- Thread starter
- #221
WHAT? you are spouting just the OPPOSITE of what God says about this....No. She is most certainly not responsible.
Yes, she is. If her marriage meant anything to her, yes she is. She could have shown some integrity by divorcing Bill upon proof that he had affairs and took advantage of other women.
Marital fidelity is not only Bill's responsibility, but hers as well. She showed just how much integrity she had by standing put while Clinton took advantage of women. It should have only taken one. One.
and what about ''for better, for worse, until DEATH do us part''?
MILLIONS of women and men have stayed with their spouses after they've cheated repeatedly....only they can know the reasons, and solve their own problems,
NOT Misters Know it all, like you.
Normally, in a marriage where infidelity occurs, the spouse who is cheated on is recognized as the victim, the aggrieved party. How it's handled depends on each individual marriage and family situation.
In other threads where political infidelities are exposed, there is normally sympathy for the partner - remember Edwards? None of the trash talking about Hillary was applied to Elizabeth. When it comes to the Clintons - the standards are different.
Infidelity = sexual predator
staying in a marriage = enabling sexual predator.
That's the Trumpolian Universe. Or maybe a Trumpist in a Teapot?