is definitely not imaginary and you're just sticking your head in the ground to avoid it. It's not only a huge problem, it's orders of magnitude greater than a few dozen conservatives being charged because they committed crimes. They're not being prosecuted based on ideology. They're being prosecuted based on crimes. Go ahead and tell me that they're not committing crimes. I dare you.

"And you know they commit the most crime because they're convicted more."

How fucking stupid can a person be?

Just what I was thinking about you...

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

If you're the ones aggressing, (and the left is)

Hahah...you people will tell yourselves ANYTHING

 

[lantern2814]

Active-Duty Marine Corps Major Charged In Capitol Riot

Officials say Maj. Christopher Warnagiris is believed to be the first active-duty military service member to be charged in connection with the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol.

www.npr.org

Love it.

Why are some rioters being gone after with both barrels while others are given a pass or just low priority?


Because the dems are on the side of lefty rioters.



THus, these prosecutions are political.


Anyone convicted, will be a political prisoner.


That is the country you are making.


View attachment 489381

I lose track of it . What anniversary of you guys promising a civil war is it ? 15th, 20th? Are you guys registered anywhere?

Funny, this thread is based on the premise that the 1/6 riot was a serious and real threat to our democracy, because it delayed the formal recognition of the count, by HOURS.

Yet, here you are, acting as though, any talk of civil war from US, is laughable.


Why do you support the extra aggressive prosecution of the 1/6 rioters if it was not a serious insurrection?


lol. All these questions are rhetorical. We both know that you will not give serious or honest answers to ANY of them.


I am constantly amazed at the way you libs can hold completely contradictory ideas AT THE SAME TIME, without a hint of self awareness, no matter how much it is rubbed in your face.

Their goal wasn't to delay it, it was to "stop the steal." You're literally giving them credit for failing to pull off their coup.

Wow. Did you just become aware that intents and actual outcomes are sometimes different? What a big day for you.

Run along retard.

No worries, keep defending sedition. Be even louder about that during election season next year.

Who has been charged with sedition, shit for brains?

Who said they've been charged with sedition yet, fucking moron?

Their actions violate the sedition conspiracy law.

And Chaz didn't? And the Autonomous Zone didn't? And ordering the cops to not protect ICE so the rioters could attack the building didn't?

You are supporting a massive violation of civil rights of your enemies. Those that are convicted will be political prisoners.

View attachment 490040

Sure skippy...bring it on.

I hope you enjoy the results of your labors. I hope I am still here, when you are here whining like a fag, because of how it is blowing up in your face.

Sure thing skippy. In 10 years two things will still be true. There would have been no civil war and you guys will still be threatening to start one.

Do me a favor. State your position on the 1/6 "insurrection, how bad it was, in a compound sentence, with your position that there is nothing to fear from the Right re: "Civil War".


I want to see your two positions side by side. It should be GREAT.

There is nothing to fear from the right (or the left) on a civil war.

Your attempted insurrection is a different topic, junior.

Whatever your child-like hoping for a war because you have some bizarre fantasy about how cool it would be...just know 2 things... If you INCELs ever tried it, you'd be slaughtered....and....you INCELs will never try it. Because you are a coward.

Hence your continued threats with absolutely no follow up.

So, you don't care about the people supposedly killed by the mob on 1/6? People dying is "nothing to fear"?


Are you longing for the sweet release that Death will bring?


I do not want Civil War, I am warning where you hatred and oppression and keeping of political prisoners could lead this once great nation.

Your hatred is based on abject ignorance. Aside from the reality that any such uprising will be utterly squashed by a military sworn to protect the Constitution, you won't gain much support from a country because your civil war will be based upon hate, not principle.

I doubt it will be based on hate. It will be based on their simply being a failure in life and trying to bring everyone else down to their level.

You are supporting a violation of civil rights. You are the hater here, not me.

Where, whiner?

Federal Civil Rights Statutes | Federal Bureau of Investigation

The FBI is able to investigate civil rights violations based on a series of federal laws.

www.fbi.gov

Unequal application of justice, you faggot.

Uh oh, I touched a nerve with the whiner. Had to break out the F word. Good luck proving that when so many of the white Trump mob are being released...after being allowed to riot, go home, and roam free for weeks. The guy that, with premeditated intent, brought a 950,000 watt stun gun into the Speaker's office? Some Arkansas judge tried to let him go.

Judge blocks release of man pictured with feet on desk in Pelosi's office

Richard Barnett won permission from a judge in Arkansas to return home to await trial, but a judge in D.C. blocked that decision.

www.politico.com

People being released on bail, is not the same as not being looked for or having charges dropped.

You are supporting a gross violation of the human rights of hundreds of people based on political reasons.


You are supporting the policy of holding political prisoners here in the United States of America.


Your obsession with race, sounds somewhat racist too.

Show me an article that says he was released on bail. None of them say that, they all just say he was released. I'm sure a BLM protester that walked into, say Kevin McCarthy's office carrying a 950,000 watt stun gun would just be let go to await trial. Puhleese!

Lot's of women carry stun guns in their purses, moron. It's not illegal.

Is it a weapon or not? You apologists keep making the incorrect claim that Trump’s mob wasn’t armed. They were.

The key to your car can be a weapon. You obviously have a very narrow understanding of reality.

A 950,000 volt walking stick designed to stop a wild animal isn’t a key in your purse, princess.

Wow. 400 storm the capitol in a supposed coup attempt and you got a TAZER as the star example of how dangerously armed they were?

LOL!!!!

It was 800.

Prove it, asshole

I don't have to. The FBI is on it. They have 15,000 hours of video, and they've received something like 200,000+ tips from patriotic citizens. I hope they televise some of the trials and put the video evidence right up on the screen for all to see. Then let's see conservatives say it was a peaceful protest or that it was like a regular day of tourists showing up.

if they don't do that with Antifa and BLM trials, then this will be a political prosecution and anyone convicted with be political prisoners.

That's what conservatives always say when they get prosecuted for crimes. It doesn't even matter what the crime is.

As you people become more and more abusive and tyrannical, it might become fairly commonplace.


My point stands. The 1/6 riots are being targeted for extra aggressive investigation and prosecution for political reasons.


That is a violation of their Right to Equal Application of Justice.

Would you like a little cheese with that whine?

Conservatives are SUCH big babies. You cry about justice, but you don't want justice; you want preferential treatment. And when some legal entity actually holds you to account, you throw a fit.

What happened to our Capitol on 1/6 hasn't happened in over 200 years, and when it was done then, it was done by a foreign power, not by our fellow citizens who were trying to overturn a free and fair election. That's what I call political.

Most Americans don't give a damn if you don't like the prosecutions. Hell, they're all getting off pretty easy from everything I can tell because in some other countries, they'd be rounded up and summarily shot.

Wrong YOU asshats want preferential treatment for your favored black criminals and rioters. Gee, when Americans try to hold you leftards accountable for your murder of cops, attempted mass murder in Portland, robbing of businesses and hundreds of cases of arson, you whine and cry “wacist!!”. News flash: nobody gives a shit about your whining.

I'm fine with prosecuting people who commit crimes, regardless of who they are. But, like I said, conservatives want preferential treatment. That's not fine with me.

And yet here you are defending actual libtards rioting to this day in Portland and having at least twice attempted mass murder, yet calling for death for the Capitol peaceful protesters (per your side’s definition). Hypocrite. Preferential treatments. Fuck off with that bullshit asshole.

I've never defended rioting.

Bullshit. You’ve been defending leftist rioters this whole thread hypocrite. Fuck off with your bullshit.

 

[Mustang]

Active-Duty Marine Corps Major Charged In Capitol Riot

Officials say Maj. Christopher Warnagiris is believed to be the first active-duty military service member to be charged in connection with the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol.

www.npr.org

Love it.

Why are some rioters being gone after with both barrels while others are given a pass or just low priority?


Because the dems are on the side of lefty rioters.



THus, these prosecutions are political.


Anyone convicted, will be a political prisoner.


That is the country you are making.


View attachment 489381

I lose track of it . What anniversary of you guys promising a civil war is it ? 15th, 20th? Are you guys registered anywhere?

Funny, this thread is based on the premise that the 1/6 riot was a serious and real threat to our democracy, because it delayed the formal recognition of the count, by HOURS.

Yet, here you are, acting as though, any talk of civil war from US, is laughable.


Why do you support the extra aggressive prosecution of the 1/6 rioters if it was not a serious insurrection?


lol. All these questions are rhetorical. We both know that you will not give serious or honest answers to ANY of them.


I am constantly amazed at the way you libs can hold completely contradictory ideas AT THE SAME TIME, without a hint of self awareness, no matter how much it is rubbed in your face.

Their goal wasn't to delay it, it was to "stop the steal." You're literally giving them credit for failing to pull off their coup.

Wow. Did you just become aware that intents and actual outcomes are sometimes different? What a big day for you.

Run along retard.

No worries, keep defending sedition. Be even louder about that during election season next year.

Who has been charged with sedition, shit for brains?

Who said they've been charged with sedition yet, fucking moron?

Their actions violate the sedition conspiracy law.

And Chaz didn't? And the Autonomous Zone didn't? And ordering the cops to not protect ICE so the rioters could attack the building didn't?

You are supporting a massive violation of civil rights of your enemies. Those that are convicted will be political prisoners.

View attachment 490040

Sure skippy...bring it on.

I hope you enjoy the results of your labors. I hope I am still here, when you are here whining like a fag, because of how it is blowing up in your face.

Sure thing skippy. In 10 years two things will still be true. There would have been no civil war and you guys will still be threatening to start one.

Do me a favor. State your position on the 1/6 "insurrection, how bad it was, in a compound sentence, with your position that there is nothing to fear from the Right re: "Civil War".


I want to see your two positions side by side. It should be GREAT.

There is nothing to fear from the right (or the left) on a civil war.

Your attempted insurrection is a different topic, junior.

Whatever your child-like hoping for a war because you have some bizarre fantasy about how cool it would be...just know 2 things... If you INCELs ever tried it, you'd be slaughtered....and....you INCELs will never try it. Because you are a coward.

Hence your continued threats with absolutely no follow up.

So, you don't care about the people supposedly killed by the mob on 1/6? People dying is "nothing to fear"?


Are you longing for the sweet release that Death will bring?


I do not want Civil War, I am warning where you hatred and oppression and keeping of political prisoners could lead this once great nation.

Your hatred is based on abject ignorance. Aside from the reality that any such uprising will be utterly squashed by a military sworn to protect the Constitution, you won't gain much support from a country because your civil war will be based upon hate, not principle.

I doubt it will be based on hate. It will be based on their simply being a failure in life and trying to bring everyone else down to their level.

You are supporting a violation of civil rights. You are the hater here, not me.

Where, whiner?

Federal Civil Rights Statutes | Federal Bureau of Investigation

The FBI is able to investigate civil rights violations based on a series of federal laws.

www.fbi.gov

Unequal application of justice, you faggot.

Uh oh, I touched a nerve with the whiner. Had to break out the F word. Good luck proving that when so many of the white Trump mob are being released...after being allowed to riot, go home, and roam free for weeks. The guy that, with premeditated intent, brought a 950,000 watt stun gun into the Speaker's office? Some Arkansas judge tried to let him go.

Judge blocks release of man pictured with feet on desk in Pelosi's office

Richard Barnett won permission from a judge in Arkansas to return home to await trial, but a judge in D.C. blocked that decision.

www.politico.com

People being released on bail, is not the same as not being looked for or having charges dropped.

You are supporting a gross violation of the human rights of hundreds of people based on political reasons.


You are supporting the policy of holding political prisoners here in the United States of America.


Your obsession with race, sounds somewhat racist too.

Show me an article that says he was released on bail. None of them say that, they all just say he was released. I'm sure a BLM protester that walked into, say Kevin McCarthy's office carrying a 950,000 watt stun gun would just be let go to await trial. Puhleese!

Lot's of women carry stun guns in their purses, moron. It's not illegal.

Is it a weapon or not? You apologists keep making the incorrect claim that Trump’s mob wasn’t armed. They were.

The key to your car can be a weapon. You obviously have a very narrow understanding of reality.

A 950,000 volt walking stick designed to stop a wild animal isn’t a key in your purse, princess.

Wow. 400 storm the capitol in a supposed coup attempt and you got a TAZER as the star example of how dangerously armed they were?

LOL!!!!

It was 800.

Prove it, asshole

I don't have to. The FBI is on it. They have 15,000 hours of video, and they've received something like 200,000+ tips from patriotic citizens. I hope they televise some of the trials and put the video evidence right up on the screen for all to see. Then let's see conservatives say it was a peaceful protest or that it was like a regular day of tourists showing up.

if they don't do that with Antifa and BLM trials, then this will be a political prosecution and anyone convicted with be political prisoners.

That's what conservatives always say when they get prosecuted for crimes. It doesn't even matter what the crime is.

As you people become more and more abusive and tyrannical, it might become fairly commonplace.


My point stands. The 1/6 riots are being targeted for extra aggressive investigation and prosecution for political reasons.


That is a violation of their Right to Equal Application of Justice.

Would you like a little cheese with that whine?

Conservatives are SUCH big babies. You cry about justice, but you don't want justice; you want preferential treatment. And when some legal entity actually holds you to account, you throw a fit.

What happened to our Capitol on 1/6 hasn't happened in over 200 years, and when it was done then, it was done by a foreign power, not by our fellow citizens who were trying to overturn a free and fair election. That's what I call political.

Most Americans don't give a damn if you don't like the prosecutions. Hell, they're all getting off pretty easy from everything I can tell because in some other countries, they'd be rounded up and summarily shot.

Wrong YOU asshats want preferential treatment for your favored black criminals and rioters. Gee, when Americans try to hold you leftards accountable for your murder of cops, attempted mass murder in Portland, robbing of businesses and hundreds of cases of arson, you whine and cry “wacist!!”. News flash: nobody gives a shit about your whining.

I'm fine with prosecuting people who commit crimes, regardless of who they are. But, like I said, conservatives want preferential treatment. That's not fine with me.

And yet here you are defending actual libtards rioting to this day in Portland and having at least twice attempted mass murder, yet calling for death for the Capitol peaceful protesters (per your side’s definition). Hypocrite. Preferential treatments. Fuck off with that bullshit asshole.

I've never defended rioting.

Bullshit. You’ve been defending leftist rioters this whole thread hypocrite. Fuck off with your bullshit.

You don't know what you're talking about, and I'm not surprised by that in the least.

 

[lantern2814]

Active-Duty Marine Corps Major Charged In Capitol Riot

Officials say Maj. Christopher Warnagiris is believed to be the first active-duty military service member to be charged in connection with the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol.

www.npr.org

Love it.

Why are some rioters being gone after with both barrels while others are given a pass or just low priority?


Because the dems are on the side of lefty rioters.



THus, these prosecutions are political.


Anyone convicted, will be a political prisoner.


That is the country you are making.


View attachment 489381

I lose track of it . What anniversary of you guys promising a civil war is it ? 15th, 20th? Are you guys registered anywhere?

Funny, this thread is based on the premise that the 1/6 riot was a serious and real threat to our democracy, because it delayed the formal recognition of the count, by HOURS.

Yet, here you are, acting as though, any talk of civil war from US, is laughable.


Why do you support the extra aggressive prosecution of the 1/6 rioters if it was not a serious insurrection?


lol. All these questions are rhetorical. We both know that you will not give serious or honest answers to ANY of them.


I am constantly amazed at the way you libs can hold completely contradictory ideas AT THE SAME TIME, without a hint of self awareness, no matter how much it is rubbed in your face.

Their goal wasn't to delay it, it was to "stop the steal." You're literally giving them credit for failing to pull off their coup.

Wow. Did you just become aware that intents and actual outcomes are sometimes different? What a big day for you.

Run along retard.

No worries, keep defending sedition. Be even louder about that during election season next year.

Who has been charged with sedition, shit for brains?

Who said they've been charged with sedition yet, fucking moron?

Their actions violate the sedition conspiracy law.

And Chaz didn't? And the Autonomous Zone didn't? And ordering the cops to not protect ICE so the rioters could attack the building didn't?

You are supporting a massive violation of civil rights of your enemies. Those that are convicted will be political prisoners.

View attachment 490040

Sure skippy...bring it on.

I hope you enjoy the results of your labors. I hope I am still here, when you are here whining like a fag, because of how it is blowing up in your face.

Sure thing skippy. In 10 years two things will still be true. There would have been no civil war and you guys will still be threatening to start one.

Do me a favor. State your position on the 1/6 "insurrection, how bad it was, in a compound sentence, with your position that there is nothing to fear from the Right re: "Civil War".


I want to see your two positions side by side. It should be GREAT.

There is nothing to fear from the right (or the left) on a civil war.

Your attempted insurrection is a different topic, junior.

Whatever your child-like hoping for a war because you have some bizarre fantasy about how cool it would be...just know 2 things... If you INCELs ever tried it, you'd be slaughtered....and....you INCELs will never try it. Because you are a coward.

Hence your continued threats with absolutely no follow up.

So, you don't care about the people supposedly killed by the mob on 1/6? People dying is "nothing to fear"?


Are you longing for the sweet release that Death will bring?


I do not want Civil War, I am warning where you hatred and oppression and keeping of political prisoners could lead this once great nation.

Your hatred is based on abject ignorance. Aside from the reality that any such uprising will be utterly squashed by a military sworn to protect the Constitution, you won't gain much support from a country because your civil war will be based upon hate, not principle.

I doubt it will be based on hate. It will be based on their simply being a failure in life and trying to bring everyone else down to their level.

You are supporting a violation of civil rights. You are the hater here, not me.

Where, whiner?

Federal Civil Rights Statutes | Federal Bureau of Investigation

The FBI is able to investigate civil rights violations based on a series of federal laws.

www.fbi.gov

Unequal application of justice, you faggot.

Uh oh, I touched a nerve with the whiner. Had to break out the F word. Good luck proving that when so many of the white Trump mob are being released...after being allowed to riot, go home, and roam free for weeks. The guy that, with premeditated intent, brought a 950,000 watt stun gun into the Speaker's office? Some Arkansas judge tried to let him go.

Judge blocks release of man pictured with feet on desk in Pelosi's office

Richard Barnett won permission from a judge in Arkansas to return home to await trial, but a judge in D.C. blocked that decision.

www.politico.com

People being released on bail, is not the same as not being looked for or having charges dropped.

You are supporting a gross violation of the human rights of hundreds of people based on political reasons.


You are supporting the policy of holding political prisoners here in the United States of America.


Your obsession with race, sounds somewhat racist too.

Show me an article that says he was released on bail. None of them say that, they all just say he was released. I'm sure a BLM protester that walked into, say Kevin McCarthy's office carrying a 950,000 watt stun gun would just be let go to await trial. Puhleese!

Lot's of women carry stun guns in their purses, moron. It's not illegal.

Is it a weapon or not? You apologists keep making the incorrect claim that Trump’s mob wasn’t armed. They were.

The key to your car can be a weapon. You obviously have a very narrow understanding of reality.

A 950,000 volt walking stick designed to stop a wild animal isn’t a key in your purse, princess.

Wow. 400 storm the capitol in a supposed coup attempt and you got a TAZER as the star example of how dangerously armed they were?

LOL!!!!

It was 800.

Prove it, asshole

I don't have to. The FBI is on it. They have 15,000 hours of video, and they've received something like 200,000+ tips from patriotic citizens. I hope they televise some of the trials and put the video evidence right up on the screen for all to see. Then let's see conservatives say it was a peaceful protest or that it was like a regular day of tourists showing up.

if they don't do that with Antifa and BLM trials, then this will be a political prosecution and anyone convicted with be political prisoners.

That's what conservatives always say when they get prosecuted for crimes. It doesn't even matter what the crime is.

As you people become more and more abusive and tyrannical, it might become fairly commonplace.


My point stands. The 1/6 riots are being targeted for extra aggressive investigation and prosecution for political reasons.


That is a violation of their Right to Equal Application of Justice.

Would you like a little cheese with that whine?

Conservatives are SUCH big babies. You cry about justice, but you don't want justice; you want preferential treatment. And when some legal entity actually holds you to account, you throw a fit.

What happened to our Capitol on 1/6 hasn't happened in over 200 years, and when it was done then, it was done by a foreign power, not by our fellow citizens who were trying to overturn a free and fair election. That's what I call political.

Most Americans don't give a damn if you don't like the prosecutions. Hell, they're all getting off pretty easy from everything I can tell because in some other countries, they'd be rounded up and summarily shot.

Wrong YOU asshats want preferential treatment for your favored black criminals and rioters. Gee, when Americans try to hold you leftards accountable for your murder of cops, attempted mass murder in Portland, robbing of businesses and hundreds of cases of arson, you whine and cry “wacist!!”. News flash: nobody gives a shit about your whining.

I'm fine with prosecuting people who commit crimes, regardless of who they are. But, like I said, conservatives want preferential treatment. That's not fine with me.

And yet here you are defending actual libtards rioting to this day in Portland and having at least twice attempted mass murder, yet calling for death for the Capitol peaceful protesters (per your side’s definition). Hypocrite. Preferential treatments. Fuck off with that bullshit asshole.

Peaceful protestors? See what I mean? You expect preferential treatment for conservatives who commit crimes, and the first step in that process is for you and countless other conservatives to collectively misrepresent what happened. And by misrepresent, I mean completely downplay what happened as if it was little more than a peaceful process. What a load of manure.

Fuck off you pathetic leftard liar. But YOUR side’s definition it was a peaceful protest. Now stutter and stammer and try to lie your out of it like good lemming. Manure? Seems you’re eating it again.

 

[lantern2814]

Active-Duty Marine Corps Major Charged In Capitol Riot

Officials say Maj. Christopher Warnagiris is believed to be the first active-duty military service member to be charged in connection with the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol.

www.npr.org

Love it.

Why are some rioters being gone after with both barrels while others are given a pass or just low priority?


Because the dems are on the side of lefty rioters.



THus, these prosecutions are political.


Anyone convicted, will be a political prisoner.


That is the country you are making.


View attachment 489381

I lose track of it . What anniversary of you guys promising a civil war is it ? 15th, 20th? Are you guys registered anywhere?

Funny, this thread is based on the premise that the 1/6 riot was a serious and real threat to our democracy, because it delayed the formal recognition of the count, by HOURS.

Yet, here you are, acting as though, any talk of civil war from US, is laughable.


Why do you support the extra aggressive prosecution of the 1/6 rioters if it was not a serious insurrection?


lol. All these questions are rhetorical. We both know that you will not give serious or honest answers to ANY of them.


I am constantly amazed at the way you libs can hold completely contradictory ideas AT THE SAME TIME, without a hint of self awareness, no matter how much it is rubbed in your face.

Their goal wasn't to delay it, it was to "stop the steal." You're literally giving them credit for failing to pull off their coup.

Wow. Did you just become aware that intents and actual outcomes are sometimes different? What a big day for you.

Run along retard.

No worries, keep defending sedition. Be even louder about that during election season next year.

Who has been charged with sedition, shit for brains?

Who said they've been charged with sedition yet, fucking moron?

Their actions violate the sedition conspiracy law.

And Chaz didn't? And the Autonomous Zone didn't? And ordering the cops to not protect ICE so the rioters could attack the building didn't?

You are supporting a massive violation of civil rights of your enemies. Those that are convicted will be political prisoners.

View attachment 490040

Sure skippy...bring it on.

I hope you enjoy the results of your labors. I hope I am still here, when you are here whining like a fag, because of how it is blowing up in your face.

Sure thing skippy. In 10 years two things will still be true. There would have been no civil war and you guys will still be threatening to start one.

Do me a favor. State your position on the 1/6 "insurrection, how bad it was, in a compound sentence, with your position that there is nothing to fear from the Right re: "Civil War".


I want to see your two positions side by side. It should be GREAT.

There is nothing to fear from the right (or the left) on a civil war.

Your attempted insurrection is a different topic, junior.

Whatever your child-like hoping for a war because you have some bizarre fantasy about how cool it would be...just know 2 things... If you INCELs ever tried it, you'd be slaughtered....and....you INCELs will never try it. Because you are a coward.

Hence your continued threats with absolutely no follow up.

So, you don't care about the people supposedly killed by the mob on 1/6? People dying is "nothing to fear"?


Are you longing for the sweet release that Death will bring?


I do not want Civil War, I am warning where you hatred and oppression and keeping of political prisoners could lead this once great nation.

Your hatred is based on abject ignorance. Aside from the reality that any such uprising will be utterly squashed by a military sworn to protect the Constitution, you won't gain much support from a country because your civil war will be based upon hate, not principle.

I doubt it will be based on hate. It will be based on their simply being a failure in life and trying to bring everyone else down to their level.

You are supporting a violation of civil rights. You are the hater here, not me.

Where, whiner?

Federal Civil Rights Statutes | Federal Bureau of Investigation

The FBI is able to investigate civil rights violations based on a series of federal laws.

www.fbi.gov

Unequal application of justice, you faggot.

Uh oh, I touched a nerve with the whiner. Had to break out the F word. Good luck proving that when so many of the white Trump mob are being released...after being allowed to riot, go home, and roam free for weeks. The guy that, with premeditated intent, brought a 950,000 watt stun gun into the Speaker's office? Some Arkansas judge tried to let him go.

Judge blocks release of man pictured with feet on desk in Pelosi's office

Richard Barnett won permission from a judge in Arkansas to return home to await trial, but a judge in D.C. blocked that decision.

www.politico.com

People being released on bail, is not the same as not being looked for or having charges dropped.

You are supporting a gross violation of the human rights of hundreds of people based on political reasons.


You are supporting the policy of holding political prisoners here in the United States of America.


Your obsession with race, sounds somewhat racist too.

Show me an article that says he was released on bail. None of them say that, they all just say he was released. I'm sure a BLM protester that walked into, say Kevin McCarthy's office carrying a 950,000 watt stun gun would just be let go to await trial. Puhleese!

Lot's of women carry stun guns in their purses, moron. It's not illegal.

Is it a weapon or not? You apologists keep making the incorrect claim that Trump’s mob wasn’t armed. They were.

The key to your car can be a weapon. You obviously have a very narrow understanding of reality.

A 950,000 volt walking stick designed to stop a wild animal isn’t a key in your purse, princess.

Wow. 400 storm the capitol in a supposed coup attempt and you got a TAZER as the star example of how dangerously armed they were?

LOL!!!!

It was 800.

Prove it, asshole

I don't have to. The FBI is on it. They have 15,000 hours of video, and they've received something like 200,000+ tips from patriotic citizens. I hope they televise some of the trials and put the video evidence right up on the screen for all to see. Then let's see conservatives say it was a peaceful protest or that it was like a regular day of tourists showing up.

if they don't do that with Antifa and BLM trials, then this will be a political prosecution and anyone convicted with be political prisoners.

That's what conservatives always say when they get prosecuted for crimes. It doesn't even matter what the crime is.

As you people become more and more abusive and tyrannical, it might become fairly commonplace.


My point stands. The 1/6 riots are being targeted for extra aggressive investigation and prosecution for political reasons.


That is a violation of their Right to Equal Application of Justice.

Would you like a little cheese with that whine?

Conservatives are SUCH big babies. You cry about justice, but you don't want justice; you want preferential treatment. And when some legal entity actually holds you to account, you throw a fit.

What happened to our Capitol on 1/6 hasn't happened in over 200 years, and when it was done then, it was done by a foreign power, not by our fellow citizens who were trying to overturn a free and fair election. That's what I call political.

Most Americans don't give a damn if you don't like the prosecutions. Hell, they're all getting off pretty easy from everything I can tell because in some other countries, they'd be rounded up and summarily shot.

Wrong YOU asshats want preferential treatment for your favored black criminals and rioters. Gee, when Americans try to hold you leftards accountable for your murder of cops, attempted mass murder in Portland, robbing of businesses and hundreds of cases of arson, you whine and cry “wacist!!”. News flash: nobody gives a shit about your whining.

I'm fine with prosecuting people who commit crimes, regardless of who they are. But, like I said, conservatives want preferential treatment. That's not fine with me.

And yet here you are defending actual libtards rioting to this day in Portland and having at least twice attempted mass murder, yet calling for death for the Capitol peaceful protesters (per your side’s definition). Hypocrite. Preferential treatments. Fuck off with that bullshit asshole.

I've never defended rioting.

Bullshit. You’ve been defending leftist rioters this whole thread hypocrite. Fuck off with your bullshit.

You don't know what you're talking about, and I'm not surprised by that in the least.

You are a fucking liar asshole. That’s all anybody needs to know. People can read the shit you’ve posted dimbulb. Not surprised you’re still a lying asshole.

 

[Mustang]

Active-Duty Marine Corps Major Charged In Capitol Riot

Officials say Maj. Christopher Warnagiris is believed to be the first active-duty military service member to be charged in connection with the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol.

www.npr.org

Love it.

Why are some rioters being gone after with both barrels while others are given a pass or just low priority?


Because the dems are on the side of lefty rioters.



THus, these prosecutions are political.


Anyone convicted, will be a political prisoner.


That is the country you are making.


View attachment 489381

I lose track of it . What anniversary of you guys promising a civil war is it ? 15th, 20th? Are you guys registered anywhere?

Funny, this thread is based on the premise that the 1/6 riot was a serious and real threat to our democracy, because it delayed the formal recognition of the count, by HOURS.

Yet, here you are, acting as though, any talk of civil war from US, is laughable.


Why do you support the extra aggressive prosecution of the 1/6 rioters if it was not a serious insurrection?


lol. All these questions are rhetorical. We both know that you will not give serious or honest answers to ANY of them.


I am constantly amazed at the way you libs can hold completely contradictory ideas AT THE SAME TIME, without a hint of self awareness, no matter how much it is rubbed in your face.

Their goal wasn't to delay it, it was to "stop the steal." You're literally giving them credit for failing to pull off their coup.

Wow. Did you just become aware that intents and actual outcomes are sometimes different? What a big day for you.

Run along retard.

No worries, keep defending sedition. Be even louder about that during election season next year.

Who has been charged with sedition, shit for brains?

Who said they've been charged with sedition yet, fucking moron?

Their actions violate the sedition conspiracy law.

And Chaz didn't? And the Autonomous Zone didn't? And ordering the cops to not protect ICE so the rioters could attack the building didn't?

You are supporting a massive violation of civil rights of your enemies. Those that are convicted will be political prisoners.

View attachment 490040

Sure skippy...bring it on.

I hope you enjoy the results of your labors. I hope I am still here, when you are here whining like a fag, because of how it is blowing up in your face.

Sure thing skippy. In 10 years two things will still be true. There would have been no civil war and you guys will still be threatening to start one.

Do me a favor. State your position on the 1/6 "insurrection, how bad it was, in a compound sentence, with your position that there is nothing to fear from the Right re: "Civil War".


I want to see your two positions side by side. It should be GREAT.

There is nothing to fear from the right (or the left) on a civil war.

Your attempted insurrection is a different topic, junior.

Whatever your child-like hoping for a war because you have some bizarre fantasy about how cool it would be...just know 2 things... If you INCELs ever tried it, you'd be slaughtered....and....you INCELs will never try it. Because you are a coward.

Hence your continued threats with absolutely no follow up.

So, you don't care about the people supposedly killed by the mob on 1/6? People dying is "nothing to fear"?


Are you longing for the sweet release that Death will bring?


I do not want Civil War, I am warning where you hatred and oppression and keeping of political prisoners could lead this once great nation.

Your hatred is based on abject ignorance. Aside from the reality that any such uprising will be utterly squashed by a military sworn to protect the Constitution, you won't gain much support from a country because your civil war will be based upon hate, not principle.

I doubt it will be based on hate. It will be based on their simply being a failure in life and trying to bring everyone else down to their level.

You are supporting a violation of civil rights. You are the hater here, not me.

Where, whiner?

Federal Civil Rights Statutes | Federal Bureau of Investigation

The FBI is able to investigate civil rights violations based on a series of federal laws.

www.fbi.gov

Unequal application of justice, you faggot.

Uh oh, I touched a nerve with the whiner. Had to break out the F word. Good luck proving that when so many of the white Trump mob are being released...after being allowed to riot, go home, and roam free for weeks. The guy that, with premeditated intent, brought a 950,000 watt stun gun into the Speaker's office? Some Arkansas judge tried to let him go.

Judge blocks release of man pictured with feet on desk in Pelosi's office

Richard Barnett won permission from a judge in Arkansas to return home to await trial, but a judge in D.C. blocked that decision.

www.politico.com

People being released on bail, is not the same as not being looked for or having charges dropped.

You are supporting a gross violation of the human rights of hundreds of people based on political reasons.


You are supporting the policy of holding political prisoners here in the United States of America.


Your obsession with race, sounds somewhat racist too.

Show me an article that says he was released on bail. None of them say that, they all just say he was released. I'm sure a BLM protester that walked into, say Kevin McCarthy's office carrying a 950,000 watt stun gun would just be let go to await trial. Puhleese!

Lot's of women carry stun guns in their purses, moron. It's not illegal.

Is it a weapon or not? You apologists keep making the incorrect claim that Trump’s mob wasn’t armed. They were.

The key to your car can be a weapon. You obviously have a very narrow understanding of reality.

A 950,000 volt walking stick designed to stop a wild animal isn’t a key in your purse, princess.

Wow. 400 storm the capitol in a supposed coup attempt and you got a TAZER as the star example of how dangerously armed they were?

LOL!!!!

It was 800.

Prove it, asshole

I don't have to. The FBI is on it. They have 15,000 hours of video, and they've received something like 200,000+ tips from patriotic citizens. I hope they televise some of the trials and put the video evidence right up on the screen for all to see. Then let's see conservatives say it was a peaceful protest or that it was like a regular day of tourists showing up.

if they don't do that with Antifa and BLM trials, then this will be a political prosecution and anyone convicted with be political prisoners.

That's what conservatives always say when they get prosecuted for crimes. It doesn't even matter what the crime is.

As you people become more and more abusive and tyrannical, it might become fairly commonplace.


My point stands. The 1/6 riots are being targeted for extra aggressive investigation and prosecution for political reasons.


That is a violation of their Right to Equal Application of Justice.

Would you like a little cheese with that whine?

Conservatives are SUCH big babies. You cry about justice, but you don't want justice; you want preferential treatment. And when some legal entity actually holds you to account, you throw a fit.

What happened to our Capitol on 1/6 hasn't happened in over 200 years, and when it was done then, it was done by a foreign power, not by our fellow citizens who were trying to overturn a free and fair election. That's what I call political.

Most Americans don't give a damn if you don't like the prosecutions. Hell, they're all getting off pretty easy from everything I can tell because in some other countries, they'd be rounded up and summarily shot.

Wrong YOU asshats want preferential treatment for your favored black criminals and rioters. Gee, when Americans try to hold you leftards accountable for your murder of cops, attempted mass murder in Portland, robbing of businesses and hundreds of cases of arson, you whine and cry “wacist!!”. News flash: nobody gives a shit about your whining.

I'm fine with prosecuting people who commit crimes, regardless of who they are. But, like I said, conservatives want preferential treatment. That's not fine with me.

And yet here you are defending actual libtards rioting to this day in Portland and having at least twice attempted mass murder, yet calling for death for the Capitol peaceful protesters (per your side’s definition). Hypocrite. Preferential treatments. Fuck off with that bullshit asshole.

I've never defended rioting.

Bullshit. You’ve been defending leftist rioters this whole thread hypocrite. Fuck off with your bullshit.

You don't know what you're talking about, and I'm not surprised by that in the least.

You are a fucking liar asshole. That’s all anybody needs to know. People can read the shit you’ve posted dimbulb. Not surprised you’re still a lying asshole.

What's the problem? Not getting enough fiber in your diet?

 

[lantern2814]

My understanding is that there were other cops right there. The cop that fired was NOT the last defender, being overwhelmed by the mob.

I am not cherry picking. I am comparing the one large scale right leaning riot, vs the NORM established by you people over the last 4 years.

There were a handful of cops guarding the last set of doors before the violent mob. They were vastly outnumbered and had no idea how many people were crowded on the door that they were SMASHING through.

Don't accuse me of focusing on Babbitt when it was you that was bringing it up. As for norms, the riots this summer never attempted to smash through government buildings threatening elected officials housed in them. There's no norm for what happened at the Capitol.

Hey dumbfuck , try explaining why only ONE cop fired. Every other cop in the area did NOT fire. Yet you can’t seem to address that fact. Never threatened anybody? So according to you, barricading federal workers in a building and attempting mass murder by setting it on fire is okay.

 

[lantern2814]

Active-Duty Marine Corps Major Charged In Capitol Riot

Officials say Maj. Christopher Warnagiris is believed to be the first active-duty military service member to be charged in connection with the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol.

www.npr.org

Love it.

Why are some rioters being gone after with both barrels while others are given a pass or just low priority?


Because the dems are on the side of lefty rioters.



THus, these prosecutions are political.


Anyone convicted, will be a political prisoner.


That is the country you are making.


View attachment 489381

I lose track of it . What anniversary of you guys promising a civil war is it ? 15th, 20th? Are you guys registered anywhere?

Funny, this thread is based on the premise that the 1/6 riot was a serious and real threat to our democracy, because it delayed the formal recognition of the count, by HOURS.

Yet, here you are, acting as though, any talk of civil war from US, is laughable.


Why do you support the extra aggressive prosecution of the 1/6 rioters if it was not a serious insurrection?


lol. All these questions are rhetorical. We both know that you will not give serious or honest answers to ANY of them.


I am constantly amazed at the way you libs can hold completely contradictory ideas AT THE SAME TIME, without a hint of self awareness, no matter how much it is rubbed in your face.

Their goal wasn't to delay it, it was to "stop the steal." You're literally giving them credit for failing to pull off their coup.

Wow. Did you just become aware that intents and actual outcomes are sometimes different? What a big day for you.

Run along retard.

No worries, keep defending sedition. Be even louder about that during election season next year.

Who has been charged with sedition, shit for brains?

Who said they've been charged with sedition yet, fucking moron?

Their actions violate the sedition conspiracy law.

And Chaz didn't? And the Autonomous Zone didn't? And ordering the cops to not protect ICE so the rioters could attack the building didn't?

You are supporting a massive violation of civil rights of your enemies. Those that are convicted will be political prisoners.

View attachment 490040

Sure skippy...bring it on.

I hope you enjoy the results of your labors. I hope I am still here, when you are here whining like a fag, because of how it is blowing up in your face.

Sure thing skippy. In 10 years two things will still be true. There would have been no civil war and you guys will still be threatening to start one.

Do me a favor. State your position on the 1/6 "insurrection, how bad it was, in a compound sentence, with your position that there is nothing to fear from the Right re: "Civil War".


I want to see your two positions side by side. It should be GREAT.

There is nothing to fear from the right (or the left) on a civil war.

Your attempted insurrection is a different topic, junior.

Whatever your child-like hoping for a war because you have some bizarre fantasy about how cool it would be...just know 2 things... If you INCELs ever tried it, you'd be slaughtered....and....you INCELs will never try it. Because you are a coward.

Hence your continued threats with absolutely no follow up.

So, you don't care about the people supposedly killed by the mob on 1/6? People dying is "nothing to fear"?


Are you longing for the sweet release that Death will bring?


I do not want Civil War, I am warning where you hatred and oppression and keeping of political prisoners could lead this once great nation.

Your hatred is based on abject ignorance. Aside from the reality that any such uprising will be utterly squashed by a military sworn to protect the Constitution, you won't gain much support from a country because your civil war will be based upon hate, not principle.

I doubt it will be based on hate. It will be based on their simply being a failure in life and trying to bring everyone else down to their level.

You are supporting a violation of civil rights. You are the hater here, not me.

Where, whiner?

Federal Civil Rights Statutes | Federal Bureau of Investigation

The FBI is able to investigate civil rights violations based on a series of federal laws.

www.fbi.gov

Unequal application of justice, you faggot.

Uh oh, I touched a nerve with the whiner. Had to break out the F word. Good luck proving that when so many of the white Trump mob are being released...after being allowed to riot, go home, and roam free for weeks. The guy that, with premeditated intent, brought a 950,000 watt stun gun into the Speaker's office? Some Arkansas judge tried to let him go.

Judge blocks release of man pictured with feet on desk in Pelosi's office

Richard Barnett won permission from a judge in Arkansas to return home to await trial, but a judge in D.C. blocked that decision.

www.politico.com

People being released on bail, is not the same as not being looked for or having charges dropped.

You are supporting a gross violation of the human rights of hundreds of people based on political reasons.


You are supporting the policy of holding political prisoners here in the United States of America.


Your obsession with race, sounds somewhat racist too.

Show me an article that says he was released on bail. None of them say that, they all just say he was released. I'm sure a BLM protester that walked into, say Kevin McCarthy's office carrying a 950,000 watt stun gun would just be let go to await trial. Puhleese!

Lot's of women carry stun guns in their purses, moron. It's not illegal.

Is it a weapon or not? You apologists keep making the incorrect claim that Trump’s mob wasn’t armed. They were.

The key to your car can be a weapon. You obviously have a very narrow understanding of reality.

A 950,000 volt walking stick designed to stop a wild animal isn’t a key in your purse, princess.

Wow. 400 storm the capitol in a supposed coup attempt and you got a TAZER as the star example of how dangerously armed they were?

LOL!!!!

It was 800.

Prove it, asshole

I don't have to. The FBI is on it. They have 15,000 hours of video, and they've received something like 200,000+ tips from patriotic citizens. I hope they televise some of the trials and put the video evidence right up on the screen for all to see. Then let's see conservatives say it was a peaceful protest or that it was like a regular day of tourists showing up.

if they don't do that with Antifa and BLM trials, then this will be a political prosecution and anyone convicted with be political prisoners.

That's what conservatives always say when they get prosecuted for crimes. It doesn't even matter what the crime is.

As you people become more and more abusive and tyrannical, it might become fairly commonplace.


My point stands. The 1/6 riots are being targeted for extra aggressive investigation and prosecution for political reasons.


That is a violation of their Right to Equal Application of Justice.

Would you like a little cheese with that whine?

Conservatives are SUCH big babies. You cry about justice, but you don't want justice; you want preferential treatment. And when some legal entity actually holds you to account, you throw a fit.

What happened to our Capitol on 1/6 hasn't happened in over 200 years, and when it was done then, it was done by a foreign power, not by our fellow citizens who were trying to overturn a free and fair election. That's what I call political.

Most Americans don't give a damn if you don't like the prosecutions. Hell, they're all getting off pretty easy from everything I can tell because in some other countries, they'd be rounded up and summarily shot.

Wrong YOU asshats want preferential treatment for your favored black criminals and rioters. Gee, when Americans try to hold you leftards accountable for your murder of cops, attempted mass murder in Portland, robbing of businesses and hundreds of cases of arson, you whine and cry “wacist!!”. News flash: nobody gives a shit about your whining.

I'm fine with prosecuting people who commit crimes, regardless of who they are. But, like I said, conservatives want preferential treatment. That's not fine with me.

And yet here you are defending actual libtards rioting to this day in Portland and having at least twice attempted mass murder, yet calling for death for the Capitol peaceful protesters (per your side’s definition). Hypocrite. Preferential treatments. Fuck off with that bullshit asshole.

I've never defended rioting.

Bullshit. You’ve been defending leftist rioters this whole thread hypocrite. Fuck off with your bullshit.

You don't know what you're talking about, and I'm not surprised by that in the least.

You are a fucking liar asshole. That’s all anybody needs to know. People can read the shit you’ve posted dimbulb. Not surprised you’re still a lying asshole.

What's the problem? Not getting enough fiber in your diet?

No, i just don’t try take to obvious fucking liars you asshole. Dodging the point (more likely you can’t understand it) and trying to deflect lie some more. Your desire for no punishment for leftard attempted murderers is noted.

 

[lantern2814]

My understanding is that there were other cops right there. The cop that fired was NOT the last defender, being overwhelmed by the mob.

I am not cherry picking. I am comparing the one large scale right leaning riot, vs the NORM established by you people over the last 4 years.

There were a handful of cops guarding the last set of doors before the violent mob. They were vastly outnumbered and had no idea how many people were crowded on the door that they were SMASHING through.

Don't accuse me of focusing on Babbitt when it was you that was bringing it up. As for norms, the riots this summer never attempted to smash through government buildings threatening elected officials housed in them. There's no norm for what happened at the Capitol.

A "handful" guarding the last set of doors, and more in the room where Babbitt was, if I understand correctly.


So, what, ten cops? ANd ONE fired ONE round? That does not sound like a good shoot.


And you focusing on details to justify treating THIS riot differently than all the rest, is you being dishonest.

I believe there were about 6 police protecting Congress members in the hallway, none of which could see the police standing behind the protestors as the crowd was obscuring the view in the windows. The exact number of protestors was unknown to the police in the hallway because they were crowded in front of the windows. It was clear that they were considerably outnumbered with numerous violent members in the front smashing through the windows.

One fired one round because the person was coming through the window. No further rounds were required as they stopped coming through the window, therefore were not presenting the immediate threat.

Details matter. They always matter. You trying to pretend they don't is acknowledging that you don't have an argument that withstands scrutiny.

No dumbfuck, YOU have no argument. They didn’t know where other cops were? Bullshit. Radio contact means they knew where the others were and their situation. You pretending something different happened acknowledges your lack of truthfulness.

 

[Faun]

My understanding is that there were other cops right there. The cop that fired was NOT the last defender, being overwhelmed by the mob.

I am not cherry picking. I am comparing the one large scale right leaning riot, vs the NORM established by you people over the last 4 years.

There were a handful of cops guarding the last set of doors before the violent mob. They were vastly outnumbered and had no idea how many people were crowded on the door that they were SMASHING through.

Don't accuse me of focusing on Babbitt when it was you that was bringing it up. As for norms, the riots this summer never attempted to smash through government buildings threatening elected officials housed in them. There's no norm for what happened at the Capitol.

Hey dumbfuck , try explaining why only ONE cop fired. Every other cop in the area did NOT fire. Yet you can’t seem to address that fact. Never threatened anybody? So according to you, barricading federal workers in a building and attempting mass murder by setting it on fire is okay.

Because only one cop had a vantage point at shooting her without risking hitting someone else.