'Lynch Mob': Pressure Growing

[peach174]

The FBI does not call it a criminal investigation, Peach, and it is certainly not asking your permission do so.

Of course they won't, not till the investigation is over.
You actually think that the left who controls the FBI would put a label on that? It's political Jake.


Why don't we wait and see what their investigation says at the end of it.
When FBI looks into something it is a criminal probe. No getting around that Jake.
Guy Benson - FBI: Yes, Our Probe Into Hillary's Email Scheme is a Criminal Investigation

The FBI investigation into former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton’s unsecured email account is not just a fact-finding venture — it’s a criminal probe, sources told The Post on Wednesday. The feds are investigating to what extent Clinton relied on her home server and other private devices to send and store classified documents, according to a federal source with knowledge of the inquiry. “It’s definitely a criminal probe,” said the source. “I’m not sure why they’re not calling it a criminal probe. “The DOJ [Department of Justice] and FBI can conduct civil investigations in very limited circumstances,” but that’s not what this is, the source stressed. “In this case, a security violation would lead to criminal charges. Maybe DOJ is trying to protect her campaign.”

You are mincing words with criminal investigation with criminal probe. It is the same thing.
A criminal investigation is an official effort to uncover information about a crime.

 

[peach174]

The FBI does not call it a criminal investigation, Peach, and it is certainly not asking your permission do so.

Flippancy will get you no where.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Not to worry, Peach. If "the left" are controlling the investigation, then by your standards it will never be a criminal investigation. Flippancy? How about your strained screech of outrage?

 

[rdean]

Juan Williams: Innuendo fuels Clinton email saga

But the most respected news organizations in the nation — The New York Times, The Washington Post and The Wall Street Journal, as well as ABC and other television networks — all pursue the Clinton email story as legitimate news rather than as a political vendetta.

The email story broke last March when the New York Times reported Clinton “used a personal email account to conduct government business as Secretary of State.” In July, the story escalated when the Times incorrectly reported that requests had been made for a criminal investigation of Clinton’s handling of email.

Even after a correction on that story, her totally legal use of a private server while at the State Department became an acceptable short-hand for political opponents — and reporters looking to appear tough — to condemn Clinton. Still, there was no evidence of law-breaking.

“I find it hard to believe that they would be eager to nominate someone who is under indictment and could well face felony incarceration,” Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), the winner of the Republican Iowa caucuses, recently told radio host Hugh Hewitt.

What felony charge is that?

And of course there is still no evidence that she broke any law.

The use of rumors to weaken a political candidate has a long history. In 1999, GOP presidential candidate Pat Buchanan won repeated applause at rallies nationwide when he promised that his first act as president would be to turn to his predecessor, Bill Clinton, and say: “Sir, you have the right to remain silent.”

--------------------------------

The sad thing about this is that considering what Republicans have done to this country, Democrats have far more right to turn to Republicans and say: "You have the right to remain silent".

 

[JakeStarkey]

And democratic politicians do the same, rdean.

 

[SuperDemocrat]

The lesson we learn from this is that democrats can't be prosecuted.

 

[g5000]

Even if no evidence of wrongdoing is found, Clinton’s many critics are unlikely to take the word of an appointee of President Obama’s, and will doubt that justice has been served.

Truer words have never been spoken. You rubes have already tried, convicted, and sentenced Clinton, based on what you are hand fed from your propaganda outlets.

You are so terrified the American people will prefer Clinton over the GOP candidate, you seem to bleev your only hope of winning an election these days is for your opponent to die or be in prison.

I think this is because you know, deep down inside, your philosophy is utterly bankrupt. Morally, spiritually, and intellectually bankrupt.

 

[JakeStarkey]

The far right meat puppets are amazing! Absolutely fun to watch! And disgusting as well.

 

[easyt65]

You are so terrified the American people will prefer Clinton over the GOP candidate, .

More FALSE words have never been spoken. Hillary is THE LEAST trusted candidate in this entire race, women don't like her, and young people think she is a sell-out, she just lost in Iowa, and she has realistically come out and said she doesn't think she will win in New Hampshire...

 

[g5000]

You are so terrified the American people will prefer Clinton over the GOP candidate, .

More FALSE words have never been spoken. Hillary is THE LEAST trusted candidate in this entire race, women don't like her, and young people think she is a sell-out, she just lost in Iowa, and she has realistically come out and said she doesn't think she will win in New Hampshire...

She's polling better than any GOP candidate. This has the Gnu Right terrified. That's why they spend so much wasted time talking about Clinton instead of their ideas. Because they have none.

 

[eddiew]

"Pressure on Lynch to step aside in Clinton email probe"

"Loretta Lynch is on the edge of the spotlight, about to be dragged to the center.

If the FBI finds sufficient evidence to launch a criminal investigation into Hillary Clinton or one of her top aides for mishandling classified information, Lynch’s Justice Department will have to decide whether or not to press ahead. Even if no evidence of wrongdoing is found, Clinton’s many critics are unlikely to take the word of an appointee of President Obama’s, and will doubt that justice has been served."



Loretta Lynch is the female 'Eric holder, hand-picked by Barry to cover / protect his ass and his agenda, just as Holder was tasked to do.

Is there a 'conflict of interest' here? You damn right there is! Obama is now tied to Hillary and this scandal though 18 e-mails to Hillary's private e-mail address/server. Before these e-mails were discovered Barry declared he never knew anything about them until he learned about it through the media. The 18 found e-mails shows he lied his ass off. No way Lynch steps aside / is allowed to step aside as longs as Obama's ass is connected.

Lynch was hired to do Obama's bidding as well. Her entire DOJ has been compromised, as seen by the DOJ's refusal to indict their last boss for 3 undeniably proven Felony Perjury acts before Congress in his attempt to keep 'Fast and Furious' covered up (which earned him a bi-partisan Censure, the 1st ever for a US Atty General).

The GOP can demand all they want that Lynch step aside, but there is no way that happens. Obama will not relinquish control of the situation. Lynch and the DOJ are the single point of 'success / failure' in this investigation . process.

The Hillary investigation will die at the feet of Lynch and the DOJ when she refuses to call a Grand Jury. The WH has shown their hand. The WH - not Lynch or the DOJ, whose responsibility it is to make that call - said recently that based on what 'we' know a Grand Jury will not be called. Isn't / Wasn't that LYNCH's call to make, not the WH? Fail...the fix is in.

Much like Hillary's 'win' in Iowa - 'Nothing to see here, move along!'

hows it feel getting it right back in republican faces ? Why do you think the dick,,cheney was selected as the morons VP,,,,,,,to do his bidding?? and talk about fix?? Remember tom delay??

 

[easyt65]

The lesson we learn from this is that democrats can't be prosecuted.

Al Sharpton
Charlie Rangel
Eric Holder

 

[easyt65]

She's polling better than any GOP candidate.

That's not true. Rubio, for one, is polling better...and that's before any GOP candidate opens up her past in one-on-one debates. you think Kerry was 'swift-boated'? Hillary will be destroyed...or try to end it by pulling out the 'sexist' card.

BERNIE SANDERS is polling higher than Hillary in NH.
Cruz - 46.7
Clinton - 45.7

Rubio - 48
Clinton - 43

According to RealClearPolitics the only 2 she is beating are Bush and Carson out of the 4.

 

[g5000]

She's polling better than any GOP candidate.

That's not true. Rubio, for one, is polling better..

And how is the Gnu Right treating Rubio right now?

Here are some samples:

Did someone say "lynch mob"?

What a bunch of self-destructive idiots.

 

[easyt65]

You call vetting your candidates 'self-destructive' while protecting Hillary from real debates, hard questions, and jail time for her actions... lol

We saw the results of Liberal vetting when the terrorist Obama gave a visa to murdered 12 Americans in California. No thanks.

 

[imawhosure]

You call vetting your candidates 'self-destructive' while protecting Hillary from real debates, hard questions, and jail time for her actions... lol

We saw the results of Liberal vetting when the terrorist Obama gave a visa to murdered 12 Americans in California. No thanks.

Easy, Mr. Easy! (no pun intended) They are just playing semantics with you. They know they have a political problem, and like nothing more than to pretend you do, lol. It is a game they play, just like they did with the video, and as you pointed out; "what the meaning of is, is!"

Their whole "shtick" is to go round, and round, and round again, to get people so frustrated they will throw their hands in the air. Don't worry about it, seriously. To get elected, she is going to have to debate; even if she avoids prosecution. She will get nailed to the cross! Her minions on keyboards can play semantics on here all they want, but the person who enters the stage to debate her is going to be prepped for weeks on these issues; so much so, they will know about it than she does.

If the Crats don't pull the plug on here before she gets the nomination, the GOP nominee will pull it before she has a chance to enter the White House. These people on here all know it, and basically, they are just fu***** with you, since they know they better do it while they can, as Hilly is the Democratic Titanic, and just left England on her voyage.

 

[rdean]

And democratic politicians do the same, rdean.

I guess you have some examples. Care to share them?

 

[rdean]

You call vetting your candidates 'self-destructive' while protecting Hillary from real debates, hard questions, and jail time for her actions... lol

We saw the results of Liberal vetting when the terrorist Obama gave a visa to murdered 12 Americans in California. No thanks.

Republicans let Bin Laden go. We know that for a fact.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

"Lynch Mob': Pressure Growing"

Republicans know they can't beat Clinton on the issues, so they resort to lies and personal attacks – this being one of many examples.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Siete, we are all aware of your mental inability to grasp the concept of an 'on-going investigation'. Must you CONSTANTLY remind us of your ignorance?

Easyt, that is you in the mirror to which you are speaking.

No, I KNOW what 'on-going investigation' means...since Siete points out nearly every day that HE doesn't maybe you should explain it to him.

Nope, you are being partisan. There is no criminal investigation. The material was not classified when it was sent.

Once again for to slow and stupid, IT WAS HER JOB to classify it.