"Lordy, let there be tapes" Did Cohen record the Trump KIDS still trying to do the Moscow deal?

[aaronleland]

View attachment 232263

I watch her show. I don’t remember her ever saying that. Do you have a link?

They probably lied because they're idiots, and their attempts to spin it now are being poorly handled.

"Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity."

But CAMPAIGNS are supposed to have CAMPAIGN ATTORNEYS. TRUMPS DON'T ASK!

Trump prided himself on running an unconventional campaign, and in some ways it worked. In other ways it was a mistake. A good campaign attorney would have probably suggested he weather the storm on certain issues, but instead he counted on a "fixer". A man whose job it was to make problems go away.

And the issues did go away. The campaign and the election is over. The issues no longer matter.
Libtards are still pissed off because people didn't like their candidate and they think other issues would have made a difference.
As if Trump had showed his tax returns he would get liberal votes.

I would have been pissed at Trump if he had turned over his tax returns.

Except not all of the issues did go away, but could have had he been more up front. He denied the Stormy Daniels thing all the way up until it was obvious he fucked her, and acknowledged he made her sign an NDA. He vehemently denied having any business dealings with Russia up until a week ago. These are both issues that have haunted him for two years, and it never had to. What he did looks legal, but made him look like a horse's ass. The only "truth" we know about Trump at this point is that he's very flexible as far as truth goes.

 

[boedicca]

I kinda missed the minute details over the last few days of Ivanka, JR and Cohen all working on the Moscow deal and the finite dates. Numerous sources say next week could get interesting, this time focusing on the kids. Was TRUMP told to stay out of it, let the kids do it? Was Trump driving their every move?

If the deal was LEGAL, above board and ALLOWED, why the **** is everyone lying about it? Why did TRUMP repeatedly while STILL RUNNING, then after the election and for the 21 months since the inauguration, REPEAT ad naseum I had nothing going on in Russia?



Ex-prosecutor hints Michael Cohen may have secretly recorded Don Jr. and Ivanka: ‘Lordy, I hope there are tapes’

BOB BRIGHAM
01 DEC 2018 AT 15:42 ET


Donald Trump, Jr. and senior White House advisor Ivanka Trump are facing “real danger areas” of criminal liability, career prosecutor Glenn Kirshner explained on MSNBC on Saturday.

Kirschner worked with special prosecutor Robert Mueller and was the chief of homicide prosecution at the U.S. attorney’s office in Washington, DC.

“Is there legal jeopardy in your mind?” anchor Alex Witt asked. “Could there be for Don Jr. and potentially Ivanka?”

“There could be, Alex,” Kirschner replied.

“When it comes to the kids, Ivanka and Don Jr., I think there are a couple of real danger areas, because we heard that Michael Cohen lied to Congress about, among other things, keeping the kids — keeping Donald Trump’s kids informed about what was going on on this potential deal with Russia,” he explained...

Ex-prosecutor hints Michael Cohen may have secretly recorded Don Jr. and Ivanka: 'Lordy, I hope there are tapes’

Desperate LW loon spins desperate fictional account.

Proof it is fictional?

There is no proof that Trump colluded with the Russians to steal the election.

You lose.

 

[BWK]

I kinda missed the minute details over the last few days of Ivanka, JR and Cohen all working on the Moscow deal and the finite dates. Numerous sources say next week could get interesting, this time focusing on the kids. Was TRUMP told to stay out of it, let the kids do it? Was Trump driving their every move?

If the deal was LEGAL, above board and ALLOWED, why the **** is everyone lying about it? Why did TRUMP repeatedly while STILL RUNNING, then after the election and for the 21 months since the inauguration, REPEAT ad naseum I had nothing going on in Russia?



Ex-prosecutor hints Michael Cohen may have secretly recorded Don Jr. and Ivanka: ‘Lordy, I hope there are tapes’

BOB BRIGHAM
01 DEC 2018 AT 15:42 ET


Donald Trump, Jr. and senior White House advisor Ivanka Trump are facing “real danger areas” of criminal liability, career prosecutor Glenn Kirshner explained on MSNBC on Saturday.

Kirschner worked with special prosecutor Robert Mueller and was the chief of homicide prosecution at the U.S. attorney’s office in Washington, DC.

“Is there legal jeopardy in your mind?” anchor Alex Witt asked. “Could there be for Don Jr. and potentially Ivanka?”

“There could be, Alex,” Kirschner replied.

“When it comes to the kids, Ivanka and Don Jr., I think there are a couple of real danger areas, because we heard that Michael Cohen lied to Congress about, among other things, keeping the kids — keeping Donald Trump’s kids informed about what was going on on this potential deal with Russia,” he explained...

Ex-prosecutor hints Michael Cohen may have secretly recorded Don Jr. and Ivanka: 'Lordy, I hope there are tapes’

Desperate LW loon spins desperate fictional account.

Proof it is fictional?

There is no proof that Trump colluded with the Russians to steal the election.

You lose.

Law enforcement already proved you wrong. With Flynn going to jail lying to the FBI about lifting the sanctions, proves Trump was owned by the Russians. Trump was part of the quid pro quo with Russia concerning Trump Tower Moscow which triggered the stolen email scandal to get him elected. Jim Corsi's emails prove that he was working with Wikileaks and Gucifer 2.0 to get Trump elected to get dirt on Clinton.

And then there was the Trump Tower meeting where a series of four different lying stories came out of that, confirming the conspiracy with Russia.

Got any proof to the contrary? Of course you don't. You lose.

 

[boedicca]

I kinda missed the minute details over the last few days of Ivanka, JR and Cohen all working on the Moscow deal and the finite dates. Numerous sources say next week could get interesting, this time focusing on the kids. Was TRUMP told to stay out of it, let the kids do it? Was Trump driving their every move?

If the deal was LEGAL, above board and ALLOWED, why the **** is everyone lying about it? Why did TRUMP repeatedly while STILL RUNNING, then after the election and for the 21 months since the inauguration, REPEAT ad naseum I had nothing going on in Russia?



Ex-prosecutor hints Michael Cohen may have secretly recorded Don Jr. and Ivanka: ‘Lordy, I hope there are tapes’

BOB BRIGHAM
01 DEC 2018 AT 15:42 ET


Donald Trump, Jr. and senior White House advisor Ivanka Trump are facing “real danger areas” of criminal liability, career prosecutor Glenn Kirshner explained on MSNBC on Saturday.

Kirschner worked with special prosecutor Robert Mueller and was the chief of homicide prosecution at the U.S. attorney’s office in Washington, DC.

“Is there legal jeopardy in your mind?” anchor Alex Witt asked. “Could there be for Don Jr. and potentially Ivanka?”

“There could be, Alex,” Kirschner replied.

“When it comes to the kids, Ivanka and Don Jr., I think there are a couple of real danger areas, because we heard that Michael Cohen lied to Congress about, among other things, keeping the kids — keeping Donald Trump’s kids informed about what was going on on this potential deal with Russia,” he explained...

Ex-prosecutor hints Michael Cohen may have secretly recorded Don Jr. and Ivanka: 'Lordy, I hope there are tapes’

Desperate LW loon spins desperate fictional account.

Proof it is fictional?

There is no proof that Trump colluded with the Russians to steal the election.

You lose.

Law enforcement already proved you wrong. With Flynn going to jail lying to the FBI about lifting the sanctions, proves Trump was owned by the Russians. Trump was part of the quid pro quo with Russia concerning Trump Tower Moscow which triggered the stolen email scandal to get him elected. Jim Corsi's emails prove that he was working with Wikileaks and Gucifer 2.0 to get Trump elected to get dirt on Clinton.

And then there was the Trump Tower meeting where a series of four different lying stories came out of that, confirming the conspiracy with Russia.

Got any proof to the contrary? Of course you don't. You lose.

These are ginned up process crimes (i.e., "Lying" to the FBI by giving wrong dates about things that the subject readily disclosed).

Andrew McCarthy is one of the better analysts following this farce. Mueller is not investigating a crime, he is preparing a political hit job.

With respect to the president and “collusion,” Mueller does not have a crime he is investigating. He is investigating in hopes of finding a crime, which is a day-and-night different thing.

Papadopoulos and Cohen. They consult with Russian operatives, plan meetings for themselves and Trump with Russian officials, and — in Papadopoulos’s case — discuss the possibility of obtaining campaign dirt against Hillary Clinton from Russians. Yet, though these activities are the laser focus of his investigation, Mueller did not charge them as crimes because they are not crimes. Papadopoulos, Cohen, and the rest got jammed up, not for what they did, but for lying about what they did....

Mueller’s Trump Investigation Plan: Report Not a Criminal Case | National Review

 

[BWK]

I kinda missed the minute details over the last few days of Ivanka, JR and Cohen all working on the Moscow deal and the finite dates. Numerous sources say next week could get interesting, this time focusing on the kids. Was TRUMP told to stay out of it, let the kids do it? Was Trump driving their every move?

If the deal was LEGAL, above board and ALLOWED, why the **** is everyone lying about it? Why did TRUMP repeatedly while STILL RUNNING, then after the election and for the 21 months since the inauguration, REPEAT ad naseum I had nothing going on in Russia?



Ex-prosecutor hints Michael Cohen may have secretly recorded Don Jr. and Ivanka: ‘Lordy, I hope there are tapes’

BOB BRIGHAM
01 DEC 2018 AT 15:42 ET


Donald Trump, Jr. and senior White House advisor Ivanka Trump are facing “real danger areas” of criminal liability, career prosecutor Glenn Kirshner explained on MSNBC on Saturday.

Kirschner worked with special prosecutor Robert Mueller and was the chief of homicide prosecution at the U.S. attorney’s office in Washington, DC.

“Is there legal jeopardy in your mind?” anchor Alex Witt asked. “Could there be for Don Jr. and potentially Ivanka?”

“There could be, Alex,” Kirschner replied.

“When it comes to the kids, Ivanka and Don Jr., I think there are a couple of real danger areas, because we heard that Michael Cohen lied to Congress about, among other things, keeping the kids — keeping Donald Trump’s kids informed about what was going on on this potential deal with Russia,” he explained...

Ex-prosecutor hints Michael Cohen may have secretly recorded Don Jr. and Ivanka: 'Lordy, I hope there are tapes’

Desperate LW loon spins desperate fictional account.

Proof it is fictional?

There is no proof that Trump colluded with the Russians to steal the election.

You lose.

Law enforcement already proved you wrong. With Flynn going to jail lying to the FBI about lifting the sanctions, proves Trump was owned by the Russians. Trump was part of the quid pro quo with Russia concerning Trump Tower Moscow which triggered the stolen email scandal to get him elected. Jim Corsi's emails prove that he was working with Wikileaks and Gucifer 2.0 to get Trump elected to get dirt on Clinton.

And then there was the Trump Tower meeting where a series of four different lying stories came out of that, confirming the conspiracy with Russia.

Got any proof to the contrary? Of course you don't. You lose.

These are ginned up process crimes (i.e., "Lying" to the FBI by giving wrong dates about things that the subject readily disclosed).

Andrew McCarthy is one of the better analysts following this farce. Mueller is not investigating a crime, he is preparing a political hit job.

With respect to the president and “collusion,” Mueller does not have a crime he is investigating. He is investigating in hopes of finding a crime, which is a day-and-night different thing.

Papadopoulos and Cohen. They consult with Russian operatives, plan meetings for themselves and Trump with Russian officials, and — in Papadopoulos’s case — discuss the possibility of obtaining campaign dirt against Hillary Clinton from Russians. Yet, though these activities are the laser focus of his investigation, Mueller did not charge them as crimes because they are not crimes. Papadopoulos, Cohen, and the rest got jammed up, not for what they did, but for lying about what they did....

Mueller’s Trump Investigation Plan: Report Not a Criminal Case | National Review

Thanks! You don't have any proof to the contrary. Calling them "ginned up process crimes" is worth shit. You lose.

Also, Trump has been caught with Don Jr. making up four different stories for the Trump Tower meeting, which is an attack with a foreign adversary in a presidential election against the country. Proof, at the very least that Trump is a co-conspirator for the cover up for this conspiracy. That has already been proven, and will be in Mueller's report.

And we have other proof of the conspiracy. Corsi's email dump proves the conspiracy between Trump and Russia as well.

If Andrew McCarthy were right, we wouldn't have guilty pleas with Trump people going to jail. Anyone who thinks differently is a total retard.

Lifting of sanctions is even more proof; Lifting Russian sanctions key to Trump deal exposed by Cohen

 

[boedicca]

Desperate LW loon spins desperate fictional account.

Proof it is fictional?

There is no proof that Trump colluded with the Russians to steal the election.

You lose.

Law enforcement already proved you wrong. With Flynn going to jail lying to the FBI about lifting the sanctions, proves Trump was owned by the Russians. Trump was part of the quid pro quo with Russia concerning Trump Tower Moscow which triggered the stolen email scandal to get him elected. Jim Corsi's emails prove that he was working with Wikileaks and Gucifer 2.0 to get Trump elected to get dirt on Clinton.

And then there was the Trump Tower meeting where a series of four different lying stories came out of that, confirming the conspiracy with Russia.

Got any proof to the contrary? Of course you don't. You lose.

These are ginned up process crimes (i.e., "Lying" to the FBI by giving wrong dates about things that the subject readily disclosed).

Andrew McCarthy is one of the better analysts following this farce. Mueller is not investigating a crime, he is preparing a political hit job.

With respect to the president and “collusion,” Mueller does not have a crime he is investigating. He is investigating in hopes of finding a crime, which is a day-and-night different thing.

Papadopoulos and Cohen. They consult with Russian operatives, plan meetings for themselves and Trump with Russian officials, and — in Papadopoulos’s case — discuss the possibility of obtaining campaign dirt against Hillary Clinton from Russians. Yet, though these activities are the laser focus of his investigation, Mueller did not charge them as crimes because they are not crimes. Papadopoulos, Cohen, and the rest got jammed up, not for what they did, but for lying about what they did....

Mueller’s Trump Investigation Plan: Report Not a Criminal Case | National Review

Thanks! You don't have any proof to the contrary. Calling them "ginned up process crimes" is worth shit. You lose.

Also, Trump has been caught with Don Jr. making up four different stories for the Trump Tower meeting, which is an attack with a foreign adversary in a presidential election against the country. Proof, at the very least that Trump is a co-conspirator for the cover up for this conspiracy. That has already been proven, and will be in Mueller's report.

And we have other proof of the conspiracy. Corsi's email dump proves the conspiracy between Trump and Russia as well.

If Andrew McCarthy were right, we wouldn't have guilty pleas with Trump people going to jail. Anyone who thinks differently is a total retard.

Your reading comprehension and logic functions are seriously deficient.

They were charged with lying about things that aren't illegal. That's what process crimes are. If Mueller weren't engaged in a Beria-style inquisition, none of these people would have been set up to "lie".

 

[cpicturetaker12]

View attachment 232263

I watch her show. I don’t remember her ever saying that. Do you have a link?

That headline is a c&p job. No such headline goes with anything MADDOW has ever said.

 

[cpicturetaker12]

I know all about how impeachment is done, Chumlee.

I also know that Raw Story is the fakest of fake news....Inforwars is more credible.

Did you really type that with a straight face?

Yes I did, and you should be embarrassed to try to pass off dreck form that propaganda mill as "news"....But then I remember that embarrassment isn't an emotional response that's available to leftist crackpots.

You put up INFOWARS and called RS dreck. Now that's rich.

 

[B. Kidd]

The TDS of anti-Trumpers is like Wily Coyote trying to catch the Roadrunner.
You people are cartoons!!

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

I also know that Raw Story is the fakest of fake news...

What a moronic comment....raw story is not the source, the lifetime prosecutor is the source of his own quotes. Just say, "i'm too much of an intellectual sissy to deal with this content"...at least it would be honest...

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

There is no proof that Trump colluded with the Russians to steal the election.

You, of course, could not possibly know the truth of this and are soothing yourself out loud.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

They were charged with lying about things that aren't illegal.

Another thing you made up and could not possibly know the truth of...

 

[cpicturetaker12]

View attachment 232263

I watch her show. I don’t remember her ever saying that. Do you have a link?

They probably lied because they're idiots, and their attempts to spin it now are being poorly handled.

"Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity."

But CAMPAIGNS are supposed to have CAMPAIGN ATTORNEYS. TRUMPS DON'T ASK!

Trump prided himself on running an unconventional campaign, and in some ways it worked. In other ways it was a mistake. A good campaign attorney would have probably suggested he weather the storm on certain issues, but instead he counted on a "fixer". A man whose job it was to make problems go away.

A ROY COHN shouldn't be anywhere near a presidential campaign, anywhere, anytime, any PARTY! Trump got bad advice or no advice--these ******* idiots knew better than to ask.

I don't even want to hear "AMATEURS". I've worked at the lowest level of local DEM politics and WE asked numerous questions for all types of campaign related issues!

 

[cpicturetaker12]

View attachment 232263

I watch her show. I don’t remember her ever saying that. Do you have a link?

They probably lied because they're idiots, and their attempts to spin it now are being poorly handled.

"Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity."

But CAMPAIGNS are supposed to have CAMPAIGN ATTORNEYS. TRUMPS DON'T ASK!

Trump prided himself on running an unconventional campaign, and in some ways it worked. In other ways it was a mistake. A good campaign attorney would have probably suggested he weather the storm on certain issues, but instead he counted on a "fixer". A man whose job it was to make problems go away.

And the issues did go away. The campaign and the election is over. The issues no longer matter.
Libtards are still pissed off because people didn't like their candidate and they think other issues would have made a difference.
As if Trump had showed his tax returns he would get liberal votes.

I would have been pissed at Trump if he had turned over his tax returns.

40 seats picked up in congress? Some "majority" liked our candidates.

Oh yeah, and 3,000,000 more LIKED OUR CANDIDATE than liked YOURS. Oh those pesky facts.

 

[Defiant1]

View attachment 232263

I watch her show. I don’t remember her ever saying that. Do you have a link?

They probably lied because they're idiots, and their attempts to spin it now are being poorly handled.

"Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity."

But CAMPAIGNS are supposed to have CAMPAIGN ATTORNEYS. TRUMPS DON'T ASK!

Trump prided himself on running an unconventional campaign, and in some ways it worked. In other ways it was a mistake. A good campaign attorney would have probably suggested he weather the storm on certain issues, but instead he counted on a "fixer". A man whose job it was to make problems go away.

And the issues did go away. The campaign and the election is over. The issues no longer matter.
Libtards are still pissed off because people didn't like their candidate and they think other issues would have made a difference.
As if Trump had showed his tax returns he would get liberal votes.

I would have been pissed at Trump if he had turned over his tax returns.

40 seats picked up in congress? Some "majority" liked our candidates.

Oh yeah, and 3,000,000 more LIKED OUR CANDIDATE than liked YOURS. Oh those pesky facts.

Meh. Who cares.
It will be good for the next two years, no new laws will be passed.
We have too many laws now as it is.
But Trump will still be able to nominate new Supreme Court Justices.
That's all I care about.

 

[Claudette]

Have they got him yet??

 

[BWK]

Proof it is fictional?

There is no proof that Trump colluded with the Russians to steal the election.

You lose.

Law enforcement already proved you wrong. With Flynn going to jail lying to the FBI about lifting the sanctions, proves Trump was owned by the Russians. Trump was part of the quid pro quo with Russia concerning Trump Tower Moscow which triggered the stolen email scandal to get him elected. Jim Corsi's emails prove that he was working with Wikileaks and Gucifer 2.0 to get Trump elected to get dirt on Clinton.

And then there was the Trump Tower meeting where a series of four different lying stories came out of that, confirming the conspiracy with Russia.

Got any proof to the contrary? Of course you don't. You lose.

These are ginned up process crimes (i.e., "Lying" to the FBI by giving wrong dates about things that the subject readily disclosed).

Andrew McCarthy is one of the better analysts following this farce. Mueller is not investigating a crime, he is preparing a political hit job.

With respect to the president and “collusion,” Mueller does not have a crime he is investigating. He is investigating in hopes of finding a crime, which is a day-and-night different thing.

Papadopoulos and Cohen. They consult with Russian operatives, plan meetings for themselves and Trump with Russian officials, and — in Papadopoulos’s case — discuss the possibility of obtaining campaign dirt against Hillary Clinton from Russians. Yet, though these activities are the laser focus of his investigation, Mueller did not charge them as crimes because they are not crimes. Papadopoulos, Cohen, and the rest got jammed up, not for what they did, but for lying about what they did....

Mueller’s Trump Investigation Plan: Report Not a Criminal Case | National Review

Thanks! You don't have any proof to the contrary. Calling them "ginned up process crimes" is worth shit. You lose.

Also, Trump has been caught with Don Jr. making up four different stories for the Trump Tower meeting, which is an attack with a foreign adversary in a presidential election against the country. Proof, at the very least that Trump is a co-conspirator for the cover up for this conspiracy. That has already been proven, and will be in Mueller's report.

And we have other proof of the conspiracy. Corsi's email dump proves the conspiracy between Trump and Russia as well.

If Andrew McCarthy were right, we wouldn't have guilty pleas with Trump people going to jail. Anyone who thinks differently is a total retard.

Your reading comprehension and logic functions are seriously deficient.

They were charged with lying about things that aren't illegal. That's what process crimes are. If Mueller weren't engaged in a Beria-style inquisition, none of these people would have been set up to "lie".

The process crimes are all linked to the Trump Tower meeting, Corsi's email dump, Wikileaks, Gucifer 2.0, and Cambridge Analytica. All these process crimes involve co-conspirator activity by Trump associates and his family to cover up activity legal or illegal as a front to actual illegal activity later on.

Even though there is nothing illegal about Trump Tower Moscow, the actual project ended up being the prelude to a boat load of illegal activity by team Trump later on, which compromised Trump and all of his associates. Including his family. This is where the illegal activity came in, and explains all the other schemes associated with getting Trump elected through Russia. This proves Trump conspired with Russia. By way of how the law is written, there just is no other way for Trump to walk around that fact. And by the way, there doesn't exist any lawful defense for Trump. He is a proven criminal for which his Sheep support.

 

[BWK]

Have they got him yet??

Look at how pitiful the Right is these days. They are totally detached from any defense they thought they might have.

 

[Care4all]

Proof it is fictional?

There is no proof that Trump colluded with the Russians to steal the election.

You lose.

Law enforcement already proved you wrong. With Flynn going to jail lying to the FBI about lifting the sanctions, proves Trump was owned by the Russians. Trump was part of the quid pro quo with Russia concerning Trump Tower Moscow which triggered the stolen email scandal to get him elected. Jim Corsi's emails prove that he was working with Wikileaks and Gucifer 2.0 to get Trump elected to get dirt on Clinton.

And then there was the Trump Tower meeting where a series of four different lying stories came out of that, confirming the conspiracy with Russia.

Got any proof to the contrary? Of course you don't. You lose.

These are ginned up process crimes (i.e., "Lying" to the FBI by giving wrong dates about things that the subject readily disclosed).

Andrew McCarthy is one of the better analysts following this farce. Mueller is not investigating a crime, he is preparing a political hit job.

With respect to the president and “collusion,” Mueller does not have a crime he is investigating. He is investigating in hopes of finding a crime, which is a day-and-night different thing.

Papadopoulos and Cohen. They consult with Russian operatives, plan meetings for themselves and Trump with Russian officials, and — in Papadopoulos’s case — discuss the possibility of obtaining campaign dirt against Hillary Clinton from Russians. Yet, though these activities are the laser focus of his investigation, Mueller did not charge them as crimes because they are not crimes. Papadopoulos, Cohen, and the rest got jammed up, not for what they did, but for lying about what they did....

Mueller’s Trump Investigation Plan: Report Not a Criminal Case | National Review

Thanks! You don't have any proof to the contrary. Calling them "ginned up process crimes" is worth shit. You lose.

Also, Trump has been caught with Don Jr. making up four different stories for the Trump Tower meeting, which is an attack with a foreign adversary in a presidential election against the country. Proof, at the very least that Trump is a co-conspirator for the cover up for this conspiracy. That has already been proven, and will be in Mueller's report.

And we have other proof of the conspiracy. Corsi's email dump proves the conspiracy between Trump and Russia as well.

If Andrew McCarthy were right, we wouldn't have guilty pleas with Trump people going to jail. Anyone who thinks differently is a total retard.

Your reading comprehension and logic functions are seriously deficient.

They were charged with lying about things that aren't illegal. That's what process crimes are. If Mueller weren't engaged in a Beria-style inquisition, none of these people would have been set up to "lie".

they lied about things pertinent to an official investigation.... thus the charge. Can't have a perjury charge unless the lie involves the investigation... it must be materialistic in the investigation.

 

[DandyDonovan]

I kinda missed the minute details over the last few days of Ivanka, JR and Cohen all working on the Moscow deal and the finite dates. Numerous sources say next week could get interesting, this time focusing on the kids. Was TRUMP told to stay out of it, let the kids do it? Was Trump driving their every move?

If the deal was LEGAL, above board and ALLOWED, why the **** is everyone lying about it? Why did TRUMP repeatedly while STILL RUNNING, then after the election and for the 21 months since the inauguration, REPEAT ad naseum I had nothing going on in Russia?



Ex-prosecutor hints Michael Cohen may have secretly recorded Don Jr. and Ivanka: ‘Lordy, I hope there are tapes’

BOB BRIGHAM
01 DEC 2018 AT 15:42 ET


Donald Trump, Jr. and senior White House advisor Ivanka Trump are facing “real danger areas” of criminal liability, career prosecutor Glenn Kirshner explained on MSNBC on Saturday.

Kirschner worked with special prosecutor Robert Mueller and was the chief of homicide prosecution at the U.S. attorney’s office in Washington, DC.

“Is there legal jeopardy in your mind?” anchor Alex Witt asked. “Could there be for Don Jr. and potentially Ivanka?”

“There could be, Alex,” Kirschner replied.

“When it comes to the kids, Ivanka and Don Jr., I think there are a couple of real danger areas, because we heard that Michael Cohen lied to Congress about, among other things, keeping the kids — keeping Donald Trump’s kids informed about what was going on on this potential deal with Russia,” he explained...

Ex-prosecutor hints Michael Cohen may have secretly recorded Don Jr. and Ivanka: 'Lordy, I hope there are tapes’

Trump has broken some of you, turned you into complete retards. Trump has been harder on Russia since being elected than Obama ever thought about being. FACT.

Who gives a shit if his company was trying to build a hotel in Moscow in 2015, or even is trying to now?