Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
We start by pointing out to the idiots of the world that they are dupes
You mean the scientists, right?
We start by pointing out to the idiots of the world that they are dupes
You mean the scientists, right?
This being a political issue, no not scientists....regular people who vote for the politicians that have been flushing billions down the toilet on the climate scam...when the money required to support the narrative dries up, then the climate scam dies.
Now, about that single piece of observed, measured evidence which supports the AGW hypothesis over natural variability. Got anything? Of course you don't...nothing but impotent insults, mewling, and logical fallacies.
You know that every time you post, without posting that single shred of observed, measured data which would shut me down and make me your bitch you just look weaker and more stupid don't you? Step on up to the plate goober and knock it out of the park for all the other warmers...
Oh...that's right.. no actual data to shut me up with...just more logical fallacy, insult, and insensate bovine mewling...lets hear it...come on warmer..be my bitch....mewl for me....come on..mewl
Why are you just sitting on this gold mine? You could be famous. You should go straight to the nearest institution of science and put them in their place before somebody else cashes in on this. Fame and glory await, Dingus.
Because liberals don't listen to people, that's why.We start by pointing out to the idiots of the world that they are dupes
You mean the scientists, right?
This being a political issue, no not scientists....regular people who vote for the politicians that have been flushing billions down the toilet on the climate scam...when the money required to support the narrative dries up, then the climate scam dies.
Now, about that single piece of observed, measured evidence which supports the AGW hypothesis over natural variability. Got anything? Of course you don't...nothing but impotent insults, mewling, and logical fallacies.
You know that every time you post, without posting that single shred of observed, measured data which would shut me down and make me your bitch you just look weaker and more stupid don't you? Step on up to the plate goober and knock it out of the park for all the other warmers...
Oh...that's right.. no actual data to shut me up with...just more logical fallacy, insult, and insensate bovine mewling...lets hear it...come on warmer..be my bitch....mewl for me....come on..mewl
Why are you just sitting on this gold mine? You could be famous. You should go straight to the nearest institution of science and put them in their place before somebody else cashes in on this. Go, Dingus. I look forward to seeing your name in science magazines.
Why are you just sitting on this gold mine? You could be famous. You should go straight to the nearest institution of science and put them in their place before somebody else cashes in on this. Fame and glory await, Dingus.
Why are you not shutting me down with a single shred of observed, measured data that supports the AGW hypothesis over natural variability? Why are you standing there looking like an impotent dupe who believes so strongly in something that isn't supported by the first piece of actual evidence?
Come on warmer...mewl some more for me...mewl like there is no tomorrow...Go on and on and on with your impotent sniveling...Show us that you have nothing but talk...and even that is about as weak as it gets.
Why are you not shutting me down with a single shred of observed, measured data that supports the AGW hypothesis over natural variability? Why are you standing there looking like an impotent dupe who believes so strongly in something that isn't supported by the first piece of actual evidence?
Come on warmer...mewl some more for me...mewl like there is no tomorrow...Go on and on and on with your impotent sniveling...Show us that you have nothing but talk...and even that is about as weak as it gets.
YupEvery other nation on earth recognizes the dangers of global warmingLooks like Conservative misinformation is working
It's seriously embarrassing. A bunch of fuck mouthed rednecks from the United States have unraveled the global conspiracy being pushed by some of the most educated people on Earth. Right...
Conservatives in this country have convinced people it is fake news
You think warming is more dangerous than cooling? What dangers are you talking about? This should be interesting since most of the past 10,000 years have been warmer than the present.
WowYupEvery other nation on earth recognizes the dangers of global warmingLooks like Conservative misinformation is working
It's seriously embarrassing. A bunch of fuck mouthed rednecks from the United States have unraveled the global conspiracy being pushed by some of the most educated people on Earth. Right...
Conservatives in this country have convinced people it is fake news
You think warming is more dangerous than cooling? What dangers are you talking about? This should be interesting since most of the past 10,000 years have been warmer than the present.
Warming is great if you enjoy hurricanes
That would be the point.. They were asked for their top concerns and AGW didn't make it in the top 36..The poll said nothing about whether Americans believed global warming was real.
The fact it is bogus as a threat, is commonsense and science.
We start by pointing out to the idiots of the world that they are dupes
You mean the scientists, right?
And you have yet to produce any empirical evidence...The fact it is bogus as a threat, is commonsense and science.
According to all of the rednecks that have figured out the truth. Scientists say otherwise, but what do they know?
The poll said nothing about whether Americans believed global warming was real.
We start by pointing out to the idiots of the world that they are dupes
You mean the scientists, right?
You mean THESE scientists?
1350+ Peer-Reviewed Papers Supporting Skeptic Arguments Against ACC/AGW Alarmism
or
100+ Papers – Sun Drives Climate
or
75 Papers Find Extremely Low CO2 Climate Sensitivity
or
Part 1. Natural Climate Change Observation, Reconstruction
Part 2. Natural Mechanisms Of Weather, Climate Change
Part 3. Unsettled Science, Failed Climate Modeling
and many more I can bring up to show that THOUSANDS of scientists do not agree that CO2 is the driver of weather/climate phenomenon.
CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE
Sources in the Conspiracy-Pseudoscience category may publish unverifiable information that is not always supported by evidence. These sources may be untrustworthy for credible/verifiable information, therefore fact checking and further investigation is recommended.
Popular Technology is a news website that focuses primarily on climate science, which is odd as their name is related to technology. The founders and contributors to this website all hold Ph.D’s in a variety of scientific fields, unfortunately none of them are within the field of climate science. While not directly stated, the primary mission of this website is to debunk the consensus that climate change (global warming) is occurring and is strongly influenced by human activities. Popular Technology only publishes research articles that are contrary to the scientific consensus on climate change. Interestingly, they side with the consensus when it comes to 9/11 conspiracies about how the Towers fell. Overall, per our policy, any source that rejects the known consensus of science is placed in the pseudoscience category.
On 6 June 2017, Breitbart News ran an article titled “‘Global Warming’ Is a Myth, Say 58 Scientific Papers in 2017”. This article, which is in essence merely a link to a post from a blog that goes by the name “No Tricks Zone” and some added musings on “grant-troughing scientists,” “huxter politicians,” “scaremongering green activists,” and “brainwashed mainstream media environmental correspondents,” claims that this ragtag collection of studies proves that the long-standing scientific consensus on climate change is nothing but a myth.
The blog post Breitbart linked to is a list of 80 graphs (so many graphs!) taken from 58 studies. The analysis of the findings presented by No Tricks Zone is crude, misinformed, and riddled with errors.
We start by pointing out to the idiots of the world that they are dupes
You mean the scientists, right?
You mean THESE scientists?
1350+ Peer-Reviewed Papers Supporting Skeptic Arguments Against ACC/AGW Alarmism
or
100+ Papers – Sun Drives Climate
or
75 Papers Find Extremely Low CO2 Climate Sensitivity
or
Part 1. Natural Climate Change Observation, Reconstruction
Part 2. Natural Mechanisms Of Weather, Climate Change
Part 3. Unsettled Science, Failed Climate Modeling
and many more I can bring up to show that THOUSANDS of scientists do not agree that CO2 is the driver of weather/climate phenomenon.
Popular Technology - Media Bias/Fact Check
CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE
Sources in the Conspiracy-Pseudoscience category may publish unverifiable information that is not always supported by evidence. These sources may be untrustworthy for credible/verifiable information, therefore fact checking and further investigation is recommended.
Popular Technology is a news website that focuses primarily on climate science, which is odd as their name is related to technology. The founders and contributors to this website all hold Ph.D’s in a variety of scientific fields, unfortunately none of them are within the field of climate science. While not directly stated, the primary mission of this website is to debunk the consensus that climate change (global warming) is occurring and is strongly influenced by human activities. Popular Technology only publishes research articles that are contrary to the scientific consensus on climate change. Interestingly, they side with the consensus when it comes to 9/11 conspiracies about how the Towers fell. Overall, per our policy, any source that rejects the known consensus of science is placed in the pseudoscience category.
NoTricksZone is another conspiracy bullshit website.
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/scientific-papers-global-warming-myth/
On 6 June 2017, Breitbart News ran an article titled “‘Global Warming’ Is a Myth, Say 58 Scientific Papers in 2017”. This article, which is in essence merely a link to a post from a blog that goes by the name “No Tricks Zone” and some added musings on “grant-troughing scientists,” “huxter politicians,” “scaremongering green activists,” and “brainwashed mainstream media environmental correspondents,” claims that this ragtag collection of studies proves that the long-standing scientific consensus on climate change is nothing but a myth.
The blog post Breitbart linked to is a list of 80 graphs (so many graphs!) taken from 58 studies. The analysis of the findings presented by No Tricks Zone is crude, misinformed, and riddled with errors.
You don't have a damn clue... This is why idiots like you aren't worth wasting time on... your not intelligent enough to debate facts.. You probably eat up CNN AND SkepticalShitScience as truth...We start by pointing out to the idiots of the world that they are dupes
You mean the scientists, right?
You mean THESE scientists?
1350+ Peer-Reviewed Papers Supporting Skeptic Arguments Against ACC/AGW Alarmism
or
100+ Papers – Sun Drives Climate
or
75 Papers Find Extremely Low CO2 Climate Sensitivity
or
Part 1. Natural Climate Change Observation, Reconstruction
Part 2. Natural Mechanisms Of Weather, Climate Change
Part 3. Unsettled Science, Failed Climate Modeling
and many more I can bring up to show that THOUSANDS of scientists do not agree that CO2 is the driver of weather/climate phenomenon.
Popular Technology - Media Bias/Fact Check
CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE
Sources in the Conspiracy-Pseudoscience category may publish unverifiable information that is not always supported by evidence. These sources may be untrustworthy for credible/verifiable information, therefore fact checking and further investigation is recommended.
Popular Technology is a news website that focuses primarily on climate science, which is odd as their name is related to technology. The founders and contributors to this website all hold Ph.D’s in a variety of scientific fields, unfortunately none of them are within the field of climate science. While not directly stated, the primary mission of this website is to debunk the consensus that climate change (global warming) is occurring and is strongly influenced by human activities. Popular Technology only publishes research articles that are contrary to the scientific consensus on climate change. Interestingly, they side with the consensus when it comes to 9/11 conspiracies about how the Towers fell. Overall, per our policy, any source that rejects the known consensus of science is placed in the pseudoscience category.
NoTricksZone is another conspiracy bullshit website.
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/scientific-papers-global-warming-myth/
On 6 June 2017, Breitbart News ran an article titled “‘Global Warming’ Is a Myth, Say 58 Scientific Papers in 2017”. This article, which is in essence merely a link to a post from a blog that goes by the name “No Tricks Zone” and some added musings on “grant-troughing scientists,” “huxter politicians,” “scaremongering green activists,” and “brainwashed mainstream media environmental correspondents,” claims that this ragtag collection of studies proves that the long-standing scientific consensus on climate change is nothing but a myth.
The blog post Breitbart linked to is a list of 80 graphs (so many graphs!) taken from 58 studies. The analysis of the findings presented by No Tricks Zone is crude, misinformed, and riddled with errors.
We start by pointing out to the idiots of the world that they are dupes
You mean the scientists, right?
You mean THESE scientists?
1350+ Peer-Reviewed Papers Supporting Skeptic Arguments Against ACC/AGW Alarmism
or
100+ Papers – Sun Drives Climate
or
75 Papers Find Extremely Low CO2 Climate Sensitivity
or
Part 1. Natural Climate Change Observation, Reconstruction
Part 2. Natural Mechanisms Of Weather, Climate Change
Part 3. Unsettled Science, Failed Climate Modeling
and many more I can bring up to show that THOUSANDS of scientists do not agree that CO2 is the driver of weather/climate phenomenon.
Popular Technology - Media Bias/Fact Check
CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE
Sources in the Conspiracy-Pseudoscience category may publish unverifiable information that is not always supported by evidence. These sources may be untrustworthy for credible/verifiable information, therefore fact checking and further investigation is recommended.
Popular Technology is a news website that focuses primarily on climate science, which is odd as their name is related to technology. The founders and contributors to this website all hold Ph.D’s in a variety of scientific fields, unfortunately none of them are within the field of climate science. While not directly stated, the primary mission of this website is to debunk the consensus that climate change (global warming) is occurring and is strongly influenced by human activities. Popular Technology only publishes research articles that are contrary to the scientific consensus on climate change. Interestingly, they side with the consensus when it comes to 9/11 conspiracies about how the Towers fell. Overall, per our policy, any source that rejects the known consensus of science is placed in the pseudoscience category.
NoTricksZone is another conspiracy bullshit website.
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/scientific-papers-global-warming-myth/
On 6 June 2017, Breitbart News ran an article titled “‘Global Warming’ Is a Myth, Say 58 Scientific Papers in 2017”. This article, which is in essence merely a link to a post from a blog that goes by the name “No Tricks Zone” and some added musings on “grant-troughing scientists,” “huxter politicians,” “scaremongering green activists,” and “brainwashed mainstream media environmental correspondents,” claims that this ragtag collection of studies proves that the long-standing scientific consensus on climate change is nothing but a myth.
The blog post Breitbart linked to is a list of 80 graphs (so many graphs!) taken from 58 studies. The analysis of the findings presented by No Tricks Zone is crude, misinformed, and riddled with errors.
Bwahahahahahahahahaha!!!
You are so pathetic it is funny to see a warmist ignoramus lemming automatically dismiss THOUSANDS of peer reviewed published papers with a wave of your arm.
You are making it clear you run on bullshit and stupidity.
your not intelligent enough