Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Knw why they would have signed it anyway? Because of this...From the Nunes MemoROFL! They didn't even say it was opposition research, and anyone who doesn't think it makes any difference whether Trump's opponent paid for it is beyond stupid.The footnote does not mention the fact that the Hillary campaign funded the "dossier." The court would have thrown it out if it had known that.Again the FBI hid the facts to the fisa courts
BULLSHIT, Republicans long ago admitted that Dossier's political sourcing was apropriately disclosed in Carter's FISA warrant application.
Republicans concede key FBI 'footnote' in Carter Page warrant
What the hell is the difference which campaign or interest is conducting this political opposition research? There is none. Before Hillary this research into Trump was paid for by Republicans.
If it didn't make any difference, then why didn't they mention it?
Republicans did not pay for the dossier, douchebag.
What the fuck is "tertiary evidence?"The court would have thrown it out if it had known that.
Bullshit...especially since that was only tertiary evidence
The bottom line is that the FBI lied to the FISA court.
It's a lie that Papadopolous information triggered the opening of the investigation. That "information" was planted on Papadopolous by an FBI paid spy.Knw why they would have signed it anyway? Because of this...From the Nunes MemoROFL! They didn't even say it was opposition research, and anyone who doesn't think it makes any difference whether Trump's opponent paid for it is beyond stupid.The footnote does not mention the fact that the Hillary campaign funded the "dossier." The court would have thrown it out if it had known that.Again the FBI hid the facts to the fisa courts
BULLSHIT, Republicans long ago admitted that Dossier's political sourcing was apropriately disclosed in Carter's FISA warrant application.
Republicans concede key FBI 'footnote' in Carter Page warrant
What the hell is the difference which campaign or interest is conducting this political opposition research? There is none. Before Hillary this research into Trump was paid for by Republicans.
If it didn't make any difference, then why didn't they mention it?
Republicans did not pay for the dossier, douchebag.
5) The Page FISA application also mentions information regarding fellow Trump campaign advisor George Papadopoulos, but there is no evidence of any cooperation or conspiracy between Page and Papadopoulos. The Papadopoulos information triggered the opening of an FBI counterintelligence investigation in late July 2016 by FBI agent Pete Strzok
The bottom line is that the FBI lied to the FISA court.
That's a lie
So you just make shit up?It's a lie that Papadopolous information triggered the opening of the investigation. That "information" was planted on Papadopolous by an FBI paid spy.Knw why they would have signed it anyway? Because of this...From the Nunes MemoROFL! They didn't even say it was opposition research, and anyone who doesn't think it makes any difference whether Trump's opponent paid for it is beyond stupid.The footnote does not mention the fact that the Hillary campaign funded the "dossier." The court would have thrown it out if it had known that.BULLSHIT, Republicans long ago admitted that Dossier's political sourcing was apropriately disclosed in Carter's FISA warrant application.
Republicans concede key FBI 'footnote' in Carter Page warrant
What the hell is the difference which campaign or interest is conducting this political opposition research? There is none. Before Hillary this research into Trump was paid for by Republicans.
If it didn't make any difference, then why didn't they mention it?
Republicans did not pay for the dossier, douchebag.
5) The Page FISA application also mentions information regarding fellow Trump campaign advisor George Papadopoulos, but there is no evidence of any cooperation or conspiracy between Page and Papadopoulos. The Papadopoulos information triggered the opening of an FBI counterintelligence investigation in late July 2016 by FBI agent Pete Strzok
It's a lie that Papadopolous information triggered the opening of the investigation.
Nah, that's pure fantasy. They covered that already. Sorry dude you're grasping at straws.The footnote does not mention the fact that the Hillary campaign funded the "dossier." The court would have thrown it out if it had known that.
100% wrongThe bottom line is that the FBI lied to the FISA court.
BOMBSHELL: McCabe says FBI told GOP lawmakers in 2017 they were investigating Trump -- and none objected
It turns out the FBI informed Republican leadership of the investigation into Trump.
"
“No one objected,” McCabe said of the senators’ reactions. “Not on legal grounds, not on constitutional grounds, and not based on the facts.”
McCabe also told Guthrie that, in May 2017 when it began its investigation, the FBI believed that it “might be possible” that Trump was working directly for Russia.
“You have to ask yourself why any president of the United States might not want to get to the bottom of Russian interference in our election,” he said."
So the FBI didn't act alone and actually reported it to the GOP lawmakers...
So the GOP security heads were also concerned...
The Trumpsters are going to call them liberals and establishment guys or something.
Here is a tip, the establishment is the USA and trying to help Russia tear it down has been defended for decades...
Why have a defence dept when Trump will sell out the country for trinkets any way...
So wait... they found nothing.
Why are we STILL having yet a other Russia investigation then?
Perhaps because the entire thing is giant load of BS.
Perhaps not. Like global warming the Russian Investigation is dismissed out of hand. Wishful thinking or willful ignorance - that is the question.
Giant conspiracy that made millions change their ballot box choices.
No evidence after FBI investigation and special investigation after two years.
It's you who is dreaming.
McCabe said so... So you are now down to a man's word against no denial so far...
- Firing Comey didn't, and couldn't obstruct anything. It was certainly an ATTEMPT. Incompetence is not a defense.
- Several Democrats like Finestien either said Comey should be fired or that they had no confidence in him. Because of his actions leading up to the election. Trump fired him (by his own admission) to ease the pressure on "the Russia thing"
- POTUS can fire the FBI director for any reason, or no reason at all according to the Constitution and Comey.Except to obstruct an ongoing investigation
Trump hating 3 time perjurer that was fired for lying makes claim exonerating himself.
Democrats: "We believe you, case closed".
Let's not get upset over the prospect that the President of the United States is apparently controlled by the Russian government.
Wrong. Even McCabe says it wouldn't have been approved without the "dossier."Nah, that's pure fantasy. They covered that already. Sorry dude you're grasping at straws.The footnote does not mention the fact that the Hillary campaign funded the "dossier." The court would have thrown it out if it had known that.
100% right. I'm sorry the facts disrupt your narrative.100% wrongThe bottom line is that the FBI lied to the FISA court.
