MAGA—More Are Getting Arrested.

[bripat9643]

Active-Duty Marine Corps Major Charged In Capitol Riot

Officials say Maj. Christopher Warnagiris is believed to be the first active-duty military service member to be charged in connection with the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol.

www.npr.org

Love it.

Why are some rioters being gone after with both barrels while others are given a pass or just low priority?


Because the dems are on the side of lefty rioters.



THus, these prosecutions are political.


Anyone convicted, will be a political prisoner.


That is the country you are making.


View attachment 489381

I lose track of it . What anniversary of you guys promising a civil war is it ? 15th, 20th? Are you guys registered anywhere?

Funny, this thread is based on the premise that the 1/6 riot was a serious and real threat to our democracy, because it delayed the formal recognition of the count, by HOURS.

Yet, here you are, acting as though, any talk of civil war from US, is laughable.


Why do you support the extra aggressive prosecution of the 1/6 rioters if it was not a serious insurrection?


lol. All these questions are rhetorical. We both know that you will not give serious or honest answers to ANY of them.


I am constantly amazed at the way you libs can hold completely contradictory ideas AT THE SAME TIME, without a hint of self awareness, no matter how much it is rubbed in your face.

Their goal wasn't to delay it, it was to "stop the steal." You're literally giving them credit for failing to pull off their coup.

Wow. Did you just become aware that intents and actual outcomes are sometimes different? What a big day for you.

Run along retard.

No worries, keep defending sedition. Be even louder about that during election season next year.

Who has been charged with sedition, shit for brains?

Who said they've been charged with sedition yet, fucking moron?

Their actions violate the sedition conspiracy law.

And Chaz didn't? And the Autonomous Zone didn't? And ordering the cops to not protect ICE so the rioters could attack the building didn't?

You are supporting a massive violation of civil rights of your enemies. Those that are convicted will be political prisoners.

View attachment 490040

Sure skippy...bring it on.

I hope you enjoy the results of your labors. I hope I am still here, when you are here whining like a fag, because of how it is blowing up in your face.

Sure thing skippy. In 10 years two things will still be true. There would have been no civil war and you guys will still be threatening to start one.

Do me a favor. State your position on the 1/6 "insurrection, how bad it was, in a compound sentence, with your position that there is nothing to fear from the Right re: "Civil War".


I want to see your two positions side by side. It should be GREAT.

There is nothing to fear from the right (or the left) on a civil war.

Your attempted insurrection is a different topic, junior.

Whatever your child-like hoping for a war because you have some bizarre fantasy about how cool it would be...just know 2 things... If you INCELs ever tried it, you'd be slaughtered....and....you INCELs will never try it. Because you are a coward.

Hence your continued threats with absolutely no follow up.

So, you don't care about the people supposedly killed by the mob on 1/6? People dying is "nothing to fear"?


Are you longing for the sweet release that Death will bring?


I do not want Civil War, I am warning where you hatred and oppression and keeping of political prisoners could lead this once great nation.

Your hatred is based on abject ignorance. Aside from the reality that any such uprising will be utterly squashed by a military sworn to protect the Constitution, you won't gain much support from a country because your civil war will be based upon hate, not principle.

I doubt it will be based on hate. It will be based on their simply being a failure in life and trying to bring everyone else down to their level.

You are supporting a violation of civil rights. You are the hater here, not me.

Where, whiner?

Federal Civil Rights Statutes | Federal Bureau of Investigation

The FBI is able to investigate civil rights violations based on a series of federal laws.

www.fbi.gov

Unequal application of justice, you faggot.

Uh oh, I touched a nerve with the whiner. Had to break out the F word. Good luck proving that when so many of the white Trump mob are being released...after being allowed to riot, go home, and roam free for weeks. The guy that, with premeditated intent, brought a 950,000 watt stun gun into the Speaker's office? Some Arkansas judge tried to let him go.

Judge blocks release of man pictured with feet on desk in Pelosi's office

Richard Barnett won permission from a judge in Arkansas to return home to await trial, but a judge in D.C. blocked that decision.

www.politico.com

People being released on bail, is not the same as not being looked for or having charges dropped.

You are supporting a gross violation of the human rights of hundreds of people based on political reasons.


You are supporting the policy of holding political prisoners here in the United States of America.


Your obsession with race, sounds somewhat racist too.

Show me an article that says he was released on bail. None of them say that, they all just say he was released. I'm sure a BLM protester that walked into, say Kevin McCarthy's office carrying a 950,000 watt stun gun would just be let go to await trial. Puhleese!

Lot's of women carry stun guns in their purses, moron. It's not illegal.

Is it a weapon or not? You apologists keep making the incorrect claim that Trump’s mob wasn’t armed. They were.

The key to your car can be a weapon. You obviously have a very narrow understanding of reality.

A 950,000 volt walking stick designed to stop a wild animal isn’t a key in your purse, princess.

Wow. 400 storm the capitol in a supposed coup attempt and you got a TAZER as the star example of how dangerously armed they were?

LOL!!!!

It was 800.

Prove it, asshole

I don't have to. The FBI is on it. They have 15,000 hours of video, and they've received something like 200,000+ tips from patriotic citizens. I hope they televise some of the trials and put the video evidence right up on the screen for all to see. Then let's see conservatives say it was a peaceful protest or that it was like a regular day of tourists showing up.

if they don't do that with Antifa and BLM trials, then this will be a political prosecution and anyone convicted with be political prisoners.

That's what conservatives always say when they get prosecuted for crimes. It doesn't even matter what the crime is.

As you people become more and more abusive and tyrannical, it might become fairly commonplace.


My point stands. The 1/6 riots are being targeted for extra aggressive investigation and prosecution for political reasons.


That is a violation of their Right to Equal Application of Justice.

Would you like a little cheese with that whine?

Conservatives are SUCH big babies. You cry about justice, but you don't want justice; you want preferential treatment. And when some legal entity actually holds you to account, you throw a fit.

What happened to our Capitol on 1/6 hasn't happened in over 200 years, and when it was done then, it was done by a foreign power, not by our fellow citizens who were trying to overturn a free and fair election. That's what I call political.

Most Americans don't give a damn if you don't like the prosecutions. Hell, they're all getting off pretty easy from everything I can tell because in some other countries, they'd be rounded up and summarily shot.

Wrong YOU asshats want preferential treatment for your favored black criminals and rioters. Gee, when Americans try to hold you leftards accountable for your murder of cops, attempted mass murder in Portland, robbing of businesses and hundreds of cases of arson, you whine and cry “wacist!!”. News flash: nobody gives a shit about your whining.

I'm fine with prosecuting people who commit crimes, regardless of who they are. But, like I said, conservatives want preferential treatment. That's not fine with me.

Except that is clearly not what ANY of us are saying, so why you you talking such complete bullshit?

Look at the sheer number of conservatives who are downplaying 1/6 as if it was little more than a group of tourists or law-abiding peaceful protests. If you were REAL law and order conservatives, you would demand that they be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. But that's not what you want. You just want to 'move on' as if it was little more than some kind of disorderly conduct or an inadvertent trespassing charge like someone walking on someone else's lawn only because he's taking a short cut to get to his car.

I want equality of justice.

Breaking and entering, trespassing, fighting with cops, I am comfortable calling it a riot. People who were arrested for specific criminal acts, I have no problem with them being prosecuted.

My point has been that going above and beyond normal investigation efforts, is a violation of their Civil Rights.

And it is.

That's a new one on me. Now people have a civil right not to be investigated when there's probable cause to believe they've committed a crime.

malicious investigations are a violation of your rights. That's why the government needs a warrant to search your house or go through your personal information.

A warrant requires probable cause. However, the gov't can access your personal information without a warrant.

No it can't, moron.

Sure it can. Plenty of personal information is a matter of public record and can be accessed by pretty much anyone.

They can get public information, no personal information. They can't even get your address without your permission.

 

[theHawk]

You are comparing apples to oranges. YOu are purposefully comparing one cherry picked example to the 1/6 riot, ignoring that there have been HUNDREDS of radical lefty riots, where various people were threatened and the police did not shoot down the rioters.

Indeed, there were a lot of other cops there that day. Why did only one of them fire? If the need for lethal force was so clear, why was there not dozens of cops firing hundreds of rounds?

You cherry picked Babbitt, not me.

The vast majority of the protestors were peaceful and unarmed. THe woman that was killed was unarmed.

Why did only one of them fire? Because as I stated earlier, the other cops were treating the protestors with kid gloves and retreating. This cop couldn't retreat any further as the violent mob had reached their last line of defense before reaching members of Congress.

It's utterly bizarre how the cult refuses to accept Benedict Babbitt put herself into a lethal situation.

Based on the norms set by you fucktards over the last 4 years, it would be completely understandable, how she could have though that breaking and entering would have been acceptable behavior, perhaps with some minor judicial implications.

Who over the last four years threatened to attack members of Congress and got feet away from them?

Your moral compass is broken and unrepairable.

Are you pretending to not be aware of the massive wave of riots that have been raging unchecked for years in this country, or are you actually retarded?

You didn't answer ... who among them threatened to attack members of Congress and got within feet of them?

They firebombed a federal courthouse while people were inside of it, you fucking NAZI.

Show the cop standing there who did nothing...

Police near the courthouse doing nothing while it's being firebombed:

He asked for it. You gave it. Now he will show that his asking for it, was shit, because no information will change his position because he is a mindless ideological zealot.

Dumbfuck, he posted an image where no one's life was being threatened.

Now stop lying. He didn't prove what I asked for.

If I show a picture of people being attacked and cops not shooting the rioters, would you admit it?

Possibly. If it shows the rioters were a threat to someone's life and I can find the news describing the event of the photo which confirms it, then sure.

Possibly? LOL!!!

Yes, possibly. Or are you so retarded, you'd think I'd accept your claim as fact before you post your evidence.

Errr, are you pretending to be so retarded that you don't understand the concept of a IF/THEN question?

You like IF/THEN questions? If Trump had not told his mob to be at the capital on January 6th and expect a "wild time", would the riot have occured?

The peaceful protest was a wild time. But then the few hundred that went to the Capitol were lead by Antifa and let in by cops, stuff spiraled out of control for a few minutes.

Let’s not forget that all these people just walked out and left on their own accord, they weren’t arrested on the spot. Strange for a “coup attempt” the left keep claiming it was.

 

[Mustang]

Active-Duty Marine Corps Major Charged In Capitol Riot

Officials say Maj. Christopher Warnagiris is believed to be the first active-duty military service member to be charged in connection with the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol.

www.npr.org

Love it.

Why are some rioters being gone after with both barrels while others are given a pass or just low priority?


Because the dems are on the side of lefty rioters.



THus, these prosecutions are political.


Anyone convicted, will be a political prisoner.


That is the country you are making.


View attachment 489381

I lose track of it . What anniversary of you guys promising a civil war is it ? 15th, 20th? Are you guys registered anywhere?

Funny, this thread is based on the premise that the 1/6 riot was a serious and real threat to our democracy, because it delayed the formal recognition of the count, by HOURS.

Yet, here you are, acting as though, any talk of civil war from US, is laughable.


Why do you support the extra aggressive prosecution of the 1/6 rioters if it was not a serious insurrection?


lol. All these questions are rhetorical. We both know that you will not give serious or honest answers to ANY of them.


I am constantly amazed at the way you libs can hold completely contradictory ideas AT THE SAME TIME, without a hint of self awareness, no matter how much it is rubbed in your face.

Their goal wasn't to delay it, it was to "stop the steal." You're literally giving them credit for failing to pull off their coup.

Wow. Did you just become aware that intents and actual outcomes are sometimes different? What a big day for you.

Run along retard.

No worries, keep defending sedition. Be even louder about that during election season next year.

Who has been charged with sedition, shit for brains?

Who said they've been charged with sedition yet, fucking moron?

Their actions violate the sedition conspiracy law.

And Chaz didn't? And the Autonomous Zone didn't? And ordering the cops to not protect ICE so the rioters could attack the building didn't?

You are supporting a massive violation of civil rights of your enemies. Those that are convicted will be political prisoners.

View attachment 490040

Sure skippy...bring it on.

I hope you enjoy the results of your labors. I hope I am still here, when you are here whining like a fag, because of how it is blowing up in your face.

Sure thing skippy. In 10 years two things will still be true. There would have been no civil war and you guys will still be threatening to start one.

Do me a favor. State your position on the 1/6 "insurrection, how bad it was, in a compound sentence, with your position that there is nothing to fear from the Right re: "Civil War".


I want to see your two positions side by side. It should be GREAT.

There is nothing to fear from the right (or the left) on a civil war.

Your attempted insurrection is a different topic, junior.

Whatever your child-like hoping for a war because you have some bizarre fantasy about how cool it would be...just know 2 things... If you INCELs ever tried it, you'd be slaughtered....and....you INCELs will never try it. Because you are a coward.

Hence your continued threats with absolutely no follow up.

So, you don't care about the people supposedly killed by the mob on 1/6? People dying is "nothing to fear"?


Are you longing for the sweet release that Death will bring?


I do not want Civil War, I am warning where you hatred and oppression and keeping of political prisoners could lead this once great nation.

Your hatred is based on abject ignorance. Aside from the reality that any such uprising will be utterly squashed by a military sworn to protect the Constitution, you won't gain much support from a country because your civil war will be based upon hate, not principle.

I doubt it will be based on hate. It will be based on their simply being a failure in life and trying to bring everyone else down to their level.

You are supporting a violation of civil rights. You are the hater here, not me.

Where, whiner?

Federal Civil Rights Statutes | Federal Bureau of Investigation

The FBI is able to investigate civil rights violations based on a series of federal laws.

www.fbi.gov

Unequal application of justice, you faggot.

Uh oh, I touched a nerve with the whiner. Had to break out the F word. Good luck proving that when so many of the white Trump mob are being released...after being allowed to riot, go home, and roam free for weeks. The guy that, with premeditated intent, brought a 950,000 watt stun gun into the Speaker's office? Some Arkansas judge tried to let him go.

Judge blocks release of man pictured with feet on desk in Pelosi's office

Richard Barnett won permission from a judge in Arkansas to return home to await trial, but a judge in D.C. blocked that decision.

www.politico.com

People being released on bail, is not the same as not being looked for or having charges dropped.

You are supporting a gross violation of the human rights of hundreds of people based on political reasons.


You are supporting the policy of holding political prisoners here in the United States of America.


Your obsession with race, sounds somewhat racist too.

Show me an article that says he was released on bail. None of them say that, they all just say he was released. I'm sure a BLM protester that walked into, say Kevin McCarthy's office carrying a 950,000 watt stun gun would just be let go to await trial. Puhleese!

Lot's of women carry stun guns in their purses, moron. It's not illegal.

Is it a weapon or not? You apologists keep making the incorrect claim that Trump’s mob wasn’t armed. They were.

The key to your car can be a weapon. You obviously have a very narrow understanding of reality.

A 950,000 volt walking stick designed to stop a wild animal isn’t a key in your purse, princess.

Wow. 400 storm the capitol in a supposed coup attempt and you got a TAZER as the star example of how dangerously armed they were?

LOL!!!!

It was 800.

Prove it, asshole

I don't have to. The FBI is on it. They have 15,000 hours of video, and they've received something like 200,000+ tips from patriotic citizens. I hope they televise some of the trials and put the video evidence right up on the screen for all to see. Then let's see conservatives say it was a peaceful protest or that it was like a regular day of tourists showing up.

if they don't do that with Antifa and BLM trials, then this will be a political prosecution and anyone convicted with be political prisoners.

That's what conservatives always say when they get prosecuted for crimes. It doesn't even matter what the crime is.

As you people become more and more abusive and tyrannical, it might become fairly commonplace.


My point stands. The 1/6 riots are being targeted for extra aggressive investigation and prosecution for political reasons.


That is a violation of their Right to Equal Application of Justice.

Would you like a little cheese with that whine?

Conservatives are SUCH big babies. You cry about justice, but you don't want justice; you want preferential treatment. And when some legal entity actually holds you to account, you throw a fit.

What happened to our Capitol on 1/6 hasn't happened in over 200 years, and when it was done then, it was done by a foreign power, not by our fellow citizens who were trying to overturn a free and fair election. That's what I call political.

Most Americans don't give a damn if you don't like the prosecutions. Hell, they're all getting off pretty easy from everything I can tell because in some other countries, they'd be rounded up and summarily shot.

Wrong YOU asshats want preferential treatment for your favored black criminals and rioters. Gee, when Americans try to hold you leftards accountable for your murder of cops, attempted mass murder in Portland, robbing of businesses and hundreds of cases of arson, you whine and cry “wacist!!”. News flash: nobody gives a shit about your whining.

I'm fine with prosecuting people who commit crimes, regardless of who they are. But, like I said, conservatives want preferential treatment. That's not fine with me.

Except that is clearly not what ANY of us are saying, so why you you talking such complete bullshit?

Look at the sheer number of conservatives who are downplaying 1/6 as if it was little more than a group of tourists or law-abiding peaceful protests. If you were REAL law and order conservatives, you would demand that they be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. But that's not what you want. You just want to 'move on' as if it was little more than some kind of disorderly conduct or an inadvertent trespassing charge like someone walking on someone else's lawn only because he's taking a short cut to get to his car.

I want equality of justice.

Breaking and entering, trespassing, fighting with cops, I am comfortable calling it a riot. People who were arrested for specific criminal acts, I have no problem with them being prosecuted.

My point has been that going above and beyond normal investigation efforts, is a violation of their Civil Rights.

And it is.

That's a new one on me. Now people have a civil right not to be investigated when there's probable cause to believe they've committed a crime.

malicious investigations are a violation of your rights. That's why the government needs a warrant to search your house or go through your personal information.

A warrant requires probable cause. However, the gov't can access your personal information without a warrant.

No it can't, moron.

Sure it can. Plenty of personal information is a matter of public record and can be accessed by pretty much anyone.

They can get public information, no personal information. They can't even get your address without your permission.

You clearly don't know what you're talking about. Certain sensitive personal information requires a warrant like tapping your phone to listen to your calls, or searching your home without your consent. But other information like your driving record, vehicle registration, auto insurance, credit record, phone call logs of who you called and when you called them, Facebook information, and any public records like real estate holdings do not require a warrant. And clearly the gov't does not need a warrant to get your address.

Then of course, you can always grant the police the permission to search your car or your home.

You need to educate yourself.

 

[colfax_m]

But then the few hundred that went to the Capitol were lead by Antifa and let in by cops, stuff spiraled out of control for a few minutes.

No one actually still believes this but the very fringe.

 

[freyasman]

Active-Duty Marine Corps Major Charged In Capitol Riot

Officials say Maj. Christopher Warnagiris is believed to be the first active-duty military service member to be charged in connection with the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol.

www.npr.org

Love it.

Why are some rioters being gone after with both barrels while others are given a pass or just low priority?


Because the dems are on the side of lefty rioters.



THus, these prosecutions are political.


Anyone convicted, will be a political prisoner.


That is the country you are making.


View attachment 489381

I lose track of it . What anniversary of you guys promising a civil war is it ? 15th, 20th? Are you guys registered anywhere?

Funny, this thread is based on the premise that the 1/6 riot was a serious and real threat to our democracy, because it delayed the formal recognition of the count, by HOURS.

Yet, here you are, acting as though, any talk of civil war from US, is laughable.


Why do you support the extra aggressive prosecution of the 1/6 rioters if it was not a serious insurrection?


lol. All these questions are rhetorical. We both know that you will not give serious or honest answers to ANY of them.


I am constantly amazed at the way you libs can hold completely contradictory ideas AT THE SAME TIME, without a hint of self awareness, no matter how much it is rubbed in your face.

Their goal wasn't to delay it, it was to "stop the steal." You're literally giving them credit for failing to pull off their coup.

Wow. Did you just become aware that intents and actual outcomes are sometimes different? What a big day for you.

Run along retard.

No worries, keep defending sedition. Be even louder about that during election season next year.

Who has been charged with sedition, shit for brains?

Who said they've been charged with sedition yet, fucking moron?

Their actions violate the sedition conspiracy law.

And Chaz didn't? And the Autonomous Zone didn't? And ordering the cops to not protect ICE so the rioters could attack the building didn't?

You are supporting a massive violation of civil rights of your enemies. Those that are convicted will be political prisoners.

View attachment 490040

Sure skippy...bring it on.

I hope you enjoy the results of your labors. I hope I am still here, when you are here whining like a fag, because of how it is blowing up in your face.

Sure thing skippy. In 10 years two things will still be true. There would have been no civil war and you guys will still be threatening to start one.

Do me a favor. State your position on the 1/6 "insurrection, how bad it was, in a compound sentence, with your position that there is nothing to fear from the Right re: "Civil War".


I want to see your two positions side by side. It should be GREAT.

There is nothing to fear from the right (or the left) on a civil war.

Your attempted insurrection is a different topic, junior.

Whatever your child-like hoping for a war because you have some bizarre fantasy about how cool it would be...just know 2 things... If you INCELs ever tried it, you'd be slaughtered....and....you INCELs will never try it. Because you are a coward.

Hence your continued threats with absolutely no follow up.

So, you don't care about the people supposedly killed by the mob on 1/6? People dying is "nothing to fear"?


Are you longing for the sweet release that Death will bring?


I do not want Civil War, I am warning where you hatred and oppression and keeping of political prisoners could lead this once great nation.

Your hatred is based on abject ignorance. Aside from the reality that any such uprising will be utterly squashed by a military sworn to protect the Constitution, you won't gain much support from a country because your civil war will be based upon hate, not principle.

I doubt it will be based on hate. It will be based on their simply being a failure in life and trying to bring everyone else down to their level.

You are supporting a violation of civil rights. You are the hater here, not me.

Where, whiner?

Federal Civil Rights Statutes | Federal Bureau of Investigation

The FBI is able to investigate civil rights violations based on a series of federal laws.

www.fbi.gov

Unequal application of justice, you faggot.

Uh oh, I touched a nerve with the whiner. Had to break out the F word. Good luck proving that when so many of the white Trump mob are being released...after being allowed to riot, go home, and roam free for weeks. The guy that, with premeditated intent, brought a 950,000 watt stun gun into the Speaker's office? Some Arkansas judge tried to let him go.

Judge blocks release of man pictured with feet on desk in Pelosi's office

Richard Barnett won permission from a judge in Arkansas to return home to await trial, but a judge in D.C. blocked that decision.

www.politico.com

People being released on bail, is not the same as not being looked for or having charges dropped.

You are supporting a gross violation of the human rights of hundreds of people based on political reasons.


You are supporting the policy of holding political prisoners here in the United States of America.


Your obsession with race, sounds somewhat racist too.

Show me an article that says he was released on bail. None of them say that, they all just say he was released. I'm sure a BLM protester that walked into, say Kevin McCarthy's office carrying a 950,000 watt stun gun would just be let go to await trial. Puhleese!

Lot's of women carry stun guns in their purses, moron. It's not illegal.

Is it a weapon or not? You apologists keep making the incorrect claim that Trump’s mob wasn’t armed. They were.

The key to your car can be a weapon. You obviously have a very narrow understanding of reality.

A 950,000 volt walking stick designed to stop a wild animal isn’t a key in your purse, princess.

Wow. 400 storm the capitol in a supposed coup attempt and you got a TAZER as the star example of how dangerously armed they were?

LOL!!!!

It was 800.

Prove it, asshole

I don't have to. The FBI is on it. They have 15,000 hours of video, and they've received something like 200,000+ tips from patriotic citizens. I hope they televise some of the trials and put the video evidence right up on the screen for all to see. Then let's see conservatives say it was a peaceful protest or that it was like a regular day of tourists showing up.

if they don't do that with Antifa and BLM trials, then this will be a political prosecution and anyone convicted with be political prisoners.

That's what conservatives always say when they get prosecuted for crimes. It doesn't even matter what the crime is.

As you people become more and more abusive and tyrannical, it might become fairly commonplace.


My point stands. The 1/6 riots are being targeted for extra aggressive investigation and prosecution for political reasons.


That is a violation of their Right to Equal Application of Justice.

Would you like a little cheese with that whine?

Conservatives are SUCH big babies. You cry about justice, but you don't want justice; you want preferential treatment. And when some legal entity actually holds you to account, you throw a fit.

What happened to our Capitol on 1/6 hasn't happened in over 200 years, and when it was done then, it was done by a foreign power, not by our fellow citizens who were trying to overturn a free and fair election. That's what I call political.

Most Americans don't give a damn if you don't like the prosecutions. Hell, they're all getting off pretty easy from everything I can tell because in some other countries, they'd be rounded up and summarily shot.

There have been plenty of riots over the last 4 years and they have not been investigated or prosecuted like this.

You claim that I am asking for preferential treatment is a fucking lie.


This is about you fuckers targeting your political enemies with government force. The people convinced will be political prisoners.


You want a fucking civil war? Because this is how you get a fucking civil war.

Yeah, you guys could start a civil war, and after it was put down by the military with the support of the American people, you would scream bloody murder that any prosecution against the traitors was politically motivated as if you've been wronged in some way.

The American government and the entire US military couldn't beat a bunch of Afghan goatherders.
It didn't matter how many of them me and the guys killed, at the end of the day, they won.


And they didn't have even 1% of the ordnance we do here.







If you think they're going to be more successful here, then you're braindead.

 

[freyasman]

If you're the ones aggressing, (and the left is) then it's a warning. You don't get to start shit and then play the victim when you're told to stop it.

If you're okay with this double standard at work here, then you are doing something very wrong. And yeah.... you should be worried.

It's not a warning if we aren't doing anything wrong. You can't threaten violence on people who are following the rules.

Just because you don't like the outcome isn't an excuse to use violence to change it.

I'm not worried. The vast majority of people in this nation don't support your extremists.

But you are, and you know it. And the rules are not being applied equally, when they are applied at all.

Denying reality doesn't change reality.

 

[freyasman]

You are comparing apples to oranges. YOu are purposefully comparing one cherry picked example to the 1/6 riot, ignoring that there have been HUNDREDS of radical lefty riots, where various people were threatened and the police did not shoot down the rioters.

Indeed, there were a lot of other cops there that day. Why did only one of them fire? If the need for lethal force was so clear, why was there not dozens of cops firing hundreds of rounds?

You cherry picked Babbitt, not me.

The vast majority of the protestors were peaceful and unarmed. THe woman that was killed was unarmed.

Why did only one of them fire? Because as I stated earlier, the other cops were treating the protestors with kid gloves and retreating. This cop couldn't retreat any further as the violent mob had reached their last line of defense before reaching members of Congress.

It's utterly bizarre how the cult refuses to accept Benedict Babbitt put herself into a lethal situation.

Based on the norms set by you fucktards over the last 4 years, it would be completely understandable, how she could have though that breaking and entering would have been acceptable behavior, perhaps with some minor judicial implications.

Who over the last four years threatened to attack members of Congress and got feet away from them?

Your moral compass is broken and unrepairable.

Well, James T. Hodgkinson for one.....

But you all already threw that one down the old memory hole, didn't ya'll?

 

[colfax_m]

If you're the ones aggressing, (and the left is) then it's a warning. You don't get to start shit and then play the victim when you're told to stop it.

If you're okay with this double standard at work here, then you are doing something very wrong. And yeah.... you should be worried.

It's not a warning if we aren't doing anything wrong. You can't threaten violence on people who are following the rules.

Just because you don't like the outcome isn't an excuse to use violence to change it.

I'm not worried. The vast majority of people in this nation don't support your extremists.

But you are, and you know it. And the rules are not being applied equally, when they are applied at all.

Denying reality doesn't change reality.

Don’t whine to me about the rules being applied equally when your side brushes off the long-standing systemic discrepancies of how blacks people are prosecuted in the courts.

No one is going to start a civil war because a few hundred rioters are charged for crimes you guys aren’t even denying they committed.

Call me after decades of decades of over prosecution with racial bias.

 

[colfax_m]

Well, James T. Hodgkinson for one.....

But you all already threw that one down the old memory hole, didn't ya'll?

Not really a useful example in context of the ongoing discussion. Hodgkinson died when police (including Capitol police) returned fire.

The other poster has been arguing that police oil don’t have shot a leftist protestor in a similar circumstance, but they seem to ignore a lot of details about the circumstance in which Babbitt died.

 

[freyasman]

If you're the ones aggressing, (and the left is) then it's a warning. You don't get to start shit and then play the victim when you're told to stop it.

If you're okay with this double standard at work here, then you are doing something very wrong. And yeah.... you should be worried.

It's not a warning if we aren't doing anything wrong. You can't threaten violence on people who are following the rules.

Just because you don't like the outcome isn't an excuse to use violence to change it.

I'm not worried. The vast majority of people in this nation don't support your extremists.

But you are, and you know it. And the rules are not being applied equally, when they are applied at all.

Denying reality doesn't change reality.

Don’t whine to me about the rules being applied equally when your side brushes off the long-standing systemic discrepancies of how blacks people are prosecuted in the courts.

No one is going to start a civil war because a few hundred rioters are charged for crimes you guys aren’t even denying they committed.

Call me after decades of decades of over prosecution with racial bias.

The "systemic racial bias" you're complaining about is bullshit.

The judicial system is completely unfair but that isn't about race so much as it is about class.
If you got money and connections, you got a much better chance of staying out of jail.


Claiming "Oh everybody is wacist!!!!" is a pussy move.



Get out of my face with that horseshit.

 

[freyasman]

Well, James T. Hodgkinson for one.....

But you all already threw that one down the old memory hole, didn't ya'll?

Not really a useful example in context of the ongoing discussion. Hodgkinson died when police (including Capitol police) returned fire.

The other poster has been arguing that police oil don’t have shot a leftist protestor in a similar circumstance, but they seem to ignore a lot of details about the circumstance in which Babbitt died.

No, he tried to claim no one else had ever attacked Congress personnel before and that's clearly bullshit.
A hardcore leftist tried to murder several Republicans.

 

[colfax_m]

If you're the ones aggressing, (and the left is) then it's a warning. You don't get to start shit and then play the victim when you're told to stop it.

If you're okay with this double standard at work here, then you are doing something very wrong. And yeah.... you should be worried.

It's not a warning if we aren't doing anything wrong. You can't threaten violence on people who are following the rules.

Just because you don't like the outcome isn't an excuse to use violence to change it.

I'm not worried. The vast majority of people in this nation don't support your extremists.

But you are, and you know it. And the rules are not being applied equally, when they are applied at all.

Denying reality doesn't change reality.

Don’t whine to me about the rules being applied equally when your side brushes off the long-standing systemic discrepancies of how blacks people are prosecuted in the courts.

No one is going to start a civil war because a few hundred rioters are charged for crimes you guys aren’t even denying they committed.

Call me after decades of decades of over prosecution with racial bias.

The "systemic racial bias" you're complaining about is bullshit.

The judicial system is completely unfair but that isn't about race so much as it is about class.
If you got money and connections, you got a much better chance of staying out of jail.


Claiming "Oh everybody is wacist!!!!" is a pussy move.



Get out of my face with that horseshit.

Even if it is just about class, it’s still way worse for Blake people given their lower overall socioeconomic status.

But it’s still systemically racist. Black people are more aggressively policed, more likely to be arrested, more likely to be prosecuted and receive higher sentences. They are treated differently.

Get out of my face with “judicial system is biased against conservatives” horseshit that you demand I agree with. Cry me a fucking river that a handful of entitled assholes are prosecuted for their actual crimes as if they deserve an ounce of sympathy.

 

[bripat9643]

Active-Duty Marine Corps Major Charged In Capitol Riot

Officials say Maj. Christopher Warnagiris is believed to be the first active-duty military service member to be charged in connection with the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol.

www.npr.org

Love it.

Why are some rioters being gone after with both barrels while others are given a pass or just low priority?


Because the dems are on the side of lefty rioters.



THus, these prosecutions are political.


Anyone convicted, will be a political prisoner.


That is the country you are making.


View attachment 489381

I lose track of it . What anniversary of you guys promising a civil war is it ? 15th, 20th? Are you guys registered anywhere?

Funny, this thread is based on the premise that the 1/6 riot was a serious and real threat to our democracy, because it delayed the formal recognition of the count, by HOURS.

Yet, here you are, acting as though, any talk of civil war from US, is laughable.


Why do you support the extra aggressive prosecution of the 1/6 rioters if it was not a serious insurrection?


lol. All these questions are rhetorical. We both know that you will not give serious or honest answers to ANY of them.


I am constantly amazed at the way you libs can hold completely contradictory ideas AT THE SAME TIME, without a hint of self awareness, no matter how much it is rubbed in your face.

Their goal wasn't to delay it, it was to "stop the steal." You're literally giving them credit for failing to pull off their coup.

Wow. Did you just become aware that intents and actual outcomes are sometimes different? What a big day for you.

Run along retard.

No worries, keep defending sedition. Be even louder about that during election season next year.

Who has been charged with sedition, shit for brains?

Who said they've been charged with sedition yet, fucking moron?

Their actions violate the sedition conspiracy law.

And Chaz didn't? And the Autonomous Zone didn't? And ordering the cops to not protect ICE so the rioters could attack the building didn't?

You are supporting a massive violation of civil rights of your enemies. Those that are convicted will be political prisoners.

View attachment 490040

Sure skippy...bring it on.

I hope you enjoy the results of your labors. I hope I am still here, when you are here whining like a fag, because of how it is blowing up in your face.

Sure thing skippy. In 10 years two things will still be true. There would have been no civil war and you guys will still be threatening to start one.

Do me a favor. State your position on the 1/6 "insurrection, how bad it was, in a compound sentence, with your position that there is nothing to fear from the Right re: "Civil War".


I want to see your two positions side by side. It should be GREAT.

There is nothing to fear from the right (or the left) on a civil war.

Your attempted insurrection is a different topic, junior.

Whatever your child-like hoping for a war because you have some bizarre fantasy about how cool it would be...just know 2 things... If you INCELs ever tried it, you'd be slaughtered....and....you INCELs will never try it. Because you are a coward.

Hence your continued threats with absolutely no follow up.

So, you don't care about the people supposedly killed by the mob on 1/6? People dying is "nothing to fear"?


Are you longing for the sweet release that Death will bring?


I do not want Civil War, I am warning where you hatred and oppression and keeping of political prisoners could lead this once great nation.

Your hatred is based on abject ignorance. Aside from the reality that any such uprising will be utterly squashed by a military sworn to protect the Constitution, you won't gain much support from a country because your civil war will be based upon hate, not principle.

I doubt it will be based on hate. It will be based on their simply being a failure in life and trying to bring everyone else down to their level.

You are supporting a violation of civil rights. You are the hater here, not me.

Where, whiner?

Federal Civil Rights Statutes | Federal Bureau of Investigation

The FBI is able to investigate civil rights violations based on a series of federal laws.

www.fbi.gov

Unequal application of justice, you faggot.

Uh oh, I touched a nerve with the whiner. Had to break out the F word. Good luck proving that when so many of the white Trump mob are being released...after being allowed to riot, go home, and roam free for weeks. The guy that, with premeditated intent, brought a 950,000 watt stun gun into the Speaker's office? Some Arkansas judge tried to let him go.

Judge blocks release of man pictured with feet on desk in Pelosi's office

Richard Barnett won permission from a judge in Arkansas to return home to await trial, but a judge in D.C. blocked that decision.

www.politico.com

People being released on bail, is not the same as not being looked for or having charges dropped.

You are supporting a gross violation of the human rights of hundreds of people based on political reasons.


You are supporting the policy of holding political prisoners here in the United States of America.


Your obsession with race, sounds somewhat racist too.

Show me an article that says he was released on bail. None of them say that, they all just say he was released. I'm sure a BLM protester that walked into, say Kevin McCarthy's office carrying a 950,000 watt stun gun would just be let go to await trial. Puhleese!

Lot's of women carry stun guns in their purses, moron. It's not illegal.

Is it a weapon or not? You apologists keep making the incorrect claim that Trump’s mob wasn’t armed. They were.

The key to your car can be a weapon. You obviously have a very narrow understanding of reality.

A 950,000 volt walking stick designed to stop a wild animal isn’t a key in your purse, princess.

Wow. 400 storm the capitol in a supposed coup attempt and you got a TAZER as the star example of how dangerously armed they were?

LOL!!!!

It was 800.

Prove it, asshole

I don't have to. The FBI is on it. They have 15,000 hours of video, and they've received something like 200,000+ tips from patriotic citizens. I hope they televise some of the trials and put the video evidence right up on the screen for all to see. Then let's see conservatives say it was a peaceful protest or that it was like a regular day of tourists showing up.

if they don't do that with Antifa and BLM trials, then this will be a political prosecution and anyone convicted with be political prisoners.

That's what conservatives always say when they get prosecuted for crimes. It doesn't even matter what the crime is.

As you people become more and more abusive and tyrannical, it might become fairly commonplace.


My point stands. The 1/6 riots are being targeted for extra aggressive investigation and prosecution for political reasons.


That is a violation of their Right to Equal Application of Justice.

Would you like a little cheese with that whine?

Conservatives are SUCH big babies. You cry about justice, but you don't want justice; you want preferential treatment. And when some legal entity actually holds you to account, you throw a fit.

What happened to our Capitol on 1/6 hasn't happened in over 200 years, and when it was done then, it was done by a foreign power, not by our fellow citizens who were trying to overturn a free and fair election. That's what I call political.

Most Americans don't give a damn if you don't like the prosecutions. Hell, they're all getting off pretty easy from everything I can tell because in some other countries, they'd be rounded up and summarily shot.

Wrong YOU asshats want preferential treatment for your favored black criminals and rioters. Gee, when Americans try to hold you leftards accountable for your murder of cops, attempted mass murder in Portland, robbing of businesses and hundreds of cases of arson, you whine and cry “wacist!!”. News flash: nobody gives a shit about your whining.

I'm fine with prosecuting people who commit crimes, regardless of who they are. But, like I said, conservatives want preferential treatment. That's not fine with me.

Except that is clearly not what ANY of us are saying, so why you you talking such complete bullshit?

Look at the sheer number of conservatives who are downplaying 1/6 as if it was little more than a group of tourists or law-abiding peaceful protests. If you were REAL law and order conservatives, you would demand that they be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. But that's not what you want. You just want to 'move on' as if it was little more than some kind of disorderly conduct or an inadvertent trespassing charge like someone walking on someone else's lawn only because he's taking a short cut to get to his car.

I want equality of justice.

Breaking and entering, trespassing, fighting with cops, I am comfortable calling it a riot. People who were arrested for specific criminal acts, I have no problem with them being prosecuted.

My point has been that going above and beyond normal investigation efforts, is a violation of their Civil Rights.

And it is.

That's a new one on me. Now people have a civil right not to be investigated when there's probable cause to believe they've committed a crime.

malicious investigations are a violation of your rights. That's why the government needs a warrant to search your house or go through your personal information.

A warrant requires probable cause. However, the gov't can access your personal information without a warrant.

No it can't, moron.

Sure it can. Plenty of personal information is a matter of public record and can be accessed by pretty much anyone.

They can get public information, no personal information. They can't even get your address without your permission.

You clearly don't know what you're talking about. Certain sensitive personal information requires a warrant like tapping your phone to listen to your calls, or searching your home without your consent. But other information like your driving record, vehicle registration, auto insurance, credit record, phone call logs of who you called and when you called them, Facebook information, and any public records like real estate holdings do not require a warrant. And clearly the gov't does not need a warrant to get your address.

Then of course, you can always grant the police the permission to search your car or your home.

You need to educate yourself.

Actually, that's wrong. Most of that information is privileged. They only Facebook information they can view is what the user has made public. I believe the government does require a warrant to get your address

 

[freyasman]

If you're the ones aggressing, (and the left is) then it's a warning. You don't get to start shit and then play the victim when you're told to stop it.

If you're okay with this double standard at work here, then you are doing something very wrong. And yeah.... you should be worried.

It's not a warning if we aren't doing anything wrong. You can't threaten violence on people who are following the rules.

Just because you don't like the outcome isn't an excuse to use violence to change it.

I'm not worried. The vast majority of people in this nation don't support your extremists.

But you are, and you know it. And the rules are not being applied equally, when they are applied at all.

Denying reality doesn't change reality.

Don’t whine to me about the rules being applied equally when your side brushes off the long-standing systemic discrepancies of how blacks people are prosecuted in the courts.

No one is going to start a civil war because a few hundred rioters are charged for crimes you guys aren’t even denying they committed.

Call me after decades of decades of over prosecution with racial bias.

The "systemic racial bias" you're complaining about is bullshit.

The judicial system is completely unfair but that isn't about race so much as it is about class.
If you got money and connections, you got a much better chance of staying out of jail.


Claiming "Oh everybody is wacist!!!!" is a pussy move.



Get out of my face with that horseshit.

Even if it is just about class, it’s still way worse for Blake people given their lower overall socioeconomic status.

But it’s still systemically racist. Black people are more aggressively policed, more likely to be arrested, more likely to be prosecuted and receive higher sentences. They are treated differently.

Get out of my face with “judicial system is biased against conservatives” horseshit that you demand I agree with. Cry me a fucking river that a handful of entitled assholes are prosecuted for their actual crimes as if they deserve an ounce of sympathy.

They are treated like they commit most of the crime..... because they do.

That's not racial bias, it's fucking reality.



And the fact is, conservatives who do the exact same things a leftist does, are being more vigorously prosecuted, plain and simple. Treat everyone the same..... there's nothing "preferential" about that.


Don't bitch to me about imaginary racial bias on one hand, while you excuse malicious prosecution based on ideology (and maybe race as well) on the other, you fucking hypocrite.

 

[colfax_m]

Well, James T. Hodgkinson for one.....

But you all already threw that one down the old memory hole, didn't ya'll?

Not really a useful example in context of the ongoing discussion. Hodgkinson died when police (including Capitol police) returned fire.

The other poster has been arguing that police oil don’t have shot a leftist protestor in a similar circumstance, but they seem to ignore a lot of details about the circumstance in which Babbitt died.

No, he tried to claim no one else had ever attacked Congress personnel before and that's clearly bullshit.
A hardcore leftist tried to murder several Republicans.

You really should have looked more at the context of the conversation.

 

[Faun]

You are comparing apples to oranges. YOu are purposefully comparing one cherry picked example to the 1/6 riot, ignoring that there have been HUNDREDS of radical lefty riots, where various people were threatened and the police did not shoot down the rioters.

Indeed, there were a lot of other cops there that day. Why did only one of them fire? If the need for lethal force was so clear, why was there not dozens of cops firing hundreds of rounds?

You cherry picked Babbitt, not me.

The vast majority of the protestors were peaceful and unarmed. THe woman that was killed was unarmed.

Why did only one of them fire? Because as I stated earlier, the other cops were treating the protestors with kid gloves and retreating. This cop couldn't retreat any further as the violent mob had reached their last line of defense before reaching members of Congress.

It's utterly bizarre how the cult refuses to accept Benedict Babbitt put herself into a lethal situation.

Based on the norms set by you fucktards over the last 4 years, it would be completely understandable, how she could have though that breaking and entering would have been acceptable behavior, perhaps with some minor judicial implications.

Who over the last four years threatened to attack members of Congress and got feet away from them?

Your moral compass is broken and unrepairable.

Well, James T. Hodgkinson for one.....

But you all already threw that one down the old memory hole, didn't ya'll?

No, I'm not only aware of him. I was hoping a cultist would point him out.

How did police treat him?

And thanks for making my point!

 

[freyasman]

Well, James T. Hodgkinson for one.....

But you all already threw that one down the old memory hole, didn't ya'll?

Not really a useful example in context of the ongoing discussion. Hodgkinson died when police (including Capitol police) returned fire.

The other poster has been arguing that police oil don’t have shot a leftist protestor in a similar circumstance, but they seem to ignore a lot of details about the circumstance in which Babbitt died.

No, he tried to claim no one else had ever attacked Congress personnel before and that's clearly bullshit.
A hardcore leftist tried to murder several Republicans.

You really should have looked more at the context of the conversation.

It's Faun ....... literally the most dishonest and stupid partisan hack poster here.
It's really hard to look closely at that level of lying and stupidity.

 

[Faun]

Well, James T. Hodgkinson for one.....

But you all already threw that one down the old memory hole, didn't ya'll?

Not really a useful example in context of the ongoing discussion. Hodgkinson died when police (including Capitol police) returned fire.

The other poster has been arguing that police oil don’t have shot a leftist protestor in a similar circumstance, but they seem to ignore a lot of details about the circumstance in which Babbitt died.

No, he tried to claim no one else had ever attacked Congress personnel before and that's clearly bullshit.
A hardcore leftist tried to murder several Republicans.

No, what I wanted to see was a poster find an example of someone threatening members of Congress and getting away with it, which is what some here are bitching about the left getting away crimes that the right doesn't get away with; which I knew didn't exist. I was hoping someone would mention Hodgkinson since the police shot him too, as they absolutely should have. Just like with Ashli Targetpractice.

 

[Faun]

Well, James T. Hodgkinson for one.....

But you all already threw that one down the old memory hole, didn't ya'll?

Not really a useful example in context of the ongoing discussion. Hodgkinson died when police (including Capitol police) returned fire.

The other poster has been arguing that police oil don’t have shot a leftist protestor in a similar circumstance, but they seem to ignore a lot of details about the circumstance in which Babbitt died.

No, he tried to claim no one else had ever attacked Congress personnel before and that's clearly bullshit.
A hardcore leftist tried to murder several Republicans.

You really should have looked more at the context of the conversation.

It's Faun ....... literally the most dishonest and stupid partisan hack poster here.
It's really hard to look closely at that level of lying and stupidity.

If I'm so stupid, how did I snare you into making my point??

 

[freyasman]

You are comparing apples to oranges. YOu are purposefully comparing one cherry picked example to the 1/6 riot, ignoring that there have been HUNDREDS of radical lefty riots, where various people were threatened and the police did not shoot down the rioters.

Indeed, there were a lot of other cops there that day. Why did only one of them fire? If the need for lethal force was so clear, why was there not dozens of cops firing hundreds of rounds?

You cherry picked Babbitt, not me.

The vast majority of the protestors were peaceful and unarmed. THe woman that was killed was unarmed.

Why did only one of them fire? Because as I stated earlier, the other cops were treating the protestors with kid gloves and retreating. This cop couldn't retreat any further as the violent mob had reached their last line of defense before reaching members of Congress.

It's utterly bizarre how the cult refuses to accept Benedict Babbitt put herself into a lethal situation.

Based on the norms set by you fucktards over the last 4 years, it would be completely understandable, how she could have though that breaking and entering would have been acceptable behavior, perhaps with some minor judicial implications.

Who over the last four years threatened to attack members of Congress and got feet away from them?

Your moral compass is broken and unrepairable.

Well, James T. Hodgkinson for one.....

But you all already threw that one down the old memory hole, didn't ya'll?

No, I'm not only aware of him. I was hoping a cultist would point him out.

How did police treat him?

And thanks for making my point!

What was he doing when they shot him?
Firing a rifle at multiple people.

And what was she doing when she was killed?
Trying to enter a room in a public building, unarmed.



Not the same. Not even close.