Looks like the FBI are in the clear

BOMBSHELL: McCabe says FBI told GOP lawmakers in 2017 they were investigating Trump -- and none objected



It turns out the FBI informed Republican leadership of the investigation into Trump.
"
“No one objected,” McCabe said of the senators’ reactions. “Not on legal grounds, not on constitutional grounds, and not based on the facts.”


McCabe also told Guthrie that, in May 2017 when it began its investigation, the FBI believed that it “might be possible” that Trump was working directly for Russia.


“You have to ask yourself why any president of the United States might not want to get to the bottom of Russian interference in our election,” he said."

So the FBI didn't act alone and actually reported it to the GOP lawmakers...

So the GOP security heads were also concerned...

The Trumpsters are going to call them liberals and establishment guys or something.

Here is a tip, the establishment is the USA and trying to help Russia tear it down has been defended for decades...

Why have a defence dept when Trump will sell out the country for trinkets any way...


Now let's not compare the far left with the Pres.Trump's administration.Pres.Trump is fighting against the Establishment. Remember he is not the one that is spending billions to the media to attack himself. McCabe and the rest are just playing games on the public. That they can twist the laws the way they want them to say. They has twisted everyone's minds from wanting to know what was on those emails, towards putting the focus on who hacked their emails. The public don't even know what is on the emails that were hacked.


 
skye, post: 21854175,
FBI is not in the clear

FBI is being drained

GOD Bless President Trump and all patriots.

Drained by a disturbed, desperate, wounded, pathetic POTUS that deserves every ounce of investigation the lying buffoon can get.

The FBI is cleared in the eyes of the non-deplorable.

Since Mitch has not and will not refute
McCabe’s account if the very specific May 2017 meeting McCabe’s explanation holds up.

Fox News reports:

“In addition to Ryan and McConnell, other top members of the "Gang of 8" included House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi and Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer”

McCabe: 'No one' in congressional leadership objected when told of FBI’s Trump probe

Your ‘silent coup’ by the FBI scandal is dead.

Mitch McConnell and Paul Ryan did not object.

McCabe has the Turtle by the balls on this one.

Cheers to a true patriot - Andrew McCabe.

Screw you Joseph DiGenova. Your loud mouth hate based conspiracy theory against the FBI is dead now. Spew it at your own risk.
 
tinydancer, post: 21854009
I love this bullshit the left comes up with.

Even Fox News is ‘the left” these days.

Fox News reports:

“In addition to Ryan and McConnell, other top members of the "Gang of 8" included House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi and Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer”

McCabe: 'No one' in congressional leadership objected when told of FBI’s Trump probe

Wouldn’t Fox News call McConnell’s office to determine if McCabe was lying?

Fox would love to catch McCabe in a lie? Wouid they not?

Your ‘silent coup by the FBI’ scandal is dead.

Dead dead dead.

The left gets bigger and bigger every day.,
 
Denial is not a river in Egypt.
And yet , of the two of us, there you sit , with your hilariously wrong legal claims that are paid no mind by reality...with your idootic claims of a "coup" , laughed at by all but the most staunch cultists .. with your insistence that the people already in jail aren't the criminals, but your political opponents are....

I am cool with letting everyone else decide which of us is in denial. It's not even close, so i wont sweat it.

Denial ... methinks there is much much more wrong between the ears of bripat than denial. Someone so filled with hate has more than a lose screw or two.
 
AnyDaySellers.gif
 
Denial ... methinks there is much much more wrong between the ears of bripat than denial. Someone so filled with hate has more than a lose screw or two.
Textbook....


2a. Freudian Projection
The following is a collection of definitions of projection from orthodox psychology texts. In this system the distinct mechanism of projecting own unconscious or undesirable characteristics onto another is called Freudian Projection.

  • “A defense mechanism in which the individual attributes to other people impulses and traits that he himself has but cannot accept. It is especially likely to occur when the person lacks insight into his own impulses and traits.”
  • “The externalisation of internal unconscious wishes, desires or emotions on to other people. So, for example, someone who feels subconsciously that they have a powerful latent homosexual drive may not acknowledge this consciously, but it may show in their readiness to suspect others of being homosexual.”
  • “Attributing one’s own undesirable traits to other people or agencies, e.g., an aggressive man accuses other people of being hostile.”
  • “The individual perceives in others the motive he denies having himself. Thus the cheat is sure that everyone else is dishonest. The would-be adulterer accuses his wife of infidelity.”
  • “People attribute their own undesirable traits onto others. An individual who unconsciously recognises his or her aggressive tendencies may then see other people acting in an excessively aggressive way.”
  • “Projection is the opposite defence mechanism to identification. We project our own unpleasant feelings onto someone else and blame them for having thoughts that we really have.”
 
Denial ... methinks there is much much more wrong between the ears of bripat than denial. Someone so filled with hate has more than a lose screw or two.
Textbook....


2a. Freudian Projection
The following is a collection of definitions of projection from orthodox psychology texts. In this system the distinct mechanism of projecting own unconscious or undesirable characteristics onto another is called Freudian Projection.

  • “A defense mechanism in which the individual attributes to other people impulses and traits that he himself has but cannot accept. It is especially likely to occur when the person lacks insight into his own impulses and traits.”
  • “The externalisation of internal unconscious wishes, desires or emotions on to other people. So, for example, someone who feels subconsciously that they have a powerful latent homosexual drive may not acknowledge this consciously, but it may show in their readiness to suspect others of being homosexual.”
  • “Attributing one’s own undesirable traits to other people or agencies, e.g., an aggressive man accuses other people of being hostile.”
  • “The individual perceives in others the motive he denies having himself. Thus the cheat is sure that everyone else is dishonest. The would-be adulterer accuses his wife of infidelity.”
  • “People attribute their own undesirable traits onto others. An individual who unconsciously recognises his or her aggressive tendencies may then see other people acting in an excessively aggressive way.”
  • “Projection is the opposite defence mechanism to identification. We project our own unpleasant feelings onto someone else and blame them for having thoughts that we really have.”

Q. Were these bullet points highlighted in the termination evaluation from your last job?
 
Since Mitch has not and will not refute
McCabe’s account if the very specific May 2017 meeting McCabe’s explanation holds up.

And let's not forget hyper partisan Dirty Devin Nunes. HE was there as well (and probably ran right to the White House to tell Trump what he heard)

Has HE denied this?

No?

Oh...
 
If you chumps have the goods, unseal them now and go for impeachment.
Well idiot, nobody here has the evidence, the special counsel does. And he will not indict a sitting president. Nor will the regional offices to which he will undoubtedly refer criminal activity by Donald Trump. What they will do is seal indictments to stop the statutory clock, and then unseal them the day he leaves office.
 
If you chumps have the goods, unseal them now and go for impeachment.
Well idiot, nobody here has the evidence, the special counsel does. And he will not indict a sitting president. Nor will the regional offices. What they will do is seal indictments to stop the statutory clock, and then unseal them the day he leaves office.



Lol, and those goal posts keep on moving, lol.
 
and those goal posts keep on moving
Use your big boy words. Nobody will know what your point is,if you don't use your big boy words. What goalposts?


Put don’t the pipe and read. You spouted a shit ton of Alex Jones shit. All this time you have been saying “when Mewlers report comes out Trump will be impeached “. Now you are saying Mewler will keep it super secret like the chem trails. Make up your mind. It’s like reading infowars when y’all post.
 
All this time you have been saying “when Mewlers report comes out Trump will be impeached “
No I haven't, ya little freak.
Now you are saying Mewler will keep it super secret like the chem trails
No,I said he would not indict trump in an unsealed indictment, or likely at all. Which everyone believes,including you. Damn son, try to follow a simple discussion!
 

Forum List

Back
Top